Nu Dolls (0)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
||+40 different adorable, natural young women who smile a lot and make eyes at the camera and arenít usually photographed staring into some mysterious and distant void
+No fake tits, and very little in the way of tats (exception: Vlada, with a big one on her belly and a ďVĒ right above the ...)
+Photo quality is pleasing to the eye with sharpness and color
+Variety of indoor and outdoor shoots (though Iím more of an indoor man myself)
+191 photosets and 212 videos to date, usually combined into a single set (the extra vids are b/g hardcore or masturbation)
+Fast downloads of zips and vids that peak between 660-670 kbps (20MB nominal connection; using Firefox)
+Built-in ďDoofus Recovery SystemĒ: If you accidentally close all windows to the site, you can return without having to log in again
+Nice design and good, straightforward navigation
+Extensive blog area might be of interest
+Visitorís area gives you a good idea of the content
||-First post was late Oct. 2007. Thatís 10-11 photosets per month.
-Pics are 1549 pixels on the long end; for a site at this price, there should at least be 3000px photos as well. (That would make it more competitive.)
-Some sets have less light than Iíd like, but I guess thatís a matter of taste. Theyíre not overly dark.
-Vids are only downloadable in avi (576x320)
-Vids have gotten shorter than they used to be (approx. 10 min. to approx 5-6 min)
-Models who have the same names: Anna (4), Natasha (3), Tanya (4), etc. require you to give them additional (or alternative) names if you want to keep them straight
-Too much play with the props sometimes: body parts viewed through spaces in chaise lounges, flowers all over the body (or sticking out of the Miracle-Gro), sand all over like tempura batter, a star-shaped dollop of cake icing above the ass -- stuff like that
-They have stopped doing hardcore (OK by me, but maybe not for the die-hards); last time was end of Nov. 2008
||Because the updates come approx. every 3 days, this site is better to join for the increasing size of its archives than it would be for the updates. And thatís what Iíve done, having not been a member since May of last year.
The girls are lovely for the most part, and as I said, natural in their charms. Thatís a big plus for this site.
Some of them have been making their mark at other sites as well. "Anna S" at HegreArt (also at MetArt and FM Teens) is absolutely stunning! "Anna" the extremely alluring dark-eyed brunette is also at FM Teens, TeenDreams (as Tantsi), FemJoy as Paulina, JustTeenSite as Anita, and MetArt as Atena.
While I could list a few more, I'll just have to mention Viktoriya, who has smitten both Denner and I. This girl needs MORE exposure! I have seen her at JustTeenSite as Victa, but that was some time ago. Really, she should appear in oodles of updates at every high-quality softcore site in existence.
One little picky thing they could do is have each gallery open in a new window. It is a picky point, though, as Iíve discovered that right-clicking on a gallery link in Firefox allows for the same thing.
It seems that after a nearly year-long flirtation with occasional hardcore additions, theyíve decided to stick strictly to the softcore niche. Frankly, Iím glad just because it will be clear that this is a softcore site.
Reply To Review