Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls (5)

Active
91
Jeffrey99 (27) 12-30-08  04:58pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +High Quality videos.
+Beautiful selection of young models, with different body types and sizes. They don't all look the same.
+Intimate videos with Real Orgasms.
+Lots of public nudity
+Normally 3-4 galleries per model update, around 60 images per gallery.
+2-4 videos per model update.
Cons: -Pricey ($29.95 per month, I got offered $20 per month when I went to cancel)
-Images could stand to be bigger. Currently are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. Not as high quality as some other sites.
-They do have BigPics, where are 3000x4000 or 2000x3000 but it's a seperate page from it's self and no way to know from the model update if they are available for her or not.
-No search function. Have to go by update or models first name.
-Not all models are actually first timers. For example a recent update was Franziska, who I saw alot on ALS Scan when I was recently a member to there.
-Older videos and pictures not that good of quality.
-Only updated on average 1-2x per week.
-Some videos are behind the scenes of the photo shoot, so you hear the great 3,2,1 camera click.
Bottom Line: FTV is a site that I was a member of awhile back and liked back then but it was a bit too pricey for me. The site can get alittle too extreme for me (huge toys or fisting, etc) but decided to give it another try.

Photo's: In todays day and age of high resolution and high quality, FTV's photos are step behind the competition. Current updates photos are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. While updates in 07 where, 797x1200. 06 where 712x1072. So as you can see, while FTV keeps improving every year, it still doesn't compare to sites that have 3000 or 4000px images. But FTV does offer BigPics. They are 3000x4000px or 2000x3000px. But it's only of select galleries/models. I don't know why FTV doesn't do what ALS Scans do and offer two download sizes, normal res and high res. Since offering BigPics proves they have them available. For $30 a month, not offering them as standard is unacceptable.

Videos: 08 videos are available in 8000kb/s HD WMV's, 3000kb/s WMV's & Divx vidoes. Anything prior to December 07, is available in 2100kb/s WMV & Divx. The 8000kb/s videos are great quality, unfortunately my pc can't play them smoothly. So I'm stuck with the 3000kb/s. The quality is pretty good but not as good as some 720p videos from other sites. According to FTV's site, here are the following specs:
WMV Ultra HD 1440x1080 Resolution 8000kb/sec bitrate
WMV HD 720x480 Resolution 3000kb/sec bitrate
WMV 640x480 Resolution 700-2000kb/sec bitrate

Some videos are behind scenes of the photoshoots and you get to hear the lovely 3,2,1 and then the snap of the camera. However the cameraman does do a decent job of not talking too much, unless it's the interview video, he normally just lets the girls do what they want.

The videos are normally split up into 5-10 5-7 min secments. No option for full scene download.

The site could use a update in navigation. As of now you can either list by update or by model name in alphabetical order. There no way to search for a name or to find a model with a certain body type.

Some models are also not first time video girls, some can be seen on other pages, before their FTV shoots. However the models like that seem to be few.

In closing I really like FTV and it's probably one of my favorite sites. However there are changes that need to be done to break the low 90's number. They need to start putting the images up in their default resolution, instead just putting select images in a zip and slapping them up on the BigPics page. Add the user forum and drop the price. Right now $29.95 is flat out too high for any site that isn't a network site.

If they would do both of those and drop the price to $5-10 then I think it could easily be a mid to high 90's site.

In closing if you like public nudity or like real orgasms, then I'd recommend you give FTV a shot.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

TheRizzo (23) A number of top sites are lagging behind in photo size these days. I wonder if they pre-process the images so far in advance for updates that they are always a step behind those that process their images more closely to update day and can make file sizes bigger on the fly easier?

I don't mind the $29.95 price point for a site that updates 6-7 days a week with lots of exclusive content, but I surely wouldn't complain if they lowered their price by $5 or something!

12-30-08  05:36pm

Reply To Message

2

Monahan (40) As a current member at the "please stick around" rate of $19.95, I could have written this review exactly as Jeffrey99 did. The site is all original content and has stayed high quality in terms of the professional photography and videography, but it really needs a search feature to find a model and/or specific features, such as fisting, peeing, bottles, beads, public nudity and extreme public nudity, blonde, big tits, large labia lips, etc.

One other potential improvement would be to post the aliases of its models. (FTV lists everyone by a first name only).

For example Andie Valentino (I get hard just thinking about her) has a lot of good stuff on FTV under the name Andrea; Jana Jordan appears as Yana, Gianna Michaels is named Becky, and so on. If a model isn't that popular with FTV members she won't be brought back for more...and that's a good reason for those of us who want to see more of a babe to know her full name so we can do a search on the web.

A major plus that has kept me on as a member is that the webmaster/photographer does two things I really like. First, he is superb at making the model look spectacular and shoots lovingly lingering of a model's body parts with perfect lighting and camera angles. Second, he responds personally to emails I've sent him that are candid and very interesting.

12-30-08  06:16pm

Reply To Message

3

Jeffrey99 (27) REPLY TO #1 - TheRizzo :

The problem is FTV doesn't update 6-7 times a week, it averages out to 1-2 a week max.

As to Monahan, I never have understood how FTV ranks their models. For example if you go to the recent updates page, you'll see member choice under Ileana, Franziska & Miyu. However I've never seen a page to rank or vote for the models. So not sure if it's just off of downloads or how they figure it.

12-30-08  08:05pm

Reply To Message

4

TheRizzo (23) REPLY TO #3 - Jeffrey99 :

Good point about the number of updates.
12-30-08  09:19pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.