Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net (3)

Active
81
turboshaft (24) 08-13-09  12:23am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Claimed 647 models! Yes, they are quite nubile; very hot, in their late teens, early 20s
+ Newer full length videos are 1280 x 720 @ 3500 kb/s .wmv (smaller sizes available in .avi, .mp4, .mpg)
+ No download limits, no DRM, download managers are allowed
+ 3 to 4 updates every day, and 3 new models every week
+ Newer photos are 2400 x 1600, with zips for each photo set
+ Download speeds of at least 500 kbs/s
+ Some models do hardcore content
+ Pretty clear breakdown at top of each model's page of what she does; from "topless" to "sex"
+ "Interview" pages give some info on each model
+ Navigation is pretty straightforward, and search engine works well
+ Billing through CCBill, with special PU discount of $24.31/month
Cons: - Overall repetitive and boring feel, and hardcore in particular, at least for me (see Bottom Line)
- Virtually no girl-girl content (less than a dozen scenes, if that)
- Little anal or fetish content beyond vaginal and lots of toys
- "Bonus" content is negligible, and mostly to advertise other pay sites
- Navigation within photo set pages is a little annoying
- Individual video clips are not highest quality, only 1280 x 720 when you DL the whole video
- Photos are professionally shot, but a few look a bit too Photoshopped, or as if they should not have been been released at all
- Purely my personal preference, but a few too many European models
Bottom Line: I originally approached this site as a girls only site, even though I was well aware that it had hardcore content. But come on, it's not the guys that are nubile -- it's the hundreds of hot girls! That's the one thing that is indisputable: the models here are young (late teens through mid twenties) and very attractive. Quite a few are American and new, but there are also plenty of Europeans (mostly Eastern Europe, in particular a growing number from Russia) as well as models that have been on quite a few other girls-only sites (Franziska, Sarah Blake, Kacey Jordan, Angelica Black), but none I would really call bona fide porn stars.

For those who like some variety in their model choices, this site might be a tad bland. The focus is on the nubile and skinny females in this world, but not necessarily of all races and elasticities it seems. I would not call the models themselves bland, but I really could not find any variety of girls that would include those of Asian, African, or Central and South American descent. It really was not an issue for me, as there is every hair color to choose from, most are shaven bare, though some still have pubic hair if it matters, plus tattoos and piercings, but nothing over the top. And if these girls simply are not in your preferred age range, you might want to check out their sister (mother?) site, Anilos, which looks to be much the same setup and price structure, though noticeably smaller amount of content.

So, how are all these lovely ladies captured? Well, the equipment and technology almost matches the beauty of the models. Newer videos are 1280 x 720 HD, but only in full length. Videos are broken down into one to two minute clips as well, but if you only download these clips, it's lower resolution. I guess this is good if you want to check out the content of a video before downloading the whole thing, but a letdown nonetheless if you just want that special clip. Videos are well lit, relatively well shot (no "Blair Witch" shake-'em-up contests), and have basically no apparent off camera distractions, spoken or otherwise. There are some interviews where the cameraman speaks, but it's only in interviews where I could find this happening.

Here's where my 81 score starts to really come in; though well shot, videos just did not do it for me. I would say the site is still photo-focused (more on that in a minute) but the videos are not too special for me. These ladies are eye candy, no doubt, but often somewhat reserved in videos, even in the hardcore scenes. I felt it was as much a case as just keeping the models comfortable (the solo, as well as the hardcore, content is never abusive or degrading, if you were wondering) as it was not asking enough of them. They enjoy themselves for sure, but not as much as I was expecting, and it felt as if it was too formulaic and toy focused to really make things stand out.

(Bottom Line continued below.)

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

turboshaft (24) (Bottom Line continued)

I enjoyed the photos more than the videos, but I frequently prefer photos over videos anyway. The site tends to be more about its photographic content than its videos, so I was happy with many of the photo sets. The problem was repetition, where models seemed to repeat things done by nearly every other model on the site; panty stuffing, lots of toys, striptease, some mild spreading (what they call “explicit nude”), and even more toys. Don't get me wrong, I don't hate toys; in fact, they probably keep a number of women from picking up guns and coming after us guys for subscribing to so many sites, but I do get tired of them in scene after scene after scene.

