Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Possibly my favorite current network. Excellent job of different niches and genres.
Very impressive quality and quantity: 19,946 scenes and everything after 2011 has at least HD 720 and 1080, with the newer scenes having 4K. Updates are 1-2 times per day.
Seems like they accidentally stumbled into being one of the best transsexual sites, even with all the straight scenes too.
Some of the producer sites that don’t have listings here really stand out to me like the Dana Vespoli produced scenes.
The navigation is very good. You can go from site to site and it has so many filters (models, categories) that you can click as not wanting to see or wanting to see.
There’s not hardly any of their sites that should be overlooked. Everything on this network is at least worth looking into.
Cons:
You have to look for cons on this network. Maybe you could say there’s overuse of certain models, especially the males.
They could have better pictures, even professional quality, photo sets would add to it.
Bottom Line:
Evil Angel’s original draw for me was the transsexual content. They have TS Playground, Transsexual Angels and TS Factor which is one that is easy to overlook. They have the new, but I think underwhelming, PansexualX. Those transsexual sites have a total of 2,491 scenes and of those 2,491, 1,086 are solo which I really like and 248 are transsexual with a woman. I don’t know if there is another site that has that much of those two niches in the transsexual genre on one site. I know the network has long been known for their hardcore content, but they have as impressive of a transsexual collection as most transsexual networks. They also have 65 bisexual male scenes. I was just on a bisexual male site that only had 43 scenes.
I mentioned the Dana Vespoli directed scenes. There are 209 of those, it’s advertised as “Smart sexy features, intimate female orientated sex”. It’s really some of the most hardcore sex I have seen. That is important. If it was degrading or disgusting, I wouldn’t watch it. I think these scenes are right at my limit for what is almost too hardcore. I do like that.
I don’t think they would mind that I say I like this network better than Adult Time. Both are owned by the same company. This one has less of the same type of porn. Every update is likely going to be different than the previous one. It’s one of the only sites or networks that I check the updates each day. They have a 1-2 new updates per day schedule. The video quality is very high.
I haven’t ever been that focused on navigation in my reviews. This network is that good at navigation. It has to be talked about. It looks overwhelming at first. Everything I have checked, works on the navigation. There is the one problem you should be aware of. It has the sliders that you can set for bisexual only, lesbian only, transsexual only. I have opened different channels/sites on the network to see nothing. It’s because I had the filters set to just show bisexual. If you are into the different genres that is an invaluable tool. The categories are good. It is very close to being a perfect site.
Besides the nearly 20,000 scenes, they have 6,045 models. I like that there is an ethnic blend in the models. Their latest models show the depth of models they have. One is Eden Ivy, who is a pretty, college to mid-20s looking white model. The second newest Anuskatzz, who is nearly completely covered with tattoos, the polar opposite of Eden Ivy. The third latest or newest is Isabella Fontana, who is a Latin, very pretty transsexual. If you go just a little further there is Alicia Reign, who is a either a Latina or biracial maybe. The model variance is like the scene variance. You get something different with the site. I do plan on keeping my year membership. I replaced my year Kink membership with a year to Evil Angel. It is the only year membership I currently have.
There are what I call, “Neanderthalic” scenes, especially in the older scenes. That kept me from joining long-term in the past. I don’t even mean the word disrespectfully. It’s a non-emotional, non-feeling, cold version of porn that reminds me of what the cavemen did. While most sites have decreased in quality it seems like this network just keeps getting better.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
*Hottest names in porn
*High quality scenes
*High quality photosets
*Over 2,400 scenes available for download and counting
*Unlimited downloads
*Many, many 4K videos
Cons:
*Not every scene has a pornstar listed
*Not ever scene has an accompanying photoset
*If you download photosets, you will need to rename ever file you unzip
*No VR just yet
Bottom Line:
Jules Jordan. Just like the name Peter North, everyone should recognize his name, the brand, and what to expect from his content. Many of the major names in porn can be found featured on this site. Autumn Falls, Riley Reid, Angela White, Adriana Chechik, Gabbie Carter, and Gianna Dior, just to name a few, can be found here is some of the hottest videos on the internet.
The site puts out an update once every three days, which is somewhat reasonable for the price you pay per month or per year or whatever you choose to do. Some may argue that isn't enough compared to other sites, but Jules Jordan puts out better content than what others try to charge you for on their "premium" content.
The photosets that accompany the vast majority of the scenes are of excellent quality. When I mean "excellent" quality, I mean that the original photo size doesn't look doctored or pixelated, like it has been stretched to give the appearance of HQ or High Res photos. *cough, cough* Br****** *cough* T*** S***t *cough, cough*
To be frank, yes. Jules Jordan is a bit on the pricey side of things. However, the quality of content more than makes up for that and the time it takes to wait for new updates. Waiting three days for that special scene to come out featuring Jada Stevens, Vina Sky, Athena Faris, or whoever you want to watch with Chris Strokes or Dredd is worth the wait. This site is one that I am glad I went in on and will be visiting again in the future.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-DP Fanatics is part of the Adult Time network. I don't believe it's considered a separate site. On the web page for DP Fanatics, it states that DP Fanatics is "A 21 Sextury website".
However, 21 Sextury no longer exists as a separate network: 21 Sextury was folded into the Adult Time network a few years back. When I contacted Adult Time network support, I was told that 21 Sextury still exists, even though it is now part of the Adult Time network.
-The model selection is attractive young women. Mostly white, European girls.
-The women are featured in hardcore sex: they are getting rammed by two guys, in their mouth, their pussy, their ass. So if you're into rough sex or anal sex, this is a site that will arouse your interest.
-Membership in DP Fanatics gives you access to the 21 Sextury network, as well as the Adult Time network. I'm not sure why they emphasize the 21 Sextury network, since 21 Sextury is only a small part of Adult Time network.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-As part of the 21 Sextury network, this is a professional site, where the technical features of the videos and photos are excellent:
-Video definition from 288p through 2160p.
-Excellent camera work.
-Clear, crisp images, vivid colors, natural flesh tones on the actors.
-Nice sets.
-Unlimited streaming.
-If you have downloading privileges, there's a 300 GB daily downloading limit. Which is more than enough for most people. I really don't know why they need a daily download limit, except for data hogs who try to download the entire network for piracy.
-High res zip file for each photo set.
-There is an excellent model page, with hot links to the model's content at the entire Adult Time network. As well as a model listing. The model listing has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, and you can view it by alphabetical, newest, or most popular. But since you have 13,834 models at the network (female and male), searching through the listing can be a mind-numbing experien
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-My personal preference is seeing one guy and one girl having sex. Or two women having sex.
I don't enjoy three-somes as much. Or four-somes or even-higher-somes. Keep it simple, is my thinking. But for people who enjoy three-somes, this site/channel fits the bill.
-I also don't think anal sex is the end of the world in sex. That's just me. There are plenty of PU members who really enjoy anal sex. And this channel emphasizes anal sex.
-Although the models are attractive, many of them seem to have breast implants. I mean, the breasts can be nice-sized, but they stick straight out, and barely move when the models move. Their breasts are more like bolt-ons. Their breasts don't jiggle. And when the breasts are large-sized, they are even more bolt-on, more jiggle-free, and would look better in photos, where the implants would be less obvious.
-I think the DP Fanatics site might give the wrong impression to PU members. The most common plot for the videos is a young woman walks by the glass door of a house and flashes her ass and bare breasts at the 2 guys sitting inside. The guys immediately start to rub their crotches. And then take out their cocks and start stroking away. The girl goes into the house, and it's sex party time, with cocksucking, pussy fucking, ass fucking. Real life is not like this, and if a PU member expects this kind of behavior, he (or she) will be sorely disappointed.
-If you join directly through the DP Fanatics site, the choices are:
-$9.95/month, streaming only membership
-$95.40/year, streaming + download membership.
-There's very little plot to the videos. You have a girl and two guys. They appear on screen. And with little or no interaction, they start fucking. So if you're impatient for the "good" parts to start, this site delivers the goods.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): DP Fanatics is an excellent channel of Adult Time.
Adult Time is probably one of the finest bargains in porn today.
For a low price, you gain access to over 50,000 hardcore videos and photo sets.
The quality of the content is good to extremely good.
The content covers a wide variety of niches.
There are 655 videos listed for DP Fanatics. So it's a large channel. The models are attractive, but I don't care for all the breast implants the models seem to favor. Also, I prefer a little more plot to my videos: otherwise, it's just two or more bodies slapping against each other, with little meaning to the sex. Maybe I'm a romantic, who thinks sex should have some meaning to it, even though I realize that horniness is reason enough.
But the videos are crystal clear, with excellent technical production values.
The channel is excellent, but it's not my cup of tea.
There are other channels in the Adult Time network that I enjoy far more.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site started around 8 years ago. So it has a ton of content. However, a few years ago, it was merged into the Adult Time network, so you have access to over 50,000 hardcore videos, and approximately that many photosets.
-21 Naturals focuses on natural models: this means models without breast implants, as far as I can tell. The sex is between men and women. There is plenty of solo male-female, with threesomes as well.
-The videos are professionally shot, with excellent production values: clear, crisp images, excellent lighting and sound control and camera-work, nice sets.
-Videos are available for streaming. If your membership includes downloads, your choice of definition goes from 160p through 2160p (4K).
-Over 1,000 videos at 21 Naturals. Plus you have access the Adult Time network catalog.
-PU has a $7.95 streaming only discounted membership for the first month, renewing at $19.95/month.
-The model catalog has over 1,000 models, many of them A-listers.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can pay for your membership with a credit card or a gift card.
-Can watch on your PC, mobile device, Roku.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor.
