Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Super Glam

Super Glam (0)

Drooler (220) 09-20-07  02:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)

TBP Follow-up review

I've just read through the 3rd follow-up reviews at TBP, dated Sept. 04. They tell me that SuperGlam has added (get this) 7 models over the past 7 months, and the number of photos has gone up by about 5,000 in that time (which sounds good). But Vanessa even said that they'd increased to 1536px in photo size, as if that's news. It's been the large size for most of the site's life -- for years now!

Other than such general figures, the follow-up review is the usual TBP "happy talk" about how the site continues to "improve." I'd read that blather back in Feb. (the 2nd follow-up review), joined, and found that it had hardly improved AT ALL in terms of content. Hadn't added much at all for MONTHS!

It's become clear to me that you don't spend a lot of time on at least some of the sites that you follow-up review. You can make all of the claims you wish to the contrary, but I know better.

SuperGlam itself still offers no tour worth jack squat, and they've raised the price to nearly $40! Let me think abou-- I'll pass!

One more thing. I've found it's much easier to put my trust in reviews done by the best of the PU reviewers. I take the TBP reviews less seriously. This follow-up is but one example of why.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (2)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


jd1961 (95) Well, if you go to a football game, buy a couple of tickets, and your team stinks up the field, you're not going home happy. But if you're in the pressbox with complimentary field passes and cocktails, you might have a different attitude Lol
09-21-07  04:00am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :

Great analogy, jd1961! Mind you, I have read at PU that TBP reviewers have to transact with credit cards for access to the sites they review, though I'm in the dark about who ultimately foots the bill.

And that might be the crux of matter. Looking at the time sequence of reviews by TBP and PU reviewers/ commenters/ repliers, you see things like TBP saying in Feb. this year that SuperGlam offers 4000px pix, then a PU reviewer saying later that the links labeled 4000px lead to pics that are considerably smaller -- finding no pics at that size. Conclusion? Obviously, TBP is just taking what they're shown at face value -- something that isn't true! -- and then telling us later that it is! Pardon my language, but that's what the word "flaky" is meant to describe.

And they say that more models have been added? OK, but is that a Porsche and a Ferrari, or a Focus and an Edsel? Names, please. Just seven (new ones) isn't going the break the keyboard.

Anyway, Joe Lunchbreak/PU member certainly seems to have more at stake when the "process transaction" button gets that mouse click.

As the saying goes, "Money talks, and bullshit walks."

09-22-07  03:42am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.