Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

Do you ever look at art-type nudes?

Type: Content
Yes, often 33% 15 Votes
Yes, but rarely 46% 21 Votes
No, never 22% 10 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

46 Votes Total

May 4, 2011

Poll Replies (17)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

rearadmiral (326) I'm not really sure of how the poll would define "art nudes," but for a PU who likes BDSM and has a particular interest in girl-girl milk enemas I'd see "art nudes" as including sites like Nubiles and MetArt, so yes, occasionally I'm into "art nudes."
05-04-11  03:53am

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (194) It's not clear what "art nudes" refers to. But Metart and MPL Studios and similar sites are my favorite type of site, which I'm guessing would fit into the "art nude" category.
05-04-11  04:39am

Reply To Message

3

lk2fireone (194) For what it's worth: For paintings, I prefer Pinkie and Blue Boy over Picasso. So I prefer non-nude paintings over Picasso nudes.
05-04-11  04:43am

Reply To Message

4

tangub (151) Yes i often join those type of sites, i love any site that portrays the beauty of the female form from the arty nude to glamour style.
05-04-11  06:25am

Reply To Message

5

PinkPanther (46) The art-type nudes sites - Met-Art, Femjoy, Evas Garden, Photodromm - are doing some of the hottest stuff out there these days. W4B is not terribly consistent, but I saw a set they posted recently with Ashley Bulgari that was incredibly hot. Then there's Hegre - doing beautiful stuff as well.

So it's a solid "Yes" from me

05-04-11  06:58am

Reply To Message

6

Denner (233) There are some fine/great sets from sites of which I'd say art-type:
Like the ones already mentioned here and then X-art, Torrid Art, APD Nudes, off course Errotica Archives and W4B ect..
But generally it's only suited for pix/sets and not vids - still I enjoy those "art"-like sets/pix a lot...

05-04-11  07:02am

Reply To Message

7

pat362 (367) I'm more a video guy but that doesn't mean that I don't appreciate a beautifuly photographed woman.
05-04-11  08:34am

Reply To Message

8

Capn (28) I wouldn't put them a favourite, but they can be OK on occasion. Cap'n. :0)
05-04-11  08:59am

Reply To Message

9

Jay G (65) Yes, variety is the spice of life and I have a spicy fantasy life. One of the things I love seeing is multiple nude women. Luscious.
05-04-11  09:14am

Reply To Message

10

turboshaft (24) What if I consider pretty much all porn, and all nudes for that matter, to be art? : - )
05-04-11  10:17am

Reply To Message

11

messmer (137) If "art" means nude studies then I only look at them if I come across them on a tour or by accident. Nude, to me, is fine on the final page of a set but not from the very beginning.
05-04-11  12:06pm

Reply To Message

12

elonlybuster (39) I've looked into them. They're kinda cool to past the time. I love the abstract type images.
05-04-11  05:49pm

Reply To Message

13

graymane (31) I'm not so fond of them that I'd shell-out twenty or thrity bucks for a subscription.
That goes double for those "photo-shoots." which I find to be about as exciting as spending that time viewing store-mannequins.

05-04-11  08:38pm

Reply To Message

14

yote78 (5) I LOVE gorgeous women with no clothes on, no matter where I find them and I've certainly found some real beauties visiting sites like MetArt , MPL, and the like. But after a relatively short while, I find them rather boring. The models are too posed and not spontaneous enough, with small variations of the same basic shots. I like it when the girls look like they're enjoying themselves as much I am. IOW, they have to be DOING something (i.e. posing seductively, getting themselves off (or each other), shaving...you get the picture).

It reminds me of the premise of the movie, "Mrs, Henderson Presents..." in which the girls had to pose in tableau and not move so as an inch without running the risk of getting busted for obscenity. Well, that was the 1940's and it's now the 21st Century. Acceptable erotic entertainment has come a long way in that time...and the sites I like best reflect that.

05-04-11  09:10pm

Reply To Message

15

RustyJ (145) Sometimes. Artsy porn also works from rime to time if it's done well.
05-04-11  09:19pm

Reply To Message

16

otoh (54) I'd say I do like erotica, but not art-nudes... although I guess that's a subtle, and subjective distinction. For me, I think, erotic photography focuses on the context; eg the situation, a tease, voyeurism, a clothing or other fetish, believable actual or hinted masturbation.

Whereas I see art nudes focused purely on the body of the model; which, with no context, I find a bit boring.

05-05-11  12:14am

Reply To Message

17

Drooler (218) Sites with "art" in the name I assume qualify. I like quite a few, but they can't get too out of control with the "art" aspect or it stops being hot babes and it becomes too "objet d'art" kind of stuff with excessive twiddling of skin tones, colors, blur effects, and the like.
05-05-11  03:09pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.