Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Clean & effective site layout.
Very attentive & friendly staff
Good quality photography. Well edited.
No 3 dozen shots of the same pose here
Sticks to niche well
Regular updates. 2 per day
Biased towards photosets.
Zips available in at least 2 resolutions & user defined custom zips are available
( 15 of the last 18 updates photosets )
Good value
Cons:
Still a young website. 58 models so far.
A few minor glitches with the website, which are in the process of being sorted out.
Bottom Line:
This site is catering to an undersupported niche well.
There is full nudity, both coy & explicit &
at times, for a refreshing change there is actually some shots of hose & shoes being removed.
Sets usually start fully clothed, & they seem amenable to making a feature of full strip sets.
The photography is very well done, without much if anything in the way of post work.
It is solo softcore although toys are present at times.
If you are looking for hardcore, this isn't it.
It wouldn't be fair for me to pass comment on the video as it is
not a thing that appeals to me, but at a cursory glance, it seems to be decent enough quality.
It is obvious this is a website presented by people who care.
If softcore solo photosets of natural pretty ladies appeals, this
site should hit the spot for you.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
*If you are into hairy girls, this is the site for you.
*The picture library is huge!
*Many videos to choose from.
*You can choose to pick how hairy you want your girls.
*Comprehensive search engine that narrows down your hair desire!
Cons:
*The video section is antiquated with a "volume" section that can tend to be a pain.
*The video section female models do not stand up beauty wise against the picture models and tend to be less "pretty" then the girls in the picture library.
*Archived videos are not thumb nailed and you have to just download the video to see what you get.
Bottom Line:
One of the most comprehensive hair lover sites around. Tons of pics of beautiful hairy women where you can use a great search engine to narrow that hairy search you desire. If you love women in fur, t his site is for you!
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- girls with a lot of details
- realy wonderful site with wonderfull girls with tits and pussies
- wide open pussies
- lips (long brown, and so on
- hight resolusion pictures
- wonderful girls
- tenne and older ones, ut not older than 30
- best update (day by day)
- girls with girls cum
Cons:
- some old girls and pictures
- some samall pictures
-
Bottom Line:
- really one of the best site with the best naturell and hairy pussies
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Huge amount of content
Daily updates
Cons:
In the last year or so the switch has been to more Eastern European professional model types. Prior to this switchover there were many more sets featuring American girl next door types. For this reason I would rate the latest version as having declined from being perfect to very good. Thumbs down!
Bottom Line:
Great site for fans of Eastern European professional model types with natural bushes. Fans of girl next door American types can still find tons of material in the archives, but don't expect any more significant updates
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large selection of attractive, hirsute models.
Large selection of high-quality picture sets. Updated faithfully. Easy to navigate.
Cons:
Many of the videos are of inferior quality. Some of the video graphers conduct awkward, painful to listen to, conversations with the models, in order to put them at ease, I suppose? In any case, they achieve the opposite effect in viewer and in model alike. There is also one photographer (SeanR) who uses a bit too much make-up on the various models, making them look like painted dolls rather than the attractive women they could be.
Bottom Line:
A great site for hair lovers. Highly recommended even though my cons took up a lot of space.
Follow-Up:
The sets by SeanR have become far better with less make-up and better flesh tones.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
# a sampler site that offers the young amateur, some milf's, and exotic international models in one site.
#enter the above model types into the same atk- style quality photoshoots
#Consistency: I've been a member three times without regret
#1024 X 1536 sized photos
#800,000 images; 1,300 models, and 4,000 images a week.
# Muff lover site; puffy muff hair really makes some of these shoots beautiful
# young and hairy section had great looking models; true 18-21 year olds- no posers
# Get great shoots with upskirt; lingerie tease, all shoots ending with "in your face" style hardcore.
#this site is milf, exotic, hairy, young, lesbian site in one-- great for those wanting to experiment without commiting $29 for one genre.
# I saved some of these shoots on my hardrive for later; and that always a sign that i'll join again sometime.--this site is on my rotation.
# This site does prove to me that older women can be beautiful and erotic.
Cons:
#Because this site offers the milf's; if a perfect looking body is your standard, then a quarter of this site won't appeal to you.
