Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Oldje

Oldje (0)

pat362 (375) 05-07-12  06:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They have exclusif content from a niche that's not well represented on the net.
+They have an very good selection of female European performers.
+The sex scenes are well filmed and the males do a pretty decent job considering their age.
+They have 352 videos but only the last 32 are in a single file. All the others are broken into 2 or more files.
+Video resolution is at least 720x404 for more than 100 videos and the last 32 are now 1280x720.
+They appear to still be updating with new content.
Cons: -They no longer offer class3some as a bonus site and that is too bad because it was a nice addition considering the high cost of the site.
-They don't offer any model info whatsoever so it requires a lot of research to find the names to go with most videos.
-They don't date their content so it's very hard to know the update schedule.
-They have photos but the quality is mostly poor and they often appear to be out of order. Not to mention that you have to download each pic one by one since they aren't in a complete zip file.
-There is no navigation except the page number or the ability to jump all the way to the beginning or the end of the pages.
-There's music in their videos and that can be a plus but I found at certain times to be distracting.
-The first 100 videos are only offered in Real media so not very good news.
Bottom Line: *This is a pretty decent site with content that is good to excellent but is dragged down by all the negative things that could easily be fixed if they bothered with it. They don't have a lot of male performers to choose from but the ones they have do a better than average job and there appears to be some good chemistry with the female performers which seems hard to believe when you consider the age difference between the males and the females.

*There's dialogue in some of the videos and it's normally in English. It's more often a miss because English is not the language that these people speak but it's not awful. The music is a little annoying. It's not too loud because that would make it almost impossible to watch the videos with the sound on. Mind you I wouldn't be sad if it disapeared. I think just the natural sounds of the performer is more than enough for the viewers anyway.

*I like that they are now offering their videos in a single file and that the resolution is also increased to 1280x720. Now if someone can start entering the names of the models in the database and put dates on their content then they'll have improved on most key issues.

**If you want to watch old men have sex with much younger women than this is probably the best site for that. They even have a few anal scenes as well so if that is one of your fetishes then you'll find a few videos. Be advised that it may not be in the description of the scene so you'll have to either download all the videos or check out the photos to find those scenes.

***Of course if you don't want to watch old guys have sex with very young women than avoid this site. Especially now since they no longer offer class3some and that site had mostly yojg women with younger men.***

Reply To Review

Review Replies (13)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Gazette Risque (55) This review is spot on! They could easily turn this into a fabulous site but it just seems they can't be bothered.

Used to be a member myself and I really liked the content, though they could use a better director in my opinion.

Anyway, great review!

05-07-12  08:39am

Reply To Message


xexbot (36) There is no excuse for poor quality photos on any site given today's technology. What is sounds like you are describing is someone who started a half-assed site, and never did anything to make it better. Thanks for the heads up.
05-07-12  10:17am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #2 - xexbot :

I believe that they were and still are a primarily video only site and the pics are there simply to help members know what kind of action is inside. The reason I say that is that the quality of the photos have been the same since day one. The only thing that has really changed is the quantity and by default you get a variety of angles in the shots.
05-07-12  11:00am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #1 - Gazette Risque :

It's hard to know why they don't revamp the site but seeing the way the porn industry is at the moment then maybe they don't want to waste their profits improving a site that is already not making huge amounts of money.

They still manage to produce more content and in my opinion better content than 21sextury's Grandpas fuck teens, Old farts young tarts, Old Perverts and Beauty and the Senior. I think the last three sites don't even update on a regular basis if at all.

05-07-12  11:05am

Reply To Message


gaypornolover (38) Excellent review. Sounds like something so typical of porn - excellent content let down by lousy site organisation. You seem to get a slick website with average content or great content on a poor webite, but rarely both!
I agree with you about music in porn - drives me insane!

05-07-12  03:11pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #5 - gaypornolover :

Thankfully their selection is not your typical porn music but they could take it out and I don't think it would be a problem for anyone.
05-07-12  05:39pm

Reply To Message


elephant (67) Yeah I'd agree with you on most of your points here Pat, it is the better of the old and young sites and its fair to say there is lots of room for improvement, but yeah the way the porn industry is at the moment I can't see much changes coming soon. I do like lots the makeup this company does to its girls though, well mostly anyway, not too over done like some studios opt for.
05-13-12  09:10am

Reply To Message


Gazette Risque (55) REPLY TO #4 - pat362 :

You're probably right.

Though needless to say, if they would revamp the site, it would improve the experience making for a higher customer return rate.

The content of the other sites is just not up to par quality-wise. S, again, you're right. ;)

05-14-12  07:48am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #8 - Gazette Risque :

I suspect that if the porn industry was in a better position then they might be willing to improve their site(s) because they would already have a decent number of active members to help cover the cost but the industry is not in a good place and investing huge amounts of money on the chance that your content will not wind up on tube or torrent sites is almost impossible to justify.
05-14-12  11:11am

Reply To Message


Gazette Risque (55) REPLY TO #9 - pat362 :

I don't think the investment would too high if they decided to revamp the site. It's just a matter of a tagging system and a simple new layout.

Wouldn't cost a whole lot. And it might pull in some new customers.

05-22-12  05:08am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #10 - Gazette Risque :

I'm not a computer guy so I can't tell you the cost but don't forget that these guys own a few more sites with the same design so it would require them to make the chan4ages on all of their sites and that's likely to make it a lot more expensive.
05-22-12  06:20am

Reply To Message


Cherry (2)
Hey, it's not like that anymore!!
Now Oldje.com is part of the SensualGirl.com grup that and contains 4 sites, over 500 movies and thousands of pictures: Oldje.com Class-3some.com, Class-Blowjob.com and Class-Nudes.com ( where I get all the names of the girls and many pictures of each). All 4 sites from the group are accessible with the same membership at prince of one!!
Oldje.com site have a new great look, better navigation, the video formats are optimized for Windows based PCs (wav), Apple PC (mov), Tablets (mp4), mobile phones (smaller mp4) and theatre streaming (flv)... and the pictures can be downloaded in Zip folders...
They have weekly updates on every Friday... I have no complains about, just that I can't wait the Friday for more updates... :D

01-17-13  05:18am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #12 - Cherry :

I will do a review of the site(s) soon because I am currently a member.
01-17-13  06:34pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.