Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-20 of 20  

Visit Panty Fantasies

1. Panty Fantasies (0)

Pay
Newbie
59*
alan19851 (2) 08-23-13  11:05pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -A handful of okay panty content, maybe about 20 medium-low quality videos (640x480) of the "Playtime Panty" series, otherwise most videos are much lower quality and are random hardcore scenes with a little more panty in the beginning.
-One or two pic galleries with medium quality pics
-No apparent download limit
Cons: -Overall mediocre panties content. Video count is probably under 70 videos, over half of which are of very low resolution (320x240?? come on!).
-No exclusive content. The best feature was from the "Playtime Panty" series, but there are only a handful of vids like this, and mostly everything else are intro scenes to general hardcore movies.
-Navigation is confusing. The Panty page has about 20 links, all of which open a pop-up window that leads to the videos.
-Picture selection was also mediocre, with the majority of pictures out-dated (90's thongs hiked up to the waist), and overall very low resolution.
-Broken links. Three to four of the links in the Panty section were broken.
Bottom Line: I joined this site with the $1.99 membership to check it out, and realized that it's actually easier to spend the time finding panty content for free on bing.

The navigation of the site was confusing, and the content was even worse. Their "high quality" videos are 640x480, which is very outdated.

Definitely join a panties paysite that provides exclusive content. Someone who truly understands why we search for panties sites! This site is 100% generic, and maybe would have been a good site 10 years ago.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit All Panty Pass

2. All Panty Pass (1)

Network
Active
68
luv lickn clit (21) 05-02-13  05:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: --The 15 different sites on this network try to cover all the sub-niches of panty fetish (up-skirt, young girls, shiny panties, UK panties, etc).

--All but one of the sites have both photos and videos.

--Site navigation is simple, in part because there is not a huge amount of content.

--Some of the material is pretty good--in particular some of the photo sets on Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys

--The flash player gets the job done.

--Photosets have zip files, and are small and download fast (usually in seconds).
Cons: --One of the biggest problems I had with this site was the generally low resolution of the material, with photos ranging from 900 to 1280 pixels on the long dimension, and as many as one third of the videos below 640 x 480 resolution.

--Many of the photo sets and videos are named using a name that consists only of numbers and letters (e.g. 008ch). To make matters worse, on many of the sites, the models don't even have names. There are no model pages with links to all of a model's sets and videos--you have to find them among the single list of photo sets and/or videos.

--This is archival material that is really starting to show its age (older hairstyles, etc).

--Roughly 50% of the material is non-nude or non-fully-nude.

--The sites have updates, but the total number of photo sets and videos doesn't change, so it certainly appears that they use some type of content rotation system.
Bottom Line: As a guy who loves to see a hot girl in a sexy pair of panties, I am often disappointed by the lack of attention paid to them on many standard softcore porn sites. So I decided to look around and join a panty site. I don't really like the British approach to "knickers", so I settled on All Panty Pass.

This is a collection of 15 individual sites, each of which focuses on a different sub-niche of panties. The sites are listed below, each followed by 2 numbers: the first being the number of photo sets they had when I was a member, and the second being the number of videos they had (my membership expired about a month ago).

Cute Panty Girls 925/154
Panty Honeys 267/66
Panties Next Door 281/44
Legwear Passion 159/63
Shiny Knickers 152/14
Best Nylon Girls 106/46
Jeans and Panties 101/101
90s Panties 128/0
Wet Panty Lickers 82/74
Skirts and Panties 54/42
Kitty's Panties 58/53
Panty Girls UK 47/23
Only Shiny 36/27
Sexy Soccer Panties 32/32
Virtual Panty Girls 151/22

I'll just cut to the chase and say that the site was really disappointing. This is archival material that is starting to show its age. Overall photo/video resolution is low, the file naming system and lack of model names is ridiculous, and the general quality of the panty content is good but not great.

The first thing I discovered when I entered the site and went to Panty Honeys was that a significant number of videos are low resolution. The first 3 I clicked on were all 320 by 240--so small as to be basically worthless. Just as I was starting to think I had been totally screwed, I clicked on one that was 640 by 480. The resolution of the videos is actually quite variable (Panty Honeys had 10 different resolutions among the 66 videos), both within an individual site, and across sites. The best site for video was Jeans and Panties, where they were all 720p. Most of the sites have some 720p, but the amount varies. The 2 biggest sites (Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys) each had a significant number of videos that were below 640 by 480 (20 out 66 on Panty Honeys). The videos are all downloadable with no DRM. The flash player works well and let's you scan through quickly.

The photo sets are the best feature of the sites. They are generally well lit and focused. However, the resolution is low (usually 1280 or 1024 pixels on the long dimension), and many are non-nude. Because of the small size, many zip files are less than 10 MB, and download within seconds.

