Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Ex GF Box

Ex GF Box (0)

Active
90
lk2fireone (194) 04-02-12  09:27pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Recently, 1 video update per week for the last month. Before that, no video updates for 2 months.
-Videos are dated.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Can use download manager.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Good download speeds. I posted an earlier comment that I was getting poor download speeds through this site. But the problem cleared up. Not sure what the cause was. But I am now getting about 1.36 MB/sec download speeds, which is my maximum download speed.
Cons: -Picture sets are not dated.
-Only one size for downloaded pics: no choice of high, medium, low quality photos.
-The high quality video option is really a low-to medium quality video.
-Frame height x frame width is 720 x 1280.
-A video with a runtime of 10 minutes in WMV format takes 221 MB.
-The models in the vids are not identified by name.
Bottom Line: This is a site with the theme: ex-girl friend. But the site doesn't really accomplish that theme. Instead, it's a mish-mash of low to medium quality vids and pics that have no unifying theme or purpose.

Currently
Videos: 101
Photosets: 109
Number of photos per photoset: from 39 to 76.

Bottom line: the site itself has little value. Almost all the videos and photosets are low-to-medium quality.
What gives the site value is the network access to the Royal Cash/Teen Mega World network. The network has a huge number of attractive Eastern
European teens, shown in hardcore videos. I think the network value would be increased if this ExGF Box site was eliminated. Because the site itself
is basically a waste of time.

I am giving the site a score of 90. That is based on the site including access to about 30 sites in the Royal Cash network. The value of the site contents by itself would be low 60s, in my opinion.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Stas RC (50)
Webmaster
Thanks for your review!
04-03-12  12:04am

Reply To Message

2

Denner (233) I'm not sure, I understand this right:

But if you join this (almost worthless, as you say) Ex GF Box - you get access to Teen Mega World and all the Royal Cash sites/network.

The same goes if you join Teen Mega World.

And: According to TBP joining this Ex GF Box you pay: $ 29.95.
If you join the network via Teen Mega World via TBP, you get the same deal for only: $ 19.95....

04-03-12  06:14am

Reply To Message

3

pat362 (371) REPLY TO #2 - Denner :

That one is easy to figure out. The owners of the network make more money with those people who are ignorant that they could have gotten access for a lower price by joining another one of the sites. There are 7 sites that are at 30$ and these are all available when you join TMW for 20$. It's not illegal per say but it can leave someone with a bitter taste in their mouth when they find out that they could have saved 10$ by doing some research.
04-03-12  06:33am

Reply To Message

4

Denner (233) REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :

Exactly...(I was reluctant to it like write that, LOL)
Bottom line: Always check out different sites/prices in any network.

04-03-12  06:50am

Reply To Message

5

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :

Pat sums it up neatly.
But I was curious to see the contents of Ex GF Box. And my previous membership in Teen Mega World did not include the Ex GF Box site.

04-03-12  07:29am

Reply To Message

6

pat362 (371) REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone :

I think they bought the content from another site or bought the site itself because the quality doesn't compare to most of what's on the other sites. It's not very good and it looks dated.
04-03-12  10:32am

Reply To Message

7

pat362 (371) REPLY TO #4 - Denner :

Yes. You are part of the smart group. My comment was mostly meant for people that are unaware of TBP and PU.
04-03-12  10:33am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.