Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings (2)

messmer (137) 10-10-10  11:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Big network with sites that cater to most main stream niches.

Daily updates to varying sites. Update calendar is provided.

Excellent video quality even in the lower resolutions. Introduction of 1080p HD downloadable videos a week ago.

Excellent download speed. A huge plus with the new large HD files.

Videos with a lead-in rather than just action from the very beginning.

The price is right.
Cons: Files could be smaller? An average 1080p video can be 2-4 GB.

No "official" provision for downloading 1024 x 576px, 3036 total bitrate material offered in streaming as HD. The choice is between the smaller non-HD file and the really big (1080p) one.

Intolerance of criticism. One of the recent updates had been offered before under the same name, same model .. same everything and two comments critical of this practice were removed by RK moderators twice.
Bottom Line: There have been many excellent reviews going into the technical details of this site so I thought I'd offer my personal experiences with this site rather than all the details. For details re. picture quality and resolution, for instance, please consult reviews below.

I find this network rather refreshing and on top of my list because the video quality is excellent. A small tip (and I think it must be okay with the site or they wouldn't allow it): if you really wish to download the streaming intermediary, 1024 x 576, 3036 total bitrate size (marked HD) files this can be done through an add on to Firefox called "Flash and Video Download" or possibly through your RealPlayer movies downloader.

I just wish they would make it easier on us by adding it to the downloadable material listed to the right of the videos. I also find the smaller mpeg (mp4) files generally crisper than wmv. So if you have a slow download speed you will nevertheless find the smallest sized video quite acceptable if you pick mp4. Quality is certainly better than that found on most DVD sites.

I also like the fact that natural breasts beat enhanceds hands down. Exotics4me lists them as 85% natural and 15% enhanced. So far I have found nothing to contradict his estimate.

I love the fact that every video starts with a lead-in, sometimes it's the "hunt" for a model, sometimes there's a bit of a story but it is a refreshing change from Gonzo.

All in all an excellent site that would have rated 90+ with me if it hadn't been for the fact that the site moderator twice removed my comment referring to the fact that one of the updates was a "re-run!"

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


happyending (3) Nice review. The RealityKings moderators have a low tolerance for comments. I usually use Internet Download Manager which is not free to download the streaming videos.
10-10-10  11:14am

Reply To Message


Monahan (42) I agree with the review and thanks for the tips.

A few months back I was having problems with the logon so the techs changed it. Happened again. Fixed again. Happened again. Fixed again.

Each time I lost access until tech support fixed the problem, but no extension of time was offered in any of the cases.

Minor point but each interruption lost me from 24 to 48 hours. (Gave me time to check out other sites.)

Logon has been stable now for at least 4 months.

10-10-10  11:18am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #2 - Monahan :

Glad it worked out for you, Monahan, but I agree they should have given you an extension of time for the loss of service and frustration. The site itself is very good but between tech support and censorship they don't seem to be doing so well in those areas!
10-10-10  11:57am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - happyending :

Ah, you found a way to get them as well! Great! And thanks, happyending.
10-10-10  11:59am

Reply To Message


Mort (5) Good review, thanks Messmer.
Just a warning about this one.
I just noticed when looking to subscribe that this has one of those annoying subscription pages that includes an already ticked box saying that you want a 3 day paid trial that automatically converts to a full subscription to a very expensive garbage site you have never heard of. And it is in faint gray text on a gray background.
Beware if considering subscribing!
On another note, there is a link they make available in emails to previous subscribers that gets you a cheaper subscription deal. Are such things appropriate to share here?

01-09-11  07:28pm

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #5 - Mort :

You ask:
Are such things appropriate to share here?

No, not really. We've had some problems in the past with users sharing links that the site did not intend to be shared beyond where they offered it.

BTW, I'm guessing you missed the red warning on the listing page here that says, "Beware of Pre-Checked Cross-Sells!"

01-09-11  08:06pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #5 - Mort :

Hi Mort, I wasn't aware of any of that cross checked sales foolishness going on but it's been a long time since I subscribed. I took out a long term subscription and still have a couple of months to go. That's normally a no-no and we like to warn other PUs about it. As to sharing a link to a cheaper subscription ... I would consult with Khan about that because this act would most likely by-pass TBP and rob them of revenue. At least that's the way I see it.

PS. Just saw Khan's reply so you have your answer already. :-)

01-10-11  10:55am

Reply To Message


Mort (5) REPLY TO #6 - Khan :

Thanks Khan - better to ask in advnace, than to have to ask forgiveness. Now I know :)
I had noticed your warning about pre-checked cross sells, but I guess I thought it was worth noting a further comment in case others missed it first. Probably because those things annoy me so much I wanted to say it again!

01-19-11  03:49am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.