Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Butt Naked In The Streets

Butt Naked In The Streets (0)

rearadmiral (340) 09-16-12  06:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)

Mini Review, and a recommendation to stay away

Iím a huge fan of public nudity and was pleasantly surprised to see this site since it is actually a rare site in a rare niche. This site features well-known American porn stars doing some relatively risky public nudity.

The site has 18 scenes with some well known models doing public nudity in the Los Angeles area. Stars such as Taylor Rain, Gen Padova, Violet Blue, Courtney Simpson and Desire Moore make appearances. There is public nudity in some relatively secure-but-still-public areas and most scenes also include the model performing oral sex on one of the guys. The site no longer updates and the newest scenes are likely from 2005 to maybe 2007. This, unfortunately, is where the good news ends.

I find that public nudity sites can be hit or miss. I realize this is subjective but some sites manage to remove all the tease and risk from public nudity, thereby turning the heat way down too. Such is the case here, but the heat gets further turned down by the fact that the cameraman is clearly an amateur Ė the camera work is jerky to the point that if you have a weak stomach you might want to avoid these videos. To make matters worse, the models are often filmed while standing in the shadows so lighting becomes a serious flaw. To top it all off, the editing can be pretty bad too with too many potentially interesting bits obviously cut out.

But it gets worseÖ assuming the videos were shot several years ago and realizing that technology continues to advance, then even by the standards of the year these were shot they are well below the norm. The videos come in at just 320x240 at 330kb/s and only 8fps. Surely these specs were state of the art more than a decade ago. The low resolutions combined with the jerky camera work make a lot of the scenes essentially unwatchable.

And continuing on our cavalcade of crap, the scenes are only offered as clips with no option to download the entire scene as one complete video. The only potential good news is that by offering clips only you might not realize that the download speeds are up to a decades-old standard too. I havenít seen download speeds this slow in years. The average speed I got was about 130kb/s. Thatís KILOBYTES, not megabytes. I saw speeds drift down to double digits frequently.

I always try to find something positive about any site I join, but thereís really nothing good to say about this site. The one possible positive Ė big-name American porn models doing public nudity in Los Angeles Ė is vastly overshadowed by poor camera work, poor lighting, poor editing, abysmal download speeds and the lack of full-video availability.

The last possible positive also falls flat: this could have just been a bad site in an otherwise good network, but the rest of the network (Hush Pass) isnít much better. So even if youíre a big fan of public nudity like I am, trust me on this: donít bother joining this network.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (8)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

gaypornolover (38) "Cavalcade of crap"! Love your turn of phrase!
It is always so disappointing when you find a site which offers something rare that you're really into, only to find they've messed it up! Happens to me quite a bit - at least we have PU and some great contributors like yourself to warn us off them!

09-17-12  03:41am

Reply To Message

2

rearadmiral (340) REPLY TO #1 - gaypornolover :

Thanks for the comments, gaypornlover. This was clearly my own fault given that there weren't many positive comments about the site from anyone. I got burned, but I don't feel too bad since I knew that I was likely to get burned. I had a recent experience where I signed up for a site expecting to be able to download scenes and learned it was streaming only. That site, including the Terms of Service, was pretty vague so I did feel cheated there.

I'd guess that a serious disadvantage that you have, as one of the few gay PU members, is that you're breaking the trail more than the rest of us. For most of the sites I've joined some other PU member has likely been there before. I probably haven't said this loudly enough, but I'm glad you stick around and contribute as much as you do. I may not have any personal interest in the sites you review (but I always read them!), but I am interested in your perspective and you write excellent reviews that will form a great basis for new gay members as they join PU.

09-17-12  09:11am

Reply To Message

3

gaypornolover (38) REPLY TO #2 - rearadmiral :

Thank you rear! I really appreciate those kind words.

