Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Candice Cardinele

Candice Cardinele (0)

Drooler (218) 02-05-11  02:28pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

The old copyright year trick

The bottom of the front page for this site shows a copyright year of 2011. Fair enough, but wouldn't that give you the impression that the site is new?

It isn't. And Denner did a review of it in 2008.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (5)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

anyonebutme (14) I swear, some of you guys specifically go out of your way to find any fault you can in a site just to get more tickets for the weekly raffle.

The copyright year was updated to say the current year. Who cares? It indicates nothing to nobody. I knew I should have stayed away from this site...

02-05-11  08:25pm

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #1 - anyonebutme :

Bullshit. The raffle wasn't on my mind at all. You should watch it with accusing people of things they aren't guilty of.

Besides, people can stoke up their points in other ways, such as posting a comment that simply asks if anyone has recently been a member. I've seen that lots of times, but I haven't come swooping down on them simply because of that.

Yeah, I swear. Some people!

02-06-11  05:30am

Reply To Message

3

Denner (233) REPLY TO #1 - anyonebutme :

Sorry, you feel that way....ect. la, la, la, la
...and no, not really.
And to suspect an old timer at PU like Drooler to make comments, inputs, reply ect. here just to 'get more tickets' is not only far out, but also slander and I'll call it: against better judgment...

It's essential to any serious PU to know about any site - new or old - and the fact that this site in question may try to lure some new pornusers to think this is a completely new site is certainly relevant.

02-06-11  05:43am

Reply To Message

4

Khan
PU Staff
Drooler, I suspect it's simply a script they use to keep the copyright current. Many sites use a script that will post the copyright as the current year. I wouldn't read anything into that in and of itself.
02-06-11  06:46am

Reply To Message

5

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #4 - Khan :

I might be an auto-updating script, but I think it wouldn't be unfair in that case to wonder why. Being human means taking responsibility for what our technology is doing.
02-06-11  02:42pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.