-The biggest con, in my opinion, is that it's difficult to get a complete listing of all the videos at the channel. When you have an embarrassment of riches (too many videos in your catalog), to browse all the videos in chronological order is time consuming. To view all the videos at Adult Time would be a massive task. You can search by model name or other criteria, but it's just mind-numbing to search through such a massive collection of hard core porn.
-A streaming only membership can sometimes be found in holiday specials for $5 or $10 for the first month. Memberships with downloading privileges cost more. The easiest way to get downloading privileges is with a yearly membership, that runs around $95. But holiday specials, again, can give cheaper rates.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The problem is that many PU members don't want a yearly membership, preferring the monthly option.
-A daily download limit of 300 GB. Shouldn't bother most people in the slightest.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The 21 Naturals theme is natural girls. This means girls with natural breasts.
Implants are a popular option with porn stars. 21 Naturals features boy/girl sex and threesomes (2 guys on one girl).
It also features anal sex and foot fetish.
So if you're into anal sex, and/or foot fetish, this network should offer plenty of videos that fit your niches.
In addition, because of the Adult Time network access, you get 50,000 hardcore videos covering a wide variety of niches, with 1,000s of A-list models.
The Adult Time network gives you, in addition to the usual white porn stars, Asian, Black, Hispanic stars as well. Many of the models at 21 Naturals are late teen or twenties models, but you get older models as well.
There is a photo galleries for each video. You can watch the photo galleries in a slide show or download them in a handy zip file. There is a medium res zip file, and a high res zip file option.
Some of the models range from attractive to cute to gorgeous. Zazie Skymm, Jayla De Angelis, Stefany Kyler, the girls are fucking attractive. And if your tastes run to older models, there's plenty of models to choose from.
Giving the site a score of 93. That's mainly because of the Adult Time access. However, the 21 Naturals site/channel, would, by itself, be a worthwhile join.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
HD scenes
Yes. They do have HD scenes, but most of the SD scenes have better quality than the "HD" scenes they have available. And the 4K scenes are a punchline to a joke that no one got.
Decent Photosets
This is the only saving grace. The photosets. I have said this before in some other reviews, and I will say it again. The photosets are complementary and can enhance the scene. In this case, the photosets are the only thing worth downloading since it seems that they are the highest quality items on the site and have a high view-ability compared to the videos.
Some major names Riley Reid, Faye Reagan, Kelsi Monroe, Lexi Belle, and Angelina Valentine just to name a few that are featured on the site. Some of the "newer" stars that make an appearance are: Taylor Whyte, Sheri Vi, Gina Valentina, and Scarlett Sage... If that gives you any idea of how "new" some of the scenes are.
Cons:
4K scenes?
They really aren't 4k. Some of the scenes look like they are somewhere in between 540 and 720 masquerading as 1080.
New scenes?
The "updates" that are posted look like they were done about 10-15 years ago at the start of HD filming. There is not really any true update schedule, and they come out whenever which makes it frustrating. The partner sites that you get with a membership update more frequently, however they lack quality, as well.
Bottom Line:
***Buyer Beware***
This site is partnered up with Lethal Hardcore, or is it Lethal Pass? Hard to tell. Any new scenes are not posted through this site, but their partner site and they are atrocious. It looks like it was shot from an iPhone... 10 years ago. Both streaming and download qualities suffer greatly, and direction of the scenes look tired, old, and just sad. The search features that either site have is clunky and that is being generous with the adjective. At least the older scenes have a "classic" feel to them, but that's the only draw to the site since the "newer" scenes look like they are old and the only thing worth looking at are the photosets.
I would not recommend getting a membership to this site more than once. But I also would not getting a membership to this site at all if you want a fully honest recommendation. If you want to download all the things that you find good, do so at a budget and get out immediately.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hardcore site that doesn’t stray from its name.
- Weekly updates.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- Professional models and production.
- 818 scenes, each with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set (see cons)
- The models are all attractive but no amateurs that I have noticed.
- Tags on every scene and they are accurate with added filters for more customization.
Cons:
- It is a Gamma site, it seems like the subscriptions change daily. One day they are streaming-only, the next day they have downloads and streaming included. I waited for the downloads and streaming.
- The scenes can be repetitive, not quite cookie-cutter, but there’s not a lot of variety or story.
Bottom Line:
Hard X is a site that does most everything right except sometimes it’s too professional. The porn landscape has changed over the last decade. These sites stacked with often-used professional male and female actors and actresses are not as common. Maybe that makes the feeling of too professional more noticeable? The newest scene has Mick Blue, Liv Revamped and Ramon Namor, all are big names, all are very good at what they do but I do feel like I know what they’re going to do from seeing them in a lot of scenes similar to this Dual Penetration scene.
Is that really something to complain about? It is sex after all. I guess if they started playing cards and no one got naked or had sex, that would be something to complain about too. This is a very large site. I don’t know when Gamma took this site and it’s sister sites over but the use of the site and features are very good. The navigation can be used to search from newest scene to oldest. You can use the tags, most scenes list as many as 30 tags. When you use a tag, it then brings in the option of using filters to narrow down your tag search. It is all easy to use and there’s a clean layout too.
The technical quality is very good. The last two years of updates have 4K option on the videos. You also can download the videos starting at 160p up to 1080p on all 808 scenes. The photo sets are downloadable and have a 1920x1280 resolution on the photos. The tags are useful enough I can tell you there are 73 dual penetration scenes, 95 double blowjob, 417 anal and 89 threesomes out of the 808 scenes. I believe the pairing of this site with Gamma was a major step-up for this site and has allowed it to become of the best navigating and least frustrating sites I’ve used.
The action itself is where you or I even may have some problems. The threesomes or more are very good. The one on one male/female scenes are the ones that tend to become redundant and repetitive, even nearing cookie-cutter. They do advertise their scenes as gonzo. Most gonzo porn is nearing cookie-cutter. I do wonder how much the professional models add or detract from the scenes? This seems like it’s Mick Blue’s 1,008th time doing DP. He has to start getting the feeling of he’s been there before and that risks “going through the motions”. The interesting part about this site is it does come with four other sites. These sites are having the same possible positive/negative effect on each other. The sites each have a theme so you won’t likely find that theme on this site.
I do believe if you’re a fan of hardcore porn and professional models, you will be pleased with this site’s offerings and its added ease of use, the high technical quality, along with clean layout (only one ad at the bottom of the page), makes it an even more attractive option in the cluttered world of hardcore porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of those sites that you know exactly what to expect when you read the name of it. Where has the creativity gone?
- It’s updating once per month and has 30 scenes on it.
- The tagline says The Best Anal Creampies, not being an expert on amounts of cum, I won’t say the creampies are faked but will say if you like a lot of cum dripping out of a woman’s ass you will love this site.
- Pretty models, it’s one of the strongest pros of this site.
- Technical quality is as good as it gets.
- Download speeds are good at 80% my max.
Cons:
- I am sure there are people that say the creampies are fake. I honestly can’t say. I have seen sites with the clearly fake cumshots and creampies. This one, I’m not really for sure.
- They reached an all-time new high or low, depending on your view, a stepsister little person female? I had to pause to laugh. She’s really very pretty but in this genre, that’s just a little out there.
Bottom Line:
Anytime I review an anal site, I try to remember and put that I am not a huge fan of anal. I am more indifferent to it than hating it. When done right, anal scenes can be very good as it gives a good view of the rest of the woman’s body. I would even go as far as saying the male “talent” and the cameraman often ruins anal scenes for me. I really don’t want to look at your hairy ass, Ron Jeremy. Luckily, porn’s legendary hedgehog isn’t on this site.
You really get more than just anal on this site and it’s the main reason I’m reviewing it. These scenes are long, there is a whole section of all the other sex actions in every scene and it reminds me a little of another site in this premium standalone network, Girl Cum. The women get messy wet in the scenes which I find very attractive. You will even get some squishy noises.
The technical quality is very high with all of these sites. They have 4K, 1080, two versions of 720 and 480 on all of the videos. Their picture sets are even good which I still say is one of the lost parts of good porn. The pictures are downloadable and though only 1500 long end, the first 30-40 pictures are of the model. If I could petition one change to all hardcore porn sites that would be it. Give me 30-50 pictures of the model before the sex starts, teasing, maybe even masturbating.
These sites that are included in the premium Porn Pros network seem to have some serious connections in the industry with some of the prettiest and most believable models. I said the same about Girl Cum. Either these women really are into the scenes or they’re very good actresses. Considering I’ve been watching porn for over 20 years and know acting ability is limited, it makes me believe these women really are into the sex that much.
Something I am going to add here as it’s not something I remember seeing before, beside of some models’ names there is the designation of “contract star”. Are we returning to the days of models being signed to exclusive deals to only shoot for a specific studio? I liked porn better when it was like that. Vivid was the studio I remember doing that the most. If so, that makes some of these scenes very collectible. I know the anal genre has a lot of exclusive interest and “first time” interest. If anyone knows on that, let me know. It would be interesting to see which studios could sign the bigger stars to exclusive contracts. It would also make me wonder if those women try a little harder knowing they have to make their contract studio happy with their investment.
I wouldn’t even approach this site as an anal site. I just watched one of the contract star’s scenes. She masturbates and teases for the first 13 minutes of the scene. There is then oral up until the 23 minute mark. Followed by 20 minutes of anal in multiple positions. And the scene ends with 6 minutes of pussy sex. Less than half of the scene was anal. That’s what I like about this site and the long scenes. Porn has changed a lot since the early 2000s but the focus for me should still be on the model’s body being shown off. They do a good job of that on this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hardcore site with creampies and quite a few threesomes.
