Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings (2)

MiztaBlu (28) 05-04-12  11:12am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Gorgeous Amateur Girls you dont really see anywhere else.
-Nice array of niches to cater to different tastes.
-Nice selection of download options (HD, standard, MP4)
-Consistent daily updates
-High quality videos (HD nice...standard looks good too on newer videos)
-Most of the male stars they hire are decent (except JMac IMO, but thats a personal preference)
-Good pictures and screencaps of every scene
-Multiple Membership options
-Good prices, especially for a year membership
-Alot of older videos remastered for better quality.
Cons: -Lacks "star power" (big name pornstars), which hurts it in some peoples eyes.
-Cameramen on some sites (mainly MilfHunter) are extremely annoying...STFU douchebag!!
-They remastered a bunch of older videos, but neglected to remaster alot of the more popular older videos, which I assume is to make people go get their DVDs if they want those in better quality.
-No update schedule IN TERMS OF WHO SPECIFICALLY will be on the sites. They have an update schedule for when each site is updated, but you never know who is coming up.
-No way to really interact with staff like NA and Brazzers has.
-They ruined a few sites IMO...InTheVIP, FirstTimeAuditions and to an extent, MILFHunter, because they changed the format of them without notice.
-Daily Download Limits- I THINK its like 5 GBs a day, which aint bad, but with the size of HD videos, Im sure it can annoy some people trying to catch up on some downloading.
Bottom Line: There isnt really a whole lot bad to say about RK. I know alot of people dont like them, but the reason Ive always liked this site is because they are good with updating the site regularly and they provide alot of really hot girls that you dont see elsewhere. RK shoots in Florida while most other companies shoot in Cali. Now, that does mean that RK doesnt get as many big time names, but I am fine with that because other sites offer that.

RK IMO has alot to offer if you can look past the lack of star power. There are 5 girls in particular on that site that I never seen anywhere else that were fucking amazing.

And while I dont love all of their updates and sites, I do enjoy most of them. They provide a wide array of different tastes. I am a fan of black girls and RoundandBrown is one of the very few, original, black girl sites that is updated consistently. Go find me black girls on NA and Brazzers....few and far between. RK offers, that, latinas, Euros, Brazillians, MILFs, teens, lez and others. None of the other sites offer ALL of that.

In the end, it will come down to what YOU like which will determine how much you enjoy RK. Its not perfect, but its easily one of the better network sites out there and neck and neck with NA and Brazzers IMO.

I highly recommend it to anyone who has a wide array of tastes and isnt too hung up on seeing big named stars all the time..

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Monahan (44) As a long time member and a first class procrastinator, I have intended to write a review of the site but never got around to it. Your review pretty much matches what I would say myself. One minor addition is that there are somewhat fewer girls with bogus boobies and more naturals on RK compared with Brazzers; and a somewhat larger percentage of attractive girls on RK than on Bang Bros.

And 89 is a "right on" score.

I'm curious, however. Who are the five girls who you found "fucking amazing?" There are several that make my little Richard emerge as big Dick that are not to be found elsewhere.

05-05-12  11:20am

Reply To Message


MiztaBlu (28) REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :

Actually, I just kind of tossed out that number, but there are at least 5. One girl named Lexxy on the MonsterCurves site (believe she had another scene as well). There are a few chicks on MILFHunter, CumFiesta and 8thStreetLatinas who I havent seen elsewhere that are ridiculously hot.

So actually, its probably more than 5, but the reason I like them so much may also be because they havent shot anywhere else, and that rarity makes it more appealing.

And you are right on about the more natural girls than on the other sites, but I wouldnt know where to include that anyway, because many see that as a positive, and many see it as a negative. BIG POSITIVE for me though.

05-05-12  12:26pm

Reply To Message


Monahan (44) REPLY TO #2 - MiztaBlu :

Agree about Lexxy. Downloading the scene right now.

One more RK plus, good scene descriptors in the links; not like other sites with unintelligible letter/number combinations.

05-05-12  01:11pm

Reply To Message


xexbot (36) I have always been iffy about this site because I personally get bored with their content after awhile. Like so many others, I find maybe one out of every ten videos worth the search. They do have a lot of content, I just never quite got on board with their style. Thanks for the review though, very informative.
05-05-12  03:15pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.