Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company FuckingCash Co.
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-11 of 11  

Visit Just Teens Porn

1. Just Teens Porn (0)

Twotails (2) 07-26-14  05:12am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Many extraordinarily beautiful exclusive (I think) scenes with unbelievably cute girls that look very young.
- Lovely style of hair, clothing (simple neat girlstyle), making-up and action.
- Not much anal and toying, most gb, some g and some gg (for others, this is a -)
- After tubing a lot, this was one of my few "wanna-see"-sites. Everything I saw in preview pics (also on the site itself) is there, but much more and much better quality :)
- As far as I can judge it, fast download (up to 1200kps with windows downloader, 6 downloads at the same time; not tried Download Managers; my internet connection may be limited to 1200kbs). AVI and WMV, most HD 1280x720
- only paid $50 for 60 days (non-recurring).
- On day 61 I could enter also exclusiveteensporn and dug out many nuggets there..! That was a real bonus :D
Cons: - The site is not very modern. Thus, e.g. You won't find FullHD movies!
- Photo quality (see bottom line) - Some picture galleries are only made of pictures taken from the video!
- No search for models! You have to go through the video list. At least, vid sets got the same name as the corresponding pic sets.
- Different models have the same name within the site! And of course the models have different names here as in the Diesel Network.
- Not very much content compared to other sites, but it's enough for some good sessions.
- almost no more updates (1-2 per month)
- no account area (where you could e.g. renew or give a new emailadress)
- Except for ETP, the other bonus sites they promise, are not worth mentioning (though little nice content I found in MyLovelyGirls).
Bottom Line: - Most photos come in about 8MP resolution, others are simply 1920x1080 shots out of the video (but the video with this resolution is not available, unfortunately :(). Compared to some sites (TMW), this is good, compared to others (Diesel) bad. If in doubt, go to ExclusiveTeensPorn for higher resolution pics.
- There are about 200 (forgot the exact number, but really doesn't matter - quality ways before quantity, in my case) sets each video and photo.*
- Some of the girls are also to be seen in other scenes in the Diesel Network. To me it seems there are the same producters behind.
- JTP seems to be the predecessor to exclusiveteensporn (where you though can't find FullHD either, but a much better navigation structure AND better photo quality).
- It was not possible to get an offer for renewing membership by email; no problem but a little bit strange.

I gave 88 points at time of writing review. Set it down to 82 some days after because they could deliver better quality (video: FullHD, photo: at least 10MegaPixel). Would be 90 with state of the art quality, better navigation and unambiguously naming the models, 93 when ExclusiveTeensPorn was integrated and more if additionally there were more model diversity.
Had another look at the best sets and give it 84, because these sets are so lovely.

For my porn taste, it's an absolute must-see site. There are some scenes that are indispensable in (my) collection. From this point of view, I'd give 100 points.

The cons mentioned don't really spoil it. If you can't find anything indispensable in preview images, then you can easily stay away and find better sites.

*For heavy users, 1 month is more than enough to get what you want! I'd suggest the following membership plan: 1. one month ExclusiveTeensPorn, 2. one month JustTeensPorn. 60 bucks won't bring your budget off-balance I hope but YOU to new highs :)
They sell very good stuff and they know it.
But enter via ETP, 'cause of the photos - but Miriama won't be there, unfortunately.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Sugar Paradise

2. Sugar Paradise (0)

lk2fireone (196) 10-15-12  11:54pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The photosets and videos are dated by when they were posted to the site.
-The zip file for each photoset has the name of the model in the filename.
-There is a small bio for each model. Gives her name, age and hair color.
Also gives some background on the model, which is probably fiction.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Good download speed. I got 1.0 to 1.4 MB/sec at this site (which is my maximum download speed).
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Because the videos are so short (3 to 4 minutes runtime), the file size is very small: 50 MB or less.
Cons: -On login, have to enter a captcha, which is a moving string of 5 numbers. You have to watch the captcha for a minute or two, to try to read all the numbers, since the string is moving on and off the screen. Just a minor annoyance, but it indicates poor site design, along with a bunch of other site design problems. Logging into Met-art or Erotic Beauties, major porn sites, is so easy and effortless. Why can't other sites make it easy to log in?
-Archive site. Stopped updating in 2009.
-Although photosets download with the name of the model and a unique number, videos download with the default filename of "full.wmv" or "full.avi" (depending on whether you chose the wmv or avi file format).
So you have to rename each video you download, to know what model is in the video. And there's no description on the site of what the video is about.
-Navigation is very basic.
-No search function.
-Site only has 3 models. Very limited selection of models.
Bottom Line: This is a very softcore teen site.