Pretty European models that don’t speak a bit of English.
Positions that I don’t see a lot in porn that look like should be used more often, visually stimulating.
Seems to be updating on an inconsistent schedule with 1 update in August, 5 in July.
Excellent technical quality and easy to use website.
They have 590 scenes with video, pro photo set and screenshots with each scene.
Cons:
I don’t know why, but once you show me threesomes, the male/female scenes become boring.
A few scenes in newest updates look to be older scenes.
Bottom Line:
I have started watching for the recycling problem in porn and wish I didn’t. It becomes an obsession of looking numbers up and trying to decide if a scene really is new or not. Currently, the 9th newest update doesn’t have a 4K download option and that makes me think it has been recycled from the past. Their own technical superiority causes that. Of their newest 250 scenes, all of the videos have a 4K download option except that one. It makes that one stick out like a sore thumb.
Besides that, this is a really good site if you like creampies. I can’t say I do. I don’t hate them either, but a big turn-on for me when watching porn is watching the guy cum outside the woman. The action itself nearly makes up for it. These scenes are very well edited, produced and there’s a real feeling of heat and passion between the male and female models.
The threesome scenes make the site. It’s hard for me to believe these are not bisexual males with a woman. They are not and there’s no bisexual male action (or score would be higher), but I’m not used to seeing what is two straight males be this passionate with a woman in a threesome unless it’s bisexual males. Very impressed with that part.
The rest of the site has almost no downfalls. There are 590 scenes, right at 250 of those have 4K video downloads and you have to go back to the first 90 scenes to find ones without 720p or 1080p downloads. That gives them 250 scenes with 4K down to mobile and 500 scenes total with at least 1080p and 720p down to mobile. The models are surprisingly attractive to me. I usually do not find European models this attractive, but this studio seems to draw top drawer talent. There’s a lot of anal, some DPs, including dual internal cumshots which is at least something I hadn’t seen before.
The tags are useful, but have questionable accuracy. Which is kind of a letdown as the site is quite large to dig through this many scenes.
I usually don’t comment on the settings, but most of the scenes are filmed in what looks like very upscale houses, possibly hotels and I believe it does add to the quality of these scenes. Do people really go to upscale hotels to have wild threesomes? There are also group scenes with as many as two couples, there are a few foursomes with 3 men, triple penetrating the woman and giving her triple internal cumshots. I believe the most I have seen in one scene was a 3 female, 2 male scene. The scenes are all over 30 minutes and I think once you have 4-5 people in the scene the need for a story goes away.
This is one of the better sites I’ve joined. If they had slipped a few bisexual men scenes in and more outside the body cumshots, I would have scored it even higher. The action itself is about as good as I’ve seen in the male/female world of porn. I will mention just to show much I like seeing bisexual men, a few of the scenes with multiple men with one woman does have the woman touching the penises together. I guess they get tease points with me for that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Superior technical quality, anal-centered, including DPs
520 scenes with downloadable photos and videos.
Long scenes (40-60 minutes is common)
Extensive tagging system that may go further than needed.
It is updating, but there is no set schedule and some updates may be questionable with a scene in May seemingly being Christmas-themed.
Pro models with the pros and cons that come with that.
Cons:
Scenes are formulaic despite the long duration.
The updates do concern me. Two some months, 0 in one month, four in one month. It balances out if you have a year membership, but not as good if you’re on a monthly membership.
European pro models can be very inconsistent OR robotic, there’s not a lot of middle ground.
Bottom Line:
This site is going to mark off a lot of “good” check boxes. The videos are long, the photo sets are real photo sets, not screencaps, they also have screencaps too and the quality if impressive. Nearly 200 of their 520 scenes have 4K in their download options.
This is an odd one for me. As much as I prefer long scenes, the long scenes on this site do not really have anything to do with story or building of a story. The scenes are just 40-60 minutes of hardcore sex. Their tagging system reminds me of the long length videos too. One scene has 44 tags. Some of the tags are also not very specific like, “watery” and “casual” or “fake” is that fake boobs? Fake action? Fake cum?
The theme doesn’t change in these scenes. It’s very straightforward that you’re going to see all three orifices of the woman penetrated and for those into dual penetration they have a tag for that. They even have tags for dual penetration positions like DP-Cowgirl, DP-Standing, DP-Reverse Cowgirl. I can’t be negative about the action and do think it’s why these professional models are better suited by sites like this. These models seem to be used to the camera, the dual penetration, the rigors of a 40-60 minute hardcore scene, sometimes with two men. It’s very watchable. I usually would feel uncomfortable with scenes like these since so many sites try to show the model in pain or looking like she’s being forced. This site gets a “good job” star on their report card for making clean, watchable, sexy, visually pleasing porn.
The download options are also extensive: It does look like they may encode their videos a little high. They have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p, mobile, a high res photo zip file that has photos that are 5700x3600 resolution and a screenshots zip download.
I believe it just comes down to your mood. You’re not going to get much story. The models are very attractive and seem to not only enjoy the scenes, but even give very real performances. It’s polished porn, but I believe in this hardcore of a niche that’s not that common. This niche seems more suited for a dark room with a couple of amateurs. I like the site. On the videos and the encoding, the 720p videos are encoded at 4500-5000 bitrate and it does make the files large, especially when combined with the length of the scenes. Some of the 4K scenes are nearly 20GB each. Complaining about a site excelling at something isn’t much of a complaint.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large, hardcore site focused on anal sex.
854 scenes with 2 updates per month.
Up to 4K video downloads on newer scenes.
Each scene has a professional quality downloadable photo set.
The models are professionals and most are European. The average model on this site is at least attractive.
Cons:
Hopefully, you are just on the site for the porn/sex. This site has little to no plot to the scenes and very little talking or set up.
At least for me, the guys are a mixed bag when it comes to attractiveness. It could be the European part.
Scenes are long which is usually a pro for me, but with no story or set up, the length is just a show of the long, I would even say dullness of the content.
Bottom Line:
Asshole Fever is a site that I believe is love or hate. If you absolutely love anal sex and no story, it may satisfy you, but for me the site falls short.
On the technical side of things they do everything right. The newer scenes have video downloads from 140p to 4K. Those can also be streamed in a streaming player that works well. The picture sets are even good quality, around 150 photos per set and high resolution or low resolution download zips. The site works well, but when your content is this narrow of a niche, there isn’t a lot of work needed to keep the site from being confusing. You’re going to get basic, shallow, anal sex in each scene. I usually don’t look into European sites. My little experience with porn tells me European sites are often too straightforward (which may not mean shallow to you) and to the point. There needs to be more to keep my interest and attention.
The female models are attractive and if I could give the site a positive comment about their content, most of this is not violent, or ultra-hardcore anal. Some of the scenes even remind me of what other PU reviewers describe as heartcore.
The site is large with 854 scenes and they are updating -- not on a perfectly set schedule, but do average 2 updates per month. I believe once a site has over 500 scenes they are getting into the area of there’s going to be overkill when the scenes don’t vary much. That is what plagues this site for me. I have nothing against anal sex and have joined and enjoyed anal sites before, but without much communication between the actors, the lack of a story, there starts to be too much working against the site. I even wonder if the one on one aspect of the content hurts it for me. That I have seen there is not even a threesome scene. It’s all one on one and that does create a dilemma for me. Maybe I am thinking the anal genre, it should be more raunchy, or more hardcore, but it’s just not. The scenes are plain and I want to believe a less mainstream act like anal should be more than plain.
This may not even be a negative about the content itself. I usually do not like sites that find one set niche or genre and just do it to death. You can see the negative puzzle coming together. No story, no talking, anal, anal, anal, nothing raunchy or kinky, every scene, over and over. I won’t go that low on the score since I do believe my subjective opinion is hurting the score. The site does most everything right except for parts that I don’t like. It could be okay for others, then the high quality content would be a major pro. For me, I have seen better anal sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The biller is Epoch
Updates once a week and there are more than 260 videos
Uses a lot of warmup and lube to get the models ready
Cons:
There are no photos
You get only this one site when you join and that's not clear when you join.
I don’t like the clothes on the models
Very little variety from one scene to the next
No 4K downloads or streaming
Bottom Line:
It is no secret that most porn is marketed towards men. As a woman I like to see anal sex, but prefer when it is done where the female models enjoy it as much as the men. True Anal is a site where there are many scenes that I can relate to, but not really that I can point out as outstanding. The two with Jynx Maze are probably the best on the site.
There was initial disappointment -- I clicked to join Nympho and it brought up True Anal. At the top of True Anal there is a tab for sites. One is Nympho, one is Swallowed, one is All Anal and one is Anal Only. I'm not above admitting a mistake, but when you show "sites" on the join page, maybe it's just me, I think those sites come with a membership. Maybe I wouldn't have thought that if their advertising was correct. It clearly says "6 new updates per month". True Anal had 3 updates in July, 0 in June, and 6 in all the previous months. That made me think with only 3 updates over June and July or 25% of what they advertised and had established as their normal of 6 updates per month, the other 4 sites listed on the join page came with the site and that's where the other "updates" were coming from. They can take the blame for having their other sites listed on the join page or for only having 3 updates over 2 months, on a site that averages 6 updates per month. I also wouldn't have just joined this site. I was more interested in Nympho. Once I joined, the other sites required separate, paid memberships to access. I do think it's manipulation. The sites when listed in the guest area just drop down from the menu. Once in the member area the "sites" tab is gone and replaced with a banner that says "join all of our sites for a low price!" Shouldn't that be more clear on the join page instead of showing you the other 4 sites?
