Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art

Met Art (1)

graymane (33) 11-01-10  07:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I'm not going to go into to technical aspects of the display contents because all that is clearly spelled out in the Best Porn page.
I will say that the image quality on photo sets are as good as it gets. Sharp, crisp and retention friendly with even the highest zoom setting. The number of Models appear endless, that is if you're smart enought to negotiate the dated archives, something I've yet to accomplish.
Models are listed under alphabetically labeled tabs, which I liked.
The most sterling feature, and one sadly absent in many other major sites, is their Flash Player.
This allows one to play the clip before downloading -- something I find essential.Plenty of picture sets with up to and over a hundred frames per set.
The site's reported to have thousands of videos, unfortunately I wasn't able to find them. No DRM or restriction on downloads.
No problems logging in -- as well as enjoying freedom from unexpected shortcomings after doing so.
Cons: 1) Video content, although of excellent quality, as a rule provided poorly orchestrated scenes.
2) As mentioned, I couldn't access the number of videos reported...could've been my ignorance.
3) Picture Images and videos, although offering ample nudity substantially lacked eroticism.
3) Too many closeups dwelling too long on a single scene in the video clips.
4) Sizable watermarks on videos.
5) Archives going back to 2005 produced the same material as offered in 2010. That is to say the number of selections is kind'a limited.
Bottom Line: I, personally, don't particually care for Met Art.
Although Met Art and Erotica Archives came as a combo at $30, as I've said before that if I had it to go over I'd decline the offer. Both are beautiful sites, but in my mind Met Art is over-rated.
It's fair to say, to the connoisseur, the exquisite photography alone might be worth the cost. But I'm not into precision photography.
The site never delivered what I expected, although, again, it could've been something I wasn't doing; But then again, it shouldnt've been that complicated --even for me.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Cryton (10) I ceased being a member when more and more of their photographers started using aggressive blur filters to turn the skin of models into one solid block of colour, and as a result make them appear like lifeless, plastic dolls.

Is that still going on?

11-01-10  08:09pm

Reply To Message


graymane (33) REPLY TO #1 - Cryton :

I don't know about that, but despite the touted quality of their photos, I discovered more than enough that was blurred or fuzzy.
11-01-10  08:35pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) I am sorry to say I think the vast majority of their sets are formulaic.
So much so, that there is often little to choose between the menu thumbnail of each set.

Cap'n. :0/

11-02-10  10:29am

Reply To Message


Monahan (44) REPLY TO #3 - Capn :

That's why I dropped out a few years ago. But I've decided to try again taking advantage of their on again, off again $20 price, which is now available through TBP right now.

I'm a video guy and know that I won't get too much good stuff but I am interested in seeing if their photos have returned to their normally high quality.

I'll be reporting back once I've checked the site out in more detail.

03-05-11  01:13pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.