Their model listing consists of 3 models:
Diana, brown hair
Liza, black hair
Nika, blonde hair

I thought at first I was mistaken. Where are all the different models? But those three models are used for all the photosets and videos. So if you
like those three models, you will find plenty of photos and videos with them.

There is very little eroticism. Very little touching themselves. No masturbation. Little or no spreading of the legs. This is really very
softcore. Met-art is the biggest teen softcore site there is, for photographs. But the Met-art photos, if you can imagine, are harder edged than what this site offers.

In a way, that's good. It almost makes you feel like a "clean" pervert looking at these innocent photos of naked teens.

No boys at this site interacting with the girls. This is a girl-only site.
In some of the photosets and videos, there are two girls. But the only touching between the two girls is girly innocence. I mean, these girls
hardly ever kiss the other girl softly on the lips. They are playing around, maybe touching one another's arm or leg. But really innocent. This
is the very softest of softcore.

Site statistics:

Number of photosets: 167
Number of photos per set: around 70+
Each photo has 3 sizes: Low Res., Medium Res., Original size. The original size is between the low res and the medium res.
Original res dimensions: 800 x 1200 pixels, or 1500 x 1000 pixels
Each photoset has a zip file option. You can download a zip file in your choice of low res, medium res, or original size.

Number of videos: 88
Video runtime: 3 to 4 minutes.
Frame width x height: 720 x 480
Total bitrate: 6096 kbps

You can download the videos as WMV or AVI files.
There is no choice of definition for the videos. Videos download in one definition only.

The videos are really short. A lot of the videos have a runtime of 3 or 4

minutes. The video file size is small, 50 MB or less.

The videos have more tease to them than the photosets. There is stripping in the videos. But it's done in a girlish way, very innocent, not even midcore, just young teens taking off their clothes and playing in an innocent manner to an unseen audience. No sex, no masturbation, very
little touching of their own body, no spread legs, no close-ups of the groin or ass.

The videos are poor to just OK. The girls go in and out of focus, which is annoying. This is not an artistic effect, but the camera operator just
can't keep the model in focus, even though she is barely moving from one spot to another. The camera operator is definitely not a professional.

There is no story line to the videos, it's just a girl or 2 girls getting naked, moving around, flashing parts of their bodies. They are interacting with the camera, being teasing, but innocent.

The lighting is OK, the colors are OK. These are scenes shot indoors, so the lighting is easily controlled, and there is little or no annoying
random noises in the soundtrack. The soundtrack is canned music, which I wouldn't mind hearing eliminated. But I've heard worse canned music.

The site design and navigation is basic but acceptable. There is no search function. But you have pages listing the photosets, and other pages
listing the videos. The listing shows what model (or sometimes 2 models) is in the photoset or video. But there is no description of what the
photoset or video is about. But then again, it's basically a girl getting undressed, and flashing her body at the camera. That's it. No script, or

I am giving this site a score of 70. But I think, unless you know that this is a very softcore site, with just 3 teen models, and that it hasn't updated in over 3 years, and that the photos and videos are poor or just OK in technical quality, you will be disappointed you spent your money on this site.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Pearl Teens

3. Pearl Teens (0)

lk2fireone (196) 09-22-12  07:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The only reason I am writing pros is because PU wants a balanced review. But basically, this site has little or no value. Anyone who subscribes to this site is wasting their time and money.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-DownThemAll manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Some videos can be downloaded as either MPG or WMV files. Some videos only have a WMV option.
Cons: -Zip file for each photoset downloads with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename the zip to know what photoset you have downloaded.
-Video files download with a generic default filename. So you have to re-write the filename to know what the video is. And since the model is not usually identified, and there is no description of what the action is, you make up your own description if you want to save the file.
-No streaming option to view the video before downloading it. So, you have to download each video and play it, before you can decide if the video is worth viewing or saving.
-But there are only 13 videos at this site, and none of them are worth saving. Or even viewing.
-Only have one option for the videos and photosets for definition. No high, medium or low choices.
-The photosets and videos are very low definition.
-This is an archive site. No updates in years.
-Tiny site. 13 videos. 55 photosets.
-Navigation is primitive.
-No search.
Bottom Line: CONS(continued):

-No posting date for videos or photosets.
-No model bio data.
-No models are named in any of the photosets.
-A few models are named in a few of the videos. But most of the models in the videos are not named.
-The video files are very low definition.