The weirdest site was the Virtual Panty Girls, which consists of animated photo sets and a few animated videos. It must have taken a lot of time to create this material, but I didn't find it erotic at all.

Navigation is simple, and each of the sites has the same layout. The opening page shows the latest updates and upcoming updates, and has links to pages for all photo sets and all videos. When you go to the photo or video pages, there is a row of thumbnails across the top for individual photo sets or videos (varying from about 5 to 9 thunbnails). There is also a list of number links for the next page of photoset/video thumbnails. Because there are so few thumbnails on each page, there are more pages and clicking than there need to be. Each site also has a link to the main All Panty Pass page, which has links to the individual sites.

As noted above, many of the models are not given a name, and there are no model pages where you can find all of girl's photo sets and videos on each site. This along with the number/letter filenames means that once you've downloaded the material to your hard drive, you really don't know what is what. Forget about a search feature on the sites and network...they don't have one.

About one-third to one-half of the material is non-nude, or non-fully nude. Even though the focus is panties, I do want to see what's underneath, so this was very disappointing.

With the low resolution, aging material, and plain Jane site navigation, the site has the look and feel of a site that is 10 years old. The price was $21 and change for a month, and while I didn't feel screwed, I think they would generate more revenue if they lowered that to $10 or $15 a month.

Bottom Line: There is some content here worth downloading, but the cons outweigh the pros, and I find it difficult to recommend this site.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only All Sites

3. Only All Sites (0)

Network
Active
82
roseman (253) 12-23-11  07:13am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Excellent quality photosets available in multiple download formats (standard, extra large, ultra large photos size).
- Very good quality videos available in multiple download formats (HD and High Resolution) as full length movies.
- ZIP downloads.
- Cool website design.
- Pretty easy navigation.
- Daily updates.
- Fast downloading.
- Large variety of models.
Cons: - Needs Fast/Permanent Tracks for full access to some photosets/videos.
- Old photosets and videos quality is average (Standard and High resolution size).
- No bonus content.
- Expensive.
- No trial option.
Bottom Line: I have to admit that this sites monthly membership is kinda expensive but I really think that it worths its money. The only problem that I found is that with your membership you don't have access to all photos/videos of their models as some photosets/videos need fasttracks or permanent tracks to be unlocked for view or download. With your membership you get 10 fasttracks per site and if you spent them you can buy 10 permanent tracks for 10 USD. So far from what I saw the hottest models galleries and videos can be seen or downloaded by spending fasttracks or permanent tracks and that's a big con for the site. Photosets and videos quality are great except from some old ones which have standard quality. ZIP downloads are available and videos can be downloaded as full movies. I feel that some bonus content would be cool and a trial option membership is necessary.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only All Sites

4. Only All Sites (0)

Network
Newbie
83*
tasha (1) 10-11-11  10:30am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: For those who like to boil before they burn, there is no doubt this is the best site for leg/hose/stocking fetishists on the entire WWW.
Quantity and variety are excellent. The models are beautiful. Pic resolution is fantastic.
Cons: A general sameness about all image sets despite the variety of models and outfits

Videos are generally a snooze. One model (a really pretty one named Nicole) actually says something along the lines of "Let's get this over with" in one of her vids; the boredom shows. Models could actually heighten the excitement of the whole thing by talking to the viewer (esp fetish talk).

Most notably: While conceding that OAS reliably serves the majority of men who prefer buxom/voluptuous models, there are precious few models for those of us who prefer the slender-but-shapely supermodel or petite types.

Needs more foot dipping, shoe-dangling, crossed legs shots. Lot of us leg fetishist prize those shots, guys.
Bottom Line: If you go in for a real leg tease that starts subtly and works its way to a boil, there is no better site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only All Sites

5. Only All Sites (0)

Network
Active
75
mbaya (356) 03-21-10  08:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount through TBP.
-Huge network of sites with a similar theme.
-No download restrictions. A nice plus considering the sheer quantity that is available.
-Nice photosets with three choices of photo quality, including ultra large.
-Some HD quality videos, but not enough.
-Mostly very attractive models. However, about one third were not. Seem to be classy women that you might see or even know. I didn't see a single boob job.
-Very active member forum that takes requests from members.
Cons: -Glamour type photography. Often the women have too much makeup and seem very stiff. They don't often seem into what they are doing.
-Most videos are not at all erotic. Not much in the way of sensuous movements. Rubbing an arm or a leg is not teasing.
-Many videos and photo sets don't even get to topless.
Bottom Line: The site sells itself as 100% erotic, 100% tease and 100% exclusive. They also say they are about the erotic, not the extreme. In order to be erotic without being explicit, they need to appeal to the members ability to be mentally stimulated. Without explicit photos and videos, the models themselves have to be special in a way that other sites don't often attempt.

