Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's largest sites and highest quality sites.
- No longer is just about teasing or non-pink or non-sexual poses, the site continues to become a little more risky each time I join and it's a very welcome change.
- Not only will you find at least a dozen or more models you really like, you most-likely won't see half of them thanks to size of the site.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- The models are all very attractive, very much teens and they're becoming more playful.
- The quality is close to as second to none as you can get, that's technical quality.
- The pictures can be so big that they're bigger than life-size. I opened one and all I could see was the model's belly button and a couple freckles. That's virtual reality to me.
- For a site this size the navigation is very good.
- The videos are nice technical quality and some are good, not great but the real draw here are the pictures.
Cons:
- So, about those videos, it's not meant as disrespect at all or even demeaning to the models but most of these models are so young that they're just not seductive in the videos. It reminds me of watching a woman do naked yoga. Some might like that but some won't.
- Similar to the other sites on Met-Art's network, there are cam girls over on the right of your screen.
- This is a new one that I hadn't seen before, "staff selection" videos. Looks interesting, started playing one ... it's a 30 second sample. If I want it ... pay $4 for 1 video. I don't like it. I know, I can skip it but when you're posting videos of non-masturbation then post one of masturbation and tell me I have to pay to watch/download it, I don't like it.
Bottom Line:
I've been trying to review sites that aren't reviewed as much but my subscription to Met-Art is running out in a few days and I wanted to review it.
For years, Met-Art frustrated me. I like pictures as much as videos. They're taking really good steps to improving the photo sets. More models are starting sets in clothes and teasing, that's a big improvement to me since used to it was "she's naked" in picture 1 and by the end of the set she's still naked and not showing anything. Now, you're going to see most everything including the fun teases, upskirts, upshorts, panties slid over. I'm glad to see them adding more sexuality to their site. I used to kind of "poke at them" for their models doing the "what is over on that hill over yonder" poses. Now, they're doing, "I'm bending over, what do you see?"
I listed in the cons and I really don't like the "staff selections" videos that feature masturbation, which very few if any of the regular membership videos show. At that asking price, two videos would cost almost as much as I pay for a monthly membership to Met-Art. I've been borderline on complained about Met-Art X having masturbation while Met-Art doesn't but I think Met-Art at this point has earned the right to stick to no masturbation videos on Met-Art ... which is why I don't like the staff selection videos. It makes me feel like they could just combine Met-Art and Met-Art X if they're going to charge extra for masturbation.
Met-Art's strength has always been photo sets so I didn't really punish them in the score for the video problems.
You get 4 new photo sets per day, which is more than anyone that I know of. And they have a very good variety of settings. I know someone asked recently on another review of another site about photo orientation. Met-Art has a good blend of both portrait and landscape orientation in their photos. The overall numbers would normally be more than I would try to include in a review but I'm going to try it in this one.
Here goes nothing...
18,886 photo sets
812 videos
And yes, those numbers could be wrong! I would say even if they're not exact, they're fairly close. Just estimating, that's around 1,500,000 and 2,000,000 photos. When you add in that high technical quality, it's all but impossible to complain about Met-Art.
I'm going back to the beginning because I have been very impressed with their style of shooting in the newer photo sets. We've got upskirts, upshorts and the lost art of skin-tight shirt with nipples sticking out. I don't want to say they've been influenced by anyone but a lot of these newer sets are very similar to the sets on Zishy, which to me is the best tease photography site on the internet.
The navigation features updates tab, films, photos, model list, blog and they all work! It let's you focus more on what your preference is and with a site this big that's a must. Maybe even ALS Scan has influenced them a little on the photos, I just thought about that and threw that in.
They also are adding a better blend of models, they're almost all slim/slender but a few are more built and you're starting to see more Hispanic, Asian models. That to me is where Met-Art is at their best. You're capturing very young models, so the teasing and hints at shyness is important to it. This also plays into the large photos. If it's an upskirt and you open one of the large photos, you can see everything you've ever wanted to see through the models' panties. The combination of adding more tease and big photos offsets the video problem for me.
You of course can download the photo sets in zips and some of them are as big as some videos you've downloaded. These newer photo sets are nearing 8000 long end. We have joked before about the huge pictures sometimes showing imperfections but in this case, with all this teasing, I don't mind being able to count the pubic hairs she missed while shaving.
Similar to Zishy, I just can't go all the way to a 100 with Met-Art because porn is photos and videos. I will say that if they improved their videos it wouldn't really change how I view Met-Art, as a photo site. So, maybe it's best that they don't try to become a solo masturbation video site. I don't even know that I would download the videos. I have a Met-Art folder that has over 300GB in it and it's all photos. It's going to be a long time before anyone threatens their dominance of the photo porn world.
I would recommend it to anyone but I like to think everyone likes some photos. If you're dead-set on videos, I can't say you'll be happy with these videos. I do want to mention someone asked a few months ago about sites that have videos of fully nude models lightly touching themselves but not full masturbation. Met-Art fits that description well.
Like some of my other recent, highly-rated, well-known sites, I probably won't review Met-Art again unless there's major changes. It's near perfect as it is.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
many of the girls are hot, the others pretty
excellent video quality
excellent download speed (200-300kb) high speed
no drm
huge collection
update weekly
no goofy music or poor lighting issues
Cons:
no boy/girl
can get a little too extreme, pushing tasteful
Bottom Line:
take the tour! watch all the previews...it'll kill ya'. a must join at some point. most of the girls are your prom queen type and show it all. you see everything up close in high quality and hear every juicy sound. very real feel to it, nothing fake here. no sex scences though, only posing & masturbation. top 5 site no matter what genre.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Being this site, was recently reviewed. I'm going to give a more unique point of view from the site.
The site has some amazing deals for the size of it. I've been able to find access for only $9.95. And it was only at a monthly requirement.
This site is more than worth, the access price I'm paying. It is one of the largest sites, and best organized they've seen. As was noted, there are vast amounts material to look through. if you have not been a member here it is highly recommended. But most of the materials considered soft, seeing the high quality and level that this type of material can be done at a few look at other websites and ask why they don't do similar.
Cons:
Cons:
There isn't much that can be said about this site, being negative. The only thing I could think of that would be negative, is with the mass amount of material modern technology for websites simply did not give it the needed navigation. That is not the site's downfall because simply at this point there's nothing better out there to browse through and find material.
Bottom Line:
As noted above I am taking more of a personal approach to this review. It is something new I am trying on my reviews at that simply stating statistics. At this point it became and sites like this have been around for over 20 years. We must figure at this point that most sites have a mass amount of material, and have certain conditions upon joining either monthly, yearly etc.
Overview.
The sites aesthetics are amazing. Upon joining you find yourself, with an overwhelming amount of information to start at once. You then realize even if you had paid full price that would've been well worth the amount of access. The site has been around for very long time, about eight years ago I gave the last review.I gave it a 90 at that point. It considered it a very well done site than. It is improved if that was possible, to give it a 97 this time. It is improved so much over the last eight years since the last review, that I find 97 is about the highest I could give any site. Anything above a 97 or 98 simply doesn't exist at this point in my reviews. It means they're simply technology has caught up to access some websites making it simpler than it is right now. Right now navigation has been about the same give or take for the last eight years, with little improvement. I am sure sites are waiting for the new technology that will thrust( no pun intended) this industry into a full interactive navigation system.
The good, everything you see within this site is high quality, and amazing the video and photography is unmatched. And something you might see at a professional studio is reflected here. It's obvious they take great detail in choices of lighting, atmosphere, and sound to make it an experience you won't forget. Why this may be on the soft end of things. You won't be disappointed, unless it's simply something you're not into. But the quality alone is definitely worth taking a look. The gallery is something I think that's overlooked as well in websites like this in the day and age of video. The gallery produces a high-quality and amazing experience as well. I 4K monitor, and it is amazing, the detail and perfection that you see on the stuff that's on this website.
Negative,
If there is one thing I could say about this site, is that what you get for the pricing is not all that clear. As a novice coming to that website looking at it for the first time you would not be as impressed as you will be after you join. Other websites tend to put all their best work forward. I noticed the basic advertisement, and interaction to entice others to join is at minimal. It's not a negative for the viewer or the person that may join as a member. But it actually hurts them as a business not to have the material more well known and pronounced on the website. Maybe it's just me but I compare it to other sites tend to give you a lot more before you joined telling you a lot more what's going on inside the site.
Should you join?