Site stats:
Number of videos: 13
Video size: 320x240 352x240 720x480
Total bitrate: 712 kbps 1628kbps
Different video files will have their own specifications. You don't get a choice of specifications. Most of the videos have the low 320x240 size. A few have 720x480, but even then, the video is poor, maybe from lack of focus or other factors.

Number of photosets: 55
Photo dimensions: 768x1152p or 1024x683p
Number of photos per set: 33 to 141

This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. The content was made years ago.

You get better looking photos at archive sites like My Precious Vigins and Teen Stars Magazines, as well as better looking models at those other sites.

If you like this style of photography, Amour Angels is a site that is still updating, and has superior photography and more attractive models, as well as superior site design.

There are some cute models at this site, and their photosets are OK. Not great, but OK. And if you're already a member, it's pobably worth saving some of their sets for completeness.
The videos are worthless, because of the low definition. Even if some of the models are cute, the picture is so poor no PU member would waste his time watching these videos.

Bottom line:
Because of the small amount of content, the poor quality of the content, poor site design, most PU members would give this site a miss.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Magic Porn

4. Magic Porn (0)

lk2fireone (196) 09-18-12  12:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Content is dated. The video dates range from November 2006 thru November 2008. The photosets are from 2007 and 2008.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can download the videos.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-DownThemAll file manager works at this site.
Cons: -Primitive site layout.
-No search.
-Archive site. No updates.
-Videos are from years ago. The definition is very low.
-Videos download with the default filename of full.avi or full.wmv. So you have to re-name each download, or else the succeeding videos will either over-write the previous video, or it won't download. Also need to rewrite the filename so
you know what the video is about.
-No model bios.
-Models not named in the videos or photosets.
-No streaming option for videos. Have to download the file to watch.
-Only one definition for each video.
-Only one definition for each photoset.
-You have a thumbnail illustrating each photoset and video. But the thumbnail is so small, and such poor quality, you don't really know what the model looks like.
Bottom Line: Videos:
Number of videos: 106
Width by height: 360x240 or 288x216
Total bitrate: 1340 kbps or 216 kbps
Runtime: 8 to 23 minutes

Number of photosets: 532
Number of photos per photoset: 70 to 170
Photo: 370x560 pixels or 600x336 pixels or 768x1024 pixels

This is a hardcore teen site.

Because of the low definition of the videos, they are only useful as a reminder of the early days of internet porn. No one who has access to most internet porn sites today would want to watch, or be satisfied with, the low-definition videos available at this site.

I didn't save a single video from this site. The girls might be attractive, but they are so blurry, and the videos are so low-definition, it's just a waste of time looking at them.

The photosets are like screenshots. The photoset is usually like a video-capture of a video shoot. So there is no posing for best effect, no artistic or sensual value to the photos. The colors are poor.

The truth is, I've been spoiled by the good and fine and excellent quality of the videos and photosets at today's porn sites. Looking at the content of this site makes me realize how far we've come in a few short years. This site might
have some curiosity value. But comparing the contents to what is available at other sites, this site is a waste of time and money.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Best Fucked Teens

5. Best Fucked Teens (0)

lk2fireone (196) 09-09-12  03:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Can download videos as AVI or WMV files.
-Can download a video as a single file, or download segments of the video.
-Can use a download manager. I used DownThemAll.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got about 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
Cons: -Content not dated.
-The zip file for a single photoset offers only one size definiton. There is no low, medium, high quality choices.
-The models in the photosets are not named.
-You only get a single, low-definition choice for the videos. No medium or high definition option. And the low-definition is really poor, 400x300.
-The photosets download with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename each download, or the following zip files either won't
download, or will over-write the previous "gallery.zip" file.
-The captcha on login is hard to read.
-No search function.
-Navigation is basic.
-I found no videos worth keeping.
-The photos are better quality than the videos, but I found no photos worth keeping.
-No streaming. Have to download a video to watch it.
-No model index.
-No model bios.
-Some WMV video files can't be played, because neither Windows Media Player or VLC Player could recognize the file's input.
Bottom Line: Site specs:

Number of videos: 38
Average runtime of video: from 10 to 40 minutes.
Videos can be downloaded in AVI and WMV format.

AVI files:
400x300 width x height.
1,213 kbps total bitrate

WMV files:
400x300 width x height.
1,214 kbps total bitrate

Number of photosets: 219
Average number of photos per set: from 25 to 40.
Photo dimensions: 768x1024 pixels.

