Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net (3)

sonofzog (0) 04-22-12  12:16pm
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)

No re-runs

As far as I can tell, Nubiles simply does not post more than once per model. Four or five photo sets, four or five videos, and then never again. Some of the Russian and Czech girls are well worth revisiting, and some are exclusive to Nubiles but there is never any new material after the first posts. Sad.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (8)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


Nubiles Captain (32)
We do when members speak up about which girls they want and there is enough demand for them, assuming the girls still are modeling and will come back. Got any girls in mind?
04-22-12  08:38pm

Reply To Message


sonofzog (0) REPLY TO #1 - Nubiles Captain :

Oooh, that's homework! I'll put together a list.
04-23-12  06:41am

Reply To Message


sonofzog (0) REPLY TO #1 - Nubiles Captain :

Narrowed the list down to:

Adrianne Black
Brie Turner
Nicole Rider
Samantha Bentley
Tiffany Fox
Tiffany Haze

04-23-12  05:24pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) Well, it is good to know the boss is listening! ;0)

I agree, more material of each model would be welcome.

Cap'n. :0)

04-23-12  11:34pm

Reply To Message


Nubiles Captain (32)
REPLY TO #3 - sonofzog :

Thanks! I will look at those and see how they are rated upon other people and who is still working. I really wish more people would speak up, and speak up on our site. We recently added anonymous comments per girl and that has helped a bit but the more info we get the better. I noticed also that the more girls we add the less comments and favorites per girl. It seems that less people favorite the same girl, they all have their own favorites. But yes there are going to be some that everyone loves.

Let me ask this, we have always had this internal policy of adding 3 new girls a week which usually ends up to be 4-7 sets of content a day. I am wondering what people would think if 1 of those girls was not new from time to time, it would be a repeat. I say that because its getting so hard lately to find good girls and we could focus then repeating the good ones. So many girls are tattooed up, or fat. I think the average weight gain has gone up 20 pounds in the last 5 years. We are not trying to add less content. It would be the same amount of daily sets. I just know that if we focused some direction on girls who are really hot it would be better overall. It can take us sometimes 2 or 3 months once we shoot a girl to the time she goes on the site (if she is not rushed) because of overall production. A lot of girls quit in that time. Not an excuse, just the reality of it.

04-25-12  06:24am

Reply To Message


sonofzog (0) REPLY TO #5 - Nubiles Captain :

Speaking only for me, I think it would be great if you added new sets of the best models on a regular basis. Perhaps if you tied the new sets to votes from the members, they'd be more inclined to choose favorites. And maybe some of the girls would be encouraged to continue modeling if they got work more frequently. ??

Frankly, I was amazed that you were able to find as many models as you have, at the rate you post them. I think most sites would have gone back and added sets to popular girls, often by shooting more material and stashing it for months, or by having the photographer (or a different photographer) bring the girl back for a new session.

Good work overall, definitely.

04-25-12  08:18am

Reply To Message


Monahan (44) REPLY TO #5 - Nubiles Captain :

My personal preference is for a 50/50 mix of new vs. repeaters.
06-24-12  09:49am

Reply To Message


Nubiles Captain (32)
Since this was posted we shot some reruns of some hot girls. Some of hit the site. For example last week we added new sets of Grace Hartley who is super popular right now!
09-07-12  10:23am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.