# scary hairy section will test you. Attractive models will have hairy legs in a few of the shoots.
#Wives and Girlfriends section did not appeal
#vids are shot in one piece- not segments
#Because this site is a sampler site; there's no mastery or embellishment of one genre.
Bottom Line:
#This is a sampler site; its like the entree at the restaurant. The eggs are not put in one basket. If one section doesn't appeal; there's still plenty to justify the price.
#If there is a site that could get you hooked on milf's this is the site. If you still don't like milfs after this site then you are likely never going to like them, because this site offers the best collection of milfs that I've seen.
#The same goes for those who want to sample exotics: indian, latino, international. without having to join an exotic only site to find out and still have the young amateurs with hot bodies good enough to strut their stuff on campus.
#site layout contains: Scary Hairy; women with hair that exceeds the bikini line; Young and Hairy: atk like models with hair; Mature and Hairy; Exotic and Hairy; Hairy Fun: masterbation; Hairy Lesbians, Hairy movies, and Wives and Girlfriends
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Wide selection of hairy models
Generally good search facilities
Range of good quality videos and photosets
Generally high level of model biography stats
Big site
Cons:
Cannot search for specifics like 'anal' or 'clitoris'
Videos are a bit samey - much hand-pussy play and dildo pussy play - little else
Heavy percentage of pics devoted to strip and showering (which may be an advantage to some!)
Some older videos disturbed by still flash photography
Bottom Line:
Good site for hairy models, good quality, well organised and indexed but with irritating omissions in search and content
Recent initiative has allowed 3 day access to other ATK sites (like Galleria) for minimal sum rather than full month payment
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of great pics
Good selection, and like how you can search for what you want
Very good selection of Videos
Cons:
No trial period
Bottom Line:
If you like women with a bushy pussy then this site is for you! If that's your nic I think this site is top in that field. I would certainly recommend it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I've searched the web now and again looking for the natural look, and this site I always end up coming back to.Not all of the content is excellent of course, and not saying all the girls are supposed to enjoy doing this, but from all the content there are only really 2 photographers worth looking at. Well that is all I've discovered in this site. However don't let that put you off stuff by R Williams and Sean R are very good. R Williams stuff has great angles, and he does great close shots including 'up arse'. Hs sets are usually around the 70-80 mark, and are in the same locations. Wait till you get a load of Sean R though...He is now the photographer with the most images on the site, and generally speaking his stuff is very good, and best of all most sets are well over 200 images, with some outstanding sets with great angles. Also, aside from a few most of his content is clear. If only his sets included full bottom shots like R Williams, I love them as I'm an arse man :)
Single zips.
Cons:
There is a lot of fuzzy stuff, I think mainly from Eastern Europe, and even if that wasn't a problem, the angles and the rest aren't up to it, when compared to Sean R/R Williams. Another note, some people are like me put off by hairy legs, but there are only a few of the models in this really scary hairy bracket, so not really a problem.
Their voting system is way to look at what other members consider 'hot' but I wish they had a forum (though they do respond to mails quickly) but would be nice to have a forum to request more posting of really good models. sometimes they just appear, which is a nice surprise but would be good if there was some interaction.
Bottom Line:
Aside from the cons, thankfully most of the models I like, and best of all 10 sets seems to be the norm, with some of Sean Rs going to 20 and more! A lot have a glorious hairy bush, which I find so erotic..So what I’d say is: go for it, but plan the visit around a period when you don't have any commitments!!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
#overall a solid good photo archive; out of all photo archives I have seen over the past year - the ATK Natural and Hairy archive won me over- it took the air out my lungs; and made me into a slut; looking through archives at cute, beautiful, smart women for hours.
#beautiful girls; includes attractive 30-40 yr olds; and well as the young and hairy; and scary hairy.
# raunch and rude style photosets: booty hiked up in the air in your face- skirt pulled up high; panties pulled up real tight. Relentless in-your-face raunch- pic after pic; legs spread wide; legs pinned behind ears. Its Quite different from glamour sites. Sets go on well into the 200- 300 pic range; others are less than that. 90- 160.
#raunch is shown by skirts and stretch pants with lint on them; panties that show wear and have stains on them- even skid marks.