Since this is so unusual in pornland, comparisons are difficult, if not impossible. The question to be answered is, do they succeed? Is their goal of being erotic successful?

I was a member of onlytease.com in 2006. I was somewhat disappointed by the lack of heat I saw. However times change and so have my tastes in porn. Since I love nice legs and pantyhose, I felt that maybe I should give the network a try at the newly discounted price.

I found quite quickly that the network is a LOT larger than what I had subscribed to in 2006. The quality of both the videos and the photos has greatly improved. Navigation is easy, but the search function is still inadequate.

Did they reach their goal of being erotic? Yes and no. Yes some of what you see is truly great and I love it a lot. However, the site promises a lot more than it delivers. I thought the tease referred only to the content, but the site itself could be a lot better.

Regarding the outfits, the models all too often wear pants or use opaque pantyhose. I like dresses showcasing great legs that look like legs, in other words sheer pantyhose. I don't much care for cheerleaders or bunnies either.

Overall, problem number one is that nearly all the videos simply do nothing for me. In all fairness photo sites usually have poor videos. What I feel the problem here is that the models don't have much of a feel for teasing. For the most part, European models get into this type of photo and video modeling without first doing any stripping or other live shows. They may be quite beautiful, but don't master the art of sensuous movements. For example, I see a lot of scenes with hands rubbing arms or legs, but very little in the way of quick flashes. I rarely see a glimpse of panties that seems to be an accident or are intended to build up my interest. The strip sequences are usually quite dull and often end without being even topless. A lot of sizzle, but very little steak. There is an active thread in the forum about whether models who will not even do topless should be on the site.

In my opinion,the site is very much hit and miss. You would have to go through a lot of photo sets and videos to find the true gems. If you have the time and energy, you may fall in love with the site. As for me, I am happy to find a few truly enjoyable downloads, but the site is just too much work.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lingerie Videos

6. Lingerie Videos (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
cakeweasel (1) 02-05-10  03:50pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Quite good content; they have made some effort to collect videos with various kinds of lingerie, like their name says.
- For the detail minded, they even categorised according to the type of lingerie (stockings, corsets etc).
- The exclusive stuff always seems to be solo, but is well filmed.
- Support did actually respond - didn't help, but did respond ;)
Cons: Site is an abysmal piece of crap.
The navigation is pretty much useless: the only kind of list you can get is in some random order. They do have categories, but those also just lead to randomly ordered lists.
No streaming preview.
There seems to be no way to search by title.
They have short clips which you can painfully use to preview, but there is no link to the full video! To find that you have to navigate through their crappy lists.
The only way you will be able to use this is to blindly download full videos in the hopes they might be good.
Bottom Line: Terrible site ruins good content.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Only All Sites

7. Only All Sites (0)

Network
Active
85
Drooler (220) 08-01-09  04:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (83), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Many, many beautiful women
+No toys and almost no “messy” stuff with food or bath goop
+Intuitive interface
+Fast downloads, sometimes over 2Mbps
+Can preview the content of upcoming 3-4 updates on each site
+Earned or purchased ” FastTracks” allow full access to galleries or videos of your choosing ahead of their posting schedule
+VOLUMES of all-exclusive content available now, plus several hundreds of updates yet to be posted (Coming soon --> select “View all sets available for FastTrack”)
+Very user-friendly site/network. You get 10 free “FastTracks” in a calendar month (whole network, not per site); set several viewing and browsing preferences; and go from one site in the network to another with ease once your use/passes are stored in your browser.
+Photos from the past couple of years come in three sizes: 1066, 2048, and 3000 pixels.
+Consistently good lighting and clarity in photos from Jan. 2007 on.
+No DRM
+Model pages list other sites, outside the network, she appears in
Cons: -Occasional slow navigation and sudden timeouts
-Thumbs with dead links (rare)
-Must train browser to auto-enter use/pass for downloads on subsequent logins (separate for pics and videos); doable with Firefox, but it’s still 18 times for everything in the network: (access + zips + vids) x 6
-Zips before Dec. 2007 require drilling through five levels of folders to get to the images folder (hold cntrl down while drilling to prevent desktop clutter).
-Some unattractive women
-Quite a few women never get fully undressed, like Gemma Massey (too bad!)
-High monthly network access price ($44.95)
-The “fast track” system is rather complicated; note expiry dates and other restrictions
-Boring videos: Only avi, 640x480, 3-6 minutes long. 40-50 per month (whole network) in 2009. (Image quality improves through the years, but it’s never nearly as good as the photos. Sound might be techno muzik, the girl talking, or just the air near the mic.)
Bottom Line: I thought this network would be nothing but undressing to panties, if that, so I stayed away. But one day at OnlyTease, I tried their search (for visitors) and found nearly 2000 items that were at the “figure” level of nudity.