Technically speaking, the photos are of professional quality, though obviously shot by multiple photographers and camera models, as they release three new models a week. A few models had some harsh lighting situations, where it looked as if only a small flash was used, or there wasn't much setup involved, but these are only a few earlier models, so don't worry. Some girls had what looked to be a little too much Photoshop work, where parts of their skin had a soft focus to it (more noticeable in closeups), especially when compared to videos, where cleaning up a model's complexion can be prohibitively time consuming. Additionally, some shots just were out of focus, or focus was neither on the face nor on the fun stuff. There were only one or two of these per set, but still annoying.

Navigation is simple and easy, with a good search function that can also break down by body and scene content types, plus links to videos, updates, top rated models, and the complete model directory. My one complaint for navigation was on photo set pages where I could not change the number of thumbnails per page, and it was set around twenty. Some sets are not too big, but others are and you have to browse through quite a few pages, but it is really a small problem, as you can still change thumbnail and picture size.

I think this site is well done and can serve as a model of how to shoot and capture content, if not necessarily what type content to shoot. Again, I approached this more as a solo girl site, not a hardcore one, though I really wish they had more girl-girl content then the minute amount that I found. But even the softcore content felt weak to me, but maybe I just expect more than stripping and happy-happy-toy-toy action when it is just a girl by herself.

08-13-09  12:24am

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (194) Great review. As good as any I've seen. Lots of details, interesting opinions, wonderful bottom line summation. I'm thinking of hiring you to write my next review!

I also like that trick of using the reply function to extend your allowed word-count. First time I've seen it done.

This review is definitely in the best-in-class level. No joke.

08-13-09  03:36am

Reply To Message

3

Denner (233) Turboshaft does an extremely fine review here - and it's needed for this major site.
Have not been a member for some time for one reasen:
The models - in general - have changed. And how can that be?
Well, first: the models, their acting, the repetetive style of performance has changed this "good ol'" site for sure.
It used to be a favorite of mine: damn fine solo/mastubation performance - and some ok hc/bg scenes.
It's gone downhill since a lot of PUs were up there at 88-95 in scores.
The site has - in my opinion - become mediocre in all matters: models, acting, style:
I wish it's was when a buck was still silver, before the Beatles and Yesterday, before Chrysler went down, before Nixon lied to us all on tv, before microwave ovens - when a girl could still cook and still would - and when a Ford and a Chevy would still last ten years like they should...Man, I'm getting old...
Sorry, folks...

08-13-09  07:39am

Reply To Message

4

Monahan (40) Now this is one great review. Well written and it held my interest beginning to end.

I've been keeping this site near the top of my round tuit* list of sites and tjhis review may just get me off my ass and signing up for it.

*Round tuit=when I get around to it.

08-13-09  09:01am

Reply To Message

5

Nubiles Captain (30)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #1 - turboshaft :

Thanks for taking the time to write such a detailed review of our site. I wanted to let you know that we do have the feature to change the number of thumbs on our photo pages. Just go to the my profile page and the option is there. It was a user suggestion they asked us on our message board and we did it for them.

Thanks
Captain

08-13-09  01:22pm

Reply To Message

6

turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

Thanks lk2fireone! I could have sworn you had extended one of your reviews into a reply, but I may be thinking of someone else, though you do seem to frequently max out and extend your pros and cons sections.

I'll write your next review if you pay for the membership. ;)

08-13-09  07:30pm

Reply To Message

7

turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #4 - Monahan :

Thanks for the kind words Monahan; I was worried I had starting rambling there for a while. It is a pretty big site, and I was trying to cover as much as possible (and I didn't even look at the review tips forum, so I am sure I missed something).

"Round tuit" almost sounds like a way of describing a girl's ass. Uh oh, I think you may have come up with a new site name...

08-13-09  07:35pm

Reply To Message

8

turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #5 - Nubiles Captain :

D'oh! I only looked (and looked and looked) on the photo set pages for a way to change the number of displayed thumbnails, never my profile page. I guess I am just used to the way a lot of other sites do it with the option in the photo sets.
08-13-09  07:38pm

Reply To Message

9

turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #3 - Denner :

Thank you Denner, and you're right about this site being "major;" it's very damn big...647 models! I still put most of my judgment in the solo content, as it just never felt like a really hardcore site. The fact that some models got down 'n' dirty with a dude was more of a bonus to me -- especially the ones I had previously only seen do solo or girl-girl work -- rather than my primary motivation for joining the site.
08-13-09  07:46pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.