Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Divine Breasts

Visit Site

Divine Breasts

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Big Boobs
2. BBW Girls
3. All Fetishes

ChristyPillows Inc.
17 Sites Listed
Partner: Boob Bucks

Monthly: $21.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.95 (3 months, recurring)

View all Divine Breasts Site Facts at TBP.

50.0
Feedback History  (10)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 1
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 5
Review by TheBestPorn:

70.0
TBP Review

Date: 09-28-10

Type: 2.0

Vanessa
+  Exclusive Amateur Big Boob Content.
-  Site Design Needs Major Work.
-  Content Quality Is below Average.

User Reviews (4)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Newbie
50*
mememe (0) 06-17-12  07:05am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some (not all) of the models are very busty
Cons: Poor design makes it difficult to navigate. Only low def video. Poorly shot. There is a hidden download limit which cuts you off very quickly and makes it very difficult to access most of the video.
Bottom Line: Poor quality material and badly designed. The download limit on this site makes it a complete rip off. I have had to rate it 50/100 but the real score should be much, much lower for this complete pile of ****!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
50
BubbaGump (18) 06-09-12  03:44pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -- Creative photography
-- Unique content.
-- A good number of classic photosets.
-- Site delivers what is advertised--images of women with Large BBW breasts.
Cons: -- Technical quality of images can be hit or miss.
-- Primitive site design and interface.
-- Exceedingly poor streaming speeds of both photos and videos throughout my entire memberhips period.
-- Site is not growing much.
-- Limited content.
-- Vdeos are just a novelty.
-- Site owners play games with content(hold back content and offer to let you view more content if you stick around longer or sign up somewhere else)
--Bandwidth Limit imposed to 550 MEG per day.
Bottom Line: Most of the models at this site are of the BBW variety and most sport large EEE size breasts. There is very little silicone here. These are well-endowed amateur models for the most part, with a few glam types thrown in.

Full nudity is rare and the site is mostly softcore. It's all about catering to those with a breast fetish. The photography, in many caes, is actually quite well done and creative. There are a few poorly done sets but this is the exception. However, the owners skimp on resolution at times and the actual technical quality of the displayed images can vary from fairly decent 1600 resolution to grainy and out-of-focus 1024.

If you are into this genre and natural, large breasts are your thing, you would likely find the photo content here to be interesting. However, that interest will fade pretty quickly, as the amount of content is a bit limited and the site seems to be growing at a snails pace. Unless you view only a few photosets once or twice during a one-month subscription period, you will find the content runs out pretty quickly.

Videos are pretty much a novelty and the main show are the photosets. With very few exceptions, most videos are small 350 clips that run perhaps a minute or two.

The site designers also have a habit of 'padding' the numbers when it comes to overall photosets available. For example, they have created a fair number of photosets for each model. Model X may have twenty photosets available for viewing on her page. However, what they do in most cases is split up a single photo shoot into a number of different sets. For example, a lingerie shoot might be split up into three or four seperate sets. The first set on the page would be perhaps fourteen photos of the model disrobing, the next would show the model reclining while partially disrobed, etc etc. In essence, you are being given ten different photosets for a model, when in reality, they are really just one or two actual photo shoots split up.

This type of presentation is annoying and similar things happen in other areas. There are a lot of cross-sell marketing tools being used. In more than one case, a popular model will only have one or two photosets(or perhaps none at all and a few videos will be in the model area) and a marketing link advises you that "btw..this model has her own page !". Unfortunately, that page requires a seperate memebership.

The owners also let you know that the longer you stick around, the more content you can see. For example, Model X may have only a few photosets or a video that is incomplete and ends with a tease. They will then advise you that the longer you stay past 30 days, the more content you get to see --"Want to see more of her? blah blah blah.."