#yet other models are very clean; with cute clean outfits and spot free panties and outfits.
#well balanced, exotics, mature, young, softcore, and hardcore
Cons:
#Wives and Girlfriends section should either be dropped or replaced - not a full section
#1024 x 684 mic in older parts of the site (sets made in 2006)
#navigation doesn't allow for key words, slowing down navigation for movies and sets.
#same panties are worn in multiple sets
# good resolution for a volume site- but not great. Other sites offer much larger pics.
# movies are hard to navigate.
#hardcore sets just begun; small section right now.
#you have to like hair; most are crotch hair; but some sets have hair on legs as well.
Bottom Line:
I was overcome by the power of beauty of ATK Natural and Hairy. This site is for you if you like bold; rather rude and crude poses. This is definately not a glamour site; or an art site. You get booties hiked up in your face; panties pulled up tight and in your face; legs spread wide; and even balance between softcore and hardcore.
the movies are not in Hd just WIndows at good but not great resolution.
Jasmine's sets made me blow my first wad. She has 8,693 pics; 40 updates; 5 vids.
The archives are deep. Young and Hairy; volumes 720- 1071. Scary Hairy; (18 -23yr old) vol 261 - 622; Hairy Lesbians; vol 32 - 56 (18-23);Hairy Fun 179- 291- masterbation; exotic and hairy vols 55-300
Like I said, ATK natural and Hairy offers just about everything good; mature, 18 -23 year olds; exotics; and lesbians; masterbation; vids are interviews; masterbation with fingers and toys. Overall, the vids would be better if I could find them better. No search boxes; just drop boxes.
Gallery lovers of softcore and hardcore will like this site. Mature galleries offer attractive women- different women will appeal to different people. Movie lovers will like this site- only if they can find them- have to look for them.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-tons of hair, and good niches as well
-photos are well lit and professional
-generally good looking models
-tons of photos
Cons:
-a lot of ugly models
-repetition repetition repetition
-uninteresting movies
-not really HD movies
Bottom Line:
i wanted something different so i thought id give this site a try. i joined mainly for the pix, and there are a lot! i started from the oldest where the pix were under 2 mp. unfortunately it seemed they didnt increase the size til 3/4 way thru the content. there are some great treasures in there, i found a fav of mine; Wenona! however, there are a lot of ugly women in there too. also as i said above, the model repetition was annoying. i know this is normal, but it seemed too often. after a while i even was skipping the hottest models
the video section was confusing, a lot of the videos low quality, models seemed bored. there were a few with interviews that were fun tho. also the newest videos listed as HD only download as 960x540, which is disappointing
beyond all my complaints, i joined for the pix and got my $$$s worth. however this is no abby winters quality pix and vids (even tho they seem to be straying for hair)
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Wide selection of models, videos, and pics due to a long standing in the community. They are one of the oldest working porn sites in general, but especially for niche porn. This is hirsute, hairy girls, and you can search for various factors, very general ones like "armpits" or "action." What's best is there is a little bit of everything "hairy" here. If you like solo girls, there's plenty of content. But if you like some action there is plenty of m/f and f/f content ranging from full frontal soft-core to full blown hardcore. What's more, most of the models that appear at We Are Hairy also appear here, such as Ryanne and Fawna. Video and pic quality is pretty good for the newer stuff, and you usually have a selection of about four or five video qualities (new ones often have HD options also). Pics are downloadable in a single zip file. Lately they have also been ramping up a lot more free cam shows with some pretty big ATK names, so that's been a real plus and I hope they keep that up.
Cons:
Search engine is a little dated and clunky. It gets the job done, but the way it displays results could definitely use an update. It accepts download managers usually, but only for a limited time. I find that if I wait more than a few hours it often shifts the page on me.
