Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art

Met Art (2)

gregdd (0) 11-22-10  12:02pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

Captivating!

There have been many site improvements lately. The design has been enhanced and ease of navigation has greatly increased. The models are as delicious as ever, and I actually think they're getting much more stimulating. I find new content more erotic and less artsy than in the past. The poses are more explicit, but the photography is world-class. High-res content now comes in resolutions up to 39 megapixels -- enough to make my 24" monitor seem tiny and let you see as much detail as your heart, or penis, desires.

Some of the greatest improvements I've seen are in the erotic movies and live webcams. The erotic movies are, well, erotic. For the most part, the girls have gotten away from the cutesy posing and goofing off to fill video time and are much more sensual and seductive. And the hotties on live webcams are a real treat. They're not the two-dollar whores or sleazy sluts with dildos you usually find on live webcams, these babes are classy, seductive, and friendly, and they really know how to push my buttons. I would have joined for this alone.

More than I entended to say, but I like to give credit where credit is due.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (7)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Capn (28) I am a photo freak.
When I was a member a few months back, I found there was a great degree of artsy 'sameness' about the thumbnails for the galleries, so it was difficult to pick up on sets which appealed.

Do you think there has been a recent improvement in the photography side too?

Cap'n. :0)

11-23-10  09:23am

Reply To Message

2

gregdd (0) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

Yes I do, but to see it you need to browse through the sets in the archive. The archive organizes everything by the date added in reverse chronological order, so you can see the freshest content first. If your just browsing through the models by name, everything is mixed and you'll see the old mixed with the new.

I have plenty of time and don't mind loading galleries to get a better idea of the contents, especially with the new additions. You may be different. I never thought you could get a clear picture of the gallery contents from looking at those cover shots anyway. I've certainly never felt like clicking on a gallery was a waste of time, even if the model or set didn't push my buttons. The site's fast so I can get through everything quickly.

My only real complaint is that there's not enough ass shots in some sets, but that's on the photographers. I'm a "legs and ass" lover. Hope I was of some assistance.

11-23-10  02:49pm

Reply To Message

3

Capn (28) REPLY TO #2 - gregdd :

Your views are very interesting.

I do tend to work through the archives model by model.

The last time I was a member a few months back, I just found the thumbnail for each gallery looked so similar, it was a lottery whether I was going to like it.
Most sites I can usually tell from the first preview thumbnail.
Not at this site though.

Cap'n. :0/

11-23-10  03:21pm

Reply To Message

4

Monahan (40) REPLY TO #3 - Capn :

Interesting point.

I was a member about 12 months ago and have been thinking of rejoining just because the TBP price is very attractive. I hesitated only because I gravitate more to video than pix.

As for what galleries to check out, it's interesting that your issue seems to arise more from the HUGE volume of content than on anything else. My only issue is that there's so much content and their naming convention is so clumsy it's really hard to sort through the downloaded stuff.

This discussion has me thinking that it's about time that I plunk down $20.00 and give it another go.

12-04-10  10:01pm

Reply To Message

5

Capn (28) REPLY TO #4 - Monahan :

Yes, it is not so much the huge volume, which is not a problem in itself, it is more the artsy thumbnails are so similar it is difficult to pick out galleries that are likely to appeal.

For instance, last time I was a member, I found no more than 2 dozen galleries that appealed enough to download. Seemingly no more than one or two per model. For such a huge site that is very few. Typically I have half a dozen sets of each model that appeals at the end of a months subscription.

I just found it too tiresome:

Click....'No, that doesn't appeal.' x100
1 'Ah that is a good one.'

Too frustrating!

Cap'n. :0/

12-05-10  02:45am

Reply To Message

6

Monahan (40) REPLY TO #5 - Capn :

Boy, you sound like me. I grew tired of the sameness. But worse was when the babe was a real turn on but the photographer was not into any eroticism.

The change to a bit more erotic stuff makes me interested in trying again.

12-05-10  11:56pm

Reply To Message

7

Capn (28) REPLY TO #6 - Monahan :

Yes, there needs to be at least some variation, to maintain interest.

I soon tire of the artsy fartsy stuff! ;0)

Cap'n. :0)

12-06-10  08:55am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.