Given the limited content already available, this may be a good business model to get people to stick around, but the content isn't that great that I would eprsonally pay more just to see a bit more of Model X. IMO, this tactic will simply rub people the wrong way and they will just move on. Also, who says you aren't going to do the same thing if I sign up for Model X's page? I would advise the owners to rethink this strategy. You will more often than not just succeed in ticking off your customer base instead of given them a reasont o want to stay around with knowing they won't get the same treatment for next month's rent.

As far as the site design and layout, it is quite primitive. It gets the job done. However, the menus and navigation tools are primitive. The actual streaming speeds of content is about the worse I have ever experienced at any time with any online service of any kind. Strangely, the quickest way to get content on this site is to download the photosets. Usually, the opposite is true.

Without fail, I could view perhaps one or two images in a gallery, then any subsequent images would take a ridiculous amount of time to simply load. I have a high speed DSL connection and have never experienced anything this bad.

The site also limits you to 500 MEG download per day. You cannot stream or DL past this limit. In short, the strategy of this site seems to be to employ any possible means to get people to stick around longer than thirty days. They make it is hard as possible for you to stream or view the already limited content at the site in a thirty day period. Limiting to 500 MEG download a day and freezing the stream after viewing two photos means it will take six months to get to all of the content that would take a few days of viewing to get to at any other site. The goal is obviously to frustrate you by prolonging the time to to view images via streaming so you download the sets and quickly eat up your daily allotment.

Crooked? Underhanded? Shady? I will leave that for you to judge.

I would give the actual photo content a score of 70 but the experience a 0.05. Since I can only score a minimum of 50, I will give the site an overall score of 50.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Expired
80
roseman (253) 04-06-09  02:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
83
jonesyboy (23) 01-28-07  02:54am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (5)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

brianksh (0) 05-30-09  01:13am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Canceled my Subscription

I liked the content on Divine Breasts, which was why I joined. The 500 MB download restriction really made me mad, because they never mentioned it anywhere on the site. A number of their movies are 300+ MB. I believe they do this to make sure it takes you more then 30-60 days to download their content. They get 2-3 months worth of charges from a new subscription. If your going to have a bandwidth limit state that before someone plops down their money, and make it reasonable, say 5 GB a day. Until they change this I will not subscribe again.

Very unhappy

Brian

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

fiou (0) 04-23-09  03:02pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (2)

So so

I've joined 2 weeks ago. The girls are really huge and natural. Fine. But the download limit is annoying. The quality of videos is very very average. You have to download multiple small clips. The site does work witn orbitdownloader. Try it. But after two weeks, you will probably forget to go back and continue downloading. Ann Vanderbilt is hot, but the scenes are very repetitive.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

roseman (253) 08-22-08  09:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)

Suggestion

I was a member of DivineBreasts.com 2 months ago and I can say that Ann Vanderbilt is really hot, it would be great idea if she could start her own adult website.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

RagingBuddhist (63) 03-14-08  01:35am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (0)

Some site info

Seems the new picture quality costs. It's now $21.95 a month to join.
Also...
Obviously, I should've read the reviews here more closely. I just joined. About 10 minutes into it, I find I'm over the bandwidth limit of 1/2 gig a day that's not mentioned anywhere on the site.
It's so bad, it even cut off a download in the middle of a file that would've taken it over that limit. How fucking crooked can you get?

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

roseman (253) 06-03-07  10:12am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)

New pictures size

I noticed that Divine Breast's guys have improved site's pictures quality to 1024 x 728, definitely GOOD !

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Divine Breasts

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Divine Breasts (1) 50.0 70.0
2. Alexandra Moore (0) N/A N/A
3. Alicia Loren (0) N/A N/A
4. Big Boob Gem (0) N/A N/A
5. Big Butt Bounce Twerk (0) N/A N/A
6. Dolly Morgan (0) N/A N/A
7. June Kelly (0) N/A N/A
8. Karen Udders (0) N/A N/A
9. Massive Mellons (0) N/A N/A
10. Natural Breast Fetish (0) N/A N/A

View All: Company Sites (17)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.45 seconds.