Bottom Line:
For niche porn this site has become one of the biggest and most well known. I have argued that it's a better deal than We Are Hairy simply because they both have many of the same models, but ATK seems to have a. a lot more content, and b. a much greater variety in that content, such as softcore vs. hardcore, solo vs. couple, etc. It's also a site that you will never fully rip, and well worth investing, and saving money in the long run, in the multiple month subscriptions. I would recommend three months easily if you are a hirsute enthusiast.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-the site claims over 1,500 models, 3 million photos and 5,500 videos and it is likely true
-8 photo and 3 video updates daily
-recent (after 2011) photos in 3 formats: standard (682 x 1024), Medium (1064 x 1600) and High (2000 x 3000)
-recent videos (after 2011?) in multiple download formats: Flash, WMV, HD MP4, SD MP4, and Mobile
-all natural-breasted models
-hairy models ranging from pubic hair only to hair grown out everywhere
-a range of photographers with different styles
-both soft and hard core content, but mostly soft core
-tour is very good in representing the content within the site
-custom downloads of photo sets available
-few toys (good to me)
Cons:
-the quality of photography varies (some use too little or too much light, an out of focus shot in a set, etc.)
-most models are white, amateur girls (see bottom line)
-sets are repetitive
-some unattractive models (to each their own)
-some photographers talk during the videos (not just during the interviews)
Bottom Line:
A site I keep coming back to time and again for quality hairy porn. The stable of photographers with their different styles and models (Argentinian, British, Russian, and American are common) means there is generally something for every type of fan of hairy women. The exception is ethnic women. They have an ethnic section, with at least one set a day, but compared to the other 7 photo updates a day, it seems slim. Models run the gamut from "WOW!" to "Woof" but that is a personal preference for each porn user.
The delivery of content is first rate. There are multiple formats, and with custom downloads, I have no complaints there. I can't say if it supports Download Management software as I don't use it, but downloads were quick for me. Sorry folks.
Some photographers are repetitive in their sets. LIL uses the same white and black background that drives me up a wall over and over again. Sean R is a fan favorite on the site and a major contributing photographer who specializes in gynocological spread shots. But there is a photographer for most tastes among those whose work appears on the site.
Like all ATK sites, ATK Natural & Hairy is focused on teen and amateur girls in largely indoor solo shoots. Some lesbian and some hardcore B/G shoots are on the site, But mostly it is girls stripping naked and masturbating with or, more commonly, without, a toy.
In all it is a good site for anyone looking for cute, hairy models with minimal toy usage, and lots of them.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge archive of natural women.
Huge variety of women in different shapes, sizes and colors.
Cons:
Some of the models don't wash before sets.
Some sets are repetitive.
Bottom Line:
Definitely the best hirsute/hairy website out there. I wish some of the models took a shower before sets. I like them natural, but seeing some things is a big too natural, if you know what I mean.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- FINE SELECTION OF RETRO 70'S SMUT
Cons:
- TOO PRICEY!
Bottom Line:
I really loved my time on this site and would've probably stayed on longer if it were more afforable, but it's most assuredly not. For what you get, it's highway robbery. But I suspect they knew darn well that only a select few retro connoisseurs would make such an investment and set their price point as high as possible to get as much of a return on their output. I'm clearly one of those insatiable guilty ones, but I took everything I could in the month I was subscribed to the site, and I promptly left thereafter. It didn't seem to be growing at any perpetual rate so I couldn't justify playing the game of wait-and-see. Perhaps in a year or so I'll re-join and catch up on what they updated since my departure.
Like I stated, it's definitely for guys with an appreciation for the gone days when women were on the pill and a creampie wasn't yet a fetish, but the only way to successfully complete coitus. Not that there are a lot of internal shots on here, but do you get the sense that there was some very serious dick gravy being deposited into those rank hirsute cervices.
It's all photos too so don't expect any video or anything. But overall I liked the site a lot. It could obviously be bulked up so much more, especially with those hefty entrance fees, but if you're looking for a singular investment then it's worth the price if you raid their catalogue and abort promptly. That is of course, if you're into the carefree sexual proclivites from your folk's heyday.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-There aren't many here other than the site complies with the premise of being hairy.
-There are some nice models.
Cons:
-The photo sizes are odrinary as is the quality. Any self-respecting site these days need to offer 1000X 1500 pix. Anything less is not worth the trouble of looking at. This site offers small, outdated pix.
Bottom Line:
This is such an ordinary site. it's not funny. There's nothing to gain by joiing this site. If you want hairy, go to atk, you 'll be loads happier.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Billing through CCBill.
-Great price through TBP.
-Part of a network of 1368 DVD's, 838 hours and 17405 GB.