Yes there are very few reviews on PU for me - I seem to have written half the gay ones! But I hope my contributions will be useful to somebody, and might encourage more gay people to join.

manholelover does some good reviews and has warned me off a couple of sites and introduced me to some new ones - sadly he's not around so much now but I try to keep in touch with him.

TBP are also good about doing a lot of gay reviews which is nice, though I wish they'd concentrate more on reviews of new sites instead of re-reviewing sites they've already done - sometimes several times. Still, I am grateful they do it at all.

There are also other "professional" review sites including ones devoted to gay porn only - it's interesting how much the scores vary between sites!

I still enjoy reading reviews here and taking part in the community, and the $550 I've won since joining has come in very handy too!

09-17-12  09:34am

Reply To Message

4

marcdc1 (165) Too bad. I also like public sites, and they are too hard to find. Thanks for giving us another beacon in dark waters.

Are there any site you like in this genre?

Thanks again!

09-17-12  05:22pm

Reply To Message

5

rearadmiral (340) REPLY TO #4 - marcdc1 :

I've been a member at Teasers VOD twice and highly recommend them. For me I prefer certain elements in public nudity: 1) stars I know, 2) U.S. settings and 3) not too much editing. The reason for 2 and 3 is because I think a huge part of the allure for these sites is how nervous the model is, and a model in Budapest is likely to be less nervous than a model in Los Angeles just because in the U.S. the risks are higher. Teasers has all three of these elements. But there is one warning - if you want to join Teasers I recommend that you do it soon. They've stopped updating due to a cease-and-desist order from the City of Los Angeles. There is still a lot of material though that makes the $30 fee an excellent value. Part of the reason I recommend joing now is that another site, Nude in L.A., shut down completely. That site had my #1 and 2 requirements but the shoots were edited in such a way that the nervousness was gone so the shoots lost a lot of 'heat.'

Another choice is ALS Scan. They haven't done any public nudity stuff in several years, and admittedly they did shoot that in Europe, but some of the shoots are great. I especially like the shoot with Ashley Bulgari - she is SO nervous. It's a fun shoot to watch. ALS Scan isn't a public nudity site, so I wouldn't suggest that you join just for the public stuff, but ALS Scan is one of the best porn sites on the 'net so the public stuff is just icing on the cake.

Public Flash is also good, It has my #1 and 2 preferences but can be a little more tame with usually just flashing rather than full nudity.

FTV Girls usually has some public stuff in each scene, and some of them can be pretty daring, but they're usually more tame than Teasers.

There's also Public Disgrace. This site is in a league of its own in combining BDSM, public nudity and public sex. If you're looking for degradation and humiliation (but with full consent) along with the public nudity I'd definitely try this one.

I've reviewed all of the sites I've recommended so you can get more details there. I've also reviewed a few I didn't like too so that may be of some use to you too.

Good luck!

09-17-12  05:46pm

Reply To Message

6

marcdc1 (165) REPLY TO #5 - rearadmiral :

Thanks. I'm familiar with Public Disgrace and FTV, and I agree with your reviews of them. I'll have to check out the others.

I appreciate your advice - thanks

09-17-12  05:53pm

Reply To Message

7

rearadmiral (340) REPLY TO #3 - gaypornolover :

I find that I generally don't rely on a raw number score that a lot of sites give, including TBP and our own reviews here. With TBP and the detailed reviews here I much prefer an explanation about the site. I figure that I might score a site low just because I don't like a particular niche but another PU member might score it high because they do like that niche. I try to remain objective in assigning a score. I've reviewed sites that I really didn't like but that had high-quality videos and pictures, decent download speeds and were well laid out. I still scored them high because they were good sites regardless of the fact that I didn't personally like the material.

And I agree - PU is a great place to hang out. This is probably among the most civil user-driven sites on the internet!

09-17-12  05:53pm

Reply To Message

8

rearadmiral (340) REPLY TO #6 - marcdc1 :

Glad to help. Give Teasers VOD a look. They're the best I've found.
09-17-12  05:54pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.