Now I’m glad that I waited -- and that I finally joined. Mind you, it’s usually the same women who do get fully naked and fun with it: Angel Dark, Elen (the blond Russian with the devilish smirk), Eve Angel, Jana D (Jamie J), Lola, Lucy Stratilova, Misa/Michaela Kaplanova, Mili Jay, Zuzana (Deny Moore), ETC. Considering the volume here, it’s been a bona fide candy store for yours truly (or “drooly,” I suppose).

Special mention goes to “Tammy” (aka Vendula). She’s the BEST.

The “Only” sites are photo sites, and the photos are DAMN good. If most models on this network showed off their asses the way Misa does, I’d be totally hooked! It would have EVERYTHING: great outfits, great stripping, and satisfying full nudity in excellent quality.

But they’d rather specialize at putting foreplay at the forefront, and this they do very well. I found myself grabbing “stripping only” sets of a few girls for whom I have “nude onlys” to combine them with. Kind of like “FemJoy and OnlyTease – together at last!” ;)

Here are some stats on the “Only” network sites:
OnlyTease: started July 2002. Around Nov. 2007, began occasional 3000 px photos, which became standard in March 2008. 3 updates per day!
OnlyOpaques (dark hose): started Aug. 2006; 3000 px photos most of the time from July 2007; 1 update per day
OnlySecretaries: started October 2007, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day
OnlySilkAndSatin: started Nov. 2008, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day
OnlyCarla: started Sept. 2005, stopped in April 2009 (lots of photosets, all it of tease-stripping)
OnlyMelanie: started April 2005, stopped in Feb. 2009 (same as with Carla, but REALLY cute!)

Finally, a little more about those FastTracks. One can be obtained by recommending three sites (not previously listed) that a model is on. (Must be used by the end of the current month.)

NB: You can view the thumbs of a set before deciding to FastTrack it.

I got a few that way, thanks to my application of library and information science, Lucy Lee, Tereza Ilova, etc. in the subject index.

But remember, it’s best not to join at the beginning of a month since you get 10 for free each calendar month. That’s a nice touch!

BUT be sure to download your FastTracked stuff right away, because access to it expires at the end of the month!

You can also buy 10 “Permanent FastTracks” for $9.95. These don’t expire as long as you stay a member, but they can only be used on the site you buy them on.

AND redeeming them on the site is a hassle: find the page before the billing page, click to redeem, get authorization code ... sheesh!
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Panty Licker

8. The Panty Licker (0)

Pay
Active
70
nygiants03 (162) 04-29-09  02:27pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -some decent orgasms

-amateurish girls

-680 x 1024 pics are solid

-decent panty stuffing action

- lots of pics per set
Cons: -Only 8 straight videos
-21 lesbian vids
-36 solo vids

- Only 90 pic sets
-videos are fuzzy
-overpriced
-no bonus material
-no updates
-girls are not very attractive
Bottom Line: -Cant say that its amateur, but the girls in the videos I have never seen before.

-Videos basically of sniffing panties and panties being rubbed on pussy. There is some pussy licking action, and only 2 sex scenes.

-Videos range from about 12mb to 100mb.

-Videos around 10 minutes

-All videos split into 4 parts. But some of the parts are bad links.

I'm into this kind of material, but I am very disappointed. Should of known from the low TBP score that the site was bad news. Stay away, they ask for to much money.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Panty Pops

9. Panty Pops (0)

Pay
Active
80
atrapat (112) 04-04-09  10:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -USA porn stars trying on panties but rarely having sex.
-Cumshot always on panties/ass/back of model.
-100% exclusive original unique content.
-Some big names, like Courtney Cummz or Jenna Haze (2 scenes).
-Some attempts at reality porn: simple scripts and locations.
-60+ videos. WMV or Quicktime in various resolutions.
-Max resolution: 65% 854x480 2000kbps; 35% 640x480 1000kbps.
-Video length varies a lot: from 4 up to 30 minutes.
-18 photo galleries: 75% 1200x800; 25% 600x400.
-100 pictures on average per set; 50% landscape, 50% portrait.
-Full access to other sites from this company (not updating).
-Free tour lists all updates with release date and trailer.
-ccbill.
Cons: -Erratic updates: 1 in Jan/09, 1 in Feb/09, 3 in Mar/09.
-Very little pussy penetration: handjob or blowjob at most.
-For a panties site, there's too much emphasis on blowjobs.
-Very few of the models masturbate; lots of panty touching.
-Most scenes are POV; last scene had a cameraman, though.
-Always the same guy; he talks a lot.
-Guy often jerks himself off for a long time to finish scene.
-Not enough panty variety: same panties in some scenes.
-Panties not always match bra; most of the time, no bra at all.
-Regional pricing.
Bottom Line: I came across Panty Pops while browsing the Panties niche section here. I'll try to join some of the sites but this was the first one, mainly because I knew most of the USA stars, it had a low price and network access. Scenes are always very similar: there's a model and a pile of a dozen panties; she teasingly tries on some of them, following instructions from the guy that is filming her; the guy takes out his cock and some blowjob and cock-panties interaction ensues. Absolutely no penetration except a handful of scenes.

