Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure (3)

Active
70
mbaya (356) 06-24-09  11:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Very attractive girls, mostly 18-22.
-Sticks to the niche of pretty girls performing blow jobs with swallowing.
-179 girls with many having more than one scene.
-The latest updates can be downloaded as scenes or whole videos.
-At least one photo set for each video.
-The archive goes back to 1999.
Cons: -Only 2 download options-Quicktime and WMV, 800x450, 2177kbps for the most recent update. Decent, but no comparison to the better sites on the internet.
-The scenes are extremely repetitious. The girl sucks his cock, there may be vaginal,and the guy comes in her mouth. Then the camera focuses on the cum in her mouth, the girl strips, shows off her body, gives him a handjob, he comes on her fingers, she licks them off-nice, but every scene is identical.
-Only one stunt cock, who also is the only cameraman. Sometimes poorly shot videos as a result. The money shot often focuses on her hair, chin, the wall, etc. In all fairness, I couldn't do better. After all, who can film well while coming in a pretty girl's mouth? There is a real need for a real professional photographer.
-Blabby stunt cock/cameraman.
-Daily download limit. I was locked out at 6.64GB. No DM support.
-Boring photosets. Except for the money shot photos, the photos were either not explicit or were diagonals. Useles
Bottom Line: In 1999, Thomas felt there was a need on the internet for a site featuring blow jobs with swallowing, performed by pretty barely legal age girls. He delivers what he set out to do.

However, I think his creativity as well as attention to detail ended at that point. Every scene is virtually a clone of each other. The girls, although nice to look at, are very similar. Almost without exception, they are White, the same age, dressed in similar nice clothes, almost identical makeup, earrings, you name it. Almost no variation even on the most unimportant aspects. Does every scene have to be in the same room, from the same part of the room? In ten years he could have moved the couch to another wall. Obviously he doesn't have a steady girlfriend as she would have moved the couch at least once a year.

Almost half of the videos are available only in Quicktime. He states on the site that when he started in 1999, Quicktime was superior to WMV. It is time to move on and leave Quicktime in the museum of old porn sites. I found that the WMV videos also could not play on my WD Media Player. It is probably an older version of WMV.

As a result, not one video I downloaded could be played on my video setup. Even the Arcsoft Video Converter that came with the video player could not convert the files to a format it could play.

The site has a great concept, but comes across as a site run by an amateur. The girls should be the amateurs, not the site itself. For a stand alone site without any extras or network, this is far too expensive. You can find a better value elsewhere.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Denner (233) Very much agree about cons here - was a member some months ago:
Though the girls here are mostly great looking and rarely (or NOT seen elsewhere), the style, the lack of full body views, the too annoying talk and the repetition in the scenes makes this site a bit boring.

And I think mbaya is generous in a positive way with a 70-score here..
What I really wonder is how great it could be, if some better producers got hold of some of those beautifull models - it could be a dream come through...

06-24-09  11:38am

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) Thanks for another great review, mbaya. And every boyfriend, fiance, husband will have nodded in agreement and roared with laughter at your remark:

"Does every scene have to be in the same room, from the same part of the room? In ten years he could have moved the couch to another wall. Obviously he doesn't have a steady girlfriend as she would have moved the couch at least once a year."

This comment deserves a place in Wittyguy's Hall of Fame.

06-24-09  01:18pm

Reply To Message

3

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #2 - messmer :

Comparing my remark to what Wittyguy would say is a big compliment. I try, but you are mentioning me and The Master in the same breath.
06-24-09  02:12pm

Reply To Message

4

Goldfish (67) I've considered joining this site on several occasions but that goofy sample video always gave me pause. Your review confirms most of my assumptions. Thanks!
06-24-09  03:01pm

Reply To Message

5

exotics4me (463) I gave the site an 85 just for the beautiful women. I looked at it as if it were a model site and since most of the women haven't been on any other sites, I had to give it an 85. There was a couch? I do think the price should come down, but I'm guessing Thomas has to pay a hefty chunk of money to get those gorgeous women to swallow him! His site and Dream Stash are two of those sites that bring up the whole "why is this legal, but prostitution isn't" question. Oh and that maybe answers the question of why it is always the same guy. The two guys that run Dream Stash and this site have both all but said they don't film just for the viewer's pleasure. They're getting their money worth!
06-25-09  02:29am

Reply To Message

6

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #5 - exotics4me :

I definitely agree that the women are beautiful. All of the videos are shot POV, with Thomas sitting on a couch. We each bring our own individual perspectives on what we think is most important about sites, so I completely understand a valuation that is quite different from mine. I like blow jobs, for example, so I looked at the site from that perspective. I felt that as a bj site, it had many negatives.
06-25-09  03:54am

Reply To Message

7

turboshaft (24) It sucks when such beautiful talent gets wasted on a site like this. While I can't blame him for getting all these girls, I would rather see a site that isn't another dude's self-congratulatory tribute to his conquest of a lot of hot women.

POV is nice every once in a while, but a whole site, with the same swordsman and setting, is like you are just getting access to his home video collection. There is no variety, in the action or girls, and it is boring and routine.

That tiny download limit, plus that awful sample video, will keep me far, far away from this site.

06-25-09  12:02pm

Reply To Message

8

Lionheart (47) Too bad to hear, This site looks so good, but I trust my fellow users and will have to pass on this site.
06-27-09  03:07am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.