Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Chick Trick

Chick Trick (0)

Monahan (40) 10-28-07  03:40am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)

Curiosity Compels

This review made me curious to see what's up with the site so I went to the "public" site to see what's up. It looks like it's that tired and outdated gimmick about "tricking" unwitting ladies into copulating on camera. The sample trailers are lousy quality and totally unrealistic.

Looks like a tired old site where the owner is simply trying to make a few extra bucks without investing any time, imagination or energy into the site.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (8)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Khan
PU Staff
So to be clear ... your comment is based entirely on the free (tour) areas of the site and not on the actual membership area?
10-28-07  05:29am

Reply To Message

2

Denner (233) Even if Manahans comment here is based on the preview/free tour he's got a point - a point I can follow.
I tried the same free tour and though I got a popup-blocker - still got popups.
Besides, I think it's a fair warning.

10-28-07  08:52am

Reply To Message

3

troglodite (69) Took a look myself, and while it may be premature to have "beware" warnings based on just a tour in most cases, it does appear that there are no models here newer than the ones I first saw in like 2002 or 2003. Reality porn is anything but reality - so you can usually judge a site's ability to update based on the models in their tour, since they'll generally be most of the same ones between all of the more major sites. That said - I wouldn't join this one, but if someone's looking for a long lost Taylor Rain scene or something like that, it's nice that the site is still sitting around taking memberships. :)
10-28-07  09:02am

Reply To Message

4

Denner (233) It's - "Monahan", of course - sorry, hit the wrong key...
10-28-07  11:27am

Reply To Message

5

Monahan (40) REPLY TO #1 - Khan :

Exactly.

My comment followed a 50 point review of this site by another member who reported that the site support function was totally non responsive to his calls for help. He also said that the content updates stopped a long time ago. That's why I checked out the tour for myself just to see what this site looked like. It reminded me of my early searches back in the early 2000's both in the quality of the videos and the nature of the content.

I've seen similar thematic approaches (phony scam perpetrated on supposedly innocent and unsuspecting babes), but all of them were two or more years ago. The tour is intended to get the user to spring for a subscription, so if it's a crappy tour, why should I expect the real thing to be any better?

10-28-07  04:10pm

Reply To Message

6

jd1961 (95) Look at all the pornstars from 5 or 6 years ago! The age of phony porn come ons is in the past IMO!
10-28-07  05:20pm

Reply To Message

7

Khan
PU Staff
REPLY TO #5 - Monahan :

I was not questioning your right to your opinion. I was simply making sure it was clear that your remark was based on an observation of the tour area rather than from the perspective of a paying member.
10-29-07  05:16am

Reply To Message

8

Monahan (40) REPLY TO #7 - Khan :

Completely correct, Kahn, and I thought I was clear.

I read the posted review that gave it a 50 and thought I'd check out the site. What I found as a non-subscriber was a site that appeared to be seriously out-of-date and that the low score review was likely to be spot on. The "beware" was a direct result of those observations and nothing more.

The site may be wonderful but because I didn't sign up, I really can't say. But I can say the webmaster for that site has done a lousy job promoting it and, apparently, chooses not to provide any support to paying customers of the site, based on the reviewer's comments.

Low odds that they'll see any of my money. ;-)

10-30-07  08:37am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.