Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Karup\'s PC

Karup's PC (0)

Denner (235) 10-25-10  06:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (77), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + An exorbitant amount of material
+ You can go on for days/weeks/months in your search
+ You'll find a lot of exclusive/licensed material here, that's hard to find anywhere else.
+ Even with the use of licensed material (too!), you'll find stuff here that might take you a lot of time to locate anywhere else (and save you some money)
+ Easy navigation - it's generally fun to browse all this content.
+ A lot of exclusive vids and photosets - even if they generally got external providers.
+ Fine updates - every day. (Except weekends)
+ Much better vid-quality - lately.
+ DM allowed and zip for pix
+ Almost ALL vids in WMV
Cons: Not so damn much in the cons. - but:
- The new/newer vids quality could still be a bit better!!
- In spite of the enormous amount of material, quite a lot - or at least some of the models are VERY average.
- I like old stuff, by all means - but too much of this are in low quality.
- Most of the vids here are in average quality - only the very new are in HD - wish they would update some of the old vids.
- The navigation is generally fine - but the design is an 'old timer' - they need to renew that - with a touch, though.
- A lot of model-name confusion.

AND - Cons bottomline: Why not get together a Karups network, too!
Bottom Line: Karup's PC - man, I've been here a LOT of times over the years - it's porn - no: PORN - from when things where a little bit greener/younger.

This site - and the Karup's Hometown Amateurs - and the later Karup's Older Women kind of reminds me of the old days - not so much bullshit - just a lot of fine material in vids and pix-sets - and hours and hours of browsing - and enjoying.

Like the deal where you can find models with pix and vids from long time back:

MAN, dig this - I even found the greatest vids and sets of an hungarian model - Chanel - who's now a 'working girl' (escort-service) here in Denmark/Europe - always wanted to fuck her - and now she has very fine vids and sets here - funny!

You can go on at this Karup's PC - and locate girls/models that you have not seen in a long time - and wow, suddenly, you'll find material - sometimes a little older stuff than you'll find at 21. Sextury or DDF or elsewhere. BUT the same model.... I like that!

Generally the pix/photosets of just a little older material seems/are better than the older vids.

The quality of newer vids - from late 2009 and 2010 has increased a lot. Most now in HD - whatever that means - because even if they're ok in viewing quality - none of the vids - even the latest are in the same league as what you can watch from 21. Sextury/DDF/and alike - and very far from In The Crack - if Karup's PC would ever get there, I'd put another 5 on the score...

But bottomline Karup's PC is a very decent site with a hell of a lot of fine material for the serious pornbrowser - but bare in mind 2/3 of the vids/sets are softcore - only 1/3 hc (aproxx.) - the same goes for the pixsets.
(BTW: That my score is the same as the DUKE's (TBP), says more about the DUKE than this user, but we agree here... LOL)

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


TheSquirrel (53) Great review Denner. I agree with everything you say with only one exception. The only thing we disagree on is the navigatiion. I find it really irritating and hard.

It's a shame there is a relatively small amount of hardcore compared to softcore, and that the video quality isn't a little better. Drooler also brought up the point about there being too many pussy oriented close ups.

Some of the models are a little average, but a lot do look like amateurs. Like you, I mentioned in my review that I considered the place to have an almost old fashioned kind of feel, and that's not a bad thing at all. Given the state of current porn, I think some of us like a place where they don't abuse or insult the model, have mouthy cameramen, or models with tons of tats and fake breasts. I gave it fewer points than you did but I'm a really mean S.O.B.

10-25-10  06:17pm

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #1 - TheSquirrel :

Well, squirrel - that navigation is certainly a matter of opinion, grant you that. But as Karup's PC was one of my earlier sites ever to join and been coming back now and then for some time, I maybe learned to like/relate to that navigation - still think it's rather simple - but ok, it's probably mostly a matter of "being used to"...
BTW: I do not find that KPC has more close-ups than others - maybe the opposite, even.

But anyway thanks for the thumbs-up...and appreciate the ping-pong about reviews. We need that here.....

10-26-10  07:37am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) Good review, Denner. Thanks to your observations I've put it under "favorites" meaning I'll consider a subscription once some of my present ones run out. One question, since I'm a lingerie freak, would I find many models in erotic undies to start out with or are they dressed like most seem to be these days: in a top, jeans or jeans skirt and thongs and that's it?
10-30-10  02:25pm

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #3 - messmer :

Thanks, messmer....there is quite a good number of sets/vids with lingerie and/or just cute underwear - and scenes where items are removed gradually. Can't put a percentage on, really - but the good thing is this:
Most models have several sets and 3-4 vids (some more) and generally the girls are wearing different things in each set - and among these there is fine lingerie/or sexy bra and thongs....(and not much stripped socks, thanks you)

10-31-10  02:29am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - Denner :

Thanks, Denner, that sounds good. I have a problem with all those socks and sports gear (none of my fantasies revolves around a Gym!) and blech dresses and jeans with hardly anything worn underneath them.
10-31-10  11:10am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.