| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
I was a member there up until about three weeks ago. I have to say that of the three sites that come with that membership (Exploited College Girls and Back Room Casting Couch being the other two) I think NVG is the weakest. Some of that is subjective so I’ll try to explain.
My primary reason for joining when I do (I’ve joined maybe five or six times now) is to get access to ECG. BRCC is a great added bonus that adds value to the membership but NVG is a take-it-or-leave-it part of the deal. The scenes are all fairly well done and many of the models are attractive (though some aren’t) so on that scale the site does okay.
Where the site really falls flat is in site design and technical stuff. I’m a fan of simple site designs but NVG looks like it was designed in 1995 and not updated since then. I’ve never found a search mechanism though there may be one. The only way I’ve ever found to sort the videos is by a bar at the top of the screen that allows you to sort by year. I don’t know how that date would work with a remastered video. Once you’re on a specific year page you have some very small thumbnails that really don’t assist in deciding if you want to download the scene. I can’t recall if there is any better way to see the model before downloading.
Speaking of downloading, if there are downloading options I’ll choose MP4s and look for 1280x720 if it’s available. That depends on the bitrate too as I’m looking for the best compromise between video quality and file size. The files are MP$s but if there is an option for different resolutions I didn’t see it. Even the most recent uploads are only 656x368, 2500kb/s and 29fps. That resolution is very low by today’s standards. If I’m incorrect and there are better options for downloading I hope that someone else will weigh in and let us know.
There is a big element of subjectivity here, but if this were a stand-alone site I wouldn’t join unless the price was under $10. The site itself and the video quality are too far below industry standards. But (and this is subjective again) Exploited College Girls is a great site (though the attractiveness of the models is slipping a bit in the past eight months) and Back Room Casting Couch is a good site so if you have any interest in those I’d recommend joining and you get NVG as a bonus so you can explore that.
As I said, I don’t have an active membership there now but if you have any specific questions I can try to answer them. I hope this helped you a bit.
|
10-27-14 02:50pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - rearadmiral :
That definitely helps, ra. Appreciate the long response. I was asking about this site because I've got free access to it as a bonus from Back Room Casting. But, as a bonus site, there are only tiny thumbnails and a flash video for each model. There are no details beyond that - no mention of file sizes or file type or anything. It turns out they're all mp4 of various bit rates and dimensions, some of which are pretty low quality. I was hoping the full access site was at least a little better detailed. From what you told me, it seems to be somewhat better, but not by much. Despite that, it looks like I'll be checking it out of these days... Thanks again for the reply.
|
10-28-14 09:43am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - RagingBuddhist :
You raise an interesting point that I've never considered - that the site access as a bonus to the other sites is different than if you joined through NVG. I have nothing to go on but speculation, but I'm guessing that the site access is the same whether you get a membership as part of the ECG/BRCC/NVG or whether you join specifically through NVG and get access to the other two. Maybe someone else can weigh in on that point.
|
10-28-14 03:20pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
creepingdeath84 (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - rearadmiral :
Yeah, I feel the opposite about the Back Room and Exploited College sites. Sadly, as you pointed out, the quality and dates of the older videos are disappointing. But I think as far as directing, editing and length, Net Video Girls is better and more interesting to watch.
It just seemed to me that the girls in NVG were more into it and more interesting than Exploited College Girls. Some of those girls were even silent during parts of a scene (ExCoGi).
|
02-29-16 08:01pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - creepingdeath84 :
A great thing about this site is that we can agree to disagree because of different tastes. I'm a big fan of Exploited College Girls and many of the things that you see as negatives I really like. Sure, I'd change a few things but I like the interviews because so many of the models don't show up elsewhere.
I will have to admit to coming around a bit on NVG. I was a member recently and I found I liked many of the scenes more than I had in past memberships. I just wish they'd ditch the 1990s looking website!
Welcome to Pornusers. I hope you feel welcome here and stick around. This site used to be a lot more active but with some recent changes it seems to be coming back. There are a lot of new names here. I doubt you'll find another porn forum with the comraderie and decorum that you'll find here.
|
03-02-16 05:38pm
Reply To Message
|
