Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls (2)

rearadmiral (384) 12-31-09  09:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 01-04-10  04:52pm  (Update History)
Reason: Comments from webmaster caused me to rethink a few negative or neutral statements.
Pros: - Beautiful women
- Many amateurs and ‘first-timers’
- An opportunity to see some porn stars ‘before they were stars’
- Newer files have an HD option
- Decent download speeds
- Huge site, with apparently regular updates
- Public nudity / exhibitionism

Please note - my intention is to review only the public nudity part of this site - there are many other general reviews that cover the site more completely
Cons: - The set-ups are all essentially the same – gets repetitive
- Scenes are broken up into several files
- Every file opens with a brief title screen which is VERY annoying when linking multiple files
- Expensive
- Very little variety in the type of model (not a con if you like this type of model though)
Bottom Line: This is my first review of a site that I probably shouldn’t have joined, but I’ll be objective. I have no real interest in solo-girl masturbation sites. All my other reviews are of sites that I had an interest in. The reason I joined was for the advertised public nudity. My review will focus primarily on that for anyone who has the same interest.

As other reviewers have noted, there is a lack of variety with the models. For people like me who like FTV Girls’ taste in models, this isn’t an issue, but for those who like some variety this may be a negative. There is a lack of variety is scene set-up too. Most models start outside with a little flashing and then move indoors for some masturbation. Some models are more playful and do more outdoor flashing and some outdoor masturbation too.

My reason for joining FTV Girls was because it appeared that there was a lot of public nudity. This is an under-served niche and though the site was not something I’d join otherwise, I joined to see the public stuff.

The public stuff is certainly there in quantity. Most of the models do some public flashing. As a public nudity site (and I realize that this isn’t specifically such) this is pretty tame, but well within industry norms for U.S. sites. Obviously all the models will have differing levels of daring when it comes to public nudity. A few are quite daring, a few won’t do it, and the majority do some. For most models, the extent of their public flashing isn’t all that public – they dress in skimpy clothes and flash for the camera on side streets and empty parks. A few – very few – are as daring as the best of the public nudity sites on the web.

Many of the public nudity scenes are shot in the same area, which might lead one to presume that they are staged and have the support of the property owners. If you presume that, please take note of the webmaster’s comments below: these scenes are not staged. In my opinion, having the outdoor scenes as spontaneous as this is the essence of a good public nudity site.

One thing that would normally be a big negative for me is actually a positive here. The scenes are broken down into several smaller files. I normally despise that, but if all you’re looking for is the public stuff, that works out in your favor. One added thing that is DEFINITELY a negative is that at the beginning of every file there is a title screen. When you link several clips the action gets interrupted by a two-second title screen every few minutes. The site really needs to think about fixing this. Surely a watermark is enough to identify your material.

If you’re a fan of public nudity and have run through the sites that specialize in that, FTV Girls is worth a look. There is a lot of material here, and it is well done too. Public nudity (done in the U.S.) isn’t well served, and FTV Girls adds some quality stuff to the available material.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


mbaya (364) I have to agree with your assessment of the public nudity videos on the site. I had a hard time finding them and then I found them very tame as well as boring.
12-31-09  06:17pm

Reply To Message


FTV Staff (10)
Ah, I visit this page at least twice a week, but I finally got myself an account to post here.

Take note Rearadmiral that the public stuff is as risky as it gets, there are no arrangements with resort owners, and with security cameras being added to virtually every location, its getting more and more difficult to pull it off safely. I challenge you to find a US BASED site that comes close to the risk & volume of public nudity -- sure it cannot compete with EU sites where the girl walks naked to a cafe in Budapest, but try it in the US, and might as well have the site shut down.
I make it look easy; almost every shoot has some significant risk involved. I think the best way to put it -- I trained a few photographers to shoot public stuff here, and nearly half the time they ended up getting in trouble with the law. With the combination of instinct and luck I've been able to get away with what I have for so long.
I wish the pornusers would see the site not for individual niches, like public, feet, fisting etc... but as a comprehensive site that covers all interests, puts it all in one large 'adventure' update, instead of splitting it up into several small updates giving you the ILLUSION of having a lot of updates/week.

01-03-10  02:43pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (384) REPLY TO #2 - FTV Staff :

FTV Staff:

Thanks for clarifying that a key assumption that I made was wrong, namely that the public nudity on your site is ‘staged’ in that you have some arrangements with a resort. I made that assumption based on the large number of nude outdoor scenes made there, and that was an incorrect assumption. My apologies for making the incorrect assumption and I’ve edited my review to remove that.

I will say that now knowing that you don’t ‘cheat’ with the public stuff I’ve got a better appreciation of your site. I understand that given the current political and religious climate in the U.S. that any public nudity involves a lot of personal risk for the models and the staff. I agree with you that the EU sites have the ability to appear to push the envelope a lot more, but knowing that it isn’t really pushing the envelope due to the more liberal views of sexuality in the EU takes away a lot of the excitement found in viewing an American site. Now knowing that you don’t ‘stage’ or pre-arrange the public stuff raises it to a whole different level.

While I understand your dismay in having just one facet of your site reviewed, I tried to make it very clear that my review was only for someone looking at it from that perspective. I really liked your site – the models are stunning and you present them in ways that really show them off well. I give you full credit for that. My intention though, was to get the message out to others who may be like me: having no real interest in solo girl sites, but liking public nudity. I think that anyone who reads my review and wants public nudity will be more apt to consider a membership knowing that there is both quantity and quality.

Thanks for taking the time to correct my review. Having this kind of interaction between customers and webmasters is one of the key reasons that this site is so popular.

01-04-10  04:56pm

Reply To Message


FTV Staff (10)
REPLY TO #3 - rearadmiral :

Truth be told RearAdmiral, that its becoming rather nasty nowadays, with every street corner, niche in a mall, park, resort, etc... being 'watched' with security cameras. Thank vandals & theives for the propagation of these devices. Though one specific resort actually installed security cameras around my favorite shoot locales because of me lol.
01-05-10  01:44pm

Reply To Message


Monahan (42) REPLY TO #4 - FTV Staff :


I've often wondered about the proliferation of security cameras everywhere and the effect of that proliferation on your work.

Having been in the retail biz where cctv's are used extensively for shortage control and cash handling control, visible and obvious dummy cameras are used as "decoys" and hi-res "pinhole" cameras that are virtually undetectable to most shoplifters are the ones that are taped and are used as evidence.

I suspect that, because your work is, by and large, "no harm/no foul" in the sense that the venue's management suffers no direct loss, your efforts are observed by far more security people who do not do anything at all (other than, perhaps, get off on what they are watching) than those who do something because they don't want to upset granny when a babe shows what she's made of and granny happens to see the show.

That, to me, is a part of the appeal of your site; that it is a sort of "forbidden fruit."

Thanks for your unique efforts and for making me long to be visiting a Phoenix area resort at the same time as you are doing a shoot.

01-28-10  03:11pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.