Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Massage Parlor

Massage Parlor (0)

mbaya (364) 05-22-09  08:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-56 videos about 20 minutes long. Good amount for a specialized niche site.
-Updates once a week on Wednesdays.
-Supports download managers.
-Can download whole video (1440x1080, 8255kbps) or lower quality (720x480, 3155 kbps) clips. The whole video option videos are definitely true HD quality. The clips are quite sharp and are higher quality than what you find on most sites.
-Each video also has zipdwonloadable screenshot photos. 900x600, but extremely sharp.
-Nice members forum that encourages suggestions.
Cons: -Too many actors and actresses with tattoos.
-Can get repetitious.
Bottom Line: My first reaction to this site is that it is one that others should imitate. Each video focuses on what goes on behind closed doors at a massage parlor. There actually is a bit of a story with interaction between the characters.

Each scene has about seven minutes of acting before the sex part begins in videos that are about 20 minutes long.

In the scenes the guys go to a massage parlor that tries hard to pretend that it is totally legit, not one of THOSE massage parlors. The guys talk about their stressful jobs and have the types of massage explained to them.

They get to choose from at least two masseuses that are usually wearing sexy bathrobes that leave little to the imagination.

Behind closed doors, each scene starts with a real massage, but the guys get a "happy ending" that costs extra. The sex is performed nude and consists of hand jobs/blow jobs. Not every scene is a bj, but most are. There is no vaginal or anal and only one scene has two girls. No lesbian here. Although there is some pussy eating by the guys, the pleasure is deinitely male focused.

The girls are mostly well known, attractive pornstars, but some are relative newcomers. This adds to the feeling of professionalism.

Overall the videos are well done fantasies. My only complaints are that about a third of the girls have excessive tattoos, some guys also have too many tattoos, and the scenes do become repetitive. There is a little variety, as when the two know each other, or one is a city inspector, but more variety would be better.

A huge plus is the beautiful HD quality, with WMV as the only option.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Cybertoad (Disabled) I noticed its very pricey at 30.00 minus change
seems like a very high price for 54 videos that are only 20 minutes.
Thats 18 hours of video for $30.00 or .84 cents per short movie.
My concern at looking at the ratio is that its not 20 minutes of porn its 13 minutes minus 7 minutes if acting not of porn and if you use that ratio its over 1.00 per movie.
I do not mind pre- acting but 7 minutes is a long time to sit and listen to them act their pants off.
Was a good review but the site didnt sound promising to me, and thats what I disagreed with on the review.
I liked that you said HD thats a good plus, but the tats over stated makes me want to avoid this site.
I also would have liked to have seen slightly more details on the site actors, you said well know but not who? That may have helped me like the site better.
Great review though. And 85 Rating Seems Fair.


05-22-09  10:22am

Reply To Message


mbaya (364) REPLY TO #1 - Cybertoad :

I also agree that it is 13 minutes of actual porn. What you gain is a feeling of realism, not gonzo, even though it gets repetitious. If you like a bit of story, then you will like the site. I would have liked some extras, like being part of a network, but what you do get is high quality. Considering how little quality is available either as a story instead of gonzo, or as the handjob niche, I was satisfied with the quantity. The site is only a few months old, so joining it in the future will make it more attractive. Some pornstars on the site are: Mia Smiles, Maya, Rebecca Blue, Natalia Rossi, Audrianna Angel, Nikki Rhodes, Jordan Kingsley, Rayveness, Carmella Bing, Charisma Capelli, Brooke Haven, Felony, Katja Kassijn, Charlie, Brooke Belle, Diana Doll, Holly West, Niki Rhodes, Mia Leilani, Lavish Styles, Rachel Roxx, Scarlett Faye, Tricia Oaks, Tia Ling, Scarlett Faye, Ryder Skye, Piper Austin and a few more that I did not recognize. One thing I did not mention in my review is that the files are quite large, about a GB for each, due no doubt to the HD content. By the way, the picture is comparable to the Verizon FIOS that I subscribe to. I did not feel that $30 was an excessive price for the value offered, but to each his own.
05-22-09  11:04am

Reply To Message


mbaya (364) REPLY TO #1 - Cybertoad :

Last week I started to edit out most of the long introductions. After seing them several times, I lost interest. So, I have to say that I now agree with your point on this. By the way, I used DIVX author, a nice program for editing.
08-17-09  05:36am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.