-This site has 81 scenes, 51 DVD's, 169 hours and 151 GB. The videos are about a half hour each.
-DVD quality. It should be as they are all from DVD's, mostly the series "Cum on My Hairy Pussy".
-Mostly attractive girls. All hairy and range from a full bush to landing strips plus.
-No DRM or download limits.
Cons:
-No usable search engine. You can search by model name or by page and that is all.
-Many of the scenes are also available on the sister websites. All they did was put all the hairy videos in one place. This makes the network bigger without much additional content.
-The sex is mostly nothing out of the ordinary. Few have any plot and are not better than the generic gonzo you can find on any site.
-Not download manager supported.
Bottom Line:
I was impressed by the quantity and the video quality. Nice plusses, but without a better ability to search, all you can do is go through the videos one by one for 81 pages. You then download one by one. Too much effort for standard everyday porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Screenshots illustrate the action in the video clips.
-Screenshots also show what the model looks like.
-No DRM
-No download limits
-Easy logon: enter username and password. Occasionally you might have to enter the secret word, but that is easily read, not heavily disguised
-No inactivity timeout from site
Cons:
-No photosets for picture lovers (video screenshots only)
-A series can be very repetitious. They follow the same script, the female model appears in the same room you saw a different model in, and does the same movements, then the male actor shows up and the sex is very similar.
-The site contents and site variety is smaller than the main sites in this network. This is a site for "hairy" models, models who have some pubic hair. But the site needs more content and variety in the video clips
-The video quality of the clips is ok to good, but the value of the clips is small. There are clips with more excitement or interest at other sites in the network
-Most content is non-exclusive. You can see most of the video clips at this site on other sites at the same network.
Bottom Line:
Site has limited content:
Movies 118
Total size 46 GB
compare the stats above to Devilsfilm:
movies 1,000+
total size 2,400 GB
This site is for those PU members who prefer models with some pubic hair. This is a site in the netFameSolutions network, where you get 19 sites for 1 membership price.
The basic site layout is the same for almost all sites in this network. I personally like pubic hair in the female model, but that was not enough for me to enjoy this site very much, because there are other network sites that have content that is larger and more varied, and the quality is as good or better than what is found here.
The model while having sex often appears as excited as if she is waiting for her pot pie to bake in the oven. Maybe if I moaned and groaned along with the model, it might increase my enjoyment, but then I have to worry what my neighbors might think. They might think I was having a heart attack or some other kind of physical or mental problem.
One way to easily improve the videos at this site would be to shoot the sound editor. Many of the models are continuously moaning and groaning with fake excitement, and it seriously detracts from any enjoyment you might have in watching these video clips. The male actors also tend to make a lot of fake-sounding moans and groans.
My bottom line is that this is a site with ice-cold girls and limited content. Am I being overly harsh? The technical specs/quality of the video clips is mainly ok to good for this site, as is true for most sites in this network. But the excitement factor, the personal enjoyment factor you get from watching the clips at this site, is at the boredom level. Even though a few of the models might be attractive, if they are just going through the motions of sex in a mechanical way, with their obviously fake moans and groans, I don't think the clips have much value.
I've seen clips (at other sites) where the gimmick is that the girl is supposedly sleeping and the guy has sex with her. In those clips, there was more erotic content, more excitement, partially because you didn't hear the obviously fake moans and groans from the "sleeping" girl, and partially because it's simpler for the girl to act like she's asleep than to act like she's enjoying the sex she is having with the guy who is bonking her.
Even though a girl has a pretty face and a nice body, maybe the guy should ignore her and screw the door knob or the keyhole instead.
Better yet, the girl could use the doorknob if she found it more attractive than the guy.
This site is one of the less valuable in the network. Glance through this site only after you've checked out the more important sites such as roccosiffredi, devilsfilm, silverstoneDVD and peternorth.
I am giving this site a score of 70. If the site was not part of a nice network, the score would be much lower.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Epoch.
-Discounted price through TBP.
-Part of network of 26 sites.
-Emphasis on short skirts, nice legs, trimmed bush. Not overly hairy or just a slight landing strip.
-Supports download managers.
Cons:
-Has only 14 videos.