It would be worth collecting bottles and cans, to join a site like this if you're broke. It's an experience you won't soon forget once you go back out and look at other sites and compared to this one. Why does lack the hard side of things, the soft approach seems just as rewarding once a viewer looks at the information. It's not often I am impressed especially with the absorption of the jury like this on the Internet. It is so overwhelming, to see the Internet have the material it does saturating the Internet. That it often is very difficult to find anything unique or different. But this site does it well, and pushes itself outside of the box just enough to be above the rest. As was noted in another review this is about as good as it gets for this niche. There isn't any other website out there that I can think that comes even close. And actually other should not even try it's a waste of their time to meet this level that is taken them years to get to.
Closing thoughts,
why do this review, I sometimes found myself a loss for words to describe the amazing job done. Often times in this particular type of business, we look at the sameness, the repetitive nature and it becomes boring. For some reason at least from this reviewer's point of view, they were able to take each scene and make it unique and not repetitive. It's as if they took the actresses, themselves and allowed them to dictate how their personality could be best used in this unique niche. I say unique. Because there's nothing else out there, that comes close to what I see here. I decided about a month ago to take another look back at this site. Then found myself going why did I wait so long to take a look at it again. If you've not join the site you are missing an awful lot of the intended nature of the industry in this niche. I would like to give them 100 I simply cannot give a perfect score to any site that still uses the typical menu system. What is not their fault until something else comes better along I can't read something a perfect score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Vast amount of photos - softcore only - in various resolution. (over half a million)
Great high-resolution photos
Zip for different resolution.
Ok amount of videos (480 today)
A significant selection of mostly east-european teens.
Easy navigation - fine layout
No limits of any kind
Good on updates
Ok quality live-cam
Cons:
Older videos lacks quality (but that's the same elsewhere)
A little too much outdoor-photos for my taste.
I'm not much into videos of photoshoots, but later videos are getting better.
Bottom Line:
I have not been at Met Art for a couple of years - this site has turn to a far better softporn-deal than earlier.
In contrast to some of the hardcore-sites I've visited lately, this Met Art has what I've been looking for (ok, only in the soft line).
But here is NEW stuff - photos and videos of great (mostly) looking european teens.
As a video-freak, I'm pretty content with the way this site has developed. But, fellow PU's this Met Art has given me back the pleasure of enjoying fine girl softcore photos. And these guys do a lot with fine photo-quality for the comstumers.
They have 3 diffenrent solution for the later sets:
High, medium and low (4368x2912 and 1365x1048 and 1024x683 - in that order)
And they have zip for each solution.
The later videos have 1280x720 - and the formats are several: Divx, WMV, ipod, mp4 (I think it's called) quicktime and mpg.
The earlier videos are not that swell (512x334) they are still a bit blurred - man, would it not be great if they reedited some of these videos and placed them on the site in better resolution!
I've been a bit like a grumpy old man in my latest reviews - but here I found the spirit again.
This site just makes my happy to browse for fine porn.
And above all - the joy of fine photos is back.
It's not perfect or a 100 here, but man, it's close (BUT fellow PU's - this is still entirely softcore)
And sorry, I gave up counting the amount of photosets........but I think, you get value for every penny.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
424 updates of 284 models & 26 lesbian updates downloadable
Videos in WMV 640x480 778kbs-1Mbs -> 2Mbs@ 12/05
Playtime of '07 videos: 53-119 minutes/upd.
2007 Avg. photos/upd. 244
Update photos: 700x1052 to 797x1200
Supersize photos: 179 sets of 2000x3000 to 2800x4200, ~30-60 photos/set
Totals 03/04-now: WMV video, >237 GB, update photos, >63,400
5 color code for activity
12 updates not yellow|orange|red
No video watermark, DRM
Download manager accepted
Cons:
Download limit 5 GB/24 hrs.
Exceeding download limit means loss of access for 24 hrs.
Video resolutions could be higher.
It would be nice to have more girl-girl.
It's too difficult to find many cons for this site. :)
Bottom Line:
FTVGirls went online September, 2002. Evident is a commitment to quality established early that still surpasses many sites. For instance, the WMV video resolution started out at 640x480 (nearly impossible to find elsewhere then). Several "highly-regarded" sites still try to sneak by with 320x240.
The women are from 18 to 24 y/o, except for twelve 25-32. While the site creator talked about giving the "girl-next-door" experience, I've yet to see any models there who would qualify as the average girl-next-door. All of them are lovely, and most are stunningly so. There is a range of physiques on the site, but the appearance of all is above the average on the site from whom (in spite of it's initials) one can't get a root beer float.
Flashing, nudity, masturbation, fingers, toys, other objects, orgasms, interviews, and other activities are seen on this site in a wide variety public and not-so-public locations, mostly in the southwest but a few in Hawaii or Portugal, plus a handful of contributors locations. All is original and, AFAIK, exclusive content. For the vast majority, the site title applies. Perhaps a dozen I'd seen before, which is forgivable because they're so damn cute. :) And, the models enjoyment is obvious and multi-faceted. Four have even returned to share their pregnancies. FTVGirls is a superb and unique site dedicated to young womanhood, their lives, personalities, beauty, and their sexuality...well, minus the men where applicable. :) Long may it reign.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
*I am re-reviewing sites I have scored 100, in the past, to see if those perfect scores still hold true*
- Even if not a 100, FTV has been a consistent top or near top scoring site for me for 16 years now.
- The video download quality and photo download quality is some of the best you will see.
- The models, while by definition, first timers, are mostly amateur though a few established porn stars have appeared on FTV.
- Similar to Zishy on this one, I generally love the clothing choices the models wear for their videos and pictures.
- Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
- Navigation and tags are great once you understand them
- Usually can also join FTV Milfs with a promo when signing up.
Cons:
- The punishment of having a site over 20 years. The older photo sets and videos need remastering and some have been remastered.
- I’ll prepare for the boos on this one, I haven’t ever liked the girl/girl scenes or boy/girl scenes on FTV. Keep it solo!
Bottom Line:
FTV is one of the few sites that I truly believe can score 100 and not hear complaints about the 100. It was one of the first solo American-based sites to enter the online porn world. The models have never been complained about by anyone. These models are usually amateur and they dress or are dressed in a way that normal, young women dress. That means you get a lot of teasing, especially in the pictures. With the addition of FTV Milfs and the ability to sign-up for both, you really could just join the two FTV sites and never pay attention to any other porn site. Or at least I could.
The choice of clothing seems like an ironic pro for porn but there’s one key word to describe the clothing, feminine. I’ve never shied away from my deep interest in women that are strong on the femininity. The FTV ladies do femininity better than any site I know of and they do so without being glam.
The videos on FTV show you a whole other side too. I once said the FTV setup of pictures and videos, is art-like. The videos retain the femininity of the photos but the ladies are more often naked and often being very kinky in the videos. You will see toy appearances from the FTV Toy, a large dildo that all the ladies used to try. That toy was more popular than any male pornstar.
There is the part that’s easy to forget about. The public nudity and flashing. The newer scenes still have some public nudity and flashing but it’s not near as noticeable as some of the older content, which is understandable. Our society has become more prudent and it’s now considered a terrible thing for a young lady to flash her boobs or even masturbate in public.
The navigation on FTV is one of my favorite parts but have known quite a few people who didn’t like it. You go through pages of models. You can filter them down to ages to hair color, however you want. You have to remember there are models from over 20 years. It’s a huge list. That’s why the tags are helpful. The tags will lead you to “most” of what you’re looking for. I say “most” because some of the newer scenes don’t seem to have as much care put into if the tags are all there.
One of the longtime cons for fans was the splitting of videos. When I scored FTV a 100, I listed the splitting of videos as not bothering me any longer and it still doesn’t. I guess I have watched the videos enough times that I realized the splitting is often for effect. I know when we hear of porn scenes being split, we think about a scene showing a woman getting into her masturbation, then the video stopping and leaving us to wait on our computer to download part 2 but that’s not how the FTV scenes are split. The masturbation part will be a full scene before cutting. After the cut, it may be the woman masturbating again but the type of toy, her outfit, the setting, will be different. I just don’t see it being a negative in the same vein as cutting scenes halfway through.
The list of pros is far more important to me. You will have a difficult time finding a site with this many attractive and maybe more importantly, kinky models. FTV shows the true strength of solo porn. The model is on her own. I will even mention Danielle (Blonde curly hair), one of the hottest models anyone has ever seen on a pornsite. But, even after trying multiple takes and even bringing her back to the site, she just struggled with giving a performance that matched her incredible looks. There are other models that might not jump out at you with their looks but then put on a near-perfect masturbation show and you see the similarity between real-life and porn. It’s not always just about looks. It may be about something different for every person that watches the scenes. And that is FTV’s strength. The scenes are authentic and even in the most kinky ones, it’s attractive and not just in a lustful way.