The number of photosets seems large. Certainly far larger than the 38 videos. But the reason for the large number of photosets is that photos of
a single video shoot are often separated into a number of photosets, so that the site contents appear larger. A single photoset is small, usually between 20 and 40 photos.

This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. Even though the content is not dated, I believe the content was shot years ago.

The video quality is poor. There are many reasons for the poor video quality. The main factor is the low definition of the videos. You only get
one definition in the video, and this is such a low definition that you see lines in the video on playback. This is such a low-definition video
that it's lower than the lowest definition offered at major sites like Teen Mega World or Nubiles. The colors in the videos are poor. The
costumes the models wear are cheap. The sets are cheap.

The models can be good looking, and they can put on a good show sexually. But they are wasted in these low-quality videos.

The photos are better quality than the videos. The video quality is just awful. The photos are decently photographed softcore and hardcore. Not
artistic, or sensual, but ok shots of hardcore action. The photos are low-definition, very little production values, but still better than the god-awful videos.

This site's contents might have had some value maybe 10 years ago. But compared to what is being offered today at other teen sites, this site is a waste of time and money.

Truthfully, you will find better quality videos at free tube sites than what you can find at this site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Exclusive Teen Porn

6. Exclusive Teen Porn (0)

lk2fireone (196) 09-06-12  03:36am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Most photosets have zips for high, medium, and low res.
-Can search by name of model, by tag (such as blowjobs), etc.
-Each photoset and videos is illustrated with a nice-sized thumbnail of a scene from the shoot, which gives a view of the model. The thumbnails
could be higher quality, but it gives you a basic idea of what the model looks like.
-Content is dated, by when the content was posted to the site.
-Most video shoots have a matching photoshoot. This is good and bad. It increases the content for each girl. But the photoshoots are basically a photo capture of the video shoot. And the photoshoot could easily be improved by using professional makeup on the model, as well as having a professional photographer taking the pictures, so the photos would be better posed, better framed, be more erotic or attractive.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Videos can be downloaded as AVI or WMV files.
-DownThemAll download manager works.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.

-Video files download with the file name "full.avi" or "full.wmv". So you have to rename each file, or succeeding files won't download into the same folder destination. Also have to re-name the file so you know who the model is, and what the video shows.
-Most photosets are a photo shoot of the corresponding video shoot. So the model is not posed to her best advantage. The model's make-up is not professionally applied. The photos are better than screen caps, but not by much. The photos are not high quality or professionally shot.
-You have some very attractive or cute or lovely models, but the photosets do not take advantage of the model's attractiveness. A wasted opportunity.
-The number of sets per model is completely random.
-Captcha is a little tricky. Could be easier to read.
-Site navigation is primitive. Makes you wish for sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel network, or any other site that is well-designed and easy to use.
-Quality of vids and photosets varies from poor to just OK. Makes you wish for high quality sites, or even just good quality.
-Occasionally some links don't work. You click on a link to stream a model's video, and you get a more-or-less blank page instead of the streaming video.
-Update rate: Slow. One video and one photoset per week.
-Even though streaming a video is easier than downloading the file, the stream degrades the picture slightly. So you are better off downloading the video and playing the file, for better quality viewing. But video quality at Teen Mega World is better. And the video quality at Diesel network and sites like X-Art is even more superior.

Site stats:
Number of videos: 210
Runtime: averages about 21 minutes.
Videos can be streamed or dowloaded.
Download as WMV(1280x720) or AVI(1280x720) files.
The file specs are for the more recent files.

Number of photosets: 217
Number of photos per set: about 120 - 160 photos.
Zip files for high, medium, and low resolution.
The difference in resolution between the high and medium and small is large:
High resolution photo: 5616x3744 pixels
Medium resolution photo: 1666x2500 pixels
Small resolution photo: 682x1024 pixels

On the high resolution photo size, you have each photo taking up 6 MB or more, with attractive models, and the photos are a waste of space: the
models don't appear attractive, the shots are not professionally framed, the film colors are not vibrant, etc.

On the small resolution photo size, each photo takes up 200 KB or more space, which until a few years ago would have meant a high resolution
photo. And the photos are just a waste of space: poorly photographed photos, with no production values. Shot by an amateur who has no feel or
artistic talent. You are shooting lovely girls, and ruining the opportunity, because the photos have no value.

Number of models: 177

There are a large number of Eastern European teens, many of which are featured at other porn sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel, Nubiles. The
same models are presented more attractively at the other sites: Better photography, better videos, better makeup, better costumes.
Even the recent content looks like it was shot by an amateur. A really home-made feel, and that is not a compliment.

