Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Sugar Paradise

Sugar Paradise (0)

lk2fireone (196) 10-15-12  11:54pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The photosets and videos are dated by when they were posted to the site.
-The zip file for each photoset has the name of the model in the filename.
-There is a small bio for each model. Gives her name, age and hair color.
Also gives some background on the model, which is probably fiction.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Good download speed. I got 1.0 to 1.4 MB/sec at this site (which is my maximum download speed).
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Because the videos are so short (3 to 4 minutes runtime), the file size is very small: 50 MB or less.
Cons: -On login, have to enter a captcha, which is a moving string of 5 numbers. You have to watch the captcha for a minute or two, to try to read all the numbers, since the string is moving on and off the screen. Just a minor annoyance, but it indicates poor site design, along with a bunch of other site design problems. Logging into Met-art or Erotic Beauties, major porn sites, is so easy and effortless. Why can't other sites make it easy to log in?
-Archive site. Stopped updating in 2009.
-Although photosets download with the name of the model and a unique number, videos download with the default filename of "full.wmv" or "full.avi" (depending on whether you chose the wmv or avi file format).
So you have to rename each video you download, to know what model is in the video. And there's no description on the site of what the video is about.
-Navigation is very basic.
-No search function.
-Site only has 3 models. Very limited selection of models.
Bottom Line: This is a very softcore teen site.

Their model listing consists of 3 models:
Diana, brown hair
Liza, black hair
Nika, blonde hair

I thought at first I was mistaken. Where are all the different models? But those three models are used for all the photosets and videos. So if you
like those three models, you will find plenty of photos and videos with them.

There is very little eroticism. Very little touching themselves. No masturbation. Little or no spreading of the legs. This is really very
softcore. Met-art is the biggest teen softcore site there is, for photographs. But the Met-art photos, if you can imagine, are harder edged than what this site offers.

In a way, that's good. It almost makes you feel like a "clean" pervert looking at these innocent photos of naked teens.

No boys at this site interacting with the girls. This is a girl-only site.
In some of the photosets and videos, there are two girls. But the only touching between the two girls is girly innocence. I mean, these girls
hardly ever kiss the other girl softly on the lips. They are playing around, maybe touching one another's arm or leg. But really innocent. This
is the very softest of softcore.

Site statistics:

Number of photosets: 167
Number of photos per set: around 70+
Each photo has 3 sizes: Low Res., Medium Res., Original size. The original size is between the low res and the medium res.
Original res dimensions: 800 x 1200 pixels, or 1500 x 1000 pixels
Each photoset has a zip file option. You can download a zip file in your choice of low res, medium res, or original size.

Number of videos: 88
Video runtime: 3 to 4 minutes.
Frame width x height: 720 x 480
Total bitrate: 6096 kbps

You can download the videos as WMV or AVI files.
There is no choice of definition for the videos. Videos download in one definition only.

The videos are really short. A lot of the videos have a runtime of 3 or 4

minutes. The video file size is small, 50 MB or less.

The videos have more tease to them than the photosets. There is stripping in the videos. But it's done in a girlish way, very innocent, not even midcore, just young teens taking off their clothes and playing in an innocent manner to an unseen audience. No sex, no masturbation, very
little touching of their own body, no spread legs, no close-ups of the groin or ass.

The videos are poor to just OK. The girls go in and out of focus, which is annoying. This is not an artistic effect, but the camera operator just
can't keep the model in focus, even though she is barely moving from one spot to another. The camera operator is definitely not a professional.

There is no story line to the videos, it's just a girl or 2 girls getting naked, moving around, flashing parts of their bodies. They are interacting with the camera, being teasing, but innocent.

The lighting is OK, the colors are OK. These are scenes shot indoors, so the lighting is easily controlled, and there is little or no annoying
random noises in the soundtrack. The soundtrack is canned music, which I wouldn't mind hearing eliminated. But I've heard worse canned music.

