Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy (0)

mbaya (366) 02-21-10  09:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing through CCBill without regional pricing.
-Hi Def videos
-Super high resolution photo sets
-Custom zips available as an option.
-Helpful and friendly webmaster. Excellent customer service.
-Forum and photoset comments by Capn and Messmer.
Great to see friends from PU.
-Two uploads a day, but mostly photos not videos.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download restrictions.
Cons: -Needs more attractive girls. They are natural but often leave something to be desired.
-Few models are not very thin. Not much variety in size, body shape, or age.
-The site has American models, but not yet a single one that is any race but white. Surely they can be found and photographed.
-The videos are nearly all masturbation. I prefer teasing,stripping, or just about anything but not hands on or inside their pussy,or toys.
Bottom Line: After reading reviews by some PUers that I really respect a lot, I decided to join a site dedicated to bush.

My first experience involved billing and entering. I got immediate helpful answers from the webmaster Basil. Nice first impression.

The site layout is simple and uncomplicated. There are enough options to make navigation easy. The search engine works just fine. There are no broken links and no other problems.

The first section I checked out was the videos. While the quality was great, I just don't care much for masturbation either manually or with toys. Not good. I kept nothing, as the content was not to my taste.

However, I had been expecting the photo sets to be the best part of the site, as it usually is with softcore sites.

Many of the models were of close to legal age. I wouldn't mind that, but with zero or almost no makeup, the acne that many have is just a turnoff. I like natural, but a touch of makeup is fine with me. Acne, no way, sorry. There were a few mature models, but so far very few. There were a few with at least C cups, but not many. Most were A's and B's. That can be attractive, but I also would prefer more with larger size breasts.

I hate tattoos and piercings. While only a few had either or both, I was turned off that any did. At least their bodies were otherwise all natural with no boob jobs.

Most, I felt about 75%, of the women on the site were very ordinary in their attractiveness. That can be ok, but the site definitely needs more of the better looking ones.

While the photos were of high resolution and I love the custom capability of the zipdownloads, I feel the site needs a lot more growth.

With two updates a day, I am sure the site will continue to improve. It definitely has potential. However, the site is not yet ready to get a score better than 80 from me.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


messmer (137) Nice and fair review, mbaya. I only disagree with the point you made re. unattractive models. I found ninety percent of them gorgeous. But that boils down to personal taste, doesn't it. I do agree about the lack of variety when it comes to race and appearance but am willing to give it time, it is a new site and the webmaster promised us more variety down the road, as he did in connection with more teasing, stripping. I am glad you brought up that point because both cap'n and I have been after him regarding that subject till he must be sick of hearing about it and he promised to cater more to the wishes of those who prefer a bit more of a tease in the future. The addition of your voice will be very helpful.
02-21-10  10:00am

Reply To Message


mbaya (366) REPLY TO #1 - messmer :

Attractiveness is most definitely a matter of taste. But it can't hurt to ask for better looking models. If you don't ask you have no one to blame but yourself. I know the webmaster reads our input and there is room for improvement in the site.
02-21-10  10:06am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :

Yep, that's how I feel too. If you don't like something speak up. :-)
In any case, well done. It WAS a good review. We did differ in our scores but since I felt the site, as new as it was, surpassed ATK Natural and Hairy because of ATK's lousy video quality I thought it was only fair to give it a high mark for the hairy niche.

02-21-10  10:24am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) There is something of a change of direction in the works which may well address some if not all of your concerns.

Well, maybe not as strong as that more a course adjustment! ;0)

New photographers should be coming on stream with more focussed instruction.

I am giving the forum there my best shots, but do need more participants to get some conversation & exchange of views going.

Cap'n. :0)

02-21-10  12:03pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) Studies that show there are universal standards of beauty notwithstanding, it's true that attractiveness is at least somewhat in the eye of the beholder. I'm more with Mbaya on this. I'd like to see more models that are natural (sans "tats") and frankly healthier looking, if I may say so myself. Girls that are cute, fresh and bubbly like Lena (forgot her name at this site).

And I'm soooooooo, sooooooo, SOOOOOOOO tired of toy play! ENOUGH!! STOP THE INJECTION MOULDS! Fairly slow stripping and inviting Drooler to have some real fun would be a hell of a lot better.

Funny how I can say all of this without having joined the site. That's thanks to the fabulous site tour. You can see thumbs of all the galleries.

And I'm sure I'll join some time, anyway.

02-21-10  05:02pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #5 - Drooler :

The Cap'n and I have been asking for fairly slow stripping from the moment we joined, Drooler. It's supposed to be in the works. And I so agree about toy play. I started a thread on that very subject at their forum today without having read your remarks. I'm glad you made them because I mentioned to the webmaster that most members of this forum were against toys. This backs up what I wrote nicely.
02-22-10  02:16pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #6 - messmer :

Right on! Right on! There's enough plastic crap in this world already. Why go to the extreme of sticking it in a woman's woo-woo?
02-22-10  03:25pm

Reply To Message


Basil (16)
REPLY TO #7 - Drooler :

As I said on the forum there will much less toys from now on, around 1-2 per model, just give it a time to get new content ;)


03-09-10  08:41pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #8 - Basil :

Thanks. I've been lurking. Will probably make "the lurch" soon enough. ;)
03-10-10  01:53pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.