Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit I Feel Myself

I Feel Myself (0)

PowerGlide (50) 05-31-08  11:02pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Extremely high quality content
- Updated often
- Some of the models are very hot; if you have a British Accent fetish, this site will feed it often
- FINALLY, realistic orgasms--not the feigned screaming, shouting and gasping in typical porn
- Deviates from the annoying fish-eye camera lens extreme close-ups; very organic, stable videography for maximum viewing enjoyment
- Some of the videos have outdoor solo shots
- DRM-free WMV files at 900kbit/sec. bitrate; high quality videos that will play on any decent PC.
Cons: - Absolutely, positively NO intercourse--even when "Friends" are in the picture (unless you get off watching dudes give their girl a hand job)
- Porn very clearly aimed at the female demographic; the bisexuals/Lesbians aren't the sort you would find in porn aimed at heterosexual men
- Many videos will cheat you out of a good view, lots of models never take off all of their clothes
- The camera angles, while pleasantly stable and pointed at the important stuff - girl's faces, their bits - it can get old. Videos with different angles with girls in different positions is very rare.
- "Mood" lighting overused; the better videos are shot in daylight
Bottom Line: Highly erotic content, I've downloaded A NUMBER of videos, so there's lots to enjoy here. I honestly thing there isn't enough realistic "females masturbating" porn out there; the only other site I can think of with material this engaging is AbbyWinters.com and I honestly think ifeelmyself.com is more compelling--especially with their 900k bitrate WMVs. Nevertheless, I was only able to find 2 videos on each page to be keep-worthy. So my recommendation would be to sign up, download what you like, and then sign back up in another 3 or 4 months for the next batch of goodies.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


RagingBuddhist (65) I'd call this an excellent take on the site - with one small exception. In this day and age, I wouldn't call 640x480 video "extremely high quality", no matter what the bitrate. And, if you look closely, most of the outdoor shots - even the ones that aren't homemade - are grainier than the ones done in a studio.

In each of the three times I'd joined the site, I'd brought up the issue of higher definition video on their forum. The first two times, the post "somehow" disappeared. The third time I was given a "we're thinking about it but don't expect it anytime soon" speech. It seems that the warm and friendly feeling the members and site operators are supposed to have for and with each other kinda goes out the window when you question operations... but I still love it there. But I'd absolutely adore it at 1280x720 : - )

10-17-08  10:05pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.