Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art

Met Art (4)

Active
96
Denner (233) 01-10-08  06:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Vast amount of photos - softcore only - in various resolution. (over half a million)
Great high-resolution photos
Zip for different resolution.
Ok amount of videos (480 today)
A significant selection of mostly east-european teens.
Easy navigation - fine layout
No limits of any kind
Good on updates
Ok quality live-cam
Cons: Older videos lacks quality (but that's the same elsewhere)
A little too much outdoor-photos for my taste.
I'm not much into videos of photoshoots, but later videos are getting better.
Bottom Line: I have not been at Met Art for a couple of years - this site has turn to a far better softporn-deal than earlier.
In contrast to some of the hardcore-sites I've visited lately, this Met Art has what I've been looking for (ok, only in the soft line).
But here is NEW stuff - photos and videos of great (mostly) looking european teens.

As a video-freak, I'm pretty content with the way this site has developed. But, fellow PU's this Met Art has given me back the pleasure of enjoying fine girl softcore photos. And these guys do a lot with fine photo-quality for the comstumers.
They have 3 diffenrent solution for the later sets:
High, medium and low (4368x2912 and 1365x1048 and 1024x683 - in that order)
And they have zip for each solution.

The later videos have 1280x720 - and the formats are several: Divx, WMV, ipod, mp4 (I think it's called) quicktime and mpg.
The earlier videos are not that swell (512x334) they are still a bit blurred - man, would it not be great if they reedited some of these videos and placed them on the site in better resolution!

I've been a bit like a grumpy old man in my latest reviews - but here I found the spirit again.
This site just makes my happy to browse for fine porn.
And above all - the joy of fine photos is back.

It's not perfect or a 100 here, but man, it's close (BUT fellow PU's - this is still entirely softcore)
And sorry, I gave up counting the amount of photosets........but I think, you get value for every penny.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (15)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

PinkPanther (44) No doubt about the value - multiple photo-sets every single day mean that there's always something exciting that I haven't seen before - their archives are deep, deep, deep.

Add the vids (which I'm mainly NOT a fan of) and the cam shows, which sometimes have smoking hot models, and you've got one helluva site.

I honestly can't think of another site that gives their members more high quality material on a regular basis.

01-10-08  06:49am

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #1 - PinkPanther :

"I honestly can't think of another site that gives their members more high quality material on a regular basis."

I really agree! It's my top favorite site for that reason. Some days, I never get anything, but that happens with every site. It's kinda weird that I've never reviewed it.

Denner's review is great. He mentions pic sizes in detail. Actually, there are sometimes sets that land in the 2500-3000px range for the largest size, but they're still "nicely proportioned."

About the vids, one thing I'd like mention, as I've recently gone on a hunt there, is that some of them are of photoshoots, so you don't get a sense of interaction with the model much at all (she's working with the photographer) and the camera is flashing. Two recent ones of Nikky Case are like that.

I did find vids from the following that didn't show camera flashing and were more properly "real" videos: Tim Fox (esp of Evelyn Lory!), Gubin, Majoly, and Volkov. Can't say it's going to be true every time with them, though.

And sometimes the vids are just not very professionally done. Saw one of Elle B, who's really a doll babe in photos, lying on the grass and turning to quickly pick bits of soil off herself and generally looking awkward and kind of annoyed. Seemed a bit "at two with nature" in that one.

Probably my favorite photographer on there is Tim Fox. Some of his sets of Evelyn Lory are so exciting that I just lose my mind!

01-10-08  07:54am

Reply To Message

3

Denner (233) REPLY TO #1 - PinkPanther :

Thanks PP
- for a very..........well, I just can't find the right english word for it - but something like: a constructive and helpfull reply......
Great to have folks like you as a fellow PU.

01-10-08  08:08am

Reply To Message

4

Denner (233) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

Hey old friend
What a great reply - it's a review in disguise...
I certainly agree about the vids, but man - I'm turning to photos again - and concerning the photos - no argue from this fellow PU. They are great and keep roling in - that's one of the fine things about this site - new stuff - all the time.

Thanks, again

01-10-08  08:14am

Reply To Message

5

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #4 - Denner :

Oh, YES! You've been away for two years? You're in Candy Land! Enjoy!
01-10-08  08:33am

Reply To Message

6

Denner (233) REPLY TO #5 - Drooler :

That one really made me laugh....
Yeah, back in Candy Land, for certain!

01-10-08  08:56am

Reply To Message

7

jd1961 (95) I agree with you about the outdoor shoots, I don't like those as much. Especially all those photo shoots done in water! But with all the material, and constant quality updates, it doesn't matter much.
01-10-08  11:16am

Reply To Message

8

congestus (Disabled) Thanks for giving such a thorough review. I have often looked at Met Art and considered joining but now I will give it a go.

One quick question.... what size (MB) are the video files for download?

01-10-08  11:18am

Reply To Message

9

Denner (233) REPLY TO #8 - congestus :

The newer ones are typical 200-250 mb (give or take) - a good size in my own opinion.

Older ones between aprox. 40 and 70 mb (again, give or take)

Enjoy if you join!
I did.....

01-10-08  11:35am

Reply To Message

10

Denner (233) REPLY TO #7 - jd1961 :

Yeah, jd - I have exactly the same thing with the water vids.....but a lot of the newer soft-girl-sites seems to have an urge for that kinds of shoots...alas.

By the way, our old mate, Drooler had a great line for this site:

Candy Land

01-10-08  11:38am

Reply To Message

11

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #7 - jd1961 :

I'd like to second this for the most part. I have seen a few outdoor sets that were good, but the problems in general are water and sand or mud or dark grit sticking to the girl's skin, or being clustered in tree branches and leaves, or an otherwise perfect shot but there's this tall grass blade upstaging her ass. (Man, how many times? I hate that!) And you may not see it unless you inspect at maximum size.

Add to that the uneven light, with the girl's face obscured in deep shadow, and usually her crack is, too.

Not to say that some of the indoor shoots aren't exactly peaking out the light meter. But at least the light can be controlled if the photographer cares to. Outside, it's a lot to schedule a model for a perfect day, for a shoot at high noon, with the grass mowed beforehand.

Oh, and then there is that fly alighted on the girl's butt, probably because it senses something nutritious in the vicinity. I'd rather not have to Photoshop out the little critter. There's going to be spot there that marks where it was. Anyway, that's another toughie for the photographer, getting those choice shots without uninvited guests from the Animal Kingdom.

01-10-08  11:54am

Reply To Message

12

jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #10 - Denner :

I'm starting to wonder if there is some deep symbolism with having a girl half submerged in water. It must be some sort of fertility goddess symbolism!
01-10-08  01:25pm

Reply To Message

13

jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #11 - Drooler :

There is one outdoor video I do like with Eufrat. The one where she is wearing a hat near an old building...the colors are real nice.
01-10-08  01:26pm

Reply To Message

14

PinkPanther (44) REPLY TO #12 - jd1961 :

I find pics and vids of women in water very erotic - makes me think how much fun it would be to play slip and slide with her.
01-12-08  08:30am

Reply To Message

15

jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #14 - PinkPanther :

This is the site for you then! But as I say, like it or not, it doesn't matter because there is enough material here to please everyone.
01-12-08  12:27pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.