The director and male model is Mike Adriano. He is good looking, big but not the biggest stunt cock in porn and tries to make the models enjoy the scenes. The scenes start with an interview, where the models talk about how much they like anal sex and how much they are looking forward to working with Mike. He listens attentively and asks the questions. Most porn interviews on other sites seem superficial and a bit unbelievable, but these on the site seem a lot better. It sounds like two friends just talking. He gives them a lot of warm up stimulation both manually and anilingual, not really common in porn. He uses lots of lube, which looks like it makes the scenes easy for the models. Sometimes the lube is applied too much and the model’s butts glisten in the bright sunlight. Most cumshots I saw were internal, which to me is a bit of a disappointment. In some scenes, he pulls out and aims at her gaping butt. By far I liked those better. In some scenes she pushes his cum out. In some others she pushes it onto a spoon or cup and drinks it. For me, that is pushing the boundaries of sexy into a bit extreme visuals that I was not so comfortable with. The sex was reasonably rhythmic and not as forceful as some anal I have seen on other sites. The women are not wincing from discomfort and look quite believably turned on.
The site is good sized with more than 260 scenes, but there are no additional sites that come with your membership. Instead, you are offered a discount for some others that look interesting. You also don’t get any pictures, but I don’t care about that.
The scenes are basically a formula that works for you or it does not. The scenes are very similar and the set is the same. It looks like it is his house and often his backyard and reminds me of California. The models wear clothes that do nothing for me, just what you have seen on a gonzo type site for the past few years. Searching is not so great and there are far too few tags. There is no advanced search. Being Americans, I would have expected a few more that were Black or Asian or Latina, but most are not. They are mostly quite pretty, but are mostly the standard look of many porn models in older porn of a few years ago. There is quite a bit of makeup and hardware. I don't mind a few tattoos, but must add that many models have them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The title could trick some, this is a lesbian site, the trying anal isn’t with men, but it is what I like about it.
Only 116 scenes, but I found around 80 of those worth downloading. It is not updating.
Explores the way I want to believe most women would want to try anal first, with another woman, a finger, a smallish dildo, not a 9 inch penis.
Video quality is excellent.
Very pretty models including a lot that I do know by name even though I don’t know a lot of models by name.
Also works in some older/younger fetishes.
Cons:
It’s not updating. This is a site I really like as my score shows. I would join a site like this for a year just for this content.
Some poor acting, often by the older female models, does take away from the believability of some of the scenes.
Bottom Line:
This site does something most porn sites do not do. It takes a concept that is completely believable and makes it look like it’s really happening. I am basing that on the more exploratory sites. This is one of the most believable to me. A few models I knew by name Gia Derza, Nia Nacci, April O’Neil, who I believe is one of the best porn actresses in the lesbian genre. It’s nice to join a site with what I would call a small number of scenes at 116, but realize you downloaded more from those 116 than you did from a site with 4,000 scenes.
The scenes all touch on a curiosity and that curiosity is having their butt penetrated. Fingers, tongues, dildos all get some action. There is more to the scenes than just the woman getting her first anal penetration, not that I believe it really is their first. These are standard lesbian scenes with the guarantee of some anal play. These scenes are long to even very long. One is 75 minutes long. You get a lot of story, a lot of believable (for porn) nervousness, seduction leading to trying the anal and that to me, is doing porn right. It removes the feeling of they’re just doing it for the paycheck.
I could pick 40 or more of these scenes as my favorite scene. And that brings in the part I don’t like, it’s no longer updating. The last update was in 2020. The videos are high quality with all scenes having up to 1080p downloads and a handful having 4K.
I don’t believe porn makes enough exploratory scenes and other sites could benefit from looking into and considering adding exploratory. A lot of sites try it with the stepmom walking in with her stepdaughter trying to give a guy a blowjob or walking in on the stepdaughter trying to finger/masturbate herself. I don’t think those sexual acts are exploratory. Most of us figured out how to masturbate regularly or give a blowjob, or if a guy, how to give a woman oral. Having an older, more experienced woman walking in a younger woman putting a butt plug in her butt for the first time, that’s exploratory. I know many women who have never tried anything anal.
I do think there is a chance for disappointment with the site since I believe some will expect this to be guys with females having first time anal sex. Just from my experience and in talking to women, their first anal with a guy was accidental. Maybe this is too narrow of a niche to appeal to the masses, but it’s the very type of porn I look for and prefer.
The main deduction from the score is that it’s not updating. While I am happy with the scenes they have, this just seems like another wasted opportunity to make porn that gives you a specific niche you rarely see in mainstream porn. Maybe the actresses are just very good at acting and make it more believable. It would be one of my highest rated sites if it was still continuing to update.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A large channel with 568 videos.
I got the 568 video count from a listing of all videos under the Anal Teen Angels site, but see the con section to see why that count is not reliable.
-Almost all the vids have a matching photoset, a zip file for easy downloading.
-Almost all the vids feature late teen, early twenty models from Eastern Europe who are mainly white, slender, usually attractive.
-Each video features a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what the featured model looks like, and the thumbnails are gifs that show you a brief sketch of the video action.
-The earliest videos offer 160p, 480p, 540p from 2009.
-The default file name of a video includes the video title_model name_file definition. To be inclusive, you can manually add the date posted and the site name.
-Video runtime is 30 minutes or less for the early videos, but the videos of the last few years have a runtime of 40 minutes or less.
-Site is still updating in 2021.
Cons:
-Slow update rate. Site updates with 1 or 2 videos per month.
-Some links to download a video definition lead to a 404 error, page not found. So can't download the video in a definition that is supposed to be available.
-Many of the early videos are from other sites, like Devils Film or 21 Sextury. So when I say the number of videos is 568, that is what one page displays, and the pages add up to 568 videos from my personal count of the pages listed. But a different page displays 276 video total for Anal Teen Angels, and a different page lists 375 videos for the Anal Teen Angels site. And a still different page shows a count of 374 videos for Anal Teen Angels.
I only counted all the pages shown for the 568 video count, not bothering to count the individual pages for the other counts listed.
-The 160p and 240p definition videos are not worth watching: the sets are cheap, the lighting is poor, the picture quality is poor.
-The listing of videos in chronological order is not in order.
Bottom Line:
The site has a large number of videos.
All the videos I saw had some anal action, although there is plenty of other types of sex.
A solo girl might be playing with a dildo, but if she sticks it up her ass, that counts for anal action.
However, most of the anal action is boy-girl, where the guy sticks his dick up her ass.
So if you're into anal action, this site will give you a massive amount of hardcore anal sex.
But you also get solo girl, girl-girl, and girl-girl-girl action, as well.
It's like a smorgasbord of sexual partners.
The models are Eastern Europe, mainly teens to early twenties. A lot of the models are cute.
That you've seen featured at Teen Mega World, the Wow network, Teen Skeet, even some models at MetArt and other premium glamour sites. Some of the model names are familiar, but in the porn world, a familiar model can easily have a different name than the one you normally see her with. That's porn world, where a model can have 1 common name, or even 5 to 10 names at different sites.
Over the years, they upgraded the sets, the video equipment, and the videos have shown a lot of improvement over the years.
They started offering 1080p video maybe 8 years ago at this site.
They started offering 4K video around 2019.
The main value of the site is the large amount of cute teen models, doing hardcore sex, including anal sex.
The branding of these videos is messed up.
The site started around 2009.
The first videos used the "Anal Teen Angels" logo.
Then, in 2010, the videos used the "21 Sextury" logo, even though the videos had a link by the thumbnail stating "Anal Teen Angels".
And if you look at the early videos at the site, under the Adult Time network, which the site is part of, you can find a lot of videos with the "Devils Film" logo displayed on the video.
So it's confusing, if you want to search for the videos that belong to Anal Teen Angels, because, like I said, the site will give you different counts for the number of videos that belong to the site, depending on which page you are looking at.
Bottom Line:
Forget the purist approach.
By subscribing to the Adult Time network, or the Anal Teen Angels site, you gain access to a huge amount of hardcore teen anal sex, along with other types of sex. The site is mainly boy/girl, but there's plenty of girl-girl, with some solo girl and multiple girl sex. All the sex includes some form of anal play.
So for people who enjoy anal, this site should be a worthwhile sub.
And the Adult Time network has a boatload of other hardcore anal sex videos, as well as plenty of other hardcore sex action. The Adult Time network has around 54,000 hardcore videos, covering a wide variety of niches.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 18videoz network. You get access to 18 sites.
-You have network access to over 3,000 videos. That is a large amount of hardcore videos.
-Starting Feb 17, 2017, the site and network gives expired members free limited access to our website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in your member zone. If your password stopped working you can reset it on login page or ask our support for help.
-Starting Nov 28, 2016, the network offered 4K video quality for their latest movies.
-Many of the videos and photosets are exclusive. There are videos that have been sold to competing sites. So it depends on your porn experience whether you will come across videos you've seen before.
-Updated the video player (for streaming videos) on May 30, 2016.
-Vendo is the default biller. A trusted name. I've used Vendo many times over the years and never had a problem.
-All Bang My Teen Ass videos offer definitions of 272p through 1080p.
Cons:
-Even with a PU discount, the membership fee is very high. However, I found a holiday special of $59.95/year to join 18Videoz.com directly.
Normal PU discount is:
Monthly: $29.95
Multi-Mo: $39.95 (2 months, recurs $19.95/mo.)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (3 months, non-recurring)
-Archive site. Last update was Feb 2, 2015.
-Small site. 96 videos.
-Some of the videos can be seen at other porn sites, such as Teen Mega World.
-I wish the videos had brighter lighting, better clarity. For a 1080p video, it's slightly disappointing. I much prefer the videos at Teen Mega World, which seem more vibrant. And the videos at the Wow Porn sites are better still.