-Updates only twice a month so growth is very slow.
-Daily download limit for the network.
-WMV 720x480, 1462kbps or MP4 for ipod are the only download choices. The WMV is very nice quality but not DVD. I suppose I have gotten spoiled by better sites that offer better quality.
Bottom Line:
Since the site just started in November it has only a few videos. They feature a lot of nice legs in short skirts as well as nicely trimmed pussy hair. This has become more and more rare nowadays. Call me old fashioned, but I would prefer more hairy girls in porn. That is a plus here in that the videos feature a lot of angles that show off the pussies and a lot of guys eating out the girls. However, some of the girls are not all that attractive and there are just too few videos. The sex is not all that different from standard porn, but most videos have a tiny bit of plot. Ok site,part of a very big network, but not enough here to give a better score. Maybe with more time, but two updates a month is not a good sign.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 160 scenes with a somewhat erratic update schedule but it looks like generally they get around 2 scenes up per month. The club 69 network gets an update almost daily though.
- As far as I could tell all exclusive content, a lot of interracial sex with a black male model and mostly European models (some French some Russian good mix)
- All scenes have images but no zip and the quality is only medium (around 525px × 700) They do offer a slideshow option on the site that works moderately well.
- The site does deliver on the hairy promise, all models look very natural
- A mix of models, some mature women, some more overweight girls and several skinny young looking girls. Overall the site seems focused on natural looking women, pretty minimal make-up, not the most flattering light, and pretty standard action
- A lot of stockings, high heels and corsets.
- Good download speeds, no log-outs, no issues streaming content.
Cons:
- All videos are only 640x400 resolution, with some less than ideal camera angles (they seem to really like to film stuff sideways here) and rather basic light.
- No real search options. While they provide a search bar looking even for basic stuff like mature or BBW doesn't return anything. They really need a better tagging or content filtering system.
- While it's nice to see a mix of natural looking women, the site is too disorganized. There are 18 yo looking girls as well as very mature MILFS on the same page. It's hard to find the kind of model you're in the mood for.
- Almost all scenes have b/g sex, no anal, no group sex, very little solo or lesbian action. Some older scenes have a bit of a story to them while recent ones are pretty much just gonzo sex that can get a bit boring.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site not really because of the hairy aspect as much because of the promise of pretty spectacular creampies and extensive use of corsets and stockings on natural almost amateur looking girls.
On both accounts the site delivers pretty well. All scenes I looked at ended with a creampie or the guy cumming oh her vagina, a nice change to the pretty standard facial at the end of most porn clips.
Also the vast majority of scenes start with the girls in some sort of corset/ bodystocking and a lot of them keep it on the entire time, making for some pretty hot, almost clothed sex scenes.
That being said the technical quality of the videos killed the mood for me. You only get one download option as wmv at 640x400 or you can stream the same quality scene as a flash movie. Even worse the scenes are often not lighted well so you get very dark zoom on the woman's vagina, considering all the girls are hairy/ natural looking and the male model is often black good luck seeing what is going on in the dim lights.
Another disappointment was the lack of a good search option. There is no real way to separate the younger looking models from the older ones. There is no way to select only the handful of lesbian scenes and good luck finding all scenes where the girl does deep-throat.
Bad webdesign, bad video quality, but decent looking models (if you like natural/ amateur looking girls) and pretty okay action.
The one reason I say pretty okay action despite the good cumshots and outfits is that oftentimes the camera work is bizzare. They focus too much on close-ups with several scenes not even showing the girls face until 4-5 minutes into the scene. There are also a lot of strange cuts, one moment she is giving the guy head, the next they are having sex, no transition just a rather strange jump. Add to this tons of side angles and you have some rather odd video choices.
To make things a bit more complicated there are several scenes where this doesn't really apply, the lights are better and the angles less extreme, leading me to believe that they get the content from several directors. However there is no way to tell what is what. Better content tags would have really been helpful here.
The bottomline is that I enjoyed about 30% of the content on the site and the rest of the network did offer some nice action with mature women, but overall the experience was rather disappointing. Higher resolutions and a more modern web design are absolutely necessary for this site, until they make these changes I'd only recommend this to hardcore fans of natural looking women.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