At least for me, I have found I look at the models differently when I see them on FTV. You see the real person not an actress. That is the selling point. These models whether a 10 or a 6, are going to either win fans over with their performance or fail no matter how hot they are.
I am going to score it similar to how I have in the past. A 96 and the 4 points deduction is for the lesser amount of public nudity and teasing.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A glamour, artsy, hardcore site from the famed producer John B Root.
- Some of the most beautiful models you will ever see and there are some you won't see on other sites.
- It feels different than most hardcore sites, there's a focus on the action that you don't see very often these days.
- Excellent quality photo sets from John's camera (3000 long end, downloadable zip) and videos have up to 1080p, with 720p and 480p as options.
- Covers many niches including casting that can be as extreme as fisting, women using dildos on men, women with men in regular sex, men and women masturbating together and helping each other.
- Settings can often be a plain room with a sheet up as the backdrop to the backseat of a limo to a cliff off the side of a mountain. The variation really helps this site standout and break the monotony of mainstream porn.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- Bills through CCBill.
- Movies section different than videos section.
Cons:
- No dates on scenes as far as I can tell. Don't know what the update schedule is.
- Minor one, site is in French. There is a button at the top in the middle of the page to change it to "En" or English. A lot of the titles of the scenes are still in French.
- Some of the longer hardcore scenes are in two parts.
Bottom Line:
Explicite Art was one of the first sites I joined with the name "Art" in it. I had avoided Met-Art, Hegre Art (2008 or so). I scored this site a 94 in 2008 but the review must have been replaced with a newer re-review of 90.
The only real big question here is if it's still updating. If that's not a problem to you this is one of the very best, most unique, hardcore sites on the internet. Another place it stands out is the owner/producer is John B Root, he's up there with DDF and Viv Thomas. It shows in the photo sets that are some of the crispest, clearest photos on the internet and it shows in the production quality of the "sex" in the videos.
There isn't a formulaic feel here. You do see the blank room with a sheet or curtain as the backdrop quite a bit but then you get Lou Charmelle and Manu Ferrara in the back of a limo. Followed by a couple going at it on the cliff of a mountain.
This is the type of site the porn world is missing these days.
The numbers for the site are impressive:
Roughly 450 models, many of them you won't see on other sites and all are above average to top-tier level.
Almost 1,700 videos and 1,500 photo sets.
Some of the models have 10+ videos and most of those are the ones I haven't seen on any other sites. I get the feeling there is a theme with the monotonous blank room sets being flipped to one of the beautiful, exotic locations. Some of the landscapes in the photo sets are almost as beautiful as the models.
It's like this site and the direction was ahead of its time. I could see future porn sites turning to this more desolate, lonely settings becoming vast, colorful, almost breathtaking settings. Seeing two people having sex on the cliff of a mountain is about as close to breathtaking as I want my porn to be.
There is a movies section that ties scenes together and includes extra sets, there aren't a lot of these, 32, but each has 5-6 video scenes on each one and 5-6 photo sets from each one. Some of these are very classic looking like 80s/90s. There is a compilation section that groups the models and specific niche/action together like masturbation girls. The only problem with these are the French titles. Wonder how many read that as French titties? I tried to edit it twice thinking that's what I had typed!
The navigation works as good as it can. There is a video tab, photos tab, compilations tab, movies tab, models tab and highest rated tab. Everything is easy to use and find what you're looking for. They have a categories section that seems to be very accurate. I would imagine most professional photographers are obsessive about labeling and tagging and it shows here.
Don't expect it to be a tame art site. There are DPs, orgies, even a few bisexual MMF, the women using dildos on men scenes, so the content itself goes much more into the hardcore genre than any other site with the name Art in it. I'm sure the word is used for John's photography.
One area that might surprise you as much as it does me is the different models types. They have over 200 scenes listing the model(s) as Arabic, over 100 listing the model(s) as Asian, over 150 listed as black and over 1,000 listed as Caucasian (looks to include what we usually call Latina). I had read a story years ago about John Root's love of the beauty of all women of all colors and you can see it here.
I added 5 points to the score for that great mix of diversity.
If the amount of content was lower I would be bothered more by the no dates on content and not knowing if there is an update schedule but a combined 3,200 photo and video sets is a lot of content. When you add the diversity of the models, the changing scenery and settings to the artsy production using the scenery and settings it makes this one of my favorite sites. Going into the scenery and settings using the production and mood, the blank rooms with just a sheet or curtain are often solo sets, while the scenes in the beautiful locations often are groups or a couple making more passionate sex (not love) than any of today's popular heartcore sites has on them.
My two previous reviews of it averaged out to a 92 but those were from 8 and 11 years ago. In 2019, seeing a site with this much creativity and diversity makes it a 96 for me. Throw in that the billing is my CCBill. They do charge in Euros, so the price is a little higher than a lot of sites today, around $26 after the exchange rate but it is well worth it. I didn't even cancel it and let it go over a second month since I was busy part of the month and didn't get to thoroughly go through the site. It would take a lot for a standalone hardcore site to impress me as much as this one does.
Don't forget to check out the photo shoots. I think I said it one of my previous reviews. I like John's photography style better than any photographer in porn. He captures about 70% beauty and 30% slutty and dirty. It's one of my picks for top hardcore sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another first time join for me. A heartcore site with a lot of high quality content.
- Others might not agree on this, but I prefer the pictures on this site to the videos. And the videos aren't bad at all. The pictures are just that good. (Will praise more in-depth in BL).
- Very pretty, natural models.
- Updates aren't daily, but looks like they average 2 videos a week and 3 picture sets. Or at least have since I've been a member. One week was just 2 photo sets and 2 videos, but they could use a little more structure and order to the updates.
- Uses CCBill as biller, been a long time since I joined a site that uses CCbill.
- Good amount of solo sets which I still prefer, but has plenty of boy/girl sets, boy/multiple girls and some girl/girl.
- Some 4k videos for those who want those. Still not really a big deal to me. Videos have 1080p option dating back as far as I have looked.
- Should have started the pros with this. Photo sets start with model(s) clothed!
Cons:
- I really hate this one since otherwise this site is near perfect. The navigation is a pain in the ass. It's not terrible, it works well, but there's one long page of updates. Hopefully you like scrolling. You can get around this by going to the model list, but I don't know most of these models. They have a drop-down box that allows you to filter with like 4K only, photos, videos, so that's why I say it's not terrible, but even after filtering, you're back to scrolling.
- Could use more girl/girl. I could even do without the boy/girl on here.
- The old "that's not really a con" con, would like more photos in the picture sets.
Bottom Line:
For whatever reason I've avoided joining X-Art for years. I think it has to do with my frustration with the heartcore-boom from a few years ago. It was everywhere, even on hardcore networks.
I think it creates a philosophical problem for me. I just can't see something staged ... as love. Not to worry, it's why I also don't watch mushy television shows. I know they're actors and the stories are fictional.
Outside of that, the only real fault I can find on this site is the navigation. I really don't even know what would fix it? Either way, I scanned as far as I could to see when the 1080p videos became available and after using hyperscroll for nearly a minute straight, I made it to 2010. Those had the 1080p option. The problem with this long scrolling screen is it causes a computer to lock up as it loads more scenes. I'm usually working on something else when checking porn sites out so I have to stop whatever I'm doing.
Hard to believe that's a complaint, but my PC is on the higher end. I don't know if that would muck up an older computer or not.
The rest is good. Models, much like Wow Girls, are really pretty younger women. I want to say there's a little more variety here with body size, but it wouldn't be a big difference. These models all look like fit college girls. I can tell because my wife has girl-crushes on college girls and she really likes these models.
One thing I will compliment that probably isn't mentioned much is these girls look more like regular girls than glam models. Which is really great for me. A couple that stand out right now for me are Lily Ivy and Melissa Moore. They both remind me of girls I see over at the local college. Especially in their dressed pictures.
Which is another big plus that's probably not mentioned much. All of the picture sets I've looked at start with the model in clothes. It's usually regular everyday clothes like a tank-top and shorts, some of the multiple people photo sets start in just underwear, but that's even better than starting out nude.
The solo videos are as good as any site's solo videos, believable, passionate masturbation. The girl/girl videos are also believable. The boy/girl videos are okay. It's the same problem with all heartcore sites. Heartcore tries to sell too much realism. I don't like realism in my porn and seem to become cynical towards it. No big deal though, some will really like those boy/girl scenes.