-Login is not secure. Member pages are not secure.
--Every so often, you have to re-set your password. I'm not sure if this is because it's a security measure, or if your password has been hacked.
-Ads on member pages. You click on the thumbnail of a pretty girl, and a different site pops up to join that new site.
Site theme:
Teens getting fucked in the ass.
Although the site name implies the site concentrates on anal sex, in my opinion, the site name is just a generic name that tries to attract anal lovers, but doesn't really live up to the promise.
Yes, there is some anal sex. But it's just a small part of the action. The site is small, and the action is standard porn with some breast licking and sucking, cunnilinges, blowjob, vaginal sex, and anal sex thrown in.
I don't think anal lovers will be impressed by the site: If you want glamcore anal sex, I think Tushy would be a better choice. Because Tushy is not only glamcore, but it definitely concentrates on anal sex.
I said the models are not impressive. Actually, the site features many of the same Eastern European models you have seen at TMW and the Wow sites and other porn sites. So the models can be cute, but they are not presented attractively. You have teen girls that, at competing sites, might be cute to extremely attractive, but at this site they just seem blah.
I'm talking Olivia Grace, Taissia Shanti, Foxy Di, Margarita C, Anika A and others who not only appear at TMW, Wow sites, but even MetArt and other fine photo sites. But the Wow sites make the models so much more attractive in their scenes, and even the TMW sites do a better job presenting these models. These models are fucking attractive, but their scenes at Bang My Teen Ass are disappointing. The girls don't come across as super-attractive, and the scenes lack heat.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
First, it's an archive site: last update was Feb 2, 2015.
It's a small site, with 96 videos.
The videos are meh. Boring, in spite of how cute the models can be at sites that present the models more attractively, in scenes with better heat or passion.
Navigation is easy, because it's a small site, and you get access to the 18videoz network, which has 18 sites to browse.
So there is plenty of hardcore videos at the network to browse, but this site lacks heat or visual appeal.
Am I spoiled by my long association with porn?
The site has many porn starlets that are just more attractive and show better heat at other sites, and that's why it doesn't deserve a higher score.
You're watching a scene in 1080p, and it seems like the colors are washed out and faded. I don't know if it's because the scenes are from years ago, or if they were shot on poor equipment.
But these girls deserve to be presented more attractively, with crisper images, with better heat.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large site (140+ scenes)
- Updates regularly
- Part of a larger network (Puffy Network)
- All anal
- Beautiful European models (many A-listers)
- 50/50 mix of B/G and G/G
- Multiple resolutions for streaming and download
- 4K available on most downloads
- High production values
- Easy site to use
- Lots of tags to help you sort
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Reputable billers
Cons:
- Not all models speak English
- Watch out for a pre-checked cross-sell when joining
Bottom Line:
As anyone who has read my reviews and comments here for the past 13 years will know, I’m a big fan of anal scenes. Further, if you add beautiful, petite young women into the mix then you can rest assured that I’ll be interested. However, for some reason, Simply Anal never made it onto my radar until recently.
I’ll have to confess that Simply Anal is also a bit different from many of the anal-themed sites that I usually join. In that it’s more couples porn or glamcore. Is this a bad thing? Not at all! I really enjoyed the scenes on this site even if they were softer than I would normally watch.
Because the site focuses more on sensual sex there is a slower pace and every scene features foreplay. While there may be the occasional scene buried in here where it is exclusively anal from beginning to end, all of the scenes that I watched included vaginal sex as well.
Another thing that makes this site a bit different from what I usually subscribe to is that there is an almost 50-50 split between B/G and G/G videos. But, because this site is called Simply Anal, even the girl/girl scenes feature anal play. I rarely collect G/G scenes but I make an exception when there is anal play involved, so I really liked this aspect of the site.
While I don’t collect a lot of European porn there are several models who I do collect scenes with. These would be models such as Alexis Crystal, Gina Gerson and Sylvia Dellai. Overall, however, all of the models have the look that I like – young and petite. The downside for others it may be that there is a lack of diversity: I don’t think I came across any model of colour here.
While this isn’t entirely on point, I did see Ani Black Fox (billed here as Any Black Fox) on a cam site recently and was really struck by her. She has a scene here that I find to be particularly erotic and, for what it’s worth, it’s as if seeing her on a cam site and interacting a bit has created a different level of interest. My exposure to her work before this was on much harder sites such as German Goo Girls and Legal Porno. I really liked seeing her in something quite different.
One of the primary reasons that I don’t download a lot of European porn is because many of the models don’t speak English. I find that dialogue in a scene can really add to it. It gives the viewer more of an insight into the models. Here, that problem does pop up. While many of the big-name European models are fluent in English there are many here who don’t seem to speak it at all. There are entire scenes where the models have no verbal communication whatsoever. (Oddly, this even occurred in Ani Black Fox’s scene even though she is fluent in English.)
Production values are high. Lighting, sound and editing is all top-tier.
There are currently 142 videos here with a new scene being added approximately every two weeks. There is a 50/50 split between B/G and G/G scenes so if you prefer one or the other there is lots to enjoy.
Downloads are available in at least four resolutions: 320p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. Bitrates for all are usually slightly lower than on comparable sites but the videos look great. The added benefit is that file sizes are a bit smaller. Roughly 90% of the scenes also offer a 4K version. Something I found odd in 2021 is that all scenes also offer one WMV file.
Streaming is also available in the same resolutions as above, minus the 4K.
The site is easy to use and it’s easy to find something you like. You can sort scenes by most recent or recommended or you can search by model. The site also uses an extensive list of tags. I have to give full credit to the site for such an extensive list, but I also found it a bit overwhelming because with each scene there could be two or three dozen tags affiliated with it. But, they are unobtrusive so it isn’t too much of an issue.
I don’t normally collect photos but I have to admit that this site is geared to photo collectors almost as much as it is geared to video collectors. Photos are available as singles and zips in two resolutions: HQ 3400x 2200 and LQ 1000x666.
While this review is intended of the specific site, Simply Anal, and this site does stand on its own well, it’s important to note that it is part of the larger Puffy Network. This adds a lot to the value of the membership. Five additional sites are included.
I use a download manager and had no issues doing so here. I found downloads to be consistently fast and stable. I didn’t encounter any limits.
The site bills through reputable billers so you can join with confidence.
The bottom line is that there is a lot to like here and it’s easy to recommend a membership. Whether you like B/G or G/G anal scenes, there are lots of each. Add in the 50% TBP discount and it’s an offer you can’t refuse! It’s a great site that’s part of a great network with some beautiful models at an amazing price. It’s definitely worth checking out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Jules Jordan has been making great gonzo porn for a long time and his site has been active since 2011, according to TBP, so this is another site with a massively deep archive. The list of performers on the site runs to over 800, though this also includes male performers - though you'll see the same male performers in many different scenes - Steve Holmes, for instance, is listed as appearing in 101 scenes on the site. There are over 2300 scenes on the site. Updates come at least every 3 days and lately they have been adding CamSoda scenes, which function as bonuses as they don't replace the every-3-day updates. They advertise that this site includes ManuelFerrara.com, but I'm not sure if all of that site is included as I don't see the latest Khloe Kapri scene from that site on JulesJordan.com, though maybe it w/b added soon. Both Manuel and Jules' scenes are incredibly well filmed, great production values, great camera work, lots of tease - 15 minutes of tease & solo stuff often.
Cons:
Honestly, trying to think of cons with a site this excellent is difficult. This is a site that I join for a month when they have a special a few times a year. If there were more different visions being presented on the site, or if either of them were as wacko as a Rocco Sifredi where you never know what they might do in their next scene, I might join & stay. Jules & Manuel both have their patterns of how they do scenes & that's what you're going to see here, very reliably, very professionally, very well made. The recent scene where Jules meets Vina Sky on the beach & takes her home & fucks her, could be a remake of the scene from a few years ago where Jules meets Amia Miley on the beach & takes her home & fucks her. If you get sick of Jules or Manuel or Steve Holmes, well, you're going to see lots of them on this site. I do see some remastered scenes being released without being labeled as such, if that's a turn-off. It's rare & there is so much new, it's no big issue.
Bottom Line:
One caveat to the lack of different visions - they did do a recent DVD called "Bad Cop Bad City" that has a style similar to Blacked Raw that is different than most of the material on the site - very fun stuff. I hope they experiment more in that way. The bottom line is that this is one of the best sites there is for combining great tease with great hard sex. I've never run across a problem with older scenes not working. Videos are offered for download in 5 different sizes from 360p to 4K. I've never seen the site mess around with "pay extra for downloads" crap. All of Manuel & Jules' scenes have photo sets that can be downloaded as zips as well as zips of 4K screenshots. The screenshots are 3840 x 2160. The photos download as 4000 x 2667. And their scenes come with photo sets of over 100-250+ photos. So if you're a photo fan, as I am, you'll be quite happy. These days TBP is offering this site at $9.95 - I'm not sure if that's only for the first months, but it's a great price for this site. I highly recommend it.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Note: It looks like the Teens Analyzed site and the 18videoz did a very recent update.
18videoz now gives you access to 16 sites, instead of the 18 sites it gave you until recently. Teens Analyzed is no longer part of the 18videoz network. This probably happened in the last few weeks.
The 18videoz site does not explain dropping the Teens Analyzed site from the network access.
I don't know if I'm considered a member of the Teens Analyzed site. Until a few weeks ago, I was a member, through my membership in 18videosz network.
PROS
-Join through the 18videoz site for $60/year. If you join through the Teens Analyzed site, you are charged $120/year. Both sites, until recently, gave you access to the same network sites.
