| User Reviews (4) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Watching hot girls work out naked is a turn on and I'm surprised how rare this concept is in adult video
- Many of the models are extremely attractive
- Older videos have more masturbation
- Newer videos are higher in quality
- Lots of videos
- Lots of stills
- DRM-free files that play on anything
- Nice 3-day trial option |
| Cons: |
- "Exercises" can be highly distracting due to the lack of a passable attempt at aerobics, calisthenics, yoga, etc.
- Unenthusiastic athletic activity (i.e., girls giving up half way through routines, apparently "walking" through their sets, etc)
- Rare sex acts
- Some models look very homely
- No interview or other information present about the model (not a deal breaker, but is aesthetically pleasing)
- Don't bother with the audio soundtrack
- Files can take a while to download
- Stills appear to be just screen grabs from the video and are, therefore, lo-fi in quality.
- Relatively expensive - there are cheaper hardcore sites |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been orbiting this site for a year, toying with the idea of slapping down $30 for a subscription until finally getting it done while I getting my home all to myself and I was slightly disappointed. The previews seem hot enough, but there is very little variety between the videos. On the one hand, many of the girls are pretty enough, with some masturbation, some outdoor action, and gyrations as part of an exercise or dance with plenty of appealing camera angles (without the annoying wide angle lens and zooming to which San Fernando valley-based porn is thoroughly addicted). If you're into Euro-Russian girls, this site can be particularly appealing. Nevertheless, there are big problems like the girls seem to be half-assing the exercises and while I shouldn't care, it's more of a distraction than it is erotic if they're just phoning it in. Don't bother with the sound. Some of the videos look like they were shot onto VHS and then dubbed off using a vid-cap card. Some of these ladies are rather plain looking and there is no play/interaction with the camera, so there's a somewhat cold feel to the videos. Overall, I would recommend (trying) to download as much as you can with their iffy bandwidth in a 3-day trial and moving on. Hopefully someone really executes their idea to a much higher level or they someday elevate their own standards. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ arround 250 videos
+ next door russians
+ newer videos have better quality
+ one extra site
+ nice idea of posing |
| Cons: |
-inconsistent download speed
-slow download speed 27-2100 kbit/s
-medium video quality
- music in videos (a no go!)
-sometimes unmotivated exercises from the girls
- body shape is to similar
-expansive trial price 8,95
-Expansive regular price 29,95 |
| Bottom Line: |
I am not that in voyeur sites, but seeing a 90 in the purating i had to check it out.
I can`t really say that i am disappointed, but all in all the site is only an average site form e.
You got plenty videos of every kind of duration. The videos content is, as the sitename says so sportive. that`s for itself, a good idea. you got all kind of exercises. The quality of the videos is all in all medium, something what in theses times isn`t better then standard. The newer ones have better quality, but there are to less videos i that quality.
As an extra you get the site Voyeur Realm which is like that site, only from the voyeuristic point of view.
The cons are in my opinion massive.
The downloadspeed was totally inconsitent. While downloading a single file the speed varies from 27-2100 kbit/s which takes a small video clip a long download time. If you use a downloadmanager the total speed increases, so you can download simultaniously e.g. 5-6 videos. All in all the downloadtime stays even very long.
The girls do there exercises rather very unmotivated and getting the lousy backkground music also, some of the videos aren`t worth to download them. The girls also look rather the same. Body slim, tits none, pubic hair shaved…that bores even if they stretch every part of the body.
Last but not least, the price is in regular and as a trial much to expansive for what you get. A price arround 10€ would be fitting.
All in all
Might recommend |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Bill through CCBill
-Inexpensive three day full access trial that includes full access to voyeurrealm.com.
-Archive of 160 videos going back almost three years. They are about a half hour long, some are over an hour.
-Newest videos are 720x576, 2515 kbps. Most of the site is only a little less quality.
-Russian girls, basically the girl next door type. Little or no makeup.
-Some variety of body types and ages. However, mostly 20 to 25 and very thin. |
| Cons: |
-Some girls are so skinny that you can clearly see their ribcages. Not my taste.
-Support for Download Manager Plus, but not Flashget or Free Download Accelerator.
-No model index or way of searching for models.
-Lousy, really bad background music. Turn the sound off.
-No interviews or any model information of any kind. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has yoga, stretching, dancing both ballet moves and other dancing, gymnastics, fitness workouts, etc. Almost every video starts out clothed and includes full nudity about halfway through. There is a nice mix of full body interesting shots with very explicit ass and full spread eagle pussy shots. Most importantly, they are not stingy with the erotic shots, which will keep your interest. My only real complaint is that many of the girls are too skinny for my taste. Even those videos can be well done and work for me. The girls are mostly quite flexible, limber and even athletic. Interesting to watch, but at a half hour for each video, you may want to fast forward a bit.
I like nudity, but this is better than the ordinary simple posing on many sites because of the interesting variety that comes from the athletic movements of the girls. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|