Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Naughty America

Naughty America (2)

messmer (137) 12-20-12  11:16am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

I've been bad mouthing this site ...

... because they feature so many models with fake breasts, especially in their mature sites, but have, despite my better judgement, taken the step of subscribing in order to take advantage of their exceptional offer of $7.95 for a one month trial. Surely there had to be SOMETHING that would appeal to me in this huge site.

First impression: for a one month subscription this is really a good deal, despite my previous whining, because they have an excellent search engine. By clicking on "natural breasts" in their Cougar site, for instance, I came up with 29 hits and this was only in one site. I also found two of my favorites, Rayveness and Faye Reagan under "natural."

Overall, natural breasts may be scarcer than hen's teeth but you still get more than your money's worth just by clicking in the right places. So, NA, my apologies .. in my past criticisms I did throw out the baby with the bath water. :-)

Edited 20/12/2012, 22:49 AST:

hodayathink tells me that the percentage of natural and enhanced breasts in the whole site is roughly 50/50. I will take his word for it, therefore consider the comment above modified. Naturals are NOT scarcer than hen's teeth! :-)

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (8)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


hodayathink (18) I said this to someone else, and I'll say it again: Half. They're basically half-natural and half-fake as a whole.

I realize that may not be enough for your tastes, but to act like natural breasts are a rare occurrence just isn't correct.

Edit: unless you're talking about ONLY mature models, and even then it's rare but not impossible to find.

12-20-12  01:04pm

Reply To Message


marcdc1 (174) REPLY TO #1 - hodayathink :

I'm that someone else hodayathink mentioned. As I look through the whole catalog at NA he certainly seems to be correct.

Knowing how thorough Messmer his, I'm sure his reference to mature models is also correct.

12-20-12  02:44pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - hodayathink :

You are turning a positive comment into something negative. As I have stated so many times, yes, I am mostly interested in the MILFS and so-called cougars and I was delighted to find at least 29 scenes in the Cougar section (among hundreds) that featured natural breasts.

Just look at the updates in that site in sequence and you will see how hard it is to find natural breasts. I AM GRATEFUL for the 29 scenes plus others in different categories that I will most likely come across in the next four weeks. Maybe you will be proven right with your fifty-fifty but that's still an outsized (no pun intended) amount of fake boobs.

So just accept my comment at its face value and don't be so defensive. It was a compliment, as well as a statement that it would be worthwhile subscribing to this site for a month, even for those who do not necessarily like fake boobs.

I am sure no one connected to this site itself will see my comment in any other light but that of a positive one. Cheers!

12-20-12  06:36pm

Reply To Message


hodayathink (18) REPLY TO #3 - messmer :

I apologize for going a little overboard. It's just a pet peeve of mine when people say things that can be proven incorrect with a little bit of research (and not just here, anywhere). When I first read your post, because you included Faye Reagan, I assumed that the post was talking about all women, and not just the older ones. Because the older ones skew fake, and the younger ones skew natural, if you look at the whole site, it does end up being about 50/50. And that's not an assumption, you can see it using their tagging system (click the porn finder link at the top of the page, and on the right hand side is a list of all the tags they use and the numbers across all the sites).
12-20-12  09:33pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - hodayathink :

And MY apologies for using a bit of hyperbole when talking about enhanceds. To me 50/50 is nevertheless a shocking statistic and would keep me from a long term subscription because even among naturals not all updates are desirable so the pickings would be even slimmer than those on another super site.
12-21-12  10:18am

Reply To Message


slutty (111) REPLY TO #4 - hodayathink :

You must admit though hodayathink, for many 50% fake is a very large percentage (and people are prone to hyperbole about these types of things), additionally beyond the 50% fakes there are many natural large breasted women. Not to say the site doesn't have its fair share of natural models, my impression of this place is always "christ how many fake/large breasted women are at this place"? I guess it is probably just typical of American porn sites these days for the most part though...
12-21-12  09:29pm

Reply To Message


hodayathink (18) REPLY TO #6 - slutty :

For many people here, I can see how it would feel like a large percentage. But the more I look around at other sites, the more I don't think it's seems like that much to a majority of the market. And, like you said, compared to most American porn sites that aren't specifically trying to focus on young and/or natural girls, it really isn't. They all seem to live somewhere between 30/70 and 70/30, as far as the fake to natural ratio goes, and the bigger the site, the more likely it is to fall on the 70/30 side of that spectrum. And if you stick to just the young sites on this network (for example, just My Sister's Hot Friend/Naughty Bookworms/Fast Times), you end up with a ratio around 85/15 natural to fake, and about 2-3 scenes a week (120 so far this year over 50 weeks). And for the most part, even if you completely ignored the updates with implants and pretended they didn't exist, you'd still have a site that posts somewhere between 4-8 updates every week.

I can definitely understand someone like messmer's issue, where he's specifically looking for older natural women and the majority of the most popular American mature models have implants, so he's not gonna be able to find much that he likes. But, like I was kind of trying to say, to say something along the lines of it being difficult to find natural models at all almost goes beyond hyperbole into saying something that is flat out incorrect.

Also, as an aside, why did you bring up the large breasted natural women? I don't understand it in the context of this discussion.

12-21-12  10:01pm

Reply To Message


slutty (111) REPLY TO #7 - hodayathink :

Like I said in my reply, I agree this is typical of American sites these days, and I believe many here have complained about it at others as well - I don't intend to pick on this site exclusively, I'm sure many of my reviews of American sites have the same complaint. I agree this site has a lot to offer, and I generally like it (aside from using flv on some of their videos and changing video locations to restrict download manager use) but I think to many knowing off the bat 50% of it is crap you wont ever be interested in is a bit disappointing (not that I ever really download more than 10-20% of any of site).

With regard to the large breasted comment, I tend to put large/fake in the same category, although fake is definitely worse, as I am not a fan of either and this site has a tendency to have many of both (once again, as do most American porn sites). I guess this is why I join mostly euro sites lately - I'm sure many would gripe that all the women are flat in sites I enjoy, and I would take that as a valid complaint from their perspective, even if a bit hyperbolic.

12-23-12  08:59pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.