I don't know if joining through Teens Analyzed gives you access to a few more sites or not, but in my opinion, paying a premium price for access to Teens Analyzed is not worth the extra money.
-18videoz.com network now gives you access to 16 sites.
Cons:
PROS(continued):
Until recently (within the last few weeks), you had access to 18 sites.
-Low cost site. I got a 1-year membership for $60, which is the current price for 18videoz site/network.
The current price for Teens Analyzed site (which includes the 18videoz network plus maybe a few more sites) is $120/year.
-The site and network is teen hardcore.
-Reality based porn.
-Not a lot of plot build-up. A guy and girl might tell each other hi, and then it's time to fuck. So no romance or build-up.
-Same login details work for all sites in the network you have access to.
-Video definition is mobile through 1080p.
-Site has 286 videos.
-The network gives you access to 3,278 videos.
-The content is mainly exclusive. I've only seen one video at the network that appears at competing networks.
-Customer support is Vendo. Which has a responsive live chat that is 24/7.
-Epoch is the primary biller. One of the trusted names.
-Unlimited downloads.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-They have changed the structure of the Teens Analyzed site. So I'm still unsure of how to navigate the site.
I haven't found the link to streaming videos. Maybe they will add streaming later, but for now, it appears to be dropped.
So it's much easier to download a video and watch it on my PC.
-Archive site. They advertise 2 updates per week, but the last update was November 13, 2018.
-Login and member pages are not secure. You get a popup warning from your browser that login details are open to hacking.
-Username and password are computer generated. Impossible to remember.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-A wide range of model attractiveness: there are some really cute girls, but little effort is made to present the models attractively. Except that many of the girls are really cute, and they don't need make-up or special costumes for their young beauty to shine through.
-Once in a while, you hit the login page link, and get the error message: 502 Bad Gateway.
-This is not a con of the search: but if you put in a model's name, you can find many models share the same name, so you have to check the thumbnails to see which model you are looking for.
-Default filename for videos is "fulllength-high.wmv", so you have to manually rename the files to show the model name, site name, etc.
-Once in a while your login details do not work. I assume the reason is the site is forcing members to reset their password for security purposes, instead of the password being hacked. I've had to re-set my password a few times every few months, because the old password stopped working.
-I think they updated the public page for the site. They now advertise that the network has 28 sites. However, if you count the number of sites listed, it's now 16 sites for the 18Videoz network. And the number of sites for the Teens Analyzed site is hard to determine. They also advertise that new sites are coming, but I put little faith in that claim.
-The coding for the videos is not efficient. A video file in 1080p with a runtime of 28 minutes 33 seconds takes 1.23 GB storage space. The video total bitrate is 6192kbps with a framerate of 25.00 frames/second.
BOTTOM LINE
-Site theme: First anal sex makes these teenies scream of painful pleasure.
That is the theme, but I doubt any of these girls are having anal sex for the first time.
Video runtime is usually 20 to 30 minutes.
Video definition goes from mobile to 1080p. That is for all the videos, even the earliest ones from 2012.
Maybe I was being too harsh when I said that there is no setup to the sex.
For example, one video shows a teen coughing, she calls a doctor, who shows up wearing a mask (and this was in 2012, before the Covid epidemic). He takes her temp, looks in her mouth, touches her throat, she starts stroking his arm (I guess it's different in Eastern Europe: if a doctor touches your throat, the correct response is to stroke the doctor's arm), she starts to giggle, and touches his shoulder, then starts stroking his groin (he's still wearing his doctor's clothes), then she takes off the doctor's mask, so he can suck and lick her titties, and it's time for the good old blowjob-vaginal-anal-intercourse routine.
I'm moving to Europe, where I can find some of these good-looking horny Russian babes.
I still think there is little build-up to the sex, unless you count a minute or two of a guy and girl looking at each other before the sex begins.
Actually, I'm surprised the quality of the videos is as good as it is. Many of the videos have professional camera-work (good focus, no jiggles from the camera), good lighting, an OK to a nice setting. But the main attraction is the level of attractiveness of the young, teenage models: you have some real cuties here, that you will have seen at many other sites: mainly Eastern European teen models. Teens Analyzed is one of the better sites in what used to be the 18Videoz network.
But I don't think the Teens Analyzed site is still considered part of the 18Videoz network, because it's not listed in the current listing of 18Videoz sites.
I'm giving the Teens Analyzed site a score of 69. That is very subjective.
The main objection is the membership price: $120/year is way too high.
This is an archive site. That stopped updating 2 years ago.
There are other cons:
For one, I think Teens Analyzed is no longer part of the 18Videoz network).
Another problem: they seem to have dropped the option to stream videos.
Another problem: the structure of the Teens Analyzed site is buggy: For example, the link "Bonuses" brings up a page that states "There are no such bonus There are no such bonus".
I think they are working on the structure of the site, and there are bugs that need to be fixed. The streaming option seems to have disappeared. The model listing seems to have disappeared.
I would not pay the premium membership to join this site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
With all the cookie cutter sites out there, Evil Angel is most definitely NOT. EA is a company that was based on the idea that they would provide a platform for their directors to do their own type of porn, as idiosyncratic as it was, and EA would help them distribute it, and help them make as much money from their work as possible. EA continues in that same vein today. John Stagliano's work is not like Jan Sin's work, whose work is not like Joey Silvera's work, whose work is not like Rocco Siffredi's work, whose work is not like Proxy Paige's work, etc. So when you're a member of EA, you're going to be able to explore a lot of different visions of what intense porn can be, by really talented people, and they're not fitting into someone's requirement of "it has to have this, that & whatever to fit in EA". I really respect the way that EA dealt with the pandemic. When they realized, it was going to affect their ability to create new product, they addressed it (more in botom line)
Cons:
I can't say that I like every single scene on this site, but that's true of every site that I've ever joined.
Bottom Line:
EA's tag line is "Life's Too Short For Soft Porn". If that tag line strikes a chord with you, intrigues you, makes you want to see what people can do with that concept, it's hard for me to see how you would be disappointed by this site. As I wrote above, they've got a large group of directors creating product that they distribute, and some of them - Stagliano, Silvera, Rocco - are easily among the best film-makers that have ever made porn. Joey Silvera makes almost all of his performers look better than they have ever looked anywhere. Rocco gets more intense performances out of his partners than they have ever had for anybody else. And Stagliano is just an incredible film-maker and a fascinating guy. Part of what I really like about EA is that it's an adult site in every way. They don't do things in bush-league ways & that pays dividends for the site & for members of the site. Mike Adriano used to distribute all of his stuff through EA. At a certain point, he decided to pursue his dream of having his own sites. EA had a good enough relationship with him that they host 4 new streaming-only Mike Adriano scenes every month. Promos for Adriano's sites & great content for EA members. EA has a great relationship with Adult Time, so they have partnered with Adult Time to present live shows throughout the pandemic & they also worked together on Riley Ried's recent "I Am Riley" compilation, which also included material from Riley's site. EA also did a porn-at-home series to provide more new unique content during the pandemic & encouraged fans & EA directors to create compilations of EA scenes. If you want to get more into what EA's film-makers think about the art & business of porn, there are videos where EA directors get into it in depth, including fascinating conversations about what is the difference between rough sex that is enlivening to all the participants and rough sex that is just using & exploiting the female performer(s). That's an important conversation for film-makers that are exploring the harder side of porn to be having. This is a site that is made to be explored. There are various channels that you can dig into featuring different directors. There's a huge list of pornstars on EA you can explore, and often when you bring one up, the site will display suggestions of other pornstars on the site, whose work you might want to check out. You could play challenge games trying to come up with any top pornstars of the past period that do not have scenes on this site. The site currently has 19,025 scenes, including bts & conversational videos. That's an incredible amount of material. There's a sexual preference lever so you can choose how much lesbian, bisexual or trans material you want displayed, if any. Current scenes have 8 options for downloads, from 160 p to 2160 p (4K). Photos per scene vary greatly. Some directors shoot hundreds of photos per scene, some directors very few. Photos can be downloaded as zips & the photos to be 1280 x 1920. I also really like that this site doesn't sit on it's laurels. They're always looking for new directors, they're often coming up with interesting projects, like the one they did a while back with cam girls doing their first professional shoots with top film-makers. I HIGHLY recommend this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good content featuring attractive US and Euro models in BBC anal and DP scenes.
-Good quality content and production.
-Good clean site layout, easy navigation, providing scene search and filtering by over 30 categories.
-Adaptive site design works well on mobile devices.
-Both scene and model listings linking to a detailed model info page.
-Updates presented as paged list of scene thumbnails ordered by release date, with detailed info and star ratings, with each thumbnail/title linking to a scene detail page.
-Scene detail page allows streaming, downloading, rating the scene, adding to favourites and adding comments. Model names link to a list of their scenes.
-Photo sets provided, viewable as a gallery and downloadable as ZIP file of 2000x1333 jpeg files.
-Good download speeds (if using a download manager) with no download limits.
-Video downloads are MP4 files at 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 864x480, reasonable file sizes.
-Includes rest of Smut Puppet network
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sell on sign-up page.
-Link to terms and conditions didn't work (got 404 error - page not found) so I had to find biller's (RocketPay) website and view T+Cs from there.
-On sign-up form you have to ensure that you check the box labelled "Send email" otherwise (I'm assuming) no confirmation email sent.
-Ads every time you log in and at the bottom of every page.
-Scene listings can't be sorted.
-Files always downloaded with the same name - you need to specify a filename yourself.
-Downloaded video files are very large (see bottom line).
-Probably not exclusive content (also see bottom line).
-Cancellation process involves emailing the customer service team.