I don't get why there's so little penetration. It's not that the site is deceiving since it's true to its name: the guy eventually pops on the panties and ass, with the model always lying flat on her stomach. It's the fact that all models are seasoned porn stars who have done lots of regular boy-girl scenes. It looks weird to see the guy not pull the panties apart and get down to business. That's what I was hoping to see but it happens in less than 10% of the scenes. On the other hand, almost every scene contains some blowjob. Since this site seems to be a one man job (performing, filming, editing, etc), I couldn't help but think it is just an excuse for this guy to enjoy some quality time with a few USA porn stars. Are blowjob-only rates lower?

Another thing I found weird was the panties reuse from scene to scene. Looks like the guy buys them by the dozen at Victoria's Secret (lots have the Pink collection logo) but he makes them last for several scenes; many of them are tried on by 4 or 5 different models. It looks cheap since they are probably bought for less than 5 USD each; it also brings a sense of déja vu. Models must have some panties of their own: why not ask the models to bring them on set and try them on camera? That would bring a higher variety of panties to the scenes and they may also have matching bras.

Despite its shortcomings, I feel the content is very unique, the cast is often stellar and it's more than decently produced and packaged to recommend it to anyone interested in this niche. Don't expect much from the other sites in the network: they are no longer updating; there were also a couple more sites that have been taken down and are not accessible any more.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Only All Sites

10. Only All Sites (0)

Network
Active
95
EroticShot (18) 12-21-08  08:58am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: This review will repeat at the other OT sites as they are all part of 1 network (I joined for $44.95 per month to all 5).

OnlyTease is a teasing site (Not a porn site - no hardcore, minimal full nudity, light play, softcore content). Most of the models are British. Videos average around 40-70 megs per peice and there will be 1 video per photoshoot. Most if not all photoshoots will be shot in both film and video (posted separately on the site). Videos last 4-6 minutes mostly and are almost always the same - striptease. Sometimes there is music and sometimes talking/teasing.

Photos are well done. Most sets are available via Zip download in 3 different formats - up to very high quality - 50-70meg zip files for 100 photos.

Models - Many beautiful women are available here. Many models will appear on other sites - ie Kate Harrington or Lucy Zara - many will not. For many, you will only find them on the OnlyTease family of sites.
Cons: Content is generally the same. Do not join the site looking for moaning and groaning etc. This is about all types of hosiery and outfits on sexy girls...doing sexy British girl type things! That's it! Videos could be longer...scenes could be more original!
Bottom Line: This site has one of my highest ranks because it's f'ing fantastic at what it aims to be.

OnlyTease has the largest collection of this kind of tease on the net. Some of the content is boring...some is just f'ing hot. Women like Emma Harper, Natalia, Natasha Marley, Nikki F, Sophia Smith...there are hundreds of models - they are just so sexy...sometimes this hits the spot.

You will not be disappointed if you have the funds to spare. All of their sites are worth joining.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Panty Amateur

11. Panty Amateur (0)

Pay
Active
92
Denner (233) 11-13-08  09:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (78), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Nice, no GREAT site, if you like very softcore - once in a while (if not, do not bother to read on).
Some fine and fabulous looking british girls/women with a sexy attitude, some sexy talk (NOT all) and hot lingerie.
Good amount af ok-quality videos - some newer ones in almost HD.
4,5,6 or more videoclips of the same model - great plus...
Easy navigation
Fine updates - daily - it looks like.
Way over 1000 clips at this stage.
Some very exclusive videos of topmodels like Laurena Lacey (she just got a site of her own, almost) and a doll like Annalease.
You can download more than two videos at the same time...
Cons: Site-design is very simple - and not exiting (but here it's the videos that matters)
No photosets
Most videos only in MPG - a few newer once in WMV.
Earlier videos a bit overexposed or generally not very good quality.
Scenes are mostly quite repetitive.
Some video-clips has disturbing background sound - some even sound like rain and thunder (like in Mickey Newburys songs)
Bottom Line: Cannot not help it, but I really like this site - even if the content is very soft.
No masturbation, no close-up pussy clips, no hc, but some soft lez.
Panty Amateur seems like a sister-site to Panty Maniacs - also british, but based in the Netherlands. And IT IS - a sistersite - or a co. -site.
But compared to the better scored PM this Panty Amateurs has quite a lot more. Foremost a far bigger content, better updates and some much better videos than PM.
First of all the great looking star, Laurena Lacay (here: Lorena) has 10 different videos and none is the same as the three at PM - and far better.
And the big titted and famous Petra here has 17 videoclips - she is also a knockout.
The same goes for a lot of other great british models where the amount of different videos with different outfit for the model is better than the "mothersite" - PM.
Sizes are typical a little under 100 mb which makes it more userfriendly to download.
WMV: 960x540.
No stream.
And no photosets.
Of course it's a bit annoying the way these videos stop before total nudity or masturbation, but ok, this is meant to be softcore and fetish panties - and if you can do with that, this site is great.
Of course I'd like to watch some of these great british model going more hc or just full nudity with some masturbation, but alas!!
Some of the models - but not the "finest" - apears on for exampel Suburban Amateurs with harder content (masturbation) and some in the somewhat similar Only Tease...