The photo sets could have more pictures in them. Quite a few are under 50 photos. Usually 100 is a good number. It's not really a complaint since I'm saying I would like to see even more. The photo sets can be downloaded in 1000, 2000 and 4000 high end. Download speeds are excellent on both photos and videos. I'm downloading the videos at 7 MB/s, which is above average for me.
There's only so much praise you can give a site. Having CCBill as a biller is even a big plus these days. Very pretty models. High technical quality. Models dressed at the beginning of photo sets. Downloadable photo sets. Fast download speeds. That nearly fulfills my entire mental checklist of what I want from a porn site, but there is the clunky navigation and the similar build/race models to complain a little about. Though neither of those are enough to pull this site down. I consider it a little better than Sex Art and put it well above Wow Girls.
I'll go as far as saying it has made my list of sites to return to. That list is very small these days. Would recommend it to everyone.
Edit: didn't remove any points for a minor annoyance, but wanted to mention it. When I first joined and signed in, it took me to a community page. I don't have much interest in community pages on porn sites. I thought I had joined something besides a porn site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The older, more mature, less innocent, side of FTV.
- The site has grown quite a bit and it has weekly updates.
- Much like FTV Girls, FTV MILFs focuses on mostly solo models, lots of outdoors teasing, public flashing, extended masturbation scenes.
- The majority of these models are not models that I know of. They very much remind me of amateurs that have decided they want to have some fun.
- Everything on the site is very high quality, it first opened in 2015, so all sets have 1080p videos and the photography FTV is known for.
- For the last 3-4 years, FTV MILFs and FTV Girls have been my favorite sites.
- Extras/bonus section is one of my favorite parts. You get a little bit of everything in it and it's all FTV MILFs content. From some extra store flashing videos to models filming themselves masturbate to taking showers. It stands out to me since it is FTV content instead of some licensed content from another site.
- DL speeds are very good for me (80% and up of my max).
Cons:
- I think some might question "MILFs" but they do a good job of covering the 28-50 year old range of models, there's just not as many of the upper 40s.
- The videos are split into parts, I've gotten used to it and even might prefer it now but I know it bothers some.
- If you're into FTV for the innocence, you're not going to get much of that here.
Bottom Line:
FTV MILFs was probably my most-anticipated site. I've been joining FTV Girls since 2006 and it's one of my favorite sites but my favorite models are mid to late 20s to early to mid 40s and this site delivers maybe the best selection of mostly amateur models in that age range.
I complained for years about the split videos. The newest one has 9 parts to it but as my tastes and interests change, I've found the more narrowed down clips that focus on one or two major actions (teasing, nude in public, masturbation, extreme masturbation) has let me pick the parts I'm most interested in instead of downloading what would be a huge file. Besides having 1080p option on all videos, most of the newer content also has 4K option. That newest set has 84 minutes of video, at 1080p, that would be a large file, at 4K with 12,000 bitrate it would be massive. The split videos allow you to watch your preferred parts without having to fast forward.
To me, FTV MILFs excels because it removes the innocence of FTV Girls. A lot of these models look like regular women. You just get the feeling that when the record button is pushed, they let go of any inhibitions and nearly all give top-notch performances. You can even see an almost "joy/release" on their face when they start flashing in public.
Here's some numbers since this site is still relatively new:
- Roughly 180 models, give or take a couple.
- Each model has video that ranges from 50-90 minutes total, split into parts.
- Each model has 200-400 pictures in as many as 5 different outfits.
- Around 30 bonus scenes and/or photo sets.
The navigation of the site works as good as you'll find. There's a model list that uses icons to tell you what actions are in each set, you can filter the models by date of their scenes release, age, bra size, height. There's also a lettered search to search by the first letter of their name. There's a "girl/girl" tab, too. If you favor the scenes with public nudity, you click on the icon "Nu!" and your results will have all of the scenes with public nudity.
For me, they're getting into the area of doing everything right. At one time, I used to think they should update more but the amount of content in one scene is much more than you get in most 2-3 updates on other sites. It's possible that me opening up more to the split videos has shown me just how much time and effort is put into the scenes since say split video #5 will have the model in a completely new location with a new outfit on and she'll be doing something completely different than in split video #4.
The models ages range from 24 (one of those), 26 (one of those), 27 - 49. The MILFs category has always been one that we've joked about since an 18 year old model could be a MILF in real life. And I think anything above 50 would start going into another category.
There are some hardcore scenes on this site too. I don't really like those as well but they're not that common. And they seemed to have stopped in 2017. At least based on the HC icon search. I might be in the minority on this one but there are so many hardcore sites these days that I'm completely fine with FTV sticking to mostly solo with a few girl/girl scenes thrown in.
I ran out of room in the pros. The biller is CCBill and this might not seem like much but they've (FTV) updated their login screen. Used to, it was the box that popped up in the middle of your screen. A very annoying box that stopped you from clicking on your join email to see your username/password. You would have to submit a wrong login to get it to lower the login box. Now, it's just a blank page with username/password and it saves to your browser.
I don't know how much this shows my interest and constant enjoyment of FTV but I've had a membership to FTV Girls for nearly 5 straight years and a membership to FTV MILFs for a little over a year straight. Those one updates per week, for me, have been better than what a lot of sites release in a month. I had to reserve a separate external hard drive just for FTV content.
One thing of note, the newest update is shot in Portugal which is very different for FTV as they usually shoot on the west coast of the United States but I'm guessing it might go into some legal nonsense with the United States' fear of nudity.
If you like MILFs showing very rare levels of confidence for porn, FTV's style of shooting, public flashing, some public masturbation, anything solo, high quality pictures that are some of the best in the industry, this site is a must join for at least one month. I used to join it when I renewed my FTV Girls membership as a cross-sale, seems like it was $7 for a week and it is full access, even try it that way. It's some of the best content I've ever seen and the only thing stopping it from being higher scored is the amount of content which could be higher, if I'm nitpicking.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
It is a staggeringly beautiful site
Classy but also knows when to be sensual
The models are all attractive
Excellent variety of models which is unusual in the glamour genre
Videos and photo zips are downloadable
It is still updating to an already gigantic collection
Cons:
The constant scrolling feature can be annoying
While not as softcore as many glamour sites, it still is softcore compared to popular sites these days
Bottom Line:
I was having a conversation with another porn fan and made a comment I thought could be taken as me being negative about Watch4Beauty. I said it is so good, it often leaves me wanting more. That is easily misconstrued and is more ambiguous than I usually am when discussing porn.
I understand my comment could make the clearly glamour site be stereotyped. Sites like Watch4Beauty were known for having gorgeous models posing in not so provocative poses. But that was not what my comment was about. Quite the contrary even. The models on Watch4Beauty have no problem showing you every inch of their feminine bodies. They will even give you close-up views and spread open angles. Once into the videos, they will even show you how those orifices work.
While the more risque content has not always been common on Watch4Beauty, it has been the norm for at least 10 years. There was a time when the content was even softer than it is now, but like other glamour sites, Watch4Beauty started showing more and using more. This created a dilemma. Showing pink was usually teased on glamour sites. Once it became common, there was a need for more.
Sites like Watch4Beauty including Met Art, Hegre and dozens of others nearly all started showing pink around the same time or roughly. I feel confident saying Watch4Beauty did more with showing pink than other glamour sites. I have even wondered how much the settings affected the comfortableness of the models. The models look to be on a vacation or holiday in their videos and pictures for Watch4Beauty. There is a more natural advancement from their models than from other glamour sites. These young models looked to step naturally from showing their body, but not their pink – stepped smoothly to not just showing their pink, but also showing how they use it and play with it and enjoy it.
There is a fine line in porn and I think all can agree with that. There is that moment that we – the viewer – may sigh a little and think the model is now just doing it for the money. I do not feel that way ever on Watch4Beauty. These models give off the feeling they love showing their bodies so much, it arouses them and they must touch themselves and show the viewer what they are touching.
The masturbation is believable and not drawn out for video length sake. It is very believable that these models have an orgasm or two or even three before they stop. That separates Watch4Beauty for me from the other glamour sites.
The site does feature the mobile friendly, forever scrolling feature and that feature is great if you are viewing the site on a cellphone or tablet, but it makes the site somewhat annoying to deal with on a desktop computer or laptop. It is a very minor annoyance for me. Maybe it helps that I find every single model to be very attractive? The videos are in great quality as are the photos. I like the photos from Watch4Beauty as much as any other site. The only other con for some could be that the content is 2024 softcore. Which is much different than 2005 softcore, but if you’re used to hardcore right from the start of a scene, this content will be a little softer than what you are used to.
