Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Real Peachez

Real Peachez (0)

tangub (155) 08-29-10  11:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)

Zip Download Limit. Rip-Off

Due to my liking of Sarah Peachez and prompted by PinkPanther's recent comment regarding the half price special offer here i decided to sign up. As its a holiday weekend here and i have some spare time to have a download fest i decided to go for the 3 day trial as TBP states full access trial hoping i could grab what i'm interested in which is mainly the solo picture sets.
Unfortunately after downloading only 14 picture set zips i'm getting a message stating i've exceeded my daily download limit for zip downloads. I can still browse the site, just not download the zips. I've no idea if this download limit only applies to the trial or the full membership also, needless to say i'm not taking the risk of finding out and cancelled within 30 minutes of signing up. I know it's only 3 but i still feel ripped off.

Update: Day 2 of the trial and was allowed to download 16 photo zips today, I believe the download limit must be set around the 500 MB mark rather than the actual number of zips downloaded.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (4)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


Monahan (42) It's shit like this that make me avoid sites that might otherwise get some of my hard earned money.

Don't these dolts understand you don't piss off your potential customers before they spend their money?

08-29-10  02:14pm

Reply To Message


anyonebutme (14) REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :

Then from their perspective, you're trying to download the full site on a trial subscription, of which after the affiliate fees, billing fees, hosting fees, etc., she's bringing in like a dollar maybe two for a life of naked photos. People who attempt site rips on trial subscriptions piss off webmasters just the same, probably even more so.

Sites cannot survive off those who just want to queue up as many downloads as their internet connection can handle.

If the speacial deal is, $15/mo. & 14 zip files per day, then each zip file downloaded is less than 4 cents. If you want to agree that a photoset is a ripoff at 4 cents then be my guest to do so.

If you're a fan of Sarah Peachez and still don't think she's worth even a nickel of your hard earned cash...

08-29-10  03:58pm

Reply To Message


Monahan (42) REPLY TO #2 - anyonebutme :

I und3erstand the argument completely, but if the site wants to limit the d/l's to 14, then it should say so BEFORE, not after someone signs up.

It's like going to a restaurant offering a second meal free with the purchase of a meal, and once you order, they give you half portions because they can't stay in business if they actually honor their advertised offer.

The rip off is false advertising.

08-29-10  05:29pm

Reply To Message


tangub (155) REPLY TO #2 - anyonebutme :

You seem to be making a good arguement in favour of webmasters who charge customers $30 for content that can be downloaded in a day.

I'm certainly not interested in ripping the whole site in a day as i'm not even remotely interested in the videos which use the highest bandwidth. All i wanted was a collection of her solo photoshoots and at the end of the day i'm paying a premium price at $4.47 for 3 days access compared to around $15 for the whole month so being restricted to such a limited amount of downloads does feel like i've been ripped off. If they had clearly stated that download limits apply then i would have had the choice to either subscribe for the month or not at all, just seems like a shady business practise to me.

It could also be argued that 4 cents per photoset is expensive when compared to sites like MET or ATK where you can download as many as you want in a day.

08-30-10  03:26am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.