Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Pure CFNM

Pure CFNM (0)

mbaya (364) 08-11-08  08:37am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Simple website to navigate. All the videos were available in one section and had a few screen shots and a plot summary.
-143 videos, each about 15 to 20 minutes long. You can download clips or the entire video at once.
-Mostly outstandingly beautiful women, nicely dressed, made up, hair, etc. Appear to be someone you could meet if you were very lucky. Nothing like the typical pornstar look.
-No download limit or DRM.
-Many interesting fantasies. Imagine a bj or a handjob by a group of excited, enthusiastic women who see men as sex objects. Mostly they ask for nothing in return and cooperate to give the man pure pleasure.
-Very active member forum with thousands of posts.
Cons: -Videos are 640x480, 777 kbps. Not the best quality.
-Some videos downloaded without sound.
-The dialog is in regional or nonstandard Britsh English, not the BBC English Americans are used to. Often incomprehensible.
-Does not work with Free Download Manager.
-The photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file.
-They are all screenshots from the video and many of the parts I liked were not available as a photo.
-Does not have bonus material and is not part of any network. What you get is just the website. This makes this too expensive.
Bottom Line: Honestly I did not know what to expect when I signed up. I have never seen CFNM before. The emphasis is definitely on fantasy and not the explicit sex and nudity you can find in mainstream porn.The videos break down as about 25% better than to be expected; highly erotic videos that can compare to the best in mainstream porn. About 25% were pretty good and the remaining 50% had problems in my opinion. Some repeated storylines and were totally uninspired. They were simply following a formula with no chemistry among the actors. I did not at all enjoy those humiliating men or watching men jerk off and women laughing at them. The women were mostly pornstars, not amateurs.You can check the link to the models and see for yourself who is who. I was expecting a site with appeal for women, but these men were mostly overweight, too skinny, old, etc. No better for women than mainstream. The members forum had thousands of posts, but I could not find a single one from a woman. The breakdown of the action was about 20% blow jobs, 60% handjobs, and 20% males masturbating. Many members asked repeatedly for more skin, more explicit shots of the women showing underwear,cumming on their clothes, more bj's etc. I agree.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.

  Be the first to reply to mbaya!

  Reply To Review

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.