Personally, I love the site, the models, the download options and yes, the settings. Most of these models do not look like what I picture when I think of a porn model. That too is a major plus.
My review does leave the question of what it is Watch4Beauty leaves me wanting more of? I am still waiting on a couple of the models to show up under my Christmas tree! It’s a site that does nearly everything right and the models are sexy enough, you may find yourself penning your first letter to Santa to ask for a couple of their models for yourself.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very appealing user interface
Only genuinely beautiful/sexy models featured
Different resolutions of pictures and videos available for download
Wide variety of performances, stretches the limits of erotic art, but never go beyond it(Ample use of props, dildos, peeing performances, etc.)
Backstage video to go with almost every gallery in recent times
A public forum for members to voice their opinions/demands/criticisms, which are personally replied to, and even acted upon wherever possible
The models are among the most gorgeous on the web
Cons:
Not enough outdoor shoots
Too Europe-centric, especially Czech-centric. Not enough blacks, American and Asian models
Magazine videos/pictures cannot be downloaded, are available only for viewing
Too heavy a site for a slow-speed internet connection
Bottom Line:
I'm not sure where to start, as I have so much to praise about this site. I'll start from the home page. Very well designed, a slideshow of huge pictures greet the user, with options lower down the page to navigate to the galleries, cams, free photos/trailer, and the members' section.
The cams are a farce as in almost every other Erotica site, redirecting you to an adult chat site(chatgf in this case), where you are required to purchase an additional premium membership to get access to premium features such as Private Chat, etc. I'll leave it there.
Jumping to the members' section, the member is greeted with the cover of the latest gallery/video, below which are the most recent issues of the magazine(a section covered later in this review). There's an elegant navigation bar to the left throughout the site which allows a user to navigate to Galleries(includes Videos), Cams, Magazine and About Us(not sure how the latter fits in here though). There is, similarly, another elegant navigation area, which could be termed as a mini-sitemap, at the bottom of every page on the site. These take the user to almost anywhere in the site, ranging from the galleries to the legal section.
Moving on to the galleries, the content itself is mind-blowing: The quality of pictures and videos is exemplary, that of backstage videos leaves a bit to be desired(But hey! They're only 'backstage' videos!). There's a wide spectrum of acts that the models perform for the viewer, ensuring that the galleries never get too monotonous, while at the same time resisting the temptation of going hardcore, a temptation that I have unfortunately seen some other sites in the same niche venture into, and a temptation that I hope Watch4Beauty never succumbs to. Here's how W4B describes itself: "W4B, is an exclusive, on-line erotic art magazine, for gentlemen of taste."
The peeing performances on this site, for instance, are testimony to W4B's ability to get sexier and sexier without diving into the dirty world of hardcore porn, and deserve a special mention in here. I was never a fan of watching girls urinate, but was surprised to see how sensual and sexy the peeing performances on this site have been made to look. I'm sure you would enjoy them too, irrespective of your current attitude towards peeing performances. There's now no shame in admitting how much a love these peeing performances, as much the other performances.
Members can view the pictures as a slideshow, download pictures in 3 different resolutions, backstage video in 1 (decent)resolution, and videos in 5 different resolutions/formats.
Proceeding to the magazine section, this is a mixed bag, and not all issues are adults-only. The magazine issues cover W4B models' backstage activities, luxury vacations, cartoons by the in-house cartoonist Dan, porn stars, and even porn/erotica sites that are direct rivals of Watch4Beauty. One drawback of this section is undoubtedly the inability of a member to download the pictures/video in a magazine issue.
There are a few other freebies like E-Cards, wallpapers, posters, etc. Not that they need to provide all this with the wonderful job they're doing with the part of the site that matters.
All in all, it's not just ONE of the best erotic art sites out there currently, it is THE best erotic art site out there currently. And I say this from the experience of having been a member in at least 6 other 'popular' erotic art sites in recent times. An absolute 5* site!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
#membership special is only $19.95 a month
#these women are shot as if they are royalty
#models personify godesses: Athena, Diana, Venus etc..are well represented by these models in the flesh- they models are beautiful, just made me gasp to look at them.
#pics come in 681 x 1024, 1024 x 681; 1362 x 1248, 1248 x 681; 2000 x 3008, 3008 x 2000; 2912 x 3468, 3468 X2912.
#live Met cams ( about 12 models a day); are everyday at these times:12 midnite, 5am, 8am, noon,3pm, 6pm, and 9pm; user can give feeback in realtime to met cam model.
# 2 hr webcam session per model.(in real time with model in Russia)
# movies come in DIVx;Quicktime;mpeg;wmv,ipod about every 4-5 days
#this is not just a nude site. Met art utilizes acessories very well: models wear necklaces and jewelry, earrings, shoes, belts, bracelets. You see hosiery, lingerie, ballerina outfits and more..
# offers private webcam chats for $2.50 a minute without admin.
Cons:
#there is not really a variety of themes in the vids; won't see dress up or masterbating, public nudity
#has trial memberships, be carefull when joining to select the month membership and not like $16.99 trial amount for three day trial for two sites membership and 19.99 for three day trial for three site membership unless you want to try the sites out for three days.
# specialty site; you will get your nudelover fix.Will have to go elsewhere for other genres.
#webcam for dial up connection can be choppy at times.
Bottom Line:
Met Art has very stunning and striking photosets. If I had to describe the models. They would be queens, royalty, princesses and goddesses personified and represented with these models. some of the models were so striking that they took my breath away- just great top of the line sets.
I joined this site a few days ago for the fourth time and was surprised to see the price of $19.99. I suppose this special is to help promote their other two sites Metmodels, and Errotica Archives which is offered for $19 if you join them seperatly (their banners are prominent right after joining). The idea I suppose is that they lowered the price to make it possible to have 2 memberships for just $40. I just checked. you can select two of the three for $49, or all three for $59.99.
I have the metcams on another webpage as I speak.-- just got a hello back from the model Neela, very nice. Works well even with dial up ( is what I have) and can be resized to full screen mode by pressing f11. You can tip the models and make an offer for a private webcam chat at $2.50 a minute.
I give this site a 96 because $19.99 is really a great deal to have access to their stunning models and webcam sessions that run 7 days a week. The interaction feature is nice..
I have no idea when the price will go back to what it was when I last joined which was $29.99 so I'd say that this is a real good time to jump on board and try out this site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Fantastic models
-Varied photographers
-Crisp Clear images
-Large sets
-4 daily updates
-Many new models
-Sensual poses and vibrant sets
-Continual improvements in models and average quality
-Superb Lighting
-Create Galleries
-Re-rate artists and models
-Amazing Value
Cons:
-Recent Majoly (artist) sets
-Some boring videos
-Occasional quality lapse
-Met-cam models moved to private cams
-PSP videos low res
Bottom Line:
The best artistic nude website online, there is no competition for Met-Art because they are easily in a league of their own. The reasons for this are an absolutely huge amount of archived sets and huge collection of models. New models are regularly added with increasing quality. New models that get rated highly are very quickly brought back for follow up photo shoots (usually 2 more). Completely amazing website, one you should check out as you have probably stumbled upon many great sets from them anyway.
Photo quality in the website is extremely good with models, artist and locations being of high standards. Artistic and photo quality is excellent, artists like Voronin and Ingret are masters at lighting and produce superb sets with wonderful colour contrast along with clear high megapixel photos. The actual set locations are great and varied on their own, although there is some reusing of set location there is usually a fair gap between those updates. Models are very attractive but of course people have different likes and dislikes and Met-art has the huge range to cater for anybody. I think there is plenty of variety for new models also.
The site does have a few minor negatives including movies and some artistic “choice”. Movies themselves are up and down, quality is fairly good but content varies from sexy to sterile. In some cases watching videos of existing photosets can be a bad thing. Other times videos are very nicely put together, some videos you can hear the sound of the camera clicking and the artist speaking and this may put off some people who prefer music, although many include music. Older videos tend to be sexier and racier. Another very big issue currently is the artist Majoly who seems to be bringing the quality of the site down, his recent works appear as if he has taken some shots of attractive models in good locations and then passed them through a very aggressive Vaseline filter making them look awful, thankfully most artists are not like this.