Bottom Line:
The nature of the content on this site should be pretty obvious from the it's name. At the time of review there are 53 scenes dating back to 23rd September 2020, with 10 or so scenes releasd on that date with more batches of 10 released on subsequent dates, so the content has ramped up pretty quickly since the site apparently came to be, suggesting that the content is not exclusive but recycled from other sites.
Scenes last between 20 minutes and an hour and a half - with most at around an hour - and feature a variety of US and Euro girls, both young and old, getting fucked by one or more BBCs. Scenes are boy-girl, threesome and group sex and true to the site's name, there's anal action in every scene with DP in the threesome and group sex scenes. There are also a number of group sex party scenes with equal numbers of BBCs and girls, with some scenes featuring multiple guys teaming on one girl at a time as well as one-on-one during the scene. Most scenes end in facials though some end with cum on tits, cum in mouth, cum on body and a few anal creampies. There's no scene storyline as such, it just starts with the girl(s) having fun with some pussy play and sometimes toys before the guys turn up and get down to some hardcore BBC action.
Production quality is good and the video quality is sufficiently sharp thanks to the very reasonable around 8000kbps encoding used for the 1080p content, but the longest 1080p scenes are still almost 5GB in file size so you'll find yourself consuming lots of disk space for downloads from this site.
The site's functionality is good and responsive, offering everything needed to browse and download with ease, so the scene page provides a link to the model(s) info page which also lists her scenes, the scene page also lists the tags (such as creampie, facial, brunette etc) applicable to the scene, each of which you can click on to list scenes that also have the selected tag, so if you're after anal scenes, clicking on the anal tag will list all matching scenes. All tags are also available for filtering the paged scene listings. The pages are very responsive to window re-sizing: scene thumbnails grow smaller or bigger as you reduce or increase the browser window size and the site works very well on a tablet or mobile phone, so you can browse and watch content wherever you are, then if you like a scene, add it to your site favourites and then when you get to your PC, load up the site and download your favourites. With my ageing PC, I find good mobile site functionality to be a major bonus, as I usually watch the content with my tablet and save what I like as favourites, then use my PC to just download them using Firefox and the DownThemAll download manager.
It's worth mentioning that login sessions don't seem to time-out, so your login details are remembered and you can resume partially completed downloads - indeed I never encountered any issues with resuming a previously paused download from the previous day in the Firefox DownThemAll download manager.
The only gripe with this site are the usual advertising placements when you log in and at the bottom of each screen, though to be fair, they're not annoyingly intrusive and seem to be a feature of most paysites these days.
I mentioned that the content might not be exclusive and that the amount of updates on a single day indicates recycled content, but I can't say that I've seen any of the scenes before (I've seen a lot of BBC/interracial content over the years), so I'm happy with the content which is good quality and hot. If you like seeing young and old girls in interracial and BBC action, then you'll most likely enjoy the content offered here. At just over 50 scenes there's not a lot of content but this site is also part of the Smut Puppet network which includes a large amount and wide variety of other content so it's good value at $19.99/month and so it's a recommendation from me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Note – this review is of the TS side of Evil Angel
- Part of the original Evil Angel site
- The same high quality as with other EA titles
- A good opportunity to explore what may be a new niche to you
- Large library
- Some well known directors
- Broad range of niches within TS
- Beautiful models
- The usual EA download options are available
- Great filter option to select TS titles
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds
- High production values
Cons:
- 4K is relatively rare
Bottom Line:
I trust I’m not breaking any PU rules by reviewing a site that’s well known to most of us and has been reviewed many times – including by me. But a recent interest in a niche new to me and a hunt for more information led me to conclude that no one has concentrated on one unique aspect of EA, namely Transgender or Transsexual porn. (Note – I understand that TG or TS is the preferred term but if I’m wrong please remember that I’m new to this.)
I’m new to TS porn. Sure, I knew it existed but had no real interest in it. More recently I was reading some threads on another porn forum and learned that TS porn is widely popular and on another thread people were posting photos of their favourite TS models. I have to confess to being really surprised at how stunningly beautiful many of these women are. I vowed to explore this niche a bit more.
EA provided the perfect network for me to explore this interest with relatively little risk. I’ve been a member at EA many times and I trust them and even if I lost interest in the TS material I’d still get a lot of value from the straight stuff they’re famous for.
First off, EA offers a handy tool which essentially turns the site into a TS site. There is a slider by which you can select to include TS stuff or to show only TS stuff. That makes for a great filter.
EA currently has 2260 TS scenes on 228 DVDs, making it a good value for anyone looking for this niche. The titles are from some of the best known TS directors such as Joey Silvera and I was surprised to see TS titles from well-known directors of straight porn such as Jay Sin. (Though the Jay Sin TS scenes aren’t nearly as zany as his straight titles.)
The EA TS collection dates from 2001 and stretches into the present day. Obviously the older titles don’t have the same video quality. The older titles top out at 540p but by 2014 most scenes are available as high as 1080p. While the main EA site offers 4K on a lot of newer scenes 4k is relatively rare on the TS side of the house. The newer scenes offer the same broad range of download options as the ‘straight’ side of EA does, with the 4K exception. The range is from 160p to 1080p so there is something for all devices and download speeds.
Updates seem to be added these days with a new scene in a new DVD every couple of days. There is a gap between the most recent updates and those from several months ago but I suspect that this could be the result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
TS can cover some unique niches and all seem to be well represented here. There are scenes featuring TS models fucking women, TS models fucking men, TS models fucking TS models and men fucking TS models. There is something for everyone whether you’re a TS collector or just wanting to explore a bit.
This is entirely subjective, but my preference is for feminine TS models in scenes where they are in a ‘traditional’ B/G scene with a male. I seems that starting about three years ago there were a lot more models who fit that description coming into the business. Prior to that I found that a lot of the TS models were relatively masculine, but there is a current crop who are quite beautiful in a feminine way. I downloaded a lot of those scenes.
Because this is the TS side of EA, a lot of what makes EA a great site is here as well. The site is well laid out and it’s easy to find things you’ll like. The production values are high, in part because the same directors are making these scenes as on the ‘straight’ side. I’ve subscribed to a lot of Gamma sites (EA is part of the Gamma family) and I’ve never had a bad billing experience.
The site allows download managers and I saw download speeds nearing my maximum limit for my connection.
Broadly speaking, I think the TS material at EA will appeal to two groups. For those who like straight porn but also like TS stuff, EA offers a lot of both in high quality. For those like me, who are new to TS porn this is a chance to explore that with very little risk. If I changed my mind and didn’t download any TS scenes I still have all the value of the ‘straight’ side of the site.
So for those of you who subscribe to EA for straight porn, you may want to check out some of the TS scenes they offer, especially the newer ones with very beautiful models. For those unfamiliar with EA, check out reviews of the complete network and know that if you have a TS interest you can add value to the membership.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
All-natural female models with an emphasis on male/female sex.
Some of these models are knockouts! Mia Split, Romy Indy, Alyssa Reece are all worth looking deeper into their careers in porn.
Watching the guys try to have gentle to moderately paced sex with these beautiful women.
They are updating once per week. There are 988 scenes to choose from.
The video quality is high and the pictures are excellent quality, both are downloadable.
It’s easy to get around on the site, there are no ads and they have broken the scenes into pages so you don’t have to scroll forever.
Cons:
It’s romantic. I can’t believe I listed that as a con either. Everything looks so nice, the bedding, the curtains, and there’s nothing close to rough.
The scenes are repetitive and heavily scripted. Nearly every scene is right in the 25 minute area.
No more than 2 people in any scene! It’s porn! There has to be another guy around somewhere?
Bottom Line:
This site gets my attention with their all-natural models. I reviewed a site with mostly tattooed models not too long ago and questioned if tattooed people only have rough sex. This is the other side of it. Tell me it’s not true. These all-natural models do have rough sex sometimes, right? It feels like a social experiment or really bad job of stereotyping. I do like this site and really, I like it better than I expected to. I like Kink and a little edginess with my porn. There’s not much of either on this site. Mia Split may add a different twist to the site with her flexibility. She looks like the one that needs to be doing rough hardcore. If your body bends that much use it. I named off the other two too, Romy Indy and Alyssa Reece, they remind me of women I know. Which is the biggest selling point here. These women look like your next door neighbors. Maybe your next door neighbor’s daughters! I’m going to make it kinky eventually.
I did not list it as a con, but there is no story and very little dialogue. Maybe it’s just my newness to European porn, but shouldn’t this niche of porn have a story? Why are they making soft, passionate love? Was it a lucky Tinder find or did they just happen to walk into a house and decide to have sex? I do see it as a con, but the female models save it. The pairings with the males is also very good. You won’t see any foot-long dicks trying to squeeze into an 18 year old model. I wonder if they even paired these couples together for physical compatibility? I got that feeling in the Romy Indy scenes. There isn’t a long, 3-5 minute section in the videos of the woman trying to get the dick all the way in her. There is more focus on the man and woman being in tune with each other’s movements. That saves the site for me.
There are 988 scenes. With once a week updates they will be to 1,000 around the time my subscription runs out. The download options for videos includes all 988 videos having 1080p. I will mention the older scenes have 1080p, but not 720p, they jump from 540p to 1080p. The newer scenes have all the options from 4K down to two mobile versions, those also have 1080p and 720p, 540p, 480p and 360p.
I used to didn’t pay much attention to pictures, but have learned these more artsy sites have some really great pictures. The photo sets have around 80-100 photos in them. The resolution is 5800x3700 on the high-res download zips and there is a smaller resolution available too.
