Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Teen Sex Movs

Teen Sex Movs (0)

Active
92
lk2fireone (194) 05-10-11  10:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discounted price of $19.95/month thru PU/TBP.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Good download speeds (My max download speed is 620-630 KB/s, and I regularly get that speed downloading files from this site without a download manager).
-Can use a download manager. I can use DownThemAll here.
-Large selection of attractive white Eastern European teens. Mainly slender girls with small breasts, but some models with medium breasts.
-Little to no tattoos or piercings on the models.
-Most of the recent videos are professionally shot: ok to good lighting, camera-work, focus, colors of skintones, foreground and background.
-Choice of 3 download options for videos: high, medium, low quality WMV files.
-Streaming option.
-Photosets (which are a photo capture of a video shoot) have a single zip option.
-Content is dated.
-There is a model list with a nice-sized thumbnail for each female, that has a link to the model's videos and photosets.
Cons: -Cons are mostly minor.
-No storyline or plot. A boy and girl fuck. Maybe say a few words before fucking, but no buildup or tease or stripping before the sex.
-Little variation in scenery: fucking takes place in bedroom, bathroom, or some other room indoors.
-No costumes to add color to scene (models wear drab street clothes which come off within a minute or two for fucking.
-Older videos are not as good as the more recent ones shot the last few years. Older videos usually don't have the good camera-work, higher
definition, etc. But there is a ton of newer material that is very good quality at this site and at the bonus sites.
-No model bios.
-Search is basic. Can search by model name, which shows her material at the network.
-Default filename for downloaded video or photoset is a useless number: for example, 315.sethigh.wmv and 315.setall.zip for the most recent video and accompanying photoset posted.
Bottom Line: Number of videos: 560.
Number of photosets: 560.

High quality video (for newer content):
Width x height 1280x720.
Total bitrate: 4224 kbps
Video runtime: 20-30+ minutes.

The older content from several years ago is much lower in quality.

Photo:
Size: 120-160 KB.
Width x height: 960-1440 pixels.
Resolution: horizontal x vertical: 300 x 300 dpi.


Number of photos per photoset: 150-200
The individual photos at this set are better quality than the average photo at the network. I think they hired a photographer who knew what he
was doing, for a change. These are basically good quality photos: in focus, framing and skin tone. The photos are not the artistic or top quality you get at Met-art or MPL Studios, but they are much better than the often blurry, screen-cap photos found at some of the bonus sites.


Updates: Irregular update rate for this single site. One new video about every 3-7 days.
Most of the bonus sites do not update. But with the ones that do, you get a large number of updates to keep you watching for new material.

This site is part of the Teen Mega World network (Royal Cash).
This is a basic, bread-and-butter teen fuck site. This is fuck-suck-lick-bj-fuck-some-more. If you want romance or tease or eroticism go look elsewhere.

The models are real teens. Many of them are really physically attractive.
Little variety of teens: they are slender white Eastern European girls, most with small breasts, but a good number with medium breasts.

The sex action includes cunninlingus, BJ, vaginal and anal fucking. Not much tenderness to the sex, but a ton of fuck-suck-fuck-some-more, with BJ. After a while, seeing so many of these videos, the action loses a lot of its impact. You'd like some variety to the sex, maybe some buildup or
tease or romance or freshness; but you do get a ton of straight fucking of many attractive young teen girls. There are a limited number of stunt cocks, but that's common: most hardcore sites seem to have a few stunt cocks servicing a large number of different girls.
Membership to any site in the network gives access to a large number of bonus sites in the network. Some sites charge $29.95/month, most sites charge $19.95/month (with the PU/TBP discount). Unless there is a special reason, save $10 and join one of the $19.95/month sites, because most memberships give access to most of the same bonus sites.
Most of the network sites are teen female. There are a few small niche sites: a male gay site, an old-and-young site, latin shemales site, latin
teen site. But the vast bulk of the network content is teen girls (some solo or girl-girl, but most is boy-girl, with some two boys on one girl).
If you are into hardcore slender white Eastern European teens with straight fuck-suck, this site and network will give you plenty to look through for a very low price. For the site and the network access, I am giving this site a high score of 92.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

TheSquirrel (53) Good review, I think you sum up the experience well. We both see the same thing, but our marks are different. You have to enjoy those really thin models or there is very little to enjoy. If you do, the newtork is a paradise.
05-10-11  10:37am

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #1 - TheSquirrel :

I think you expressed the idea very well in your review of Teen Mega World:
"For some members, the thin girls will be an absolute plus, so I admit this is all about personal taste...Add 10 points to the score if you like thin young models but subtract 15 if you don't."

Personal taste is a huge factor in how much you enjoy a site. But patience and other factors also count: are you willing to wade through the junk you don't like to try to find what you might enjoy, or will the junk turn you off before you can find any material to your liking?

I know that I have paid for sites I barely looked through because the material I first saw was boring or disappointing. There might have been videos or photos I would have liked, but it just wasn't worth the effort. So psychology plays an important part in how much we enjoy a site, in different ways.

There is very little material at Teen Mega World network that I find really outstanding. But I think the network deserves a high score, not because of my personal satisfaction or dis-satisfaction, but because there is a large amount of content that is "good" quality and the price is low.

But the network could be improved a huge amount. By better material, easier navigation, etc.

05-10-11  10:58am

Reply To Message

3

Micha (1) Ninety two? I wouldn't give it more than fifty

This site is the porn equivalent of a recycling bin. It's where they retire all their crap. Most are low quality vids and images ( images are mostly vidcaps) with the actors phoning in their performances.
Much of the material is reminiscent of porn from the sixties, complete with sunglasses and high heels. Many of the performers were listless and didn't appear to be interested in what they were doing.

The entire TeenMegaWorld Network is the slowest pornsite I've ever seen. My downloads never exceeded 178 Kbps with my 2 Mbps modem.
Pages took 3 to 6 minutes to load,and constantly timed out. Streaming videos never buffered, so the only option was to download, and with my DL manager it often took between 50 and 100 resumptions to download a 25 minute vid. There are some pretty good vids and photosets in that network, but few on this site.

I am very aware that good or bad porn is very subjective, but by no stretch of my imagination can this be a 92.

06-19-11  07:16pm

Reply To Message

4

RagingBuddhist (63) REPLY TO #3 - Micha :

"Ninety two? I wouldn't give it more than fifty"

So, give us your review.

01-08-12  10:50am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.