Content on the site is almost beyond quick description. There are so many great sets in the archives dating back almost 10 years. They will post up a preview of the four updates coming for the next day. You can rate on each model and each artist and then change your vote at a later stage, which I do quite a bit. There is a brief bio for the model which I think is sufficient, more community feedback, such as commenting on sets or voting on upcoming sets is something to look at. After a year with this site I still check it daily for content. It’s very much worth a yearly membership, especially considering the huge amount of existing photos you may need to download. I’ve still got hundreds of models to rate and I try to rate every new set, which again emphasizes the content and introduction of new models, 39 new models in January 09 alone. Its amazing value and I will continue to subscribe given what I have seen in the past year. I’m glad to be a subscriber.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the most technically-impressive, female-friendly, somewhat-artsy, websites on the internet.
- A more sexual version of Met-Art from Met-Art.
- Top-tier female models, including some favorites from Met-Art doing things they don't do on Met-Art.
- Very good fetish content, especially clothing fetishes.
- Production values are so high you might think you're watching a blockbuster Hollywood film.
- Photos and videos are both well-represented. Will go further in BL.
- Navigation is excellent and usually straight-forward.
- If you're into artsy hardcore they have quite a few sets where the models wear clothing and even partial masks to add to the plot.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max).
- Not surprising to me but the solo sets are my favorites on here and should be joined by solo fans just for those.
- At this point, has a lot of content.
- Updates daily
Cons:
- It's going to be too artsy for some. Some are going to say, "Why are you covering that pretty model's face?"
- The hardcore sets are hit or miss, some are very good and others are average at best.
- Those live girl ads.
Bottom Line:
It seems fitting that I review Sex Art after reviewing X-Art last week. I've noted before on nearly every site owned or managed by Met-Art that you're going to have trouble finding much to complain about. Sex Art is the same way. Just pulling out numbers, resolutions, it's very impressive to see how much work they put into their site and content. I get the feeling they have someone who is live on each set and this person is OCD, they go around making sure every single object in the room is perfect, nothing distracting is going on and that appeals to me to a point. It also can become boring.
I still don't understand why Met-Art started Sex Art then came out with Met Art X. I'm pretty sure Met Art X is just solo masturbation but Sex Art has that too. Get the OCD person in there. Things are getting confusing. I'm going to do the numbers first because that's where Sex Art is at its best.
1,001 films as they call them, scenes, videos to most. Their lowest available high resolution is 1080p dating back to film #1. There are around 250 films with the 4K option, too. Each of these films can be downloaded in resolutions from 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K if newer. They are some of the crispest videos I've watched. Sound is good and clear, too.
1,400 photo sets, roughly 4500 long end resolution, the amount of photos does vary from maybe 70 to 150. They are available to download in 3 different sizes. Maybe better than any site, these models almost always start out dressed in regular clothes. Similar sites do this too but a lot of them get by with the "panties and bra are fully clothed". If this helps put some perspective on it, I have a folder with 768 of their photo sets in it.
580 female models, so quite a few have more than 1 video or photo set. I used to think Sex Art was going to get my first-ever 100 score. I know the content is often vanilla to hardcore fans but they do everything they're supposed to do and surpass nearly all standards. I've not pulled the trigger on the 100 for a few reasons. The live girl ads. They're not really obtrusive but I've almost clicked them a dozen times. The videos that don't have any chemistry hurts some. It's just not quite there. And that's okay, too. I'm sure if they fixed those, I would find something else to complain about!
The last time I reviewed both Sex Art and X-Art, I felt Sex Art was a little better and I still feel that way. I see Sex Art as 5-6 points better than X-Art. Though, neither should take offense, I doubt any of the other "heartcore" sites would get an 80 from me. It's kind of strange to say this but if this was just a solo site, the score would be higher. They're going to tell me to try Met-Art X.
They have pulled away from the "series" style of films and I think that's a good move. They had ongoing series like "Girls Love Sex" and "Kamikaze Love" but I think it limited them.
They have a relationship with models that I've tried to think of a word to use to describe it but can't figure it out. As an example, maybe she's still very active but a set last week has Suzie Carina in it and I've not see her in nearly a decade. She still looks great, too. It's almost like they can get any model that's active. One of my favorites is Lorena B, she's a good example of how they have multiple videos/photos of one model. She has 34 photo sets and 15 videos on here.
While I'm happy with the navigation some might say it's too minimal. The scenes have tags on them and you can use those to find scenes with the same tags but there's no "category" search. So, if you like anal, you have to hope someone tagged a scene as anal. I did a search on the site to see if "anal" brings up anal scenes and I don't think it works. One of the results was a set named, "Analogies". That's where being a regular member works against a review. I join and can look back to see what I last downloaded and just start from there.
The models here, like other heartcore sites, are slender or athletic, not a lot of racial diversity but there is some and tattoos and implants are minimal. The picture sets here, like X-Art, are my favorite part. I like the Sex Art videos a little more. I join twice a year, actually moved my membership month up a bit this year since I've bumped off some sites from my regular rotation. I hope they continue doing variations in the fetishes (hose, panties, short-shorts) as I think it's a newer strength for their site. If you're used to the old Met-Art it can be fun being a member here since you get in the routine of the photo sets stopping at the fully nude parts but they go all the way here. A 96 might be as high as I can go on Sex Art and I would recommend it to those into clothing fetishes, solo models, pretty models, some of the models look too young models and of course for those who like heartcore style male/female porn
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of my favorite sites I consider it a guilty pleasure
Incredible site for those who love pictures of pretty young women
Around 1,500 picture sets and all are downloadable
There are over 300 videos you can download
Classic-style navigation that will make you wish for the old days
Three to four updates per week
Cons:
If you prefer videos this site might disappoint you
The price is $40 per month, but they do offer a half price promo to past members
Bottom Line:
This site first caught my eyes when I noticed a sample set of their photos. It was of an adorably cute, but also very sexy, young woman with the tiniest amount of baby fat still showing above her bikini and those increasingly hard to find banana boobs. I joined the site just based off those samples and that was maybe 8-10 years ago. I still only join the site once per year, but that’s more me being a cheapskate and needing constant change, than anything against the site or its quality.
The navigation will remind you of sites that were popular not that long ago. Everything is spelled out for you along the top of each page. Updates/Model Directory/Photos/Videos and the second row has top videos, top models and the one that tells you, you’re on a high quality photo site, “top photographers”.
You may be thinking it’s like Met-Art and you wouldn’t be that far off. The difference being, the settings, in my opinion, the quality of each and every set that makes it to the site. A lot of photography sites have small picture sets, but all the sets on Showy Beauty have at least 100 photos and there are no duplicate poses.
They also update weekly, usually 3 times, sometimes 4 and every update is at least worth viewing, maybe even downloading. Porn has changed so much, so fast, over the last 5 years and this site is a perfect example of showing the change. Showy Beauty sets out to show you a beautiful model, let you appreciate her dressed and even in normal poses, to fully nude with legs spread. I have never viewed a picture on SHowy Beauty that looked like a wasted picture or pose.
The videos aren’t bad, but those are mostly the softcore type videos you are probably used to. The videos have background music and it’s kind of like watching a filming of a photo shoot. I much prefer the photo sets and it does make me wonder if other sites put more time and effort into their photo sets if we could possibly see a resurgence in the popularity of photos? At times, I do feel like I’m desensitized to the numerous but similar, all out hardcore, videos we can find on nearly all porn sites.
The models are nearly all A plus level models. Nearly all models are 100% natural. You won’t see many if any tattoos and you will see more of the bodystyle we used to in porn. The small waist, medium chest, medium to curvy hips and butts and you will see some pubic hair too.
I don’t expect the site will ever become a hugely popular site, but it should. This is very much the porn that most of us were first introduced to. It just seems like many of us wanted more and more, but didn’t take time to figure out the older style was enough. As my imagination becomes a part of my porn viewing pleasure, I can do so much more with photos that leave it up to my imagination to think what happens next than just taking the word of a porn producer who decides what happens next. It’s a great site that seems to only publish the best of the best of their content. I’m rating it as high as I think I can score a site that focuses on photos.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Stunning Models Most beautiful women in the world
-Lifetime membership option
-Multiple updates per day
-Softcore & Hardcore
-Commenting & Rating is allowed
-Add your own tags
-Ability to rate & follow models
-Ability to view all network sites or individually
-Massive amount of content
-Photo set slideshow option
-Next and previous gallery links on each gallery page.
Cons:
-Some sites cost extra on top of network membership
-No options to view models you have favorited
-Some models have alias on other network sites
-Some updates are from sets from past. (This could also be a pro. There have been sets posted of models that are popular today but set was taken when model was much younger than they are today.)