I may need to bury my head in the sand for saying I really like this site. I am sure I will want something rougher and kinkier to watch, but this is the best I have seen in the romantic style of hardcore. Can I get a vote for Romcore? I would recommend it to those into this style. I like it better than Sex Art and X-Art.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You can sometimes find a low-priced membership of around $60 for 1 year.
-A lot of cute models at the site and network.
-Videos offered in your choice of definition:
Download from mobile up to 4K.
Streaming offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
-Video runtime around 25-30 minutes, so easy to watch.
-Sex is basic, with oral, vaginal, anal.
-You get access to around 15+ sites in the network.
-Network has 3246 videos, 2256 models.
-Site has 182 videos.
Cons:
-Archive site. Last update was May 29, 2020. Before that, the update rate was 1 or 2 videos per month.
-Login and member pages are not secure, so prone to hacking. A few days ago, I got a message my account was blocked, due to password sharing. I've never shared my password with anyone. I don't know if the account was hacked, or it's just a glitch with the site server.
-Navigation is poor. Multiple reasons for this:
-The search engine is messed up.
-1. It only returns a minimal number of hits if you enter a phrase such as "redhead model".
I got 3 hits. Surely, there are more than 3 redheaded models at the site and network.
2. The search engine freezes your search term. After entering the phrase "redhead model", I tried entering a different phrase to search for. The seach engine returned the previous search, "redhead model", and wouldn't search for a new phrase. Even when I logged out of the site and re-logged in, and tried use the search for a different phrase, the site still showed me
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
"redhead model" as my search term.
I don't know what to call it, except messed up. And worthless.
3. They have a model listing, but it's only for the network, not for the site.
And they mix in the stunt cocks in the model listing. So you have to manually page through thousands of mdoels in the model listing to find the models you might like. Which takes a lot of time. The model thumbnails are small and not flattering to the models, and the thumbnails for the individual videos are small and not flattering to the models, which decreases your interest in the videos.
It's just a poor presentation of the site and network.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Network advertises "most beautiful amateur girls ultimate hardcore action".
But that is standard porn hype. Many of these girls are Eastern European models you've seen at many different porn sites. And I wouldn't call the action the ultimate hardcore. If you want over-the-top hardcore, visit Rocco Siffredi, or the Porn Fidelity sites.
-The photosets download in only 1 file definition. But the quality is just OK to poor. The photos are more like screen caps. What is surprising is the size of the downloaded photoset. Around 245 MB for a photoset of 102 photos. MetArt's high grade high definition photos are in that size range, and First Anal Date's photos are more like screen caps than real photos, so I don't know why the First Anal Date photos are so large.
The First Anal Date photosets are not worth collecting, even when the model is cute, because the quality of the photos is poor.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
In spite of a number of attractive models, the site does not impress me much.
The videos seem like home-shot videos, even though they are probably professionally shot.
The sets are just OK, not as nice as what you find at many competing teen hardcore sites.
Stats:
Videos: 182 videos.
Video runtime: 20-30 minutes.
Photosets: around 100 pics per set.
Photoset size: around 245 MB.
Photo quality: poor.
I would rather spend a few more dollars and get a membership in a porn site/network that will give me better quality content. It's not the attractiveness of the models, but the overall impression of watching home-made sex videos that is poor.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many beautiful American models. I found them all to be outstanding.
Segpay is the biller.
168 updates with a trailer and a photoset for each video
Fast downloads and easy navigation.
Nice production values, enjoyable scenes.
All videos available for download up to 4K
Cons:
Prechecked cross sale where you don’t expect it. There is a drop down box for yes or no.
I wish these sites would either start naming the filenames what the scene is or hire someone to come organize these scenes for me.
Bottom Line:
I don’t usually look for anal focused sites, but it was interesting anyway. The site is very professional in its production values as well as the selection of models.
There are many beautiful American models, 122 to be precise. Some I did not know, but many were big names in the industry. As I am sure people know by now, I am a collector of some favorite models and I found some videos here that I have never seen before. The ultimate pro Jynx Maze has three scenes that were new to me. A few others were quite good starring Kendra Spade and Chloe Amour. I loved Asian May Thai and hope I can find more of her scenes. She has that natural Asian petite look that I find irresistible, and she is a great performer as well. I would have preferred more ethnic variety, but at least there were a few scenes with MILFs for a variety in age. It would be hard for me to recommend the site by itself unless you're a collector. They have a few models I collect and this content is exclusive.
The technical quality is as high as you will find. The oldest video on the site has the typical 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K options and a 720p WMV option as well. I am happy with 720 HD, but some feel a need for the best quality available.
In June and July there were three updates. The older videos are not dated, so I don’t know what is happening here. At the moment there are 168 updates and as many photo sets for each. You do get value for your money, even if it eventually becomes an archive site.
Downloads were very fast and were as fast as my computer can operate. I was able to max out my system at about 80 to 85 percent.
I think they could make it easier by letting you pick your username and password. As it is, you have randomly generated usernames and passwords that you have to keep going back to look them up to enter them. I also would have liked if the file names were all unique. I did not see any reason to have to rename every video download. They also don’t have any scene descriptions, so you are not sure what you will get. At least there is a trailer for each video.
I found many interesting scenes, it's a good site overall.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An anal focused site with unrelated sub-genres. The main video page includes categories for: anal, anal creampies, gapping (which is really more rimming), and cuckolding (which has more of a foot licking with banging category).
- STILL updating about 1X/week
- While I like anal content I usually go for sites that are more well rounded. That said the sex here was good - but as you might guess unimaginative and repetitive. I really felt like the only thing that changed each shoot was the model.
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- pictures available as zips
- The older stuff features more established models (Janet Mason, Barbra Summers)
- Great Stars (but not their best performances) like Lauren Phillips, Kate England, Kaylee Hilton.
- New
Cons:
Pros Cont:
- New talent I haven't seen before: Black Angel, Cristin.
- The network includes 43 sites.
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring. Cams include Lelu from LeluLove.com. That's the site I never quit, so I was stoked to find an easy search for her stuff here.
CONS:
- It seems to me like they are recycling content from older DVDs? I'm not sure but it has that look to it.
- Formulaic to the point of being boring. I KNOW some of the talents they brought in is killer - but they fail to deliver good performances. Everyone's entitled to a bad day, but when you see great performers wasted over and over again - it's disappointing.
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks old
Bottom Line:
I'd give this a skip. If you want anal content there are much better sites. If you buy for the network maybe pass through here and see if you like anything - but I wouldn't spend long.
The dated design, the repetitive content, the underwhelming performances all combine to keep this from being recommendable.
What this site does have going for it is the price (reasonable) and extensive catalog. But short of that this site is middling in every way. There's no personality, there's no passion, there's no hook.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-As part of the Teen Mega World network, you get access to 30+ teen sites.
-The last few years, the site offers videos with definitions from 360p through 2160p (UHD).
Earlier videos are from 360p through 1080p.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-This is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. Based on the level of attractiveness of the teen models, the quality of the videos. They are not glam videos, but they are excellent quality: nice sets, nice costumes (nothing fancy or glamourous, just nice clothes), good lighting and sound control.
And the videos are, in my estimation, bread-and-butter videos, showing teen sex in different categories. That applies to the network.
The site features anal sex. Maybe some cock-sucking, pussy-licking, pussy-fucking, but each scene that I saw had at least some anal sex.
I don't know why the videos appeal so much to me. They are just straight sex. Not violent or abusive, just a guy and girl having sex.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
And since the site theme is anal, they include that as part of the sex. The girls seem to really enjoy getting fucked up the ass. Along with getting fucked up their pussies. What can I say? The models, which are mainly attractive to some really lovely girls, are having a good time. And I would assume the guys are too.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Login and member pages are non-secure (not https).
-The search engine is poor. If you enter a model's name, you get a bunch of hits that are not the model's name.
-If you want to find the model's content at the site or at the network, go to the model's page, and that will give you links to her content.
-They advertise daily updates. That refers to the network, not to the site. Anal Beauty site updates with 1 or 2 videos per month (with matching photo sets).
-The thumbnails of the models need to be upgraded to show how attractive these girls are.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-I wish they would tone down the moans, groans, screams of pleasure of the models, to make the sex more realistic. I assume the girls are having a good time, but moans, groans, and screams of pleasure are just too theatrical to be real. It's better than having the girls crying and moaning as if in pain, but are these girls really such nymphos that just touching a cock will start them moaning and groaning, and licking the guy's ass and cock and balls while emitting strange sexual noises?
I know some girls do get excited in sex, and make noises, but these models are directed to show excess enthusiasm.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: anal sex.
The site definitely shows anal sex in action. Along with vaginal sex, licking pussies, licking balls and cocks, licking the guy's ass.
So if you are into anal sex, this site should be a good fit.
Just turn down the volume if you don't want your roommates and/or neighbors to hear the screams, moans, bodies-slapping against each other. Although I wrote that the sound control is good, that means that you don't usually hear trains or airplanes or other extraneous sounds. But the noise these girls make is truly excessive. I know they are supposed to be excited, and enjoying the sex, but the noise level from the girls is just too fucking loud. And the guys, while not as noisy, are also told to make grunts and groans to show how much energy they are putting into the sex.
Having said that, these teens are fine-looking girls with lovely bodies. And they put on a sexual show for you. The noise might be excessive, but the basic action is not. And I appreciate that the sex is energetic without being over-the-top with violence or sadistic elements. The girls seem to really appreciate the attention the guys are paying to them.
Anal beauty is a fine teen site. With 144 videos and matching photo sets.
If you are into anal sex, the network has plenty of other anal content.
As well as a wide variety of other teen sex niches.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. Because the site is good, and the network is excellent, if you are into attractive teens having sex.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
