Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy (1)

RagingBuddhist (65) 01-01-12  10:10pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (61), NO (0)

Update to my review

Obviously, it's been a while since my review, so here are a few updates.

On the plus side:
The number of models has increased nicely (250+), along with it, the addition of different age and body type models. There are also a few ethnics now appearing on the site.
Picture viewing preference can now be set globally.
Custom zip files for pictures in 3 resolutions.

On the negative side:
I have to agree with a lot of the comments that have been left on here and on the site - weird camera angles, focus and lighting issues are far too common in a lot of the picture sets. Two recurring themes that bother me personally are the models pulling on their pubic hair throughout the set and similarly having to touch themselves or keep their hands near their crotch.

With the video, I've seen a considerable amount of scenes where the camera is constantly moving, almost in (for lack of a better phrase) an amateur-with-their-first-camera fashion.

I'm still an amateur fan and definitely old school - I like my women natural and I still like the site. Fortunately, Basil is one of the most attentive webmasters I've encountered and I have no doubt that anything that can be done to appeal to more people will be taken care of.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (3)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) Welcome back, RB, good to have you around again! :0)

As you say the site has grown and has many positives, most importantly the 'can do' attitude shown by Basil.

For my tastes, there is still far to much 'touchy, feely' & toy play.
Clear, full body nude shots are still unfortunately way underused.

Cap'n. :0)

01-02-12  12:24am

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

Thanks, Cap'n. Oddly enough, I really wasn't gone - been watching PU pretty much daily.

As far as WAH goes, I think the problem lies with some of the photographers. You can tell by some of the comments left which ones gather the most complaints.

01-02-12  01:24am

Reply To Message


Basil (16)
REPLY TO #2 - RagingBuddhist :

Hello RB,

Thanks for your warm words and yes, you're absolutely right - we're still miles away from perfection but working hard to get there. You're not the only person with such complaints/requests and for us it's a matter of breaking "odd" habits of our photographers that were formed over the years of their shooting and as you may understand it's not that easy to do so.
So far we've got rid of many bad photographers and working hard with remaining to get the best content ever. It's a very long and painful process but I hope that you'll see the improvements soon.

Thanks for rejoining guys and all the best in 2012!


01-02-12  03:45pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.