Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

How many hours a day do you view porn?

Type: General

Submitted by Randyman (0)
Less than 1hr 32% 7 Votes
1-3 hrs 50% 11 Votes
3-6 hrs 14% 3 Votes
6-9 hrs 0% 0 Votes
9-12 hrs 5% 1 Votes
12+ hrs 0% 0 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

22 Votes Total

Jun 27, 2014

Poll Replies (12)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date


jberryl69 (Disabled) Well - at least that's the way it is these days. I actually spend more time on this site than I do viewing porn. Sad day huh?
06-27-14  06:56am

Reply To Message


Cybertoad (Disabled)
I used to spend about 1 hour a day at PU, but the last year has been so slow that I tend to come on everyday or everyother day pop in post and leave a bit read new reviews which as not as often as they once were.
But I consider PU part of the pron process.

Viewing porn means to me watching it for fun, as opposed to DL's. Dl's are not always as fun especially in large bulks.

Did I answer the question ? 1-3 hours doing something porn related just depends what part of porn sometimes I wont watch for fun for a week, but will come here and DL much more often.

06-27-14  08:23am

Reply To Message


pat362 (373) I probably spend less than an hour looking at porn and even if I add the time I search for it or talk about it than I barely get over an hour and that`s not every day. On some days it`s less than an hour.
06-27-14  06:04pm

Reply To Message


David19 (5) Probably 1-3 hours on average but 95% of that is time spent masturbating to photos of topless women freely available on the Web--and only 5% on paid porn sites. There is so much free material available that there is usually not a lot of reason to pay. Also, since I am mainly into tits, a photo of a topless woman will do just as much for me as explicit hardcore porn videos. And of course many topless photos of women are not "officially" porn but it does not matter much for me why a woman's tits are bare as long as they are. A woman, for example, going topless for a protest such as the 2012 student protests in Quebec still is being photographed with bare tits and makes just as good masturbation material as "official" porn.

I do occasionally look at paid porn sites but, like I say, the amount of time that I spent actually paying for porn is much lower.

06-28-14  06:41am

Reply To Message


jberryl69 (Disabled) REPLY TO #4 - David19 :

David, while I understand the sentiment, "There is so much free material available that there is usually not a lot of reason to pay." Usually the 'free' part of it is because people willingly rip off the artist's work which isn't exactly given away but is thievery.

While this type of download cuts across all types of genre from main line movies to music to porn. It is very easy to justify these actions but really if you were to reverse the roll - it being your work - I doubt you would be so generous.

Cutting to the chase, if everyone were to download their desired content for free, then there would be no capital for these people to operate with. There is your reason to pay.

Understand, you don't have to sign an AT&T contract to get content, but rather sign up through the PU website usually getting a nice discount, stay the month & download to your heart's content. I have my favorite sites which cater to my niche and that's how a lot of us support the industry.

As an example (& I don't mean to beat a dead horse here), one can join Evil Angel for $15 for one month and download every thing you'd want that fills your niche. That $15 is what you alone would pay to go to a movie, eat popcorn & have a soda which you get to enjoy for about 90 - 120 mins.

And that sir is my perspective of free vs pay. Hope this gives you a reason to revisit your position.

06-28-14  12:46pm

Reply To Message


LPee23 (24) It's been about 2-3 hrs/day lately, but that's about to change. I'm moving up in the world professionally, which is a good thing, but soon my work is going to demand my time close to 24/7. I probably won't be able to comment here as much either, but I'll make sure to check in often.

Edit: To whoever answered 9-12 hrs/day, I envy you and the time you have on your hands. Wealth can be measured in time as well as money, and I wish I could have the same luxury as you.

06-28-14  04:35pm

Reply To Message


David19 (5) REPLY TO #5 - jberryl69 :

I think you are perhaps missing the point. There is a great deal of material available on the Web that was never intended in the first place for use on for-pay porn sites. There is no thievery involved because the material wasn't intended for commercial purposes in the first place. This include photos of women taken in public settings where they happen to be topless for whatever reason, free Porn 2.0 sites where people upload topless photos of themselves or their SO's, photos posted publicly from the free areas of websites, etc. Yes, stealing photos that were intended to be published for commercial reasons isn't right. But I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about photos that were published freely to the Web with no intention of a profit. Evilangel.com would do nothing for me because it looks like a hardcore porn site. Hardcore does nothing for me--it is actually a bit of a turnoff for me. A photo of a woman standing topless--she doesn't have to be totally nude--is just as much, if not more, of a turnon for me as a hardcore porn site. When it comes to what I am looking for--which is very softcore porn--there is as much available for free on the Web without having been stolen from anyone without having to spend time looking at pay sites.
06-28-14  07:16pm

Reply To Message


jberryl69 (Disabled) REPLY TO #7 - David19 :

OK I see where you're going with that - I just misunderstood. As far as Evil Angel not having the kind of material that you like (and yes, for the most part it is hard core) there are photosets which contain images you might like - [img]http://hw02.images.famedownload.com/phot...previews/49717_1.jpg[/img]
06-29-14  04:04am

Reply To Message


David19 (5) Not sure if anyone is still reading this old thread but I just noticed that the moderators commenting, noting my preference for free sites, that in my profile I say I spend $500 / mo on pay sites. There is no contradiction here. On the camgirl sites--which is where by far the biggest chunk of my money for pay sites goes--one can rack up a $500 bill in very short order. But that is about the limit of my budget and these days I do like to stick to a particular budget. I can rack up a $500 bill on a camgirl site in far less than a month. So the rest of the time I need free sites to keep me occupied and financially solvent.
04-19-15  10:44am

Reply To Message


PU Staff
For the record, I'm the only moderator here and I haven't remarked on this thread.
04-19-15  02:16pm

Reply To Message


David19 (5) Khan--fair enough but there was a comment that you sent me a year or so back while approving my message of 6/28/2014 stating:

"Staff Note: odd ... your profile says you spend about $500/month on porn sites."

That is what I was responding to.

04-19-15  05:47pm

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #11 - David19 :

Ahh, understood.
04-19-15  06:13pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.06 seconds.