Still Panty Amateur is a great site - if you can do with this kind of very softcore...
But, man - I'd like to watch Laurena Lacey or Petra or Annalease in some harder stuff.
Anybody knows where - if at all?
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Panty Jobs

12. Panty Jobs (0)

Pay
Active
74
elonlybuster (39) 09-26-08  08:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Young attractive girls
-Good amount of content
-Good quality videos
Cons: -Updates once every blue moon
-There's ads eventhough you pay
Bottom Line: First off this is like an advanced manual pleasure site. That is you won't see any penetration or much else.

The cam is POV, and high quality at that and you basically watch a girl grind on the guy, give him a handjob with her panties, and simple things like that.

As far as I could tell there's no download limit. I downloaded 4 files simultaneously while browsing the site and no problems. The same can be said with daily limits.

The big downfall to this site is that there's no search feature to find a certain girl by name or anything. Not a big deal, but it would be nice to see it.

The videos are high quality, the girls are pretty attractive, there are a few screen caps, but lack of updates are can be annoying as well as a steep price just to watch a half-naked girl jack off a guy without much else.

IT goes without say that unless this is your cup of tea you'll probably pass right by without a second thought.



Rating of 74 due to the quality, background work, the girls, lack of updates, as well as a few smaller things. After a year you should have a slightly better site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Flower Panties

13. Flower Panties (0)

Pay
Active
65
ace of aces (179) 04-24-08  03:21am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + full trial access
+ exclusive content
+ easy navigation
Cons: - regular price to high
- low-medium video quality
- not much new things
- girls are not what i expected
- to less videos (arround 90) for that price and quality
- plain site design
Bottom Line: positivly is to metion that you have trial access, but beware with the trial access you aren`t able to get to the networksites CutiesInTights.com,PeeHunters.com,YoungFatties.com,
PlumperWorld.com,PlumpMature.com,
MaturesWorld.com,FuckThisTranny.com,TrannyMovieClips.com.

if i look at this extra content i am not really unhappy not getting access to that :).

the girls are not that hot as i wished. few of them don`t make me even trying to download the video, but that`s alway`s a question of taste.

all in all i don`t think this site is worth trying it regular. also as a trial it`s nothing what fills my computer and makes me like watching it often.

i like good quality videos, but you don`t find them here :(
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Panty Amateur

14. Panty Amateur (0)

Pay
Active
95
WeeWillyWinky (88) 02-15-08  05:03pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Site has one mission and carries it out nearly perfectly.
- Video is top quality, with some HD. All vids, even as far back as 05, are top quality: at least 2000 kbps.
- Very attractive British models.
- One new vid every day.
- Tons of content. There may be over 800 videos at present.
Cons: - Scenarios are repetitive.
- No download options. People with slow connections will need a lot of time on their hands.
- Limited nudity.
- Lighting bad in a few vids.
- If silicone were tea, this site would have more than China.
- Longer videos, with a bit more creative thinking, would be an improvement, though five minutes is pretty good for the material as it's currently presented.
Bottom Line: If you are looking for hardcore, masturbation, toys, etc, you will absolutely loathe this site.

If you find that panties just get in the way of the good stuff and feel that they are more of a nuisance than anything else, this site will cause you to become suicidal with boredom.

If you feel that the thong is the greatest advancement in the history of women's underwear, this site will cause you to go postal on your monitor, and then you'll have to buy a new one.

If you feel that a "panty video" should include: panties around the ankles at all times, panties being sniffed, panties being inserted into various orifices, you are encouraged to avoid this site, in the same way that anyone with taste should avoid a Pauly Shore movie.

If you come to this site looking for porn, you will not find it, unless you're convinced that any woman who would allow herself to be photographed topless is a harlot in service to the Lord of the Underworld.

