Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Karup\'s Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs (0)

Active
87
TrashMan (103) 02-17-09  08:18pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: STKPC=similar to KarupsPC
UKPC=unlike KarupsPC

+STKPC, lots of models
+STKPC, pornstar directory with headshots
+STKPC, excellent download speeds
+STKPC, tons of image sets, all linked on the girl's page with ZIP downloads available
+STKPC, 100% exclusive content
+STKPC, site search with advanced controls
+STKPC, newer hardcore updates have both split and full scene downloads (last 1.5 years), however only recently (like, YESTERDAY) did they start in the softcore section.
+UKPC, KarupsHA features more american models, which is better if you enjoy listening to girls talk in videos, or if you like finding girls you have seen on sites like VideoBox.
Cons: +STKPC, girls have no last names, rather have numbers "Sarah 1", "Sarah 2", etc.
+STKPC, very old sets do not offer full scene downloads, only split scene
+STPKC, there are watermarks on all content, and all videos have 10 second intro material which shows the legal stuff and an "KarupsHA" logo.
+STKPC, no real bonus material
+STKPC, poor update schedule. 455 (video) updates in last 365 days, equates to ~1.3 updates per day, worse than KPC.
+STKPC, softcore content makes up brunt of updates. Last 386 (video) updates of last 455 were softcore (which is ~84.8%).
+STKPC, videos only available in WMV.
Bottom Line: Overall, there is nothing really different between KarupsHA than KarupsPC in terms of technical aspects. Back in the day, yes, there was a distinct difference. KarupsPC was created in 1997 (according to Whois info), while KarupsHA was created in 2001 (again, according to Whois info), so they put more focus on KarupsPC, as it was the household name in the Karups network, at least until KarupsHA gained steam. More updates were given to KarupsPC, better quality, better layout, better organization, etc. But now that they have devoted more effort to KarupsHA you really can not tell the difference between the sites:
-They look the same - you login to both members area and the only major difference is the girls who are plastered around the page (I would love to know who the girls are).
-The videos are the same, same nomenclature, same watermark location, same intro crap, etc.
-The girl naming scheme is the same ("Sarah 1", "Sarah 2", etc.)
-The quality is the same
-The organization is the same (softcore vs hardcore, videos split by type, e.g. toys, ethnic, athletic, etc.)
-The pornstar directory is the same
-etc. etc. etc.

So what is the difference? The difference is the focus. KarupsPC has focus on girls who are from Eastern Europe / Western Russia with a few American girls sprinkled in (they girls are there, just not named with proper names) while KarupsHA focuses more on girls from North America with a few European/Russian girls sprinkled in (again, they are there, just hard to find). So its all about your particular taste: European girls who speak broken English and look you in the eye like they really want you, and are ready for action, or American girls who speak perfect English and look at this as another job. My choice is KarupsHA because there are more girls on the site that I am looking for (I can name at least 5 off the top of my head right now) where as KarupsPC, not so much.

Again, in short, KarupsPC = KarupsHA, except PC focuses more on European/Russian girls while HA focuses more on American girls.
Only reason I gave KarupsHA an 87 while KarupsPC an 85 while being the same site is because I prefer American girls over European/Russian girls.

On another note, I would really prefer if these sites were part of a network where you buy one and get access to the other :P. The fact that they are essentially the same sites with different girls would make such a decision a no-briner.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

badandy400 (103) Now this is a damn good review. Well done!
02-17-09  08:52pm

Reply To Message

2

TheSquirrel (53) Agreed. This is a very impressive review.
02-18-09  06:10am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.