Bottom Line:
This is my personal favorite that I visit daily. SIte is clean and very easy to navigate. There is multiple updates per day; typically 1 updates for several of the sites in the network. The image and video quality is superb. Though not listed on their join page; I was able to contact them and obtain a lifetime membership option. I was also offered options to add additional sites for a fee per site for life. There is mostly softcore & glamour shoots here but majority are very intimate with close up shots of these beauties. There is many galleries/videos featuring fingering and toys as well as girl/girl and guy/girl hardcore via SexArt. There is commenting & rating allowed. The users are very positive and informative. You can add your own tags to galleries and videos which making finding things again easy. The model rating system is well thought out and you can follow a model which gets you an email anytime they have an update. Unfortunately there is not a page to view all the models you have favorited. The network site allows for you to view all the network sites or you can view the sites content independently. There is an absolute massive amount of high quality material here. I also love that when viewing a gallery you can start a slideshow with options on speed and image size. There is also links to the previous and next galleries which makes browsing very easy.
Really the only thing I don't like about the site is it was confusing exactly which sites you get when you join and I've seen variations of which site depending on where you look. Some sites cost extra in addition to your network membership. I also don't like that some models have different names depending on which site they are on. It would be nice if they would combine them and list the names as an alias. You can't view a list of models that you have a favorited.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
– Give me FTV Girls and FTV Milfs and I'm all but set on my porn needs.
– Updating 4 times a month.
– Video and picture quality is as good as you will get.
– Download picture zips and videos. Unlimited as far as I know.
– Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
– The best collection of amateur Milfs.
– Still the best navigation, too.
Cons:
– The infamous nitpick con of porn needs to establish an age range with Milfs and Matures. I'm really not complaining. Just needed a con.
Bottom Line:
The last few years of my porn collecting has seen me turn to mostly amateur models. I'm confident in saying no fully nude porn site gets better amateur models than FTV Girls and FTV Milfs.
FTV Milfs runs into the debate over the use of the Milf word, while it's true, an 18 year old model could be a Milf, by definition. The word in porn does generally signify an age range or if not a range, let's say “over 25”. I've said many times, my favorite porn models are 25-35. That was a big deal back when I said that, I joined and collected a lot of sites with teen models. That was because teens were the big focus in European porn. Things have changed now and my preferred model, body type, seems to be replacing the popularity of teen models.
FTV Milfs covers that range well, but their FTV Girls does too. I join both at the same time.
There are good reasons: Nearly all the content is solo. I like seeing the models wearing their normal clothes, being ready in said clothes and seeing how comfortable they look. There doesn't seem to be any pressure on them to do anything they're not comfortable doing and because of that, they do nearly everything imaginable to themselves. Somewhere, a male pornstar, or just a random male, is saying he can do more for the model than she can and there's me, shaking my head.
I'm even thinking women feel flattered to be on this site. Something special happens when an amateur model’s perception starts out on a positive note instead of feeling like she's just another number on the casting couch. You can see it in the content.
The only downside FTV Milfs has is it's not been around as long as FTV Girls. The site is still big. There are over 400 models and there is a great blend of body types, boob size, race and most look like women you catch yourself taking a second or third look at while shopping for produce.
Speaking of produce, nothing is off limits, bananas acting like dildos and my favorite niche of public nudity, it's all covered on FTV Milfs.
The navigation on the FTV sites continues to make me wonder why others haven't copied it. There is an off chance my years of membership makes it easier to use, but their tags are as good as I have used. I think I even admitted, at one time, I didn't notice the tags and/or just thought those were there for looks. I can't give a number on how accurate the tags are but each time I've clicked one, I've found exactly what the tag said I would find.
The picture sets are some of my favorites. I have regularly admitted I have clothing fetishes and still do. I'm starting to think I'm not going to grow out of those. I would call the pictures warm and natural. The models are also one of the bigger collections of natural Milfs. I haven't noticed a lot of tattoos or implants. Of course, tattoos don't bother me. The models look real. Years ago, I considered the FTV Girls site to be glam, but not anymore and FTV Milfs isn't necessarily glam. Some of the models do seem to feel best in pretty dresses, but it's dresses you would see women wearing at the store.
The downloads are unlimited as far as I know, but I wouldn't be close to hitting a limit. I mostly just download the new videos and picture sets. I have an entire external hard drive of FTV Girls and FTV Milfs content.
I have said this before about just a handful of sites, it feels like a premium site.
You still get 4 new updates per month and that's almost always 4 new women. I don't join enough mainstream porn sites to say all the models are amateurs but that's going to lead me to say, I believe they are. The biggest reason is a fairly simple one. The models don't act like they're just on another porn scene. I believe that could be the biggest strength of FTV Milfs. There's definitely some flattering to be one of the new four models in a month. I'm thinking back to how Playboy’s Playmates and Penthouse Pets were looked at on such an elevated level. I'm thinking these models on FTV Milfs are experiencing their chance to be like those Playmates and Pets were.
With the great navigation, fast download speeds and easy join and cancel from CCBill, there's just not much to complain about and lots to be positive about.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Some of the better porn stars plus tons of amateur girls, like your next door neighbor hottie.
-Amazing amount of content that goes back for years, took me months to download all the videos I wanted to keep.
-Videos are very well done and shot with a lot of attention. No DRM.
-Girls from around the world.
-First time I saw Erika on this site I died and went to heaven.
-Nice website.
Cons:
-Time to jump on the Hi-Def video bandwagon, these amazing women deserve HD!
-A few of these girls might remind you of your ex, maybe a good thing, maybe a bad thing.
-More international chicks!
-Speculum, WTF. Not my thing.
Bottom Line:
You can tell whoever does this website puts an amazing amount of effort into it and it pays off. Be aware that your'e only going to see solo action with hands, toys, fruit, shoes, etc. This site is by far the best hot babe solo action joint in the world. Worth every penny.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ 100% exclusive content
+ nice looking European (French mostly) models
+ variety of actions (soft/hardcore, straight/lesbian, masturbation/peeing/fisting/etc)
+ high res pictures (up to 2000*3000 for newer content) and video (1280*720) with a range of formats (including iPod version)
+ Downloads in zips
+ no DRM
Cons:
- continuous condom use
- original French content (with only further translation to English)
- some scenes are too short to focus on them
- pricing for Europe (€30/month)
Bottom Line:
Explicite Art is a collection of nice looking French models (currently 362) in a variety of situations and actions: soft and hardcore; solo, straight and lesbian; masturbating, peeing, fisting and so on, both in pictures and video, with updates coming almost every day (they have explicitely excluded only Sundays). Immediate drawback is that the original language is also French, which only then translated to English (subtitles here are, probably, the best solution as they allow keeping intact the emotional component of sounds).
EA's attention to technical quality results in pictures up to 2000*3000 px, which is more than necessary for just full screen viewing, with smaller versions of each picture for sorting/previewing, and true HD video (1280*720). Pictures can be loaded in zips; video is in a range of formats (MP4, MOV, ...) with a special version for iPod.
With all the above $24.95/month is a quite reasonable expense. European customers have to pay more: €29.95/month recursively. It looks like the "special offer" does not work or has its very specific meaning to the east of Atlantic Ocean.
Overall impression: site really deserves attention.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Excellent value with yearly option.
-Unlimited downloads.
-No DRM.
-Supports download managers (actually incourages use of them).
-Has great respect for models.
-Huge amount of models, all appear to be 18 and are extremely attractive.
-High definition videos.
-Multiple daily updates.
-Super quality pictures.
Cons:
-Not that many videos.
-Browsing site can be slow (but downloads are fast).
-Some navigation issues (can be hard to find all of a certain models content).
Bottom Line:
Firstly I'd like to say I'm not going to deduct anything from this site in terms of points or cons because it's a softcore site.
This is made clear by the tour and the name of the site, so anyone who joins Met-Art would be ill-informed if they expect hardcore content.
I joined Met-Art recently, for the first time ever; and based soley on the information available in the FAQ and tour, I took out a yearly membership ($99), and It's one of the best decisions I've ever made.
If you look at my reviews, you'll quickly notice I'm not one to use all caps in a sentence, but I'm going to make an exception here:
ALL THE MODELS ARE ABSOLUTELY STUNNING. THE BEST LOOKING TEENS YOU'LL FIND ON THE NET, PERIOD.
Whilst that was out of character, I needed to make it very clear. The people who run this website strive for quality. All of their content is superb. The photo sets are available in low, medium and high resolution to suit your download speed / hard disk capacity, but the high quality pictures are nothing short of spectacular, and they don't have any watermarks.
