| User Reviews (4) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-tons of videos. it looks to be 1 update per week. very few repeat models
-REAL amatuers, not tons of makeup or fake boobs. im guessing theyre college girls looking to make some money
-very entertaining videos
-trial gives full access
-great download speeds. ive been getting around 2mb/s and have gotten 50gb the past 2 days
-download managers supported (i use download them all for firefox)
-uses ccbill payments. never had a problem with them, very easy to cancel
-newest videos are 720p
-most videos are 20+ minutes |
| Cons: |
-a lot of the photos are screen caps. however they are honest about it and label them such
-very confusing filenames. sometimes theres similar names like nsv-001 & nsv-01
-older videos quality drops. even the newest videos quality isnt very impressive for being 720p |
| Bottom Line: |
basically hot russian teens doing stretches and jumping around having there boobs bounce. they range from uncomfortable, embarrassed, and having fun. a lot of the girls are normal looking, with a couple 10s. quality isnt the best and the music gets old fast (tho it is quite catchy), but its the best place to ogle real amateur teens working out
i love this series of websites. theres no others like them, they own this niche. the $10 3 day trials is a steal, its just too bad they dont have a $20 a month deal with tbp cause id def sign up for that instead |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Archived: |
littlejoe wrote 1 review (01-25-07) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-No regional billing even though it is through CCBill.
-Inexpensive three day full access trial. There is no need to spend more for a full month as you can get it all with a download manager. In my book this makes the site a bargain.
-Once a week updates in an archive of 241 videos, about a half hour each.
-Natural looking Russian amateurs. About as unglam as you can get. They are real, not overly made up plastic looking clones. However, the models are mostly very similar in body type and age and the content can get repetitive. Instead of porn star clones you get natural women who don't vary much either. |
| Cons: |
-Video quality could be a lot better. The stats show 1280x720, 4000 kbps for the best videos, but I suspect these are redone lower quality shoots.
-As you may expect with amateurs, many are very ordinary in their attractiveness. Like many non porn star websites, you have to search for the knockouts. There are some videos here that I really love.
-Sometimes slow downloads.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable.
-WMV is the only video option.
-No way to search. The videos are listed in date order. However, almost none of the models have more than one video.
-Turn the sound off as the background music is terrible. |
| Bottom Line: |
When I was twelve, the 19 year old next door used to dance and exercise nude. Sometimes she drew the shades and sometimes she did not. I think she secretly got off on me watching her. That makes nude exercise enough for me to love this site, although it is hardly perfect.
One thing I appreciate is that the models seem real. These are amateurs acting like amateurs. Sometimes they play up to the camera, and sometimes they just go through the motions. If they are showing me their bodies in an explicit way, I truly don't care if they are enjoying themselves. If a model shows me her pussy spread eagled, do I care if she is having a good time? It is all the same to me if they are an exhibitionist or just doing it for a paycheck.
In most of porn, I get the feeling that a scene I am watching is of people who fit the ideal of what porn producers think we like. Further they usually pretend they are having a good time and most of the time that involves bad acting. That seems so fake and artificial to me. It is obvious that on most porn sites the models are doing it for just a paycheck, but on this site you don't get bad acting in an obvious attempt to pretend otherwise.
A criticism I have of most softcore nude sites, think MetArt for example, is that the models are not erotic and just don't give that something extra that would work for me. Too much art, not enough erotic.With this site, you have movement that often teases in that you seldom know when you are going to get that great angle or that explicit shot. The teasing may not be intentional or played up, but you get it just the same. If you want to see a twenty year old on her back,opening and closing her legs, this is what you get. How about arching her back and pushing her pussy towards the camera after laying on the floor doing scissor kicks with her legs? Works for me.
If they only had better video quality I would give the site a higher score. |
| Respond: |
11 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Archived: |
mbaya wrote 1 review (01-14-09) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score. |
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Nude Sport Videos Activity - Nude Sport Videos Reviews - Nude Sport Videos Comments - Nude Sport Videos News