Navigation is primitive, making it hard and time-consuming to search the site.

Bottom line: In spite of many attractive teen models, this is a poor choice.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Tasty Teen Video

7. Tasty Teen Video (0)

toynoise (1) 10-04-10  04:54pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Fast downloads.
Cons: 1. Hardly any hardcore content - I count 8 scenes. Yes - *8*
2. No streaming
3. Tesco self-service has better navigation. Hit and hope.
4. The day after signing up, my email account is hacked and starts sending out porn spam. For the first time. Coincidence...?
5. One bonus site not accessible. About three others have no video content.
Bottom Line: Christine O'Donnell would approve of this network.

One of those 'bundle' sites, with each site containing a tiny handful of randomly assembled scenes (if you're lucky) and then no further updates. Sit back and watch the money roll in. I'm in the wrong business...
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Exclusive Teen Porn

8. Exclusive Teen Porn (0)

slutty (111) 04-21-10  07:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Attractive euro models
-Good video quality, 1280x720 10000 kbps, pretty crisp
-Decent selection of bonus sites, although some are only available as loyalty sites
-Photo quality okay, 1024x760 typically
-Zip downloads available
-Decent download speeds, 1 MB/sec
-Download managers work
Cons: -Smallish collection, 100 or so videos and 114 photo sets at the time of this review
-Very poor navigation, no real search function, most video sets dont even provide a model name.
-Camerawork isn't very good in most videos
-Models don't always seem very interested
-A bit too "gonzo" for me
-Expensive for what you get
-While you get access to several bonus sites - many are either no longer updating or not exclusive
Bottom Line: I'd say this site is acceptable, if it were a bit cheaper I might recommend it a little more highly. There are some good videos on this site that I will definitely keep, but the many negative issues with the site are quite a drawback.

When I joined you get bonus access to the following sites:
HDteensvideo (144 video sets, 68 photo sets)
bestfuckedteens (36 video sets, 219 phot sets)
pearlteens.com (13 video sets, 85 photo sets) - don't think exclusive
teensamateurvideo (129 video sets, 289 photo sets)
fucking-young (130 videos - most in parts only, 1000+ photo sets) - not exclusive
And several other pretty much worthless non-exclusive sites.

The navigation of all of these sites is pretty much the same, you click on photos or vidoes and bring up a list. Some are a bit more evolved, but not much. I didn't see a model index on any of the sites, or a search function. Some videos are given stupid names, but many don't even have model names.

Given the size of the sites, I am not sure why they have "loyalty" sites, as I doubt anyone ever stays around long enough to become a member, or at least they shouldn't. Especially since you don't appear to be given any kind of discount for being "loyal" and you only get like one extra site a month.

Bottom line, even though the video quality is pretty good, and there are some attractive models to be found, I'd probably look elsewhere unless there is a specific model you see in the preview that you really like.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Exclusive Teen Porn

9. Exclusive Teen Porn (0)

RonnyO (8) 01-02-10  10:10am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Hot, young euro-teen models
- Exclusive content
- Mostly hardcore
- Good quality vids, high-res pics
- Plenty of preview clips
Cons: - Sporadic updates
- Older vids are lower-quality, though not terrible
- No options for quality settings on videos
- Slow download speeds
Bottom Line: ExclusiveTeenPorn.com and its sister site, JustTeensPorn.com, is one of the smaller, but longer-tenured players in the exclusive euro-teen space.

ExclusiveTeenPorn.com produces high-quality, unique scenes featuring genuinely young, natural models in mostly hardcore b/g action. A handful of solo, lesbian, and anal scenes also appear.

Currently, the site features just over 100 videos, and a slightly larger number of picture sets. Nearly every video has an associated high-res photo set, though not every photo set has an accompanying video. Vid quality ranges from 640x480 @1.75 Mbps for the older videos to 1280x720 @ 4Mbps for the latest, meaning that even the oldest videos are at least acceptable.

Like most of its competitors, the main draw here is the selection of beautiful, young models in hardcore scenes that can't be found anywhere else. Many of the models are featured on other euro-teen sites such as TeenMegaWorld, My18Teens/MyTeenVideo, 1PassForAllSites, and others - a pool of models that seems to be constantly expanding with fresh, young talent - but the scenes themselves are all exclusive.

The scenes get straight to the action - no dialogue or storytelling, and no cheesy music to distract from the actual sounds of sex. There's a nice variety of outfits and settings, too, with even a few outdoor scenes among the older videos.