The site design and navigation is basic but acceptable. There is no search function. But you have pages listing the photosets, and other pages
listing the videos. The listing shows what model (or sometimes 2 models) is in the photoset or video. But there is no description of what the
photoset or video is about. But then again, it's basically a girl getting undressed, and flashing her body at the camera. That's it. No script, or

I am giving this site a score of 70. But I think, unless you know that this is a very softcore site, with just 3 teen models, and that it hasn't updated in over 3 years, and that the photos and videos are poor or just OK in technical quality, you will be disappointed you spent your money on this site.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (11)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


gaypornolover (38) Excellent review! I've noticed more sites using Captcha codes - I don't understand why and they really get on my nerves.

If I'm using a genuine username and password I don't see why they need a Captcha too.

I thought Captcha was for forms to prevent multiple entries to competitions etc.

10-16-12  05:34am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) REPLY TO #1 - gaypornolover :

I don't like Captcha. Period.

But some Captcha forms are worse than others.
There are some, where the letters/numbers are so twisted, that you have to guess what the letters/words are, and I get some of those wrong again and again, that I just give up. This isn't for any porn sites that I know of, but for some other content.

There are also Captchas where the letters/numbers move across the screen, and go off the screen and come back on. That's the case with this site. So you have to watch the Captcha a few times, to get all the letters/numbers.

No big deal. Just a bit of irritation. Especially compared to sites that just require the username and password, and are very easy to log in.

I guess they use Captcha for security. But if you are really a computer expert/hacker, there are probably automatic programs that will handle the Captcha.

So the extra security just makes life a bit more difficult for the rest of us.

10-16-12  08:45am

Reply To Message


graymane (33) Add me to captcha haters. There's got to be an easier way. It's tough to think a site that's hankering for more business would subject potentals to this kind of grief. Greed, maybe? Like the cost to explore for something more practical.

Very, very well done review, BTW. Of course that's nothing new, nor would we expect less from the great merits of your handywork.

10-16-12  09:31pm

Reply To Message


Denner (235) Fine review, lk2. Was a member long time ago at one of the bonus-sites - and then had this, too - of course. Do they still provide the bonus sites, as said at TBP - you made a review for Pearl Teens last month. So I guess that's so - or?

BTW: I think it's very fine, that we make reviews of each - most important sites - from a network...not all have the same taste, thumbs up, lk2.

10-17-12  05:51am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) REPLY TO #4 - Denner :

They still have the bonus sites.

If you join one site, you automatically get 9 more sites included.

Then, if your membership goes into a second month, you get 1 additional site.

If your membership goes into a third month, you get 1 more additional site.

If your membership goes beyond 3 months, you get 2 more sites.

But: almost all of the site are small. And most stopped updating years ago.

So there are much better ways to spend your money, than on a membership to this network. You will find much more content, better quality content, easier site navigation, and more frequent updates at other sites and networks.

Maybe years ago this site/network might have justified a membership, while they were still updating, and they might have improved the quality as time went on.

But this is just one of many sites/networks that has little value compared to what other sites offer today.

10-17-12  07:09am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) REPLY TO #3 - graymane :

Thanks for the support, graymane.

By the way, you current avatar is certainly eye-catching. Lol.

10-17-12  07:12am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone :

Guess your're right....it was once a place to get some/a few fine exclusive pieces of material ....was wondering a bit about this place, but I'll skip it for now...Thanks!
10-17-12  07:21am

Reply To Message


Cybertoad (Disabled) My firewall blocked this site with

" Warning: Unsafe Website Blocked!
fucking-cash.com "
Anyone know anything about this, my software only blocks a site like this if it is installing a script on my pc which is not good.

Just wondered.

10-17-12  09:50am

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #8 - Cybertoad :

I just asked one of our Editors to check and they didn't get any kind of "alerts". They keep their browser security set to medium so it's possible your computer is more sensitive.

fucking-cash.com is the company which owns the site so I'm guessing the alert you're seeing is the result of some bit of shared code they use for all of their sites.

10-17-12  10:08am

Reply To Message


Cybertoad (Disabled) REPLY TO #9 - Khan :

Thanks Khan,

I use a special firewall that is designed to go after scripts and malware pretty tough. I do not get to many false positives, but sounds like this time I may have. I only get these alerts maybe once a month if that so when it occurred it seemed usual, but glad it was a tracking script for joining or monitoring !


10-17-12  11:52am

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #10 - Cybertoad :

Obviously, I can't be positive about what triggered the alert for you but a shared script would be my guess.
10-17-12  12:38pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.