Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

What's more befitting a stubborn, irascible, unbending and/or deceitful webmasters?

Type: General

Submitted by graymane (31)
Suggest an attitude change 10% 1 Votes
Demand an attitude change 0% 0 Votes
Form a retaliatory protest 0% 0 Votes
Initate a boycott 40% 4 Votes
Suggest his ass be kicked-out 20% 2 Votes
Any better ideas? 30% 3 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

10 Votes Total

Jun 21, 2014

Poll Replies (9)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

TrepaNation (2) Starting with spelling "Irascible" properly... :P
06-21-14  12:09am

Reply To Message

2

rearadmiral (334) It may only be symbolic, but I think asking Rick and Khan to delist a site that has a proven issue is a good idea. While there may not be too many of us who are active on this site I'm confident that there are thousands who rely on it for purchasing decisions. If TBP/PU could delist a site it may have an impact.

Consider the recent delisting of German Goo Girls after members repeatedly complained of fraudulent billing. Sure, the webmaster weighed in each time promising to fix it, but until the site chose a reputable biller it needed to be delisted.

06-21-14  05:44am

Reply To Message

3

Khan
PU Staff
REPLY TO #1 - TrepaNation :

My bad. I generally try to catch spelling errors in submissions. Obviously, I miss some. It's corrected now. I know how misspelled words bug some folks.
06-21-14  07:59am

Reply To Message

4

Monahan (42) REPLY TO #2 - rearadmiral :

Ditto that. I see PU as the Consumer Reports of porn and want to know about the bad apples in the biz.
06-21-14  02:31pm

Reply To Message

5

Cybertoad (104) I think the should be forced to suck the cock of each member, so they truly understand the hierarchy in this relationship.
06-21-14  03:21pm

Reply To Message

6

Drooler (220) Somehow it seems that a boycott of a company that makes underwear has more chances of success than a boycott of a porn website with a webmaster of dubious character and/or unpleasant personality.

Guys slip into their briefs, it seems, for qualitatively different reasons than they click "join," even if they know the webmaster is a wretched troll.

And usually disputes with webmasters are more isolated and interpersonal. They don't incite the kind of activism that happens when outsourced textile workers are shut out of the factory after forming a union.

It's probably because there's a lot more at stake.

Well, at least we have our reviews ...

06-21-14  04:51pm

Reply To Message

7

TrepaNation (2) REPLY TO #3 - Khan :

No worries. I had a bit too much to drink last night, and that can make me a little bit.. irascible :D
06-21-14  07:11pm

Reply To Message

8

graymane (31) I would hope a reasonable assumption is embraced by those partaking in a poll matter of this nature, that is mostly put together as somewhat of a lark --- not so much as to overly bad-mouth our industry-webmasters ... (although a respectable number out there do appear to desperately need an attitudinal adjustment) ... but to foster needed attention to the fact too many of them (webmasters) are simply NOT LISTENING.
Turning deaf ears to the pleas of we who are financing their lively-hood to wallow in the lap of luxury.

I don't think I need to expound further on this matter .....cause' I figure my detractors, by now are baling in droves; ... or kindly seeking a way of getting my drift.

Gotta say though, before putting a wrap on this poll submission, I'm happily going out by passing on a note of due consideration for Drooler's (likely unwitting) but supportively help deciphering somewhat the poll's intention, by offering brilliant, contrasting examples.

06-22-14  04:03am

Reply To Message

9

Drooler (220) Unwitting yet brilliant -- must be a natural.
06-22-14  05:12am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.