Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy (3)

Drooler (218) 01-19-09  02:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

One Opinion: Going Hardcore Wasn't the Answer

I'd joined this site almost two years ago. Wasn't too thrilled by a lot of the women, though a few were really hot.

Then I recently got an offer to rejoin for $20. I see they've started adding hardcore as of Dec. last year.

Frankly, I don't think that step was as critical as simply getting better looking women. Having gone through their archives, I feel I've done it mostly for Queen and Country.

Older doesn't bother me, to a point at least, but fat and/or shriveled just ain't what I'm after. And there are a couple of girls in there, young ones, who would have looked nice had they not apparently had a head-on collision with a hardware store (face piercings).

Messmer's right in his review that the photographers produce sets that could be clones of each other. Being an ass man, I was disppointed that the recent Michelle from Hungary, a very hot girl, never got to show her goods the way Josi, another dynamo, was able to. Who (or which robot) did the shooting made all the difference.

"Toby" is probably my favorite photographer there. "Atomic W" does OK sometimes.

I feel I got my money's worth, thanks to my waiting so long and their generous discount. But as I was saying, ugly-solo isn't going to be improved upon by ugly-likes-duckies.

There's no other ATK site that has this problem, generally speaking. Why it does at all is beyond me.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (5)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

messmer (137) Hi Drooler, I find that having older women in the line up is a plus for the site, even if some wrinkles should start showing. Hardcore is not my thing so I politely turned down their offer to re-subscribe. To me hc will never be an improvement but I know that many people asked for it so I'm happy for them that they are finally getting their wish.
01-19-09  12:33pm

Reply To Message

2

The Bishop (2) I have to agree largely with your comment going hardcore isn't the answer, and also agree I'd prefer if they just added more quality sets of good looking girls.

However I do think there are a good deal of decent looking girls in there, but also some not so, 'ugly solo' as you put it :)

01-31-09  07:02am

Reply To Message

3

Capn (28) REPLY TO #2 - The Bishop :

Quite agree.

:0)

09-06-09  11:59am

Reply To Message

4

The Bishop (2) REPLY TO #3 - Capn :

Cheers,

Glad you do :)

09-06-09  01:00pm

Reply To Message

5

mbaya (356) I did not care for the hardcore videos. Other sites have much better. I prefer that they stick to the posing videos, which they do better. The quality of the models should be greatly improved if they expect to continue.
09-20-09  10:47am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.