Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Bikini Riot

Bikini Riot (0)

Drooler (220) 09-02-07  08:06am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Very hot & familiar women, usually posing by a pool, striping out of bikinis and getting into some nicely provocative poses
+Collection of 53 models with a total of 140 exclusive pic sets and approx. 15 non-exclusive sets (usually older stuff seen at MatrixNudes)
+95 videos of acceptable quality at 640x480 wmv; 480x360 wmv and iPod mp4 320x240 also available
+What’s New link gives all of the updates
+Attractive design and mostly easy navigation
+1200px images (the last two updates only)
Cons: -No zips
-Very slow w/updates: just 3 new pic sets and 3 new vids per month is typical
-Only most recent updates dated, on home page
-a few “Polaroid Scans” and BTS pics of lesser quality; those who run the site seem to think these are worth getting excited over
-Pic sizes vary: 42 sets top at 800 px, 96 at 1024, and to date, just two are at 1200px (I counted them pretty carefully)
-clicking on an update takes you to the model’s page, so you have to remember which one you clicked
Bottom Line: If you’ve got a thing for “American” girls, you may be especially pleased with the exclusive content here. The only girls here that I know of not from the U. S. of A are Jana Cova and Zdenka (Czech), Kellie Marie (Welsh), Monica Sweetheart (Hungarian), Crystal Klein and Sanja Matice (Austrian), and Martina Warren (English). Not that I would for a second recommend ignoring the obvious charms of the aforementioned beauties from across the big pond!

The best of the burger and fries group are, IMHO, Tiffany Brookes, Charlie Laine, Crissy Moran, Carli Banks, Rita G, Jamie Hammer, and Mindy Vega. I’d include more but their pics are too small and/or non-exclusive.

There’s a good emphasis on ASS here, which I find is a real plus! There was a time when the site had only 800px photos; then they upgraded many sets to 1024px. Will they do it again, to 1200? That would be nice, but they should just settle on 1600s, NOW, and get proactive for once.

It's also nice that the toys stay in dishwasher on this one. It's just softcore posing and showing plenty of pink, unaided.

Zip files and more frequent updates would also be a step forward. Granted this site has some things really going for it, but given its shortcomings and glacial progress, I can only rate it in the 70’s, as a “might recommend/enjoy at your own risk.”

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Denner (235) Thanks Drooler - great review.
A little surprised your points ain't higher or more likely: hoped it would have been, because you also have some good praise here and some really promissing stuff, it seems.
Just a simple user-question: Do my favorites like Crissy Moran and Mindy Vega have more than one video? I'm nuts about collecting stuff (especially videos) with these two fabulous women.

09-02-07  08:45am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Hi Denner,
I just logged back on to check. There are five videos of Crissy, three of Mindy, and one of them together.

I'm cautious with the points ratings, so they might seem low in light of the positives that I mention for a site. I just don't want another user to feel misled by the points ratings, should that user spend hard-earned dough on a site and see it quite differently, in a negative way, from the way I do.

That's why I try to include enough specific info about a site as well, so that the user has a pretty good idea of what's there and how good it is, or not.

If Bikini Riot provided zips and photos at 1600px, retroactively, I'd probably rate it in the 80's even without more frequent updates as there is enough content buildup now to merit joining at the current price of $19.95.

The bit with the points is that people tend not to see them the same way, as they are the most subjective part of a review, being numbers. So I use the basic guidelines: 80's mean I recommend it, 70's mean I might, 90's mean I do strongly.

09-02-07  09:03am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

Understand your rating well.
AND: Five videos of Crissy and three of Mindy, wauw!
For 19.95.
Thanks a lot, Drooler for bringing my attetion to this site - going for a sign up right now.

09-02-07  09:10am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) Just joined.
I like it - and go for faboulous girls like Crissy Moran, Mindy Vega and more.
Well, as I mentioned: just joined - and it looks swell - thanks, m'man...
It's not for a 90 or a 95, but, no matter, man:

Allow me to mention this again: It's from these kinds of rare reviews that others PU's gets the hint of the special stuff!!!!!!!!!!!!

09-10-07  08:33am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #4 - Denner :

I've been trying to hit sites that seem to lack attention, whether they be great or so-so. Thanks!
09-10-07  05:12pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.