Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit WTF Pass

WTF Pass (0)

TheSquirrel (53) 03-07-12  01:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

My First Membership Of The Year

Thanks to BadMrFrosty, who put me on to this one. Originally my first membership was going to be with VideosZ, but they had pre checked cross selling, so I went to sign up for Team Skeet, but they had pre checked cross selling too. Finally here's a network that doesn't have it.

As Frosty mentioned, this not only has the same sites as Chicki Porn (under slightly different names), it has an extra three sites not available with Chicki, and all that $15 cheaper using the TBP/PU link. Added to that, it doesn't have the pre checked cross selling.

What we get is a lot of attractive female talent often ruined by cameras weilded with all the dexterity and sympathy, of a partially blind epileptic nine year old, with attention deficit disorder. Lighting is hideously bad at times, and even outside, somehow they contrive to get dark shadows running through all the interesting bits. A real shame.

But we do have a network that doesn't all look the same. The individual sites do, for once, all have their own identity. There is some good stuff here, but you do have to search around for it. There is an awful lot of padding which takes up hours of time, and gigabytes of room.

Is the price at $19,95 worth it? I would say yes. If only, if only, they could get the lighting and camerawork right, this could be an amazing network. As it is, I am disappointed, but consider the money worth it. I know I won't have the time to spend wading through all the talk and waffle that leads up to the good bits. Despite all that I would recommend it, if you can overlook the faults.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (7)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

RustyJ (145) If this is the network I think it is, I say it's well worth joining at least once. Yeah, the camera can be shaky, lighting bad and sound is just a radio blasting next to camera but the content is quite fresh and unique. The whole scenes take huge amounts of space though.
03-07-12  09:30pm

Reply To Message

2

BadMrFrosty (56) Glad to help :)
03-08-12  08:13am

Reply To Message

3

TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #1 - RustyJ :

Agreed Rusty, this place has some different content which is definitely worth a membership. It's such a great shame they can't photograph professional models in a professional way, and from comments elsehwere, these ARE profesional models. At least most of them are not the same models we see in hundreds of videos, but are relatively fresh faces (and bodies).

Thanks again Frosty, without your comment I'd have missed this one, but I was aware of Chicki Porn. I would have signed on for $15 more, with 5 fewer sites. The TBP/PU WTF link gives a massive 42 per cent off Chicki Porn prices.

03-08-12  08:29am

Reply To Message

4

TheSquirrel (53) I have edited my original comment. You get three extra sites not four like I originally said. In my last reply I then went and typed five extra sites. The mix up came because Chicki Porn is Dolls Porn on WTF. Thankfully Frosty is more reliable than I am.

As an addition I would have hoped the camerawork would improve over the years, but the latest "Wild New Year College Orgy," added at the end of last year, on College Fuck Parties, has not only 9(!) parts, it has some of the worst lighting, and worst camerawork I have ever seen.

03-08-12  08:48am

Reply To Message

5

RustyJ (145) REPLY TO #3 - TheSquirrel :

Yes, they are mostly professional although there are some I've never seen before or since then again. Also there are many who were on these sites before they were everywhere.
03-08-12  09:00am

Reply To Message

6

BadMrFrosty (56) REPLY TO #4 - TheSquirrel :

To be fair, I think the amateurish lighting and camera work is kind of the point. Its supposed to feel like you are watching a actual party and not a professional porn shoot. The same with the home video site and the public sex site, they are supposed to feel "real". The other sites, especially the massage one, have great lighting and camera work IMHO.
03-08-12  09:55am

Reply To Message

7

TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #6 - BadMrFrosty :

Yes I agree there Frosty, the massage porn one is not so bad, although that maybe because there is one setting and one couple.

Possibly I am just being too negative (as usual), but we all know these are professional models. Even when photographing amateur models, I prefer to see directors and cameramen who are professionals, shooting in a professional way. But I do take your point. It does make it look more amateurish, which may appeal to some.

03-08-12  10:01am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.