Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Brain Pass

Brain Pass (0)

TheSquirrel (53) 05-28-09  04:48pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (50), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great value for money, a lot of content for a low price with a $10 discount for TBP users, resulting in a $19.95 a month sign up fee.
A lot of exclusive content.
No download limits.
No regional discrimination, meaning those of us in Europe are treated equally and do not get ripped off.
Good download speed.
Newer videos are of good quality and can be downloaded whole, rather than small segments. But you can choose between either whole or segments.
A variety of download speeds and therefore quality.
A good variety of vanilla porn sites.
There are pics which can be zip downloaded, although they are not of great quality.
There are quite a few daily updates overall. It's just some sites are basically dead, with no new updates at all.
Once you sign in you do not have to resign in to each separate site, although there is a series of 5 letters you have to fill in every time you visit the site.
Quite good camerawork in that there aren't too many gynaecological close ups.
Cons: Some really large and irritating watermarks.
The only real amateur site "BrunoB Reloaded" uses condoms for every scene.
Some of the sites are very small.
Some of the sites have little or no updates, nor state when the last update was.
Some of the videos do not have all the scenes available so are not really complete videos.
Some of the older videos do not have complete scene downloads, so they have to be downloaded in 5 minute segments.
Some of the sites are just single model sites.
Some of the sites are just multi sites of the same porn star. For instance Lex Steel.
Some of the material is very samey and there is nothing particularly high class and outstanding.
The photos are low quality, and just vid caps but can be downloaded in zip form. Some of them are very blurred and of low quality. What's more I found some did not unzip totally so I had to download manually. I really do not think the site would appeal to photo fans.
A few too many tattoos and fake breasts.
Bottom Line: IMO, this isn't really a network, more a series of videos, of which there are plenty. According to BrainPass the figure is 8420 videos and 912 photo sets. I haven't counted them personally but have no reason to dispute their figures.
There is a lot to see and download here, but some of the sites can't even be called sites.
For instance, at the count I made today (my last day of membership - 28 May 2009) "Silverstone Video" only has 107 videos,"The Lucky Man" only has 15, and "Doghouse Digital" only has 41. If that constitutes a "site," then I'm a gay Dutchman, and Drooler is my bitch. It's a bit like going to one of those DVD sites, and instead of referring to them as DVD's or videos, they call them sites instead.
There are WMV streaming segments at 700 kb/sec. I tried these and found them to be reasonable quality.
There are low quality WMV videos at 56 or 128 kb/sec, and MPG videos of 350 kb/sec for iphone and ipod. I have not tried these.
High quality WMV downloads are at dimensions of 720x480 and a bit rate of between 2000 and even up to 5000 kb/sec.
High quality MPG downloads are between 600 and 1000 kb/sec, depending on the site.
Pic dimensions are 720x480.
Although there is a lot of content, the standard and look is very much of a muchness. There is no real high class or outstanding content.
There is no real fetish material, but I don't expect it on this sort of site, so I don't put that down as a "con."
For me the outstanding site is "FirstSexVideo." This may not appeal to some, because the review I read by mbaya is totally accurate. There is a lot of talk leading up to the sex scene, which is not particularly high quality given today's standards. But for me it's a really unusual site in that these are genuine first time models being interviewed, and having sex on camera for the first time.
"The Lucky Man" only has 15 videos but they are at least in the "group sex" category. The one drawback is that most of the girls really do look like veteran porn performers.
With most sites it's usually 3 to 5 minutes of build up, then it's clothes off followed by, as expected, oral, then straight sex, and sometimes anal. OutdoorBackdoor obviously specialises more in anal. They have the cum in mouth type sites too. The main thing is, apart from FirstSexVideo, most of the material is what you would expect. Apart from a few videos where the girls start off totally naked, you mostly have the usual 3 to 5 minutes for a build up. It's then down to action. The girls are generally reasonable looking, not necessarily first division, but maybe second.
Even though I have listed a number of negatives, I really quite liked this site overall. The pros and cons are very similar to a number of other networks. Nothing outstanding but nothing really negative. A lot of reasonable and enjoyable porn, which is quite good fun and gives you hours of viewing, and tons to choose from at a bargain basement pric

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


mbaya (366) It is very interesting that we basically agree on the facts and overall impressions, but differ on that intangible of how interesting a network or site can be. I suppose I am just a bit tougher on the site and expect more. Thanks for mentioning my review as being accurate.
05-28-09  07:35pm

Reply To Message


TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

I agree with everything you have said. I think your reviews and those of Denner are very accurate. I would not have subscribed if the FirstSexVideo site had not been added to BrainPass. A lot of PU members have been saying how everything looks the same. For me, this is one site that is different and I knew I would like, simply because I enjoy casting and amateur videos. I have seen many of the videos featured on FirstSexVideo 3 or 4 years ago, because they were broadcast on satellite. But it's the sort of thing you either love or hate. If you're not into that sort of thing, which a lot of members aren't as they like the fantasy thing, they are definitely not going to rate it.

I don't review many sites, but I had this one in the pipeline as not many seem to have reviewed it. It's my last review because I feel I should not be contributing to a site that has censorship. I know PU has some good points, and the members are great. It's just on principal I feel uneasy about contributing to a site that has censorship, and talk about free stuff is forbidden and clamped down on. I know there are reasons for this. There's no right or wrong. Just a personal thing. I shall always be checking in here and even making an occasional post if I really think a point needs to be made, but I shall go back to being an observer.

05-29-09  11:40am

Reply To Message


Brainpat (21)

Thanks for very extensive review. You guys are very serious about your reviews and what you write is the kind of feedback we like to read and take in consideration so that everytime we make change, we know what direction to take to make our network not just better, but hopefully the best.

Once again, thank you for taking the time, but also to consider the Brainpass network in the first place.

Pat (AKA Brainpat)

06-01-09  06:19am

Reply To Message


TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #3 - Brainpat :

Thank you, I appreciate your comment, especially as I did list a number of negatives. On the other hand I do think there are a number of positives and consider the site is good value at the price available through TBP. I revised the review a number of times to try to get it as accurate as possible. I would add one further positive - No sign up pre checked cross sales, or nasty tricks. In the current climate that is one thing a lot of us appreciate.
06-01-09  09:12am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.