**

I didn't take points off because of the limited scope of this site, because it doesn't claim to be anything other than what it is. This is a video site, there are no pics; it's a panty-site, there's no hardcore. It's a site directly aimed at the panty/upskirt video collector, with a touch of voyeurism and mild sapphic play. If you're not interested in those things there is no reason for you to visit.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit TNV Girls

15. TNV Girls (0)

Pay
Active
86
WeeWillyWinky (88) 01-06-08  09:11pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - True to the niche
- Very pretty girls.
- Lots of content, updated regularly.
- Good quality video, and quality seems to be improving steadily.
- These girls seem to really love smooching with one another. Can't blame them for that now can we?
Cons: - Too much outdoors material. Kinis are for sunning and swimming, panties are for indoors. Or maybe I'm just crazy?
- Too many tats. Tattoos are nasty, dang it.
- Pic quality needs to be taken up a notch or two.
- *Some* of the best quality vids are DRM protected.
Bottom Line: TNV rates a higher score than its sister site, Virginal Visions, because there is so much more material here and because the vids are more varied and of higher quality, generally speaking. I think the pics are better (content-wise) at VV, but that's because I'm an old schooler when it comes to ladies' skivvies.

I ended up keeping almost 6 gigs of video and 261 zipped pic sets. The pic sets are numbered up into the 800's, so I obviously didn't get anywhere near all of them. Newer vids come in at 1000 to 1600kbps, 640x480, and run from 15 to 20 mins, and you can usually get them in one file. I don't know if 20 minutes is the 'whole' video in any particular case, but these files are big enough. Most of the pics are small, but the bigger ones are 1024x768. Despite their size they are very nice, for the most part.

I don't care for the fainting vids. There's something creepy about a guy feeling up a girl while she's out cold. I know it's fantasy, but it still bothers me.

The site is very softcore and heavy on soft-lesbianism, and only recommended to those who appreciate pretty girls getting it on in their underwear.

One more note: when I joined the site it was having technical problems: pics not opening, links not working, etc. I emailed the webmaster and by the next day everything was fixed. There was even a message posted at the site about maintenance problems which were being attended to. Good work, and good customer service. Few points extra for that.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cute Panty Girls

16. Cute Panty Girls (0)

Pay
Active
75
WeeWillyWinky (88) 12-19-07  06:22pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exhaustive and eclectic selection of panty-oriented content
- Some excellent video content
- Decent sized pics: avg 768x1024
- good bonus site on offer
- vids and pics are categorized for search purposes, but not in the actual lay-out of the site.
Cons: - Non-exclusive material
- lots and lots of boring, dated pic-sets
- pics seem to have been air-brushed to look fresher
- quality is pot-luck, hit and miss.
Bottom Line: I'm a panty/lingerie enthusiast and I must say things seem pretty dismal at this point all across netland, with a few rare exceptions.

Cute Panty Girls is more or less a grab-bag of odds and ends all tied together and semi-organized. I saw several sets from Panty Plaza and many others are over-familiar. There is some good stuff, but if you're into this kind of material odds are you've seen it before, and you've certainly seen better.

Video content is panty-oriented and fetish oriented. You'll see several high quality hand-job vids, some low-quality spanking vids, casting/strip/interview vids, masturbation, toys, even watersports.

Pic content is mostly lingerie and panties, with focus on glamour/softcore. There are tons of sets, nearly 900 I think, and most of it, for the panty-enthusiast who's been around, is second-rate, not to mention non-exclusive. I have to say, though, there are some diamonds in the rough. I finally got the complete set from a pic I've loved for several years, for instance. Don't know where it comes from, but it's in the top five percentile for the avid undies/lingerie pic collector, of this I'm sure.

Must mention there are two bonus sites. One of them, Jeans and Panties, contains 50 vids (and counting) which can be downloaded in HQ or HD. These vids are tepid in content but the quality is great, and the girls are gorgeous. Good quality pic sets accompany the vids. The other bonus site, Panty Lickers, offers decent quality vids and pics.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Asian Panty Peeks

17. Asian Panty Peeks (0)

Pay
Active
70
WeeWillyWinky (88) 09-05-07  08:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good looking models.
- High-quality pics.
- Vids look OK.
- Interesting style, lots of mirrors, costume-play.
- Regular updates.
Cons: - Navigation is terrible to practically non-existent.
- Use of the term "Lolita" in at least one set title, which I believe is considered unacceptable nowadays and should be.
- Sets are poorly organized and contain tons of the same shots over and over, some turned sideways, some turned upside down, just to beef up the quantity of pics and to tire your patience for no good reason.
Bottom Line: I need more characters to do justice to how poorly put together this site is. Navigation? What's that? You have what seems to be two main pages with thumbs leading to the galleries. Both pages are over-long. None of the galleries are numbered. There are no model lists or browse features whatsoever. Vids are offered on the right-hand sidebar of one of the main gallery pages.

