Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit DDF Network

DDF Network (3)

martinlongbow (0) 07-24-14  12:32pm
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)

recycling content

just subbed to ddf and found out that they are recycling content for some shoots.it looks like they are updating multiple times a day but some of the scenes are way old dated with comments from 2008-2012.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (5)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


pat362 (375) You can add using leased material to the list of things they do that can be considered less than desirable but all of these semi-negative things have to be compared with the fact that they update with about
07-24-14  04:06pm

Reply To Message


DDFNetwork (2)
Hi Martin,

Thank you for your honest feedback, please let us react to the concerns you raised.

We are republishing weekly about 4-5 of the best of our older sets, completely reedited and remastered. Compared to the 27 exclusive updates we publish a week, and the fact that the republished sets are remastered, I wouldn't consider this as a downside.

We have a huge archive of scenes, and some of our best material is worth a re-edit and remaster with today's new technologies, also it's worth a revisit, as which we select for these purposes are simply epic scenes, and still they are exclusive. We are also increasing the overall quality of our archives, now closing to 13,000 scenes.

We won't ever republish scenes what reached their Best Before Date, that's for sure, so I hope you forgive us for not communicating the remasters so clear and will find satisfaction in either these, or the 22 brand new and exclusive weekly updates.

Kind regards

DDF Network Representative

07-25-14  03:55am

Reply To Message


LPee23 (24) REPLY TO #2 - DDFNetwork :

Hi Kris,

DDF is lacking nothing in terms of new updates. You are putting out some amazing stuff. Did you read my comments on the previous DDF review and on my poll regarding removing old content where I mentioned DDF? You will see that this is something that I am very opinionated about. I was about to post a review that gave DDF some of my highest praises but also some harsh but honest criticism for removing some truly epic older shoots. My interactions with your first-line customer support have been pleasant, but after 6 months they have not resulted in a single classic DDF shoot in the pee fetish genre being re-posted. The sets that I have in mind don't have Best By Dates, and they feature models such as Sandy, Justine Joli, Zafira, and Zuzana Z.

For a while I held off on writing my review of DDF. It would have been a difficult review to write. On one hand, DDF is amazing, and your new content deserves 100%. On the other hand, it frustrates me to no end to have missed out on such amazing older content. I am glad to see you posting here for DDF and listening to PU members. I would love to give you feedback as you remaster older content. Is there a way we can talk more about this? You can either reply to me here, PM me here at PU, or reply to my email via my username LPee23 at DDF. I am now holding off on writing my review again, not because I even presume that an honest but negative review from one member could necessarily move mountains at DDF, but because I really hope that this issue can be resolved, and I would really much rather write you the positive review that I think you deserve one day.



07-25-14  06:56pm

Reply To Message


DDFNetwork (2)
REPLY TO #3 - LPee23 :

Hi LPee23,

I see your problem here. We are not yet at the point to start remastering of the house of taboo sets you are mentioning, but they will be re-captured within a few months. It's a huge job to remaster all these archive videos, so I hope you'll have the patience for our team, and I hope you understand that we are following a specific structure in the remastering of our archives, where we cannot change the order, otherwise - with a huge archive like ours - it would lead to total chaos.

Anyways, I forwarded your request to our reproduction team, so they'll let me know when they start the processing of the taboo sets, so I can update you. As soon as any of those done, I'll say a word for you at the updates planning. If you have any spoecific sets in mind, please don't hesitate to send it to support@ddfnetwork.com, addressing your email to Kris.

Kind Regards


07-28-14  04:22am

Reply To Message


LPee23 (24) REPLY TO #4 - DDFNetwork :

Hi Kris,

That is great news. Thank you for getting in touch with your reproduction team on my behalf. I am really glad to hear that these amazing shoots have a chance of being seen again, and that you would be willing to say a few words for me at your updates planning. I completely understand why you must follow a specific structure as you remaster your older content. I will be in touch with you regarding some specific requests. Sometimes I think porn is like art ... too often it isn't fully appreciated until it becomes scarce. Now that these classic DDF shoots are gone, if only temporarily, I have realized how amazing they really are. It's an uncommon site that would give the time of day to this type of request, and an even rarer one that would honor it. DDF already stands out thanks to your reply.



07-28-14  06:17pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.