The great content and gorgeous models also serve to highlight the main negative of the site: updates are inconsistent, and generally infrequent. Only one to three videos are added each month, with an average of perhaps two - a terrible schedule for those burning to see more of these nubile young girls in action.

Very few, if any, of the networked bonus sites appear to update at all, and among these, only a very small number of videos seem to be unavailable elsewhere. For the most part, they include only "classic" content from very old, defunct providers, much of which can be found on bonus sites for other networks or even for free on the net.

Download speeds also never seem to exceed 200KB/s to East Coast USA, which starts becoming more and more of a problem as video quality and picture sizes increase.

The only real "carrot" provided for recurring membership is bonus access to JustTeensPorn.com, another full-fledged site featuring similar models and exclusive content, but with a similar update schedule, after three months of continuous membership. Considering the quality of the content, it may be worth it for some, especially if the alternative is to buy two simultaneous subscriptions (one to each site), but in my opinion, it's probably best to just check in to each site once every several months.

Given the infrequency of updates, it won't take you long to catch up.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit My Lovely Girls

10. My Lovely Girls (0)

Denner (235) 05-01-08  08:05am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (77), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Part of a PASS with up to 10 different sites
Vast amount of videos/photosets.
Unique content - some exclusive, some on license basis.(a few you can see at Teendreams, but just a few)
Easteuropean/russian/ukranian - and more alike girls.
Great , just great looking teens in the selection.
Very fine quality in videos at 4 of the 10 sites
Photos also ok
1280x720 in hd/great wmv quality
Very rare girls here - some exclusive.
A lot of hc, a lot of fine solo russian girls - and some lez.
Zip for photos on some sites - some NOT!
Do NOT go for photos entirely!
Quite regular updates (just found an entirely new video with Helen/Natasya (see her own site) wow!
Good download speed: I got up to 700 kb/sec. with IDM.
Cons: Confusing navigation
Too many "check-points" with username/password to every site - even if this is a "pass".
4-5 of the sites are only photos - still some good content - but at some sites no zip for photos.
Confusing set-up where navigation between sites are shitty. Some of the sites are NOT in the same league as others.
Not sure about updates - BUT they seems to be just ok! (They just got an entirely new Helen-video).
Bottom Line: This is my second try of a completly unknown area of russian/ukrainian content of girls.
But this I can tell:
A lot better sites/pass here than my18teens - see former review.
First there are 3 dammed good sites at this pass:
My Lovely Girls

The rest is mostly old stuff (no full scenes video) and poor photo sets.
But those 3 sites are worth the 29.95.
The videos are just plain great - some entirely exclusive and some on licensed basis - but all in fine quality.
1280x720 - only in wmv
some older in 720x576
all in full scene downloads AT the primary sites!!
Man, there are some great solo scenes here, that just rocked my world - and that I did not expect.
Yuliya or an unknown Candy - wow!
The best allround site is HD teens video - just fucking amazing!!!
Crisp videos - something like 50 of the best darned easteuropean teen-videos I've seen, yet.
Exclusive Teen Porn: Great all round teen porn with some 50 high-quality videos of both solo and hc.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Exclusive Teen Porn

11. Exclusive Teen Porn (0)

OneMan (27) 01-08-08  08:05am
Rookie Badge  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good quality video. Most have AVi or WMV at 1280x720. Although this suggests HiDef, it is not quite...although at around (I would estimate)3500 kbps it is damn good nonetheless !

Around 50 half-hour vids available in clips or whole films. Fulls are around 500MB in size.
Fast connection speeds - just as well !

3 sizes of photos. Around 50 sets. Good quality
Cons: Needs to grow some more.
No free cuddly toys...none really. can only get bigger.
Bottom Line: Just joined the exclusive network and gained access to 10 sites - all teen stuff.

Gorgeous girls and good variety. Excellent choice of pic sizes, vids in clips or full...and excellent quality.

As part of a 10 site $30 package who could complain.

Worth the price for a month, even it were on its own !

Will report on other 9 as I visit them !
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-11 of 11  

Easy Site Search
Advanced Search

Most Reviews
1. Babes Network.com (6)
2. 21Sextury.com (5)
3. 18X Girls (4)
4. Blacked.com (3)
5. Wow Girls (3)
6. Team Skeet (3)
7. DDF Network (3)
8. X-Art (3)
9. Brazzers (3)
10. Bangbros Network (3)

View All : Most Reviews

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.07 seconds.