Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Brazzers

Brazzers (5)

Active
80
BadMrFrosty (56) 02-17-11  02:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Recent 1080P videos are EXCELLENT Quality
+ Photo sets with 99% of scenes
+ Great value yearly membership
+ Zipped photo sets
+ Multiple video quality download options
+ Mostly very good download speeds
+ Download manager compatible
+ Clean easy to use interface with filter and search options
+ Great looking models
+ High production values
+ 29 sites included in membership (Not all updating)
+ Approx 4000 scenes, all scenes from last 2 years available in Full HD, 12 mbit 1080P.
+ No regional pricing
+ Monthly live shows
Cons: - 1080P only available for elite members
- Not much variety in content
- First years worth of 1080P content is badly BROKEN
- Download speeds not consistent
Bottom Line: Before reading the rest of the review, answer me these questions three:

Hate fake boobs?
Hate overuse of makeup?
Hate over-produced commercial porn?
Deduct 50 from the score, move along nothing here to see.

Still reading? OK, good you will very much like this network.

After my extremely positive first look (See my comment), some cracks are starting to show. The download speeds, while generally excellent, are very erratic. As I write, I have 2 files downloading which are struggling to go above total 500 Kbps. A few days ago using the same connection, downloading 2 files from the same site I was getting total speeds of 10,000 Kbps. The speeds have been bad for the last 24 hours, looking at their forums this is a recurring problem that rears its ugly head every couple of weeks.

My second big issue is with the 1080P videos. It seems they screwed up big time with the encoding profile. What this means is that for all 1080P videos on the site from early 2009 to mid 2010 (That's a LOT of videos) you cannot play them at all in Windows Media Player and in MPC-HC you cannot seek (jump to different parts of the video). Playing them in VLC seems to work OK but the problem for me is that I watch all my grot on my big living room TV. Attached to this TV is a ultra low power HTPC, which thanks to DXVA, can normally play high bitrate 1080P videos without a problem. VLC does not support DXVA and without it my PC is not powerful enough to play them. I could fix the files but as a purist I like my videos as downloaded from the site, pure and unsullied.

Those are really my only issues with the network. The download speeds I am willing to forgive as long as it doesn't get worse. The broken videos are what knocked a good 15 points of the score, turning it from a truly excellent site to merely a great one.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Jay G (65) I really enjoy reading good writing, and you are a GOOD writer. If you ever review regular movies or anything else online I'd enjoy reading your stuff! Do you have a blog?
02-17-11  07:59am

Reply To Message

2

BadMrFrosty (56) REPLY TO #1 - Jay G :

Thanks you for the positive encouragement. I don't have a blog or any other outlet for my ramblings, I tend to analyze and dissect movies and other media over several beers each Friday night in the pub. Alcohol fueled debate is always a interesting experience :)
02-18-11  02:57am

Reply To Message

3

Jay G (65) REPLY TO #2 - BadMrFrosty :

I've added you to my favorites which hopefully means I'll get emails when you write something. Lift a glass or two soon! I've been known to enjoy a Stella Artois or two in the evening.
02-18-11  05:38am

Reply To Message

4

Drooler (218) "Some cracks are starting to show." Nice double entendre!
02-20-11  04:34am

Reply To Message

5

TheSquirrel (53) It was another good review Frosty. One of those cases where the review is better than the network. I'm never subscribing to any site that only scores 30.
02-20-11  06:10am

Reply To Message

6

RustyJ (145) Good review, thanks for it. This is one site however that has such a reputation that I'll never subscribe even though some content looks interesting. It appears that they are considered crooks by both the industry as well as their customers.
02-20-11  10:46pm

Reply To Message

7

BadMrFrosty (56) REPLY TO #6 - RustyJ :

I remember reading article about their shady practices a while ago. It mentioned they have improved they way they do business although they are certainly not squeaky clean. The article centred on their owning and running many tube sites, which is understandably why the industry were not too fond of them. I don't recall it mentioning them screwing over customers, do you have any details about this?
02-22-11  09:26am

Reply To Message

8

BadMrFrosty (56) REPLY TO #4 - Drooler :

I hold my hands up, I didn't actually think of that when I wrote the sentence. Although being British the double entendre is so deeply entrenched in our being, we use them subconsciously all the time :)
02-22-11  09:29am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.