Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Rookie Babe

Rookie Babe (1)

Drooler (218) 03-12-10  10:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

Hey, Let's Go Forward with SMALLER PICS!

I let this site build up for some time before rejoining. I only rejoined for the large-sized pics (at least 2048 pixels!). Guess what? The 53 most recent galleries go no larger than 1200!

I've really fucking had it with web sites that do this shit.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (4)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Denner (233) Oh, yes - way smaller pics and/or videos/clips in horrible 3-5 GB sizes...how come people behind some sites think that's what paying users want...?
BTW: Rookie Babes webmasters can shake hands here with 21 Sextury in a new line of smaller pics....
Even as a video-clips collector, I go for some photosets, too - and it's not getting any better...in general!

03-13-10  09:06am

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

It's a huge surprise and an even bigger disappointment. Who would think they'd actually REDUCE the sizes of the most recent pics? That hasn't been the direction that most sites have been going (the Babelicious lot notwithstanding, at least until their recent turning back to larger than 1000px, and only on the one site they continue to update).

I can't imagine they wouldn't have the larger sizes from the original shoots, as they have large ones posted of the same models. It's not that costly to continue posting them at least as zips.

You subscribe in good faith and then pay $30 for someone else's very stupid decision. That really pisses me off.

03-13-10  01:46pm

Reply To Message

3

anyonebutme (14) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

It's just porn.

Are we paying for the pixel dimensions, or for the visual of the images? Don't let things like this piss you off. Make a quick note of it and move on. Site put up probably $10-15k to create the 50 photosets, to which they are asking $30 for access to all of it. Is this worth letting such things get under your skin?

03-13-10  04:03pm

Reply To Message

4

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #3 - anyonebutme :

Thanks for the counseling session, but I'm afraid that you've forgotten that not everyone sees things as you do. And though it pissed me off, the more important thing is that those who do care about pixel dimensions -- and some do, believe it or not -- will know if they read the comment.

And I'm a bit tired of your pointless crusade in which you are effectively telling other people that they are wrong for having priorities different from yours. Go find something else to do. Or as you might say, worth doing.

03-13-10  04:50pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.