Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit VideoBox

VideoBox (6)

Active
85
Denner (233) 12-21-09  08:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: No other site has this huge amount of videos.
Still better/easier navigation - it's plain simple. (not including search)
Nice price.
Custom-clips for downloading shorter previews
A lot of different categories
Ok download-speed
Fine daily updates
DL-manager allowed
Great latin-material
Cons: Search-machine stinks - search for A and you get B.
Old videos market as new
Too many anal-videos
Quality varies too much
Not much difference in video-quality if you choose the higher price
Too many videos put in here are the ones you can buy for $1
'No personality' - all in here seems pretty 'impersonal'
Pornstar-search is almost useless - see below
Bottom Line: Most PUs have been at this site several times - and we go back again and again, why?
Maybe because VideoBox has that endless amount of clips where you can hope to find those really special ones.
BUT - most of the times you get dissapointed - mainly because the motherload here consists on DVDs or videos that are for sale at any low-price porndealer out there... but here you get it at home - for - yes, still: a low price.
I do not expect to find the top-material here - but ok, maybe 1 out of a hundred, you still catch up with great videos - after a loooooong search.
Some damn fine latinas are my latest - see Marcellinha Moraes in 'Full Service Fucking' - for one.
And you can get lucky to find some fine videos of some favorites - Get lucky?
Yes, because the search-machine is horrible - for both categories and pornstars:
Categories: Search for Blondes - and you get hundreds of everything else, search for masturbation - and you get hundreds of Gonzos.
Pornstars: They got a major problem here - hire some PU - and it will get them much better help about the right names - AND the right scenes - ok, out of over 64000 videos, it's got to be a job - but still: You find too many models under wrong names - and the same model with up to four different names.
Still VideoBox has its force - when you get fed up with the same deal at more special sites, you can just go browsing and browsing and browsing here.
BUT: Major bottomline is still the lack of top-quality videos - they are too rare here - no matter to which price you choose to join.
The 85-score goes mostly to the vast amount and the - sometimes - joy of an almost endless search (without the search-machine of VideoBox) you got to choose you own speciel way here...
Gave it a 95 in an earlier review - but times are changing and the main cons are that VideoBox does NOT keep up in viewing quality for most videos...

Reply To Review

Review Replies (12)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Monahan (40) Good review. The search process, as Denner says, is virtually useless. name searches return totally random results. If (a big IF) a model is correctly identified with a correctly spelled name in a scene, you have a better chance finding more of that model's stuff by clicking on the cast name in the scene than if you type the name in the search box.

With their huge inventory that grows at the rate of over 1,800 new DVD's per year, it's a real shame that they've failed so badly in the indexing process.

The price is right (esp. for the 1 year membership that I purchased), but the frustration I experience in trying to find scenes with specific babes makes the 85 score posted by Denner a bit high. I am more like an 82 myself.

12-21-09  11:25pm

Reply To Message

2

Denner (233) REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :

'With their huge inventory that grows at the rate of over 1,800 new DVD's per year, it's a real shame that they've failed so badly in the indexing process.'

It's my main objection to this site - like stated above by Monahan - AND the uncertainess (is that english?) of the quality of videos: You find what looks like a possible favorite - and then you get half-blurred videos - EVEN at the socalled DVD-quality - cannot still get over that fact...

12-22-09  06:33am

Reply To Message

3

messmer (137) Excellent review, Denner. You hit the nail right on the head in your cons section. My personal rating for this site would be closer to 80. I just let the four month subscription lapse because I haven't seen anything new and exciting in a long time. There is too much of a pre-occupation with anal and not enough attention paid to fetish and niche material. I know that anal was considered to be a fetish at one time but now, with every second (at least) DVD being anal it's become main stream. Just hope that all the anal lovers will have had their fill soon and we will be able to get something else now and then.
12-22-09  07:54am

Reply To Message

4

Denner (233) REPLY TO #3 - messmer :

Thanks a lot, Messmer - those words are surely welcome.

And - man, quite: Never seen so much anal-material elsewhere, BTW - and why?. Never understood why a major site like this is topping with anal-stuff......

12-22-09  08:03am

Reply To Message

5

PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #4 - Denner :

It's what their members want - or at least the vocal ones - whenever there's a scene that doesn't include anal, there's always very highly rated comments complaining about that.
12-22-09  07:07pm

Reply To Message

6

uscue (39) REPLY TO #5 - PinkPanther :

Yeah and it makes no sense to me. I'm personally not an anal fan, does nothing for me, so I'm tired of seeing all these anal updates. I'd like to see some weird niche's like American Vice has. If Videobox gave uncommond dvds like American Vice, for me it would be perfect.
12-23-09  05:39pm

Reply To Message

7

PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #6 - uscue :

Funny, when I take a look at American Vice's recent updates, I'm seeing anal, anal, dp, anal, anal, fat girls, anal, inter-racial, anal, anal, Asian, anal - lol

What am I missing that they have that's unique?

12-24-09  02:04am

Reply To Message

8

uscue (39) REPLY TO #7 - PinkPanther :

I haven't been an American Vice fan forever because I hate their site. Because of that, I have no idea how they update now. All I know is when I was a member they had numerous unique DVDs on file (including a series with midgets and some deformed guy). That's what I was talking about.
12-25-09  09:05pm

Reply To Message

9

PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #8 - uscue :

And emulating that would make Videobox better?

Uh, no thanks!

12-26-09  05:42pm

Reply To Message

10

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #8 - uscue :

American Vice has "a series with midgets and some deformed guy". That's what I would call a really specialized niche. Personally, I prefer regular boy-girl videos, or even girl-girl videos, to watching a midget or some deformed guy.
12-27-09  06:59am

Reply To Message

11

messmer (137) REPLY TO #7 - PinkPanther :

Yep, that's what I was referring to in my recent comment at American Vice. The Webmaster got slightly upset over my remarks but as far as I am concerned he's definitely gone more "main stream" over the past few months. I'm not looking for grotesque but more niche content would be an improvement over what he's offering now.
12-27-09  10:40am

Reply To Message

12

uscue (39) REPLY TO #9 - PinkPanther :

Haha, I didn't download that video. It was just an example of something weird and out there, types of things we'll never see at VB
12-27-09  06:56pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.