There are not as many videos on the site, perhaps around 400 at a guess, and not all of them are in high definition, but are all a pleasure to watch.
I'm now running out of space for this review, but this has to be my favourite site so far.
Heed the con's I noted and then Join this site.
I can't recommend it enough if you like beautiful teens and don't require hardcore content.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
*Design
*Amount of content
*Exclusivity
*Sections or Features
*The camera man,the webmaster Robert
*Respectful,honest and pro with the girls.
*A serious site
Cons:
*The price.A bit expensive
*Updates weekly
*Sometimes,girls are not too cute.
Bottom Line:
This site is one of the most finest in the porn
bis.One of my favs.The quality is very important
issue.I always look for the excellent handle of
the camera in videos,and the webmaster is pretty
good.It's not easy to find good videographers.
Now I remember people like PixandVideos site or
Denys de F.in One by Day site,maybe the camera-man
in AssTraffic site.
Maybe this site is not the best one'cause there
isn't has hardcore-girl/boy- just girls,although
you can find kinky shoots or extreme insertions.
Highly recommended.Worth the price and wait for
surprise if you stay for the 2d.month.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Very pretty girls
Extremely erotic situations
Great masturbation scenes
Awesome toys
No scripts
The quality of the videos are extremely good
No limits for downloads
Great library of previous models
Cons:
Content can feel old after a while
There are only some fetish scenes that improve the variety of the site performances
Girls are new, but will be seen in more hardcore videos in the near future on other sites
Updates are once a week or so
Bottom Line:
The girls of FTV are new to the porn scene and provide a refreshing look at women trying to break into the industry. They are normally, gorgeous and young but every so often you will find an older girl who is looking for an adventure.
Some of the scenes are so unscripted that the models get caught by security guards at malls, hotels or office complexes. The girls also make themselves so crazy that they cum so hard they squirt (surprising themselves and the cameraman).
The content is consistently excellent and the girls are extremely hot. No men therefore no dicks, just a girl, her toys and hands. If that's your thing, you will love this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Very glamorous
+ Tons of picture sets
+ Multiple sets of models
+ Excelent photo quality
+ Navigation is good
Cons:
- Pricy (but well worth it)
- Video quality can be poor
- Many videos are just of the photo shoots
- Often times there will be radio music in the background, but this applies to the previous con.
Bottom Line:
If you're looking for class, then you've found it in MET-Art. This is one of the classiest sites (if not the most classy) on the net! You'll pay a good amount, but its well worth it.
Some of the hottest models around, and not just one or two photo sets, but many of the same the model. The video can be sketchy at times, but the site really isn't about video; its about gorgeous girls being professionally photographed for your viewing pleasure
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Phew – that’s a lot of hot and sexy content!
Stunning downloadable videos
High quality throughout along with lots of goodies
Navigation works effortlessly and accurately
Photos are as high of quality as I have seen
Models are real, girl next door types and are all sexy
Cons:
They are likely their own biggest competition and that never turns out well. You either top your previous work and make it lesser or you fail to top it and make your current work lesser.
The split videos
Bottom Line:
FTV Girls was “hardcore” to me back when I started perusing online porn. There are scenes with men with women and lesbian scenes too, but FTV’s strength is in the solo niche It surprises me how many times I have read someone complain about the site being named FTV which stands for First Time Video. There is little to no doubt that most of these models are filming their first ever porn scene. What I think happened, FTV carries a connotation of innocence and youth. FTV has one of the broadest age ranges for what is often advertised as a teen site. The Teen genre has stuck around so long that FTV now has a MILF site.
The girls next door style of models has been a forever strength of mainstream porn. That’s also a belief around FTV (all amateur, not true). There are some major porn stars on FTV.
The navigation cannot be praised enough. This is a massive collection, but you shouldn’t have any problems navigating the network.
This is what a typical scene wants to do and have you experience. A model meets up with the photographer. She takes pictures and does an interview style video where she answers some unique questions. She then works on her teasing ability and posing as well. That ultimately leads to the model masturbating. It’s beyond believable. A young woman teasing others and showing her body off suddenly decides to masturbate.
That is made better by the various toys FTV brings to the set. You’re going to see fingers and fists and multiple toys. All of which make guys wish they were the object or toy and makes women like myself, wonder why we didn’t try being with women.
FTV has taught me I do prefer simpler porn. These videos are based on a young woman doing something she most likely tried as her first sexual activity. The technical points of the site are easy to look over. The videos show a different woman (often less shy). I do believe that is one weakness of FTV. I do believe we as viewers fall into a mindset of what we think young, first time models do to themselves. Which in turn is a major strength.
On top of all the positives from above: The photos and videos are unlimited downloads. There’s so many examples of actions we would see as important to a successful porn site and those are right.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Discount through PU
-Huge site with over 2000 models and over a million photos. Archives go back to 1999.
-Nearly every model is absolutely drop dead gorgeous with few exceptions.
-Models are natural in that there are no tattoos or implanted breasts. Most are shaved, but many are not.
-Six updates daily.
-Zipdownload photo option with three choices, large, medium and small
-Three video download choices, MP4, AVI and WMV. The AVI is the best quality. HD quality at 1280x720.
-No download limits. Works with download manager.
-Great search engine. Without it, the site would be unnavigable. Even with it, many searches provide over a thousand photo sets. This can be daunting if you are trying to get to them all.
-User rating system for photographers, models, photo sets and videos. You can search by ratings.
-Wonderful, very complete tour that lets you see what you will get.
Cons:
-Not very fast downloads. I got speeds of about 600KB and my FIOS conenction maxes out at 2400.
-The largest photo files are huge, ranging from 200MB to over 1GB. Individual photos can be as much as 6MB.
-Close to zero ethnic variation. Nearly all models are thin Eastern Europeans between 18 and 25.There are a few Asian, Black and Latina models and they are exceptionally beautiful. I just wish there were more.
Bottom Line:
I don’t usually sign up for big well known sites that have many reviews as I prefer niche sites. However, I felt in the mood for a photo site that had so many nice reviews, as well as a very low discounted price. I love the quantity and quality of the models and the photo sets. This is overall a truly great site that deserves the many wonderful reviews. I will focus primarily on the videos as I am much more a into them than photos anyway. The previous reviews were much more focused on the photos and I feel did notappreciate the videos.
I was impressed by the videos here. The models are almost without exception drop dead gorgeous. At present there are 1077 videos and are now being updated more so than in the past. As of today, 30 new videos have been posted this year. They added 106 in 2011.
The quality is HD, DVD level stunning and most videos are outdoors. Usually lighting is a negative in outdoor photos and videos, but mostly that is not a problem here. There are a few videos of public nudity that were just ok. Some were not really public, as you are directed to scenes in a forest or a deserted beach. Some of these were hot, but the majority were not very effective at creating eroticism.
Across the board, the camera work is outstanding and the videos are generally shot by the same photographers who shoot the photosets. This leads in many cases to the videos being either a video of a photo shoot, very boring, or suffer from a lack of direction that makes the videos look like moving photo sets, also some what boring. But there are also many that do work and are very erotic.
I like the work done here by Luca Helios. He generally gets the models to flirt with the camera in most of his videos. There is also a little teasing and even a few showcase a bit of stripping. No dancing though. They have a rating system on the site and he has the number one slot with a video featuring Dominika A called "Parusa". She walks past some shops, enters a room, and slowly removes her clothing, piece by piece. She gets to total nudity at 3:37 and spends the rest of the video, about four minutes, in a chair and on a bed showing us her body in slow motion. No masturbation here, this is all for our pleasure. She shows everything and is very explicit. Nothing artsy about this; it is the good stuff. He also has a video starring Jenni A called Carefree that I really like. She comes walking down stairs inside a house, bottomless, and walks towards the camera and teases. This goes on for about ten minutes. She is simply gorgeous and knows how to create a mood. Great direction in a video that works.
I also appreciated the videos by Goncharov, especially Ksucha C in a video called Lathin. She is not much to look at, but is great at teasing. She goes to a home in the forest wearing a short skirt. She teases us continually with pussy peeks up her dress, while not wearing panties. Very hot.
While many videos are not worth downloading unless you just love a particular model, there are some true gems here. I appreciate eroticism that focuses on putting on a good show.
As a total package, I would give this site at least a 95 for the sheer quantity and quality.
As a video site, I think it is fair to compare it to the videos on other photo sites. It is number one in that category in my book. Compared to other soft core sites, in the area of videos of solo females without masturbation, I think it can hold its own. I would give it at least an 85. There are just too many videos of photo shoots and posed videos to go for a higher score.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
