Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

How do you feel about non-nude amateur sites?

Type: Niches
Some of them are really hot 3% 1 Votes
I find the tease a turn-on 21% 7 Votes
They're ok but not my thing 29% 10 Votes
Waste of bandwidth 29% 10 Votes
Undecided 9% 3 Votes
Other (see reply) 9% 3 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

34 Votes Total

Dec 30, 2011

Poll Replies (19)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

RustyJ (145) I have no idea what they are. If they aren't even nude or there is no sex involved, what are they exactly amateurs in? Just a site with pictures of ordinary people?
12-30-11  12:14am

Reply To Message

2

tangub (151) Yes sometimes I do find the non nude tease a turn on and have joined several sites over the years which feature a lot of non nude content. Next Door Nikki is one of the most well known and hottest non nude models but would you call her an amateur? As Rusty said i'm not quite sure how you'd define an amateur NN model from a professional one. Next Door Models had a lot of NN content that i enjoyed and I remember the old Teen Stars Magazine site had some non nude models along with topless and full nude content.
12-30-11  01:36am

Reply To Message

3

Capn (28) Now, I have to be careful how I answer this one.

A Non-Nude amateur site, along with the proffessional non-nude sites, such as the 'Only' network, CAN deliver very good teasing eroticism.

Softcore tease material is really always what I am hunting for.
That said, non-nude does NOT do it for me.
For me, there HAS to be full body nudity.

Cap'n. :0/

12-30-11  03:57am

Reply To Message

4

Drooler (218) They're not "my thing," but I won't say that they're never "not my thing." It's certainly a turn-on when a pretty, gorgeously dressed and styled girl preens around with inviting eyes and body motion. But any subscriptions I've had to such sites were accidental and mostly before PU/TBP came along with informative reviews.
12-30-11  05:02am

Reply To Message

5

Denner (233) You got some fetish sites like: "sex fully dressed" or alike, you got some mediocre sites with fully latex-dressed teens ect..ect..
Not bad - but still a very limited way of porn...I'm old fashioned, properly - this: to me porn is female body - naked - and/or with lingerie ect....but covered up in clothes: no, thank you...

12-30-11  08:55am

Reply To Message

6

pat362 (367) I've never been a member and I'll never be one so I have no facts to support this but can a solo non-nude model site even be considered porn?

Who exactly pays money to watch a girl remain dressed in all her pictures and/or videos?

I can see buying into a site that has models that do nude and non-nude content but a site that contains all non-nude stuff baffles me.

12-30-11  10:52am

Reply To Message

7

slategrey (13) Never gave it much thought, but there not my thing. I like boy/girl hardcore scenes the best and a non-nude is a big difference from that.
12-30-11  12:17pm

Reply To Message

8

PinkPanther (46) Tease - when done well - is one of my favorite things. Any girl can just go - wham - clothes off - and any photographer can go - oooo - pics of boobs and pussy - but it takes some imagination to do tease really well.
12-30-11  03:15pm

Reply To Message

9

gaypornolover (38) Er... what?

NON-nude sites?

You mean like... Disney or something?

Sorry, does not compute...

12-30-11  03:42pm

Reply To Message

10

graymane (31) I did a review on fame-girls, which features three Russian girls who began modeling online in their early teens, who've remained non-nude and are now about 20 yrs. old and still fogging up my computer screen. The blond in this trio has achieved an untold cult of males from all over, of all ages, who're still licking their chops while shelling out mooch-o Euro green-backs waiting for that first exposure of those pearly-gates that she's been cleverly concealing all these years.
But lets face it! Therein lies her success. Exposure means the mystery is solved.

12-30-11  07:21pm

Reply To Message

11

Capn (28) Actually.

I object to the 'Waste of Bandwidth' option in the poll.

It is the first time I have seen it included.

All very well if something doesn't appeal, but 'Waste of Bandwidth' is very subjective.

I regard any video as a waste of bandwidth really, but I wouldn't be so dismissive of other folks preferences as to vote for it!

Cap'n. :0E

12-31-11  05:36am

Reply To Message

12

Khan
PU Staff
REPLY TO #11 - Capn :

Your objection is so noted.

I will, however, bring to your attention ...

The phrasing of the question, including the words "you feel", leaves that option as the users' personal feeling.

BTW, though you may not recall it, this is (intentionally) a word-for-word copy of a poll we initially ran 19-April-2007. So you see, this is not the first time that this wording has been used. If you do a search of past polls for the term "waste" then you'll find this type of phrasing has been used for any number of questions.

12-31-11  06:28am

Reply To Message

13

Capn (28) It was the first time I had come across it.
I haven't been a member that long ;)
Its use doesn't strike me as being fair to folk that may be in favour on any poll :0/

Cap'n. :0)

12-31-11  08:38am

Reply To Message

14

Khan
PU Staff
REPLY TO #13 - Capn :

Capn, remember, there is a difference between saying:
This is a total waste (for everyone)
and
I feel this is a waste of time/bandwidth/whatever for me ... which is what this phrasing is meaning.

But again, your objection is noted.

12-31-11  09:04am

Reply To Message

15

otoh (54) I'm not really sure what kind of site we are talking about. I like some non-nude material - especially fetishwear, pinups and the like, a well-conceived lingerie or latex set can be much sexier than a poorly conceived nude one. But I'm not sure that qualifies as Amateur - maybe I'm missing something...
12-31-11  09:15am

Reply To Message

16

Khan
PU Staff
Guys, don't put too much stock in the term "amateur".

Some place (a poll or the forum) I explained how a certain type site became known as amateur even though the model may have been doing it for years so I won't go into that again here. But what were're talking about here is basically what you find if you browse our non-nude niche.

The Next Door Nikki site that tangub mentioned is a good example.

12-31-11  09:34am

Reply To Message

17

messmer (137) I don't see any sense in subscribing to a non-nude site. Even if there is a bit of a tease factor involved. It's either stripping to nudity or nothing.
12-31-11  10:12am

Reply To Message

18

yote78 (5) What's the point?
01-02-12  10:36am

Reply To Message

19

lawless (6) Go to the european beaches to see a lot of topless girls, it's better than non nude amateur porn :-)
01-10-12  05:21pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.