Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Lietuva Girls

Lietuva Girls (0)

mbaya (356) 04-30-09  03:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)

Spencer's review

I see Spencer gave this site a rating of 77, more than I did. OK, no problem. I also see a rating by Spencer of 76.5 for nudesportvideos.com, also no problem. Taken together, I do have a problem, though. These sites cannot even be spoken of in the same breath regarding the quality of the videos or in the enjoyability of the sites. Both are of Eastern European amateurs, but there the similarities end. When I read what you wrote as plusses or minuses of both sites, I think even you agree that nudesportvideos is far superior, not only a half point apart.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (4)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

badandy400 (103) Mbaya. Check out the numbers he lists for how he rates each site. He actually lists Lietuva Girls as having better quality. Nudesportvideos seems to gain some ground back by updating more and being more unique.

If the sites are not all that similar then why the fuss? Maybe I am missing something here. We all tend to review sites little differently base on what the site is. I guess I just do not see your point yet, please fill us in with your thinking on this topic?

04-30-09  10:05pm

Reply To Message

2

mbaya (356) REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :

Lietuvagirls has videos that simply are not worth watching. The quantity of videos that are worth keeping is miniscule. The photos are just barely ok. Nudesportvideos is a site with a lot more quantity of videos that are of much higher quality. On originality alone it is a significantly better site. The hotness factor of the two cannot be compared. No way could I ever rate the two sites with nearly identical scores. Anyone is free to disagree with me or my ratings, but one site I rate as 90 and the other as generously 70. My major gripe is that NSV was not rated at least an 80 after praising it in his review. I probably would have said nothing if he had not, or had found fault with it. If you like a site, give it an appropriate score.
05-01-09  01:13am

Reply To Message

3

badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :

I see what you are saying. Where the reviews done at a similar time? Also worth noting is that one is a full review and the other is an express review. I do not know if that makes any difference though.

I am interested to here a response from Spencer. But then again, this is why we are given a site for our reviews and they have a site for theirs.

05-01-09  02:01pm

Reply To Message

4

mbaya (356) The dates are 4/1/9 and 4/25/9. Before I joined PU I felt the professional reviwers on TBP were more to be trusted than the amateurs on PU. The longer I am on PU, the more I realize how wrong I was.
05-02-09  12:18am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.