All pic sets are contained on one page each, with big thumbnails. Some sets have over 200 pics. Every set I looked at so far is made up of a few choice views of the model repeated over and over and over, with tiny variations. These sets could be trimmed by seventy percent and you wouldn't lose anything. They need someone who knows how to coordinate photo sets.

To add to the tedium someone has decided to have each pic open in a new window. Maybe I'm just an idiot but I can't see how to change this. Each pic has to be closed out in order to view another one, unless you want to keep a thousand windows open. To make things even worse, each set is numbered identically: "b_001" to b_ whatever". Always a "b", never a different letter.

This site is way softcore and caters more to the voyeur than the panty/lingerie lover. "Peeks" is what you get most of the time. There is a truckload of tease and very little pay-off, though there are a few sets which contain full nudity. The quality of some of the pics is offset by the sheer tedium caused by this site's lack of organization and concern for the customer.

Follow-Up:
upped the score to 70.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit TNV Girls

18. TNV Girls (0)

Pay
Active
80
nygiants03 (162) 07-16-07  12:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - frequent updates every 2-3 days
- a few hd videos
- some very erotic content especially the fainting videos
-you can zip download pics, pics looks fairly good
-over 20 extra streaming cams and galleries( nothing to write home about)
- lots of content
- mostly good looking girls
Cons: - only 2 full length movies as of now. Supposedly it says more will come soon
-older videos in lots of clips
-almost all videos are in wmv video format, some avi
- site navigation is very difficult
-hardly any of the girls are big boobs. only one girl that i see with a d cup
-mostly all softcore even though there is some lesbian oral
Bottom Line: Video categories by girl, panties, nude, girl play, girl on girl, parties, fainting, long play, and special
-37 party videos , 58 long play videos ,38 by girl, 82 girl play videos , 154 girl-girl videos , 42 fainting videos , 73 panties vidoes, 8 nude videos, 2 special

-Pic categories by girl, panties, nude, girl play, girl on girl, panties

-The full videos are 403 mb and 652 mb long

-the upcoming pics and vid section is empty

-Lots of lesbian videos, a few solo, a few of a guy touching the girl which is during the fainting videos, and many other softcore vids and pics.

-The fainting videos are of a girl pretending to be passed out and a guy taking advantage of her by rubbing her body and touching and kissing her.

-site has lots of content and potential. Lots of young girls in erotic situations, and natural settings but the videos are all over the place with different clips it makes it very annoying and confusing. If they can fix that and put give every a video a full scene option and more download options this site will be Great!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Amateur Upskirts

19. Amateur Upskirts (0)

Pay
Newbie
100*
Searcher (0) 04-13-07  04:57pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Have you ever thought you'd died and gone to heaven? Well if, like me, you thrill at the sight of a nice pair of female legs emerging from a skirt - "in the most delightful way!" - then this site will certainly prove as addictive to you as it has to me. I wouldn't even really describe myself as a "porn user", because these are everyday scenes, but just aimed straight at someone with a strong panty fetish. These girls know exactly what to do to tease and show, and they love doing it.
Cons: I have tried, but I really can not think of any. My mouth just starts to salivate at the very thought of what I know I shall enjoy seeing, and I have never yet been disappointed. Maybe it's just me, but to me this site is Paradise, and there are many scenes which I'm sure will stay etched in my brain for as long as I have one!
Bottom Line: With your membership you also get joint membership of two other sites on a similar yet varied theme, filmed by the same brilliant cameraman. Pantyhose Amateurs is one, Michelle Lynn is the other, each one equally superb. There are even bonus sites generously added to the package. In conclusion I'd like to add that I joined originally for one month only - and that was so long ago now I can't even remember the date! We all like different things of course, but this Super-Site is definitely "My Bag"! If it is your bag too, then I recommend you to try it, and I'm sure you'll love it too.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lingerie Videos

20. Lingerie Videos (0)

Pay
Newbie
98*
speedy (0) 02-28-07  10:52am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Love the site, it's updated with a new movie everyday. has large high quality movies and short clips of babes doing the nasty in stockings, lingerie and my fav latex.

oh, also has some HD content and pictures.
Cons: A bit pricy, but worth it to me.
Bottom Line: Not sure what to say but, if you like hot chicks in stockings, pantyhose, lingerie or latex it's a great site to be a member of.

but you need a fast internet connection for some of the movies because all the full clips are 200mb + it takes me a long time to download on my slow connection. I usually stick with the short clips but sometimes like a movie part so much I need to download the whole thing.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-20 of 20  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. All Panty Pass (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.12 seconds.