Review Replies (2)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Monahan (38)
|
I'm a current member and still draining off content from the large inventory, but I agree with this review. I'm easier on the score, however. I would go with a 65-69 because the quantity of decent quality material is far better than many sites at equivalent pricing.
I see a 60 score to be one to use for a site with a few (very few) redeeming qualities such as feeding a fetish, a single model who is spectacular but little content, etc.
An example of a 60 is a solo model site I found a few years back that I was able to drain completely in a few days' time.
That said, NS is a big site with a bunch of good stuff in its archives, so it's worth a month or two membership, but unlike other popular sites like BZ and BB, it looks like they've lost their mojo.
|
09-26-10 08:49am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
alexmedia (22)
|
The site looks interesting and not actually expensive.
Thank you for review